Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com

[cbgerry]

Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com

http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/fre...earch&aff_id=0

---------------------
BugHunter 2.2c freeware - Security & Privacy - Anti-Spam & Anti ...
BugHunter freeware - DOS based Malware Removal Tool suitable for use
on a number of operating systems - Freeware Download Box.
http://www.freewarebox.com/free_1206...-download.html - 24k - Cached
- Similar pages
--------------------

SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
Look up a site report:

Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.

freewarebox.com
Red Verdict Image: Adware, spyware, or viruses (2)

In our tests, we found downloads on this site that some people
consider adware, spyware, or other unwanted programs.

Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
Contact information: Established in Country Popularity
2005
UNITED STATES

A few users
Automated Web Safety Testing Results for freewarebox.com
e-mail tests for freewarebox.com:
Download tests for freewarebox.com:

Downloads we found on this site:
Download Analysis

Babes Solitaires (babesolwe.exe)
Adware-RBlast,Spyware-WebHancer
BitComet 0.61 (BitComet_0.61_setup.exe)
Sveglia 2.1 (sveglia21.exe)

1 red download

In our tests, we found downloads on this site that some people
consider adware, spyware, or other unwanted programs.

Online affiliations for freewarebox.com:
Link Graph

Linked to green sites

When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
Annoyances from freewarebox.com:
Reviewer and Web site owner comments
User Review Summary for freewarebox.com

This site is good (1)
This site spams (0)
Adware, spyware, or viruses (2)
Excessive popups (0)
Phishing or other scams (0)
Bad shopping experience (0)
Browser exploit (0)
freewarebox.com Web site owner comments (1)

Hi,
more than 6 months we haven't links to reported "red" sites like:
dailymp3software.com or fwnetwork.com.
Review or links again.
Thank you,
Peter
Submitted by freewarebox at 2007-04-16 16:58:48
User Reviews (3)
page 1 of 1

Posted at 03/25/2007-06:43:33 AM by jjacko2007, Reviewer , View
profile [ Reputation score: 1 / 9 ]

Rating: Adware, spyware, or viruses

I'm not about to endorse ANYTHING provided by this company. Talk about
detrimental to the fight against net nuetrality! Let me explain why.
Progs like the comodo verification engine as first seem like a great
idea, made to ensure the validity of things like the verisign seals
you see on a lot of ecommerce websites. IT'S BUNK! Quote taken
directly from the faq on how it works :
"Today, larger sites and most banks are registered with us. Smaller
sites that don't display the green border could be legitimate - but be
sure to check out their other trust credentials like being hacker
proof. Then decide for yourself whether to
purchase from that merchant."
http://www.vengine.com/ products/vengine/faq.html
I can tell you how this service is going to be used to pressure
smaller companies, retailers and website owners who ARE completely
legit into paying the costs of being added to the comodo database, as
well as possibly being protected under their "hacker proof" protection
services (yeah, go ahead and call it extortion if ya want that's what
it is). When comodo gets a request from verificationengine users by
dropping an email care of newVEsite@comodo.com, comodo will turn right
around and take the businesses' name and domain and attack them by
approaching them with all kinds of pressure full of figures and
persuasions like the number of people that are either afraid to or
refuse to buy from them because they don't have a silly little green
glow around their seal when a comodo user does a mouseover on it. So
the little guys will be pressured into paying anywhere from 30 bucks a
month or more for services that really don't do squat for them. IT
DOESN"T HAVE TO BE LIKE THIS. WE HAVE GOT TO WORK TOGETHER TO SPREAD
THE WORD ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS AND HELP PEOPLE TO LEARN THAT COMMON
SENSE CAN PREVAIL OVER FEAR AND PARANOIA. Because if we don't they're
gonna take this net nuetrality thing and companies like
Comodo IP Ltd
7 Campus Rd
Bradford, Yorkshire BD7 1HR,
UNITED KINGDOM
+44 1274730505, Fax: +44 1274730909
domain-admin@comodogroup.com
who use people that don't know any better to drive the little guys out
of business, and before you know it the internet is gonna be nothing
more than a great big walmart. This thing sounds like it works similar
to web beacons coooperating with third party cookies (I don't know
about you but I don't like the idea of it making modifications to the
way my browser runs - with a little green border around it sounds like
a kiosk) on the user/client end - something I abhor and do not allow
(because that's how some companies like webloyalty.com and
reservationrewards.com are stealing cc info and using it across
multiple domains).
No way no how. I do not trust this company (notice it's British owned
too - yes, I know ewido is british owned but they're a good company
not like these dirtbags) AT ALL. I hope you all understand the gravity
of this and what it can and probably will mean if we do nothing.

Their DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY found at

http://www.venginecom/ corporate/contact.html

releases them from any liability in the event of user displeasure:

"The program is provided to you "as is" by Comodo and any use by you
of the program is at your own risk. Comodo does not wa rant that the
program will operate substantially in accordance with the
documentation accompanying the program. To the maximum extent
permitted by law, Comodo disclaims all warranties of any kind, whether
expressed or implied, in equity or at law, including, without
limitation, implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a
particular purpose, and non-infringement.
Comodo does not warrant that the functions contained in the program
will meet any Service offering extended to Include On-Demand
requIrements or needs you may have or that the program wIII operate
error free or In an uninterrupted fashion, or that any efects or
errors in the program will be corrected, or that the program is
compatible with any particular platform. Some
jurisdictions do not allow the waiver or exclusion of implied
warranties so they may not apply to you."

EVERYONE please see this for what it REALLY IS. A BIG LOAD, someones
idea on how to use ignorant computer users/consumers to extort (not
just)small websites and web companies. I'll be listening and looking
for ideas on how to send a message to comodo group in a big way that
their scheme has been exposed. Will probably begin by listing them in
other consumer watch places.

www.freewarebox.com/ free_900_verification-engine-download

Posted at 06/11/2006-01:38:06 AM by ghekko, Reviewer , View profile
[ Reputation score: 0 / 9 ]

Rating: Adware, spyware, or viruses

Wants to install some type of free revenue software prior to
installation of downloaded software

Posted at 02/17/2006-03:17:11 PM by Anonymous Preview User, Reviewer ,
View profile [ Reputation score: -2 / 9 ]

Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.

Copyright (c) 2007 McAfee, Inc.

This will be the rating popup - TBD

TOPIC# http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=434
_________________
*****BlueCollarPCNet Forum Owner*****
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/index.php
BLUE COLLAR PC TOOLBAR (freeware)
http://bluecollarpc.communitytoolbars.com/

[David H. Lipman]

From: "cbgerry" <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net>

| Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
|

< snip >

Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.

Thank you in advance.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[Heather]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:c0fni.1035$I76.771@trnddc05...
> From: "cbgerry" <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net>
>
> | Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
> |
>
> < snip >
>
> Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.
>
> Thank you in advance.

Sheesh, you are way more polite than I am.....this a$$hole has been on
here before with his long, senseless, terminally stupid attacks.
Perhaps if we all killfile him, then he can rant and rave all he wants.
Who cares!!

Cheers.....Figgs (and thanks for the help earlier.....got pictures of
the village from Zee on the ME group and sent them on to her).
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
>
>

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Heather" <nospam@nospam.invalid>


|
| Sheesh, you are way more polite than I am.....this a$$hole has been on
| here before with his long, senseless, terminally stupid attacks.
| Perhaps if we all killfile him, then he can rant and rave all he wants.
| Who cares!!
|
| Cheers.....Figgs (and thanks for the help earlier.....got pictures of
| the village from Zee on the ME group and sent them on to her).

Yeah, maybe. He pissed me off when he cited Engima's web page concerning a discussion the
CEO of Enigma had on Spyware Warrior.

I again strongly urge *ALL* to read the ORGINAL thread of 4/26 on SpywareWarrior on Enigma,
affiliate spamvertising and other noted points of contention.
http://spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810

Gerald has NO clue what's; up, down, left or right.
Maybe Dustin will stop responding to his tantrums and then maybe Gerald will stop the BS
posts.

Maybe...

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[Dustin Cook]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
news:xJfni.6049$ct5.3131@trnddc06:

> From: "Heather" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
>
>
>|
>| Sheesh, you are way more polite than I am.....this a$$hole has been
>| on here before with his long, senseless, terminally stupid attacks.
>| Perhaps if we all killfile him, then he can rant and rave all he
>| wants. Who cares!!
>|
>| Cheers.....Figgs (and thanks for the help earlier.....got pictures of
>| the village from Zee on the ME group and sent them on to her).
>
> Yeah, maybe. He pissed me off when he cited Engima's web page
> concerning a discussion the CEO of Enigma had on Spyware Warrior.
>
> I again strongly urge *ALL* to read the ORGINAL thread of 4/26 on
> SpywareWarrior on Enigma, affiliate spamvertising and other noted
> points of contention. http://spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810
>
> Gerald has NO clue what's; up, down, left or right.
> Maybe Dustin will stop responding to his tantrums and then maybe
> Gerald will stop the BS posts.
>
> Maybe...
>

I don't know David, Apparently Gerald has been ranting here, and on
google groups. and now, he's actually giving me real ammunition. For
example,

http://groups.google.com/group/SpyFo...d/f9852466fb60
ba7a/d9cd419f8f848f84#d9cd419f8f848f84

The thread ping cbgerry also has a few urls where he's extending this to
cover more space, I suppose? The guy is seriously ****ed in the head.
He's even resorted to linking to an old arguement between 4Q and myself,
and he still doesn't have a clue. I almost feel sorry for his stupid ass.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[cbgerry]

On Jul 17, 11:24 pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
wrote:
> From: "Heather" <nos...@nospam.invalid>
>
> |
> | Sheesh, you are way more polite than I am.....this a$$hole has been on
> | here before with his long, senseless, terminally stupid attacks.
> | Perhaps if we all killfile him, then he can rant and rave all he wants.
> | Who cares!!
> |
> | Cheers.....Figgs (and thanks for the help earlier.....got pictures of
> | the village from Zee on the ME group and sent them on to her).
>
> Yeah, maybe. He pissed me off when he cited Engima's web page concerninga discussion the
> CEO of Enigma had on Spyware Warrior.
>
> I again strongly urge *ALL* to read the ORGINAL thread of 4/26 on SpywareWarrior on Enigma,
> affiliate spamvertising and other noted points of contention.http://spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810
>
> Gerald has NO clue what's; up, down, left or right.
> Maybe Dustin will stop responding to his tantrums and then maybe Gerald will stop the BS
> posts.
>
> Maybe...
>
> --
> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site
warnings are certainly not the owner home domain - Dustin Cook
Bughunter. I thought that was quite clear to any reader - it is to me.
So here to avoid the confusion perhaps even caused by Dustin C
clouding the content of those posts seemingly - or perhaps even a
little "snow blind" in anger for the moment not seeing that NONE of
those Red Download sites were his Home Domain as Bughunter Owner
commonly or public well known as Bughunter at bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk ......

So here is the actual 'All Green Download" McAfee Site Advisor Report
- For Dustin Cook Bughunter - the real Owner and Real Bughunter
Product Homepages or Official Bughunter website - however you wish to
word it - or in real world, right, Dustin Cook owner of Bughunter and
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk official domain website "where bughunter
lives on the net" - the Official real Bughunter and real Website to
obtain it from. (I call that explanation dead banged). It is obvious
to anyone reading it. Like one report is even the download
"registered" at Snapfiles.com - so that is what I mean as obvious to
anyone reading it.... like the first thing that hits me there is okay,
the owner must have registered with Snapfiles to sell, distribute, or
offer whatever version of download, whatever descriptive words are
your cup of tea accurately, but that certainly that is OBVIOUSLY not
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk website. It is the software download at
Snapfiles.com and not at bughunter.it-mate.co.uk in other words. Each
of those RED warning download sites are along the same exact line.

You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a
sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can
appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to
leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
street jargon.

All I can say is you sir, Dustin C, invite chapters. Have you heard
that before ? ( I am just ranting , not expecting answers, I think you
misunderstand too much the "underclass").

Well I am thinking I can add here what I came to say - because
everything below this is information not conversation. I'll try
list...

1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".
2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry
with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I
mean I would. The point is a security software is being offered at -
apparently according to McAfee Site Advisor - at malicious content
websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have
you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not
the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit
aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common
folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting
paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making
the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
"your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -
disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You
actually need to be an "Advanced User" to actually understand and do
things correctly without someone worrying over your back. I call it
'Computer Operator" at their "Station" like having a driver's license
for a Novice their first day behind the wheel. This is who stops in
over my way. And granted, this topic should be a part of the
repertoire as just another vein in the massive place called
cyberspace. So the point was with these type topics - it is quite
necessary for days and days even to resolve things. It can take a lot
of communications. That is what was referred to as the Soap Opera....
that is what this looks like to the average consumer. The average
consumer is extremely pressed for an hour maybe two at a session and
not even on a regular basis as well. Threatwares mess that up bad and
what is worst, trying to find information of how to take care of it
immediately. The majority of people are in a great hurry on the Net -
and that is my reference to long needed conversations being
sarcastically as a "What's this Soap Opera? Let me out of here".. like
I said you severely misunderstand what I say. You completely judge me
wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
Channels.

3) Let me floor this to important information I wished to say as a
bottom line here... So the whole rest of this point is that a sleeping
public may not know the other angles to all this. As far as the Red
zones - there are now in alarming numbers what are called "Disposable
Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the
account without warning. Right back to Yahoo and they would just open
another account until shut down until they finally earned the name in
security as "Disposable accounts". This has obviously translated to
Botherders today reportedly responsible for up to 70 percent or more
of world UCE (spam). This is now a new name "Disposable Domains"
whereby at the same attitude websites are opened and shut down like
the old example of Yahoo email accounts. Point is that with pirated
software or Unauthorized Use someone's software can suddenly appear at
one of these Disposable Domains and the cyber criminals can add
malicious content to the website for drive-by installations of malware
and the worst can even rifle a pirated copy of software and relaunch
it with adware, spyware, and or other malware or all together and more
at the Disposable Domain site.... and we all know how irate that is
going to make the owner of the original software to say the very
least.

4) .... Cut to the chase point is that the Red Zone listed sites can
easily be this in the McAfee Site Advisor Reports. So that I said all
of this to point out that out if missed and that what may have been
missed ORIGINALLY is that Dustin Cook Bughunter bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk DOES NOT appear as a "red download" warning at McAfee Site
Advisor and below I have added that proof that is quite public and
available to the public with a download of Site Advisor installed in
Internet Explorer or Firefox browsers.

I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
----------------------------------------
Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Site Advisor Report On: All Green Download...
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

-------------------------------------------
BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
BugHunter is a DOS based malware scanner which has a frequently
updated database of signatures as well as engine updates. The program
is designed to quickly ...
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
-------------------------------------------

SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
Look up a site report:
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.

it-mate.co.uk
Green Verdict Image

We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems.

Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
Contact information: Country Popularity

A few users
Automated Web Safety Testing Results for it-mate.co.uk
e-mail tests for it-mate.co.uk:

We have not found any e-mail sign-up forms on this site.
Download tests for it-mate.co.uk:

Downloads we found on this site:
Download Analysis

AB Extension Pack 1.1.8 (abep-1_1_8-setup.exe)

AB Extension Pack 1.1.9 (abep-1_1_9-setup.exe)

AbcShortcuts 1.0 (abcshortcutssetup.exe)

AlphaChess (alphachess_setup.exe)

Avant Browser 11.0 Build 25 (Freeware) (absetup.exe)

87 total downloads. See more.

87 green downloads

In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
spyware, and other unwanted programs.

Online affiliations for it-mate.co.uk:
Link Graph

Linked to green sites

When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
Annoyances from it-mate.co.uk:
Reviewer and Web site owner comments
User Review Summary for it-mate.co.uk

This site is good (1)
This site spams (0)
Adware, spyware, or viruses (0)
Excessive popups (0)
Phishing or other scams (0)
Bad shopping experience (0)
Browser exploit (0)
it-mate.co.uk Web site owner comments (0)

Are you the owner of this site? Add a comment
User Reviews (1)

page 1 of 1
Learn more about our reviewer system.
Rating: This site is good

Secure Download and Good Program
Posted at 03/25/2006-11:59:48 AM by Arctic Fox, Reviewer , View
profile [ Reputation score: 2 / 9 ]

page 1 of 1

Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.

Copyright © 2007 McAfee, Inc.

This will be the rating popup - TBD

[ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are
too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of
Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility
and abuse at my personal addresses. And no I don't answer Unsolicited
Email as rule. Webmaster and Postmaster are NOT personal addresses.
You have said some very cheap things about my email addresses that was
quite unexpected and may be beyond your understanding. Like I said you
talk to your lawyer and he will tell you that you have to be VERY
SPECIFIC WORD FOR WORD WITH EXACT PARTICULARS you "claim" are
"offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am
not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the
circles - "generally just write the webmaster with your objections and
some brief easy reports to support them and the webmaster generally
always complies immediately without legal actions required but
indicated if needed. They will get the message fast if they value
their domain (most all do)". May you please comply. I honestly do not
understand what you are saying as apparently incohesive. I am now - in
these next hours looking at EVERYTHING I posted for what is offensive
and especially under the law as you keep saying. This is on your
behalf Dustin Cook Bughunter - in lieu of common appropriate action by
you. Do you understand so I am not misunderstood Mr. Cook ? You have
made no "formal request for removal" of objectionable material and I
will certainly add in apology if there is due per investigation right
now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF
RIGHT NOW AS ACTING AS IF YOU SENT ME A BILL OF PARTICULARS YOU WISH
REMEDIED IMMEDIATELY OR LEGAL ACTION WILL PURSUE --- SO THAT WITHOUT
SUPPORT OF SAME, LISTED, OR PRESENTED BY YOU PROPERLY PARTICULARLY
LISTING ONE BY ONE BY LAW TO ASK FIRST AND PROSECUTE SECOND (BUT YOU
SIT HERE LYING THAT YOUR ADDRESS IS BLOCKED - YOU HAVE NEVER CONTACTED
THE BLUE COLLAR PC.NET WEBMASTER ADDRESS) --- I WILL ACT AS IF YOU
PROPERLY PRESENTED AND ASSUME BILL OF PARTICULARS ARE - AND LOOK FOR
- ANY POSTINGS OR STATEMENTS THAT DEFAME "DUSTIN COOK BUGHUNTER
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk" MADE BY THE OWNER OF THE BLUE COLLAR PC .NET
DOMAIN BE REMOVED IF AND WHERE POSSIBLE IF THEY EXIST - AND
IMMEDIATELY - AS CEASE AND DESIST OR FACE LEGAL ACTION..... DO YOU
UNDERSTAND MY - I SAID MY - GENOROSITY TO YOU ? ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. THIS
IS NO GAME AS YOU SAID, OR IS IT ??? WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM ???

IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
UNDERSTAND THAT.

GOOD BY MR. COOK - I WILL BE IN TOUCH WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THIS POSTING
WITH FULL RESULTS FOR YOU .... SATISFACTORY ? ASK YOUR LAWYER -
HONESTLY I DOUBT HE WOULD SAY DIFFERENT - VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY
MR.COOK.

BLUECOLLARPC.NET

[David H. Lipman]

From: "cbgerry" <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net>

< snip >

|
| BLUECOLLARPC.NET

Posting the SAME content over and over is considered spam or just plain abuse.

This posted reply was seen numerous times. I consider that Usenet abuse.

You are kindly asked to stop this abuse.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[cbgerry]

On Jul 17, 10:50 pm, "Heather" <nos...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote in messagenews:c0fni.1035$I76.771@trnddc05...
>
> > From: "cbgerry" <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net>
>
> > | Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
> > |
>
> > < snip >
>
> > Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.
>
> > Thank you in advance.
>
> Sheesh, you are way more polite than I am.....this a$$hole has been on
> here before with his long, senseless, terminally stupid attacks.
> Perhaps if we all killfile him, then he can rant and rave all he wants.
> Who cares!!
>
> Cheers.....Figgs (and thanks for the help earlier.....got pictures of
> the village from Zee on the ME group and sent them on to her).
>
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > Dave
> >http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> >http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site
warnings are certainly not the owner home domain - Dustin Cook
Bughunter. I thought that was quite clear to any reader - it is to me.
So here to avoid the confusion perhaps even caused by Dustin C
clouding the content of those posts seemingly - or perhaps even a
little "snow blind" in anger for the moment not seeing that NONE of
those Red Download sites were his Home Domain as Bughunter Owner
commonly or public well known as Bughunter at bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk ......

So here is the actual 'All Green Download" McAfee Site Advisor Report
- For Dustin Cook Bughunter - the real Owner and Real Bughunter
Product Homepages or Official Bughunter website - however you wish to
word it - or in real world, right, Dustin Cook owner of Bughunter and
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk official domain website "where bughunter
lives on the net" - the Official real Bughunter and real Website to
obtain it from. (I call that explanation dead banged). It is obvious
to anyone reading it. Like one report is even the download
"registered" at Snapfiles.com - so that is what I mean as obvious to
anyone reading it.... like the first thing that hits me there is okay,
the owner must have registered with Snapfiles to sell, distribute, or
offer whatever version of download, whatever descriptive words are
your cup of tea accurately, but that certainly that is OBVIOUSLY not
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk website. It is the software download at
Snapfiles.com and not at bughunter.it-mate.co.uk in other words. Each
of those RED warning download sites are along the same exact line.

You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a
sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can
appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to
leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
street jargon.

All I can say is you sir, Dustin C, invite chapters. Have you heard
that before ? ( I am just ranting , not expecting answers, I think you
misunderstand too much the "underclass").

Well I am thinking I can add here what I came to say - because
everything below this is information not conversation. I'll try
list...

1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".
2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry
with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I
mean I would. The point is a security software is being offered at -
apparently according to McAfee Site Advisor - at malicious content
websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have
you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not
the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit
aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common
folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting
paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making
the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
"your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -
disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You
actually need to be an "Advanced User" to actually understand and do
things correctly without someone worrying over your back. I call it
'Computer Operator" at their "Station" like having a driver's license
for a Novice their first day behind the wheel. This is who stops in
over my way. And granted, this topic should be a part of the
repertoire as just another vein in the massive place called
cyberspace. So the point was with these type topics - it is quite
necessary for days and days even to resolve things. It can take a lot
of communications. That is what was referred to as the Soap Opera....
that is what this looks like to the average consumer. The average
consumer is extremely pressed for an hour maybe two at a session and
not even on a regular basis as well. Threatwares mess that up bad and
what is worst, trying to find information of how to take care of it
immediately. The majority of people are in a great hurry on the Net -
and that is my reference to long needed conversations being
sarcastically as a "What's this Soap Opera? Let me out of here".. like
I said you severely misunderstand what I say. You completely judge me
wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
Channels.

3) Let me floor this to important information I wished to say as a
bottom line here... So the whole rest of this point is that a sleeping
public may not know the other angles to all this. As far as the Red
zones - there are now in alarming numbers what are called "Disposable
Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the
account without warning. Right back to Yahoo and they would just open
another account until shut down until they finally earned the name in
security as "Disposable accounts". This has obviously translated to
Botherders today reportedly responsible for up to 70 percent or more
of world UCE (spam). This is now a new name "Disposable Domains"
whereby at the same attitude websites are opened and shut down like
the old example of Yahoo email accounts. Point is that with pirated
software or Unauthorized Use someone's software can suddenly appear at
one of these Disposable Domains and the cyber criminals can add
malicious content to the website for drive-by installations of malware
and the worst can even rifle a pirated copy of software and relaunch
it with adware, spyware, and or other malware or all together and more
at the Disposable Domain site.... and we all know how irate that is
going to make the owner of the original software to say the very
least.

4) .... Cut to the chase point is that the Red Zone listed sites can
easily be this in the McAfee Site Advisor Reports. So that I said all
of this to point out that out if missed and that what may have been
missed ORIGINALLY is that Dustin Cook Bughunter bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk DOES NOT appear as a "red download" warning at McAfee Site
Advisor and below I have added that proof that is quite public and
available to the public with a download of Site Advisor installed in
Internet Explorer or Firefox browsers.

I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
----------------------------------------
Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Site Advisor Report On: All Green Download...
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

-------------------------------------------
BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
BugHunter is a DOS based malware scanner which has a frequently
updated database of signatures as well as engine updates. The program
is designed to quickly ...
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
-------------------------------------------

SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
Look up a site report:
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.

it-mate.co.uk
Green Verdict Image

We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems.

Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
Contact information: Country Popularity

A few users
Automated Web Safety Testing Results for it-mate.co.uk
e-mail tests for it-mate.co.uk:

We have not found any e-mail sign-up forms on this site.
Download tests for it-mate.co.uk:

Downloads we found on this site:
Download Analysis

AB Extension Pack 1.1.8 (abep-1_1_8-setup.exe)

AB Extension Pack 1.1.9 (abep-1_1_9-setup.exe)

AbcShortcuts 1.0 (abcshortcutssetup.exe)

AlphaChess (alphachess_setup.exe)

Avant Browser 11.0 Build 25 (Freeware) (absetup.exe)

87 total downloads. See more.

87 green downloads

In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
spyware, and other unwanted programs.

Online affiliations for it-mate.co.uk:
Link Graph

Linked to green sites

When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
Annoyances from it-mate.co.uk:
Reviewer and Web site owner comments
User Review Summary for it-mate.co.uk

This site is good (1)
This site spams (0)
Adware, spyware, or viruses (0)
Excessive popups (0)
Phishing or other scams (0)
Bad shopping experience (0)
Browser exploit (0)
it-mate.co.uk Web site owner comments (0)

Are you the owner of this site? Add a comment
User Reviews (1)

page 1 of 1
Learn more about our reviewer system.
Rating: This site is good

Secure Download and Good Program
Posted at 03/25/2006-11:59:48 AM by Arctic Fox, Reviewer , View
profile [ Reputation score: 2 / 9 ]

page 1 of 1

Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.

Copyright © 2007 McAfee, Inc.

This will be the rating popup - TBD

[ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are
too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of
Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility
and abuse at my personal addresses. And no I don't answer Unsolicited
Email as rule. Webmaster and Postmaster are NOT personal addresses.
You have said some very cheap things about my email addresses that was
quite unexpected and may be beyond your understanding. Like I said you
talk to your lawyer and he will tell you that you have to be VERY
SPECIFIC WORD FOR WORD WITH EXACT PARTICULARS you "claim" are
"offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am
not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the
circles - "generally just write the webmaster with your objections and
some brief easy reports to support them and the webmaster generally
always complies immediately without legal actions required but
indicated if needed. They will get the message fast if they value
their domain (most all do)". May you please comply. I honestly do not
understand what you are saying as apparently incohesive. I am now - in
these next hours looking at EVERYTHING I posted for what is offensive
and especially under the law as you keep saying. This is on your
behalf Dustin Cook Bughunter - in lieu of common appropriate action by
you. Do you understand so I am not misunderstood Mr. Cook ? You have
made no "formal request for removal" of objectionable material and I
will certainly add in apology if there is due per investigation right
now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF
RIGHT NOW AS ACTING AS IF YOU SENT ME A BILL OF PARTICULARS YOU WISH
REMEDIED IMMEDIATELY OR LEGAL ACTION WILL PURSUE --- SO THAT WITHOUT
SUPPORT OF SAME, LISTED, OR PRESENTED BY YOU PROPERLY PARTICULARLY
LISTING ONE BY ONE BY LAW TO ASK FIRST AND PROSECUTE SECOND (BUT YOU
SIT HERE LYING THAT YOUR ADDRESS IS BLOCKED - YOU HAVE NEVER CONTACTED
THE BLUE COLLAR PC.NET WEBMASTER ADDRESS) --- I WILL ACT AS IF YOU
PROPERLY PRESENTED AND ASSUME BILL OF PARTICULARS ARE - AND LOOK FOR
- ANY POSTINGS OR STATEMENTS THAT DEFAME "DUSTIN COOK BUGHUNTER
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk" MADE BY THE OWNER OF THE BLUE COLLAR PC .NET
DOMAIN BE REMOVED IF AND WHERE POSSIBLE IF THEY EXIST - AND
IMMEDIATELY - AS CEASE AND DESIST OR FACE LEGAL ACTION..... DO YOU
UNDERSTAND MY - I SAID MY - GENOROSITY TO YOU ? ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. THIS
IS NO GAME AS YOU SAID, OR IS IT ??? WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM ???

IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
UNDERSTAND THAT.

GOOD BY MR. COOK - I WILL BE IN TOUCH WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THIS POSTING
WITH FULL RESULTS FOR YOU .... SATISFACTORY ? ASK YOUR LAWYER -
HONESTLY I DOUBT HE WOULD SAY DIFFERENT - VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY
MR.COOK.

BLUECOLLARPC.NET

[cbgerry]

On Jul 17, 10:35 pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
wrote:
> From: "cbgerry" <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net>
>
> | Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
> |
>
> < snip >
>
> Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site
warnings are certainly not the owner home domain - Dustin Cook
Bughunter. I thought that was quite clear to any reader - it is to me.
So here to avoid the confusion perhaps even caused by Dustin C
clouding the content of those posts seemingly - or perhaps even a
little "snow blind" in anger for the moment not seeing that NONE of
those Red Download sites were his Home Domain as Bughunter Owner
commonly or public well known as Bughunter at bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk ......

So here is the actual 'All Green Download" McAfee Site Advisor Report
- For Dustin Cook Bughunter - the real Owner and Real Bughunter
Product Homepages or Official Bughunter website - however you wish to
word it - or in real world, right, Dustin Cook owner of Bughunter and
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk official domain website "where bughunter
lives on the net" - the Official real Bughunter and real Website to
obtain it from. (I call that explanation dead banged). It is obvious
to anyone reading it. Like one report is even the download
"registered" at Snapfiles.com - so that is what I mean as obvious to
anyone reading it.... like the first thing that hits me there is okay,
the owner must have registered with Snapfiles to sell, distribute, or
offer whatever version of download, whatever descriptive words are
your cup of tea accurately, but that certainly that is OBVIOUSLY not
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk website. It is the software download at
Snapfiles.com and not at bughunter.it-mate.co.uk in other words. Each
of those RED warning download sites are along the same exact line.

You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a
sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can
appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to
leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
street jargon.

All I can say is you sir, Dustin C, invite chapters. Have you heard
that before ? ( I am just ranting , not expecting answers, I think you
misunderstand too much the "underclass").

Well I am thinking I can add here what I came to say - because
everything below this is information not conversation. I'll try
list...

1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".
2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry
with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I
mean I would. The point is a security software is being offered at -
apparently according to McAfee Site Advisor - at malicious content
websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have
you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not
the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit
aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common
folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting
paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making
the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
"your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -
disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You
actually need to be an "Advanced User" to actually understand and do
things correctly without someone worrying over your back. I call it
'Computer Operator" at their "Station" like having a driver's license
for a Novice their first day behind the wheel. This is who stops in
over my way. And granted, this topic should be a part of the
repertoire as just another vein in the massive place called
cyberspace. So the point was with these type topics - it is quite
necessary for days and days even to resolve things. It can take a lot
of communications. That is what was referred to as the Soap Opera....
that is what this looks like to the average consumer. The average
consumer is extremely pressed for an hour maybe two at a session and
not even on a regular basis as well. Threatwares mess that up bad and
what is worst, trying to find information of how to take care of it
immediately. The majority of people are in a great hurry on the Net -
and that is my reference to long needed conversations being
sarcastically as a "What's this Soap Opera? Let me out of here".. like
I said you severely misunderstand what I say. You completely judge me
wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
Channels.

3) Let me floor this to important information I wished to say as a
bottom line here... So the whole rest of this point is that a sleeping
public may not know the other angles to all this. As far as the Red
zones - there are now in alarming numbers what are called "Disposable
Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the
account without warning. Right back to Yahoo and they would just open
another account until shut down until they finally earned the name in
security as "Disposable accounts". This has obviously translated to
Botherders today reportedly responsible for up to 70 percent or more
of world UCE (spam). This is now a new name "Disposable Domains"
whereby at the same attitude websites are opened and shut down like
the old example of Yahoo email accounts. Point is that with pirated
software or Unauthorized Use someone's software can suddenly appear at
one of these Disposable Domains and the cyber criminals can add
malicious content to the website for drive-by installations of malware
and the worst can even rifle a pirated copy of software and relaunch
it with adware, spyware, and or other malware or all together and more
at the Disposable Domain site.... and we all know how irate that is
going to make the owner of the original software to say the very
least.

4) .... Cut to the chase point is that the Red Zone listed sites can
easily be this in the McAfee Site Advisor Reports. So that I said all
of this to point out that out if missed and that what may have been
missed ORIGINALLY is that Dustin Cook Bughunter bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk DOES NOT appear as a "red download" warning at McAfee Site
Advisor and below I have added that proof that is quite public and
available to the public with a download of Site Advisor installed in
Internet Explorer or Firefox browsers.

I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
----------------------------------------
Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Site Advisor Report On: All Green Download...
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

-------------------------------------------
BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
BugHunter is a DOS based malware scanner which has a frequently
updated database of signatures as well as engine updates. The program
is designed to quickly ...
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
-------------------------------------------

SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
Look up a site report:
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.

it-mate.co.uk
Green Verdict Image

We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems.

Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
Contact information: Country Popularity

A few users
Automated Web Safety Testing Results for it-mate.co.uk
e-mail tests for it-mate.co.uk:

We have not found any e-mail sign-up forms on this site.
Download tests for it-mate.co.uk:

Downloads we found on this site:
Download Analysis

AB Extension Pack 1.1.8 (abep-1_1_8-setup.exe)

AB Extension Pack 1.1.9 (abep-1_1_9-setup.exe)

AbcShortcuts 1.0 (abcshortcutssetup.exe)

AlphaChess (alphachess_setup.exe)

Avant Browser 11.0 Build 25 (Freeware) (absetup.exe)

87 total downloads. See more.

87 green downloads

In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
spyware, and other unwanted programs.

Online affiliations for it-mate.co.uk:
Link Graph

Linked to green sites

When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
Annoyances from it-mate.co.uk:
Reviewer and Web site owner comments
User Review Summary for it-mate.co.uk

This site is good (1)
This site spams (0)
Adware, spyware, or viruses (0)
Excessive popups (0)
Phishing or other scams (0)
Bad shopping experience (0)
Browser exploit (0)
it-mate.co.uk Web site owner comments (0)

Are you the owner of this site? Add a comment
User Reviews (1)

page 1 of 1
Learn more about our reviewer system.
Rating: This site is good

Secure Download and Good Program
Posted at 03/25/2006-11:59:48 AM by Arctic Fox, Reviewer , View
profile [ Reputation score: 2 / 9 ]

page 1 of 1

Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.

Copyright © 2007 McAfee, Inc.

This will be the rating popup - TBD

[ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are
too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of
Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility
and abuse at my personal addresses. And no I don't answer Unsolicited
Email as rule. Webmaster and Postmaster are NOT personal addresses.
You have said some very cheap things about my email addresses that was
quite unexpected and may be beyond your understanding. Like I said you
talk to your lawyer and he will tell you that you have to be VERY
SPECIFIC WORD FOR WORD WITH EXACT PARTICULARS you "claim" are
"offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am
not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the
circles - "generally just write the webmaster with your objections and
some brief easy reports to support them and the webmaster generally
always complies immediately without legal actions required but
indicated if needed. They will get the message fast if they value
their domain (most all do)". May you please comply. I honestly do not
understand what you are saying as apparently incohesive. I am now - in
these next hours looking at EVERYTHING I posted for what is offensive
and especially under the law as you keep saying. This is on your
behalf Dustin Cook Bughunter - in lieu of common appropriate action by
you. Do you understand so I am not misunderstood Mr. Cook ? You have
made no "formal request for removal" of objectionable material and I
will certainly add in apology if there is due per investigation right
now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF
RIGHT NOW AS ACTING AS IF YOU SENT ME A BILL OF PARTICULARS YOU WISH
REMEDIED IMMEDIATELY OR LEGAL ACTION WILL PURSUE --- SO THAT WITHOUT
SUPPORT OF SAME, LISTED, OR PRESENTED BY YOU PROPERLY PARTICULARLY
LISTING ONE BY ONE BY LAW TO ASK FIRST AND PROSECUTE SECOND (BUT YOU
SIT HERE LYING THAT YOUR ADDRESS IS BLOCKED - YOU HAVE NEVER CONTACTED
THE BLUE COLLAR PC.NET WEBMASTER ADDRESS) --- I WILL ACT AS IF YOU
PROPERLY PRESENTED AND ASSUME BILL OF PARTICULARS ARE - AND LOOK FOR
- ANY POSTINGS OR STATEMENTS THAT DEFAME "DUSTIN COOK BUGHUNTER
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk" MADE BY THE OWNER OF THE BLUE COLLAR PC .NET
DOMAIN BE REMOVED IF AND WHERE POSSIBLE IF THEY EXIST - AND
IMMEDIATELY - AS CEASE AND DESIST OR FACE LEGAL ACTION..... DO YOU
UNDERSTAND MY - I SAID MY - GENOROSITY TO YOU ? ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. THIS
IS NO GAME AS YOU SAID, OR IS IT ??? WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM ???

IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
UNDERSTAND THAT.

GOOD BY MR. COOK - I WILL BE IN TOUCH WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THIS POSTING
WITH FULL RESULTS FOR YOU .... SATISFACTORY ? ASK YOUR LAWYER -
HONESTLY I DOUBT HE WOULD SAY DIFFERENT - VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY
MR.COOK.

BLUECOLLARPC.NET

[Dustin Cook]

cbgerry <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net> wrote in
news:1184859560.477294.98110@d55g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com:

> On Jul 17, 10:35 pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
> wrote:
>> From: "cbgerry" <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net>
>>
>> | Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
>> |
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>> Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-c
>> s.c
> om/got-a-virus.htm
>
> Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
> that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site

<snip rest of this, it's very wordy, I don't understand most of what your
saying because for some reason, you don't use english?>

I believe I mentioned that the urls you provided didn't have anything bad
to say about BugHunter. I believe you did that as revenge on what you
felt was a personal attack on you due to my including your toolbar.

I have reviewed the toolbar again, and I am removing it from the next
signature release; With a full apology forthcoming. I made a mistake and
targetted it too soon, so I'm doing the respectable thing here. It will
be removed in the next signature update and an apology will be issued to
you regarding it. Public apology. Ok?

> You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
> apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
> you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a

It's not hard to have a civil conversation with me, Many people have no
trouble doing so; even my enemies. I simply don't understand most of
what your writing. I make my share of mistakes using english, I'm best
known for misplacing words and such, but you can usually get the jest of
what I wrote. Your a different case.

I used to be a very aggresive person, back in my previous badguy days. I
would like to think that's not as bad anymore. However, at the same time,
I will defend my program as best that I can from false claims made
against it. Specifically false claims, that is. I can't very well debate
why the interface looks so bad, etc.


> sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
> in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
> to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
> different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can

usenet doesn't have family protocols. Fidonet does, depending on the echo
your posting in. But, usenet is essentially wide open territory; it's
been that way since it's conception.

> appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
> me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to

I really haven't gone out of my way to slam you sir, I did fail to sign
up an account with you at your forums; but I can't seem to comply with
your rules. and now, alas, i'm officially blacklisted from your pad, so
it doesn't matter.

> leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
> hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
> street jargon.

I realize I did come off a bit harshly with you sir, and I don't mean to
belittle you as badly as I did. It was out of line, and I apologize for
having said various things. However, please don't think in the future
that I don't think your good enough to hang in my circle or anything like
that, I don't do that sorta sillyness.

We are in different fields, and I can only say that I said those things
because I had taken the impression that you thought I was some newbie
punkass on the scene trying to give you a hard time. The posts about
"hackware" probably irked me the most. Some of the best software I've
used/developed you would probably call hackware.

You really have my ilk to thank for the things you can do now on the net
anyway. Geeks/hackers like me wrote the software everything else runs on.
Some of it's poorly written, some isn't. But to claim that a big
company like microsoft is in some way superior to the hacker community,
is a laugh. If Microsoft cared about security in the slightest bit, tools
like BugHunter wouldn't be necessary.

> 1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".

Correct. Potential danger doesn't qualify it as malware on it's own. I
allowed my personal thoughts to cloud my judgement.

> 2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
> unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
> lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry

You seem to be mistaken. Those sites have permission to host BugHunter.
The whole attack I made on you was you knowingly trying to find a problem
with BugHunter simply because some of the sites which host it may/have
hosted questionable software. You can say what you want, but you did try
to find problems with the software and you did try to imply via those red
warning links that BugHunter may not be safe software. If that wasn't
what you were trying to do, you wouldn't have titled it BugHunter
specifically and reposted the same thing so often.

I accept your halfassed apology for doing it, but don't assume I or
anyone else was niave enough to fall for your explanation. I was born at
night, but it wasn't last night.

> with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
> immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I

Why would I want to do that? I like those sites, they host me.

> websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have

My product is created by a former malware author, as you apparently have
now learned? It's sole purpose is to remove malware, so it's certainly
associated with it.

> you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
> Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
> Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
> me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not

One important difference. Mcafee wasn't spamming usenet with links trying
to imply BugHunter isn't safe, you were. It's really no biggie, more
interesting people have tried to discredit BugHunter before. Each day it
remains online and available is just another punch in the nose for the
doubters, and I must say, I'm enjoying every minute of it.

> the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
> public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
> are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit

Yes, which have absolutely nothing to do with BugHunter. Your site
advisor warnings don't apply to me. My software is hosted there, fine,
it's not involved in any red warnings and it never has been.

> aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
> stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
> misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common

I don't know of too many common folk who'd read usenet, see all these red
site advisor warnings, with BugHunter no less in the topic, and not
assume your intending to say it's bad/malicious. C'mon, who were you
trying to fool here?

> folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
> These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting

I didn't storm past anything, sir. I filled out an account on your forum.
That was all. You sent me a rude email in response, and deleted the
account. You then invited me to create a new one, which I did, using my
username Raid again. You disabled that account and posted my email
address right on your forum, for any spambot to harvest; outright
replacing my username with one of your choosing, in this case, my full
email address.

Very unprofessional of you to say the least. Your site obviously didn't
have an issue with the email address I used to signup, because it's never
had any problems emailing me automated messages, and your rude one I
recived the other day.

> paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
> have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making

I'm not paid for BugHunter either sir, I do it as a way to give back for
some of the harm that I caused. And no, it's not donationware either.
While I do invite donations on the website, BugHunter will never ask you
to send me a dime. If you downloaded it from a mirror and you've never
been to it's homepage, you won't even know I accept donations.

It really is 100% freeware. If you want to donate once, great! But I'm
not going to bug you about it, or make you click on any extra buttons or
anything else.

> the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
> I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
> "your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -

I am what I am. Although this might come as a shock to you, the majority
of my hacker pals are respectable people. Even 4Q has his moments. Oh,
don't let him fool you, he could code hackware if he so desired.

> disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
> any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
> volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You

I appreciate your efforts to help consumers. and I agree, threats removal
isn't something to be taken lightly. So many changes are done to the
system, getting the files alone may not be enough. BugHunter doesn't
offer to help with anything but the executables, but for techie's, thats
more than enough. If the resident code isn't able to defend itself, they
can make the necessary system changes to reverse the effects.


> wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
> Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
> Channels.

My apologies. I was only defending my program from what I perceived to be
an attack from you.

> Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
> and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the

Yes, and I understand that. However, BugHunter isn't hosted on a disposal
spammer domain. It's hosted by my friends at it-mate. They are very well
respected antimalware programmers/researchers.

Just because I use yahoo and gmail doesn't mean I'm a spammer. I've had a
yahoo account for almost 10 years now.

> I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
> ----------------------------------------
> Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Oh it is, without a doubt.

> In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
> spyware, and other unwanted programs.

I'd like to think so.

> This will be the rating popup - TBD
>
> [ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
> apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
> quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
> last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are


Oh, you did. You've been quick to clear up the mess and I am satisfied
with your efforts. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

> too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
> posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
> communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of

I haven't lied about anything so far, actually. I didn't say I was
blocked from emailing you, I'm blocked from logging in.

> Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
> required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
> achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility

My lawyer is a very decent one for this area.


> "offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
> THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
> just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
> precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am

I'm well aware of the law, and I didn't demand for you to remove anything
aside from your cheap attacks on BugHunter and the post where you thought
I or the program had something to do with spammers on your site, that
wasn't true either.

> not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
> raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the

Polite? Heh, your concept of piloteness and mine varies greatly in that
case.


> now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF

Yes I do. You don't need to use caps you know. This isn't the 70s
anymore, not everyone is on caps only terminals now.

> IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
> SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
> UNDERSTAND THAT.

While I do find your threats amusing and without merit, You still have no
reason to issue them.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml