Vanguard the Usenet Trolls and the BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Polls

[Gerald309]

Usenet Trolls and the BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Polls .....

[Don't you just hate it when you get to be older on Internet and
realize that creeps like this posed as some white collar important
people of posistion and suddenly realize they are the scum of the
world web still posing as white collar people of posistion to hurt
everyone's feelings with all there "engineered" put-downs and sarcasm
coming in like a "Jersey South Paw" that they think nobody can "pull
their covers" and expose them for what they really are and what they
really just said and to who ??? Don't you ??? Me tooooooooo ] ): Read
on ... Enjoy !



Vanguard the idiot writes about Gerald309 Posts...

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...e_thread/threa
d/1354ddb642b4f006?hl=en

MY REPLIES - IN FULL BELOW TOO....

1) ""Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an

anti-malware product. "" WRONG

1) Number one how can consumers be wrong ? If something does not work
and we know and say so - who cares what excuses people like you give
when the product has stopped selling. What was your point ?

2) ""Each user that votes has limited experience due

2) Number two - EVEN YOU will admit this is the most prejudicial
statement the world has ever heard since Adolph Hitler introduced the
"Final Solution" - the absolution and genocide of the Hebrew Race at
will. You are that disgusting by calling everyone this - STUPID. Just
who the hell are you anyway ? You my friend need an attitude
adjustment I wish I could provide in person.

to the limited number of attacks he/she receives."" WRONG OBVIOUSLY

3) ""Saying that you've never been hit with malware because you use a
particular product says

absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product. "" WRONG -
IDIOT...

3) Statistics have chronically for over 48 months declared that 90
percent or more of world computers are infected with malware - meaning
also adware and spyware. This year the reports and warnings concerning
all legitimate websites have hit the wires lkike a Christmas Tree....
and by the way we did have a contest to "Name the Rock Vanguard
Crawled Out From Under". THESE FACTS MY FRIEND ARE FROM THE SECURITY
EXPERTS WORLDWIDE AND WORLD GOVERNMENT. This means - idiot - that AT
LEAST NINE OUT OF TEN PEOPLE are infected at any given time and the
OTHER PROTECTED PEOPLE SAYING THEY ARE NOT GETTING INFECTED BECAUSE OF
A PARTICULAR PRODUCT (LIKE THE "TOP THREE" I MENTIONED THAT PASS VB100
TOP TEST IN THE WORLD BY PROFESSIONALS AND EXPERTS) ARE EXACTLY AND
ENTIRELY CORRECT OBVIOUSLY AS THE TEN PERCENT THAT ALL EXPERTS AND
GOVERNEMENTS ARE SAYING ARE PROTECTED AND ARE QUITE CORRECT ACCORDING
TO ALL EXPERTS AND GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD..... NOW YOU JUST GOOSE-
STEP YOUR LITTLE TROLL SKINNY ASSES ON THE BIG-F- OUT OF HERE
TROLL !!!!!

THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF THIS --- TROLL !!!! THANK YOU HITLER FOR YOUR
WONDERFUL OPINIONS OF THE COMMUNITY OF COMPUTER USERS WORLD WIDE - - -
- YOUR OPINIONS ? NO NO THANKS, KEEP THEM FOR YOURSELF BECAUSE LIES
STAY WITH LIES - NOT THE TRUTH !!!! DON'T COME BACK !!!!

OH YEAH - - - ABOUT THIS::::>

""--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---

Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable

format (not recommended). "": WRONG - I AM IN GOOGLE GROUPS NOT USENET
NEWS ROOMS LIKE THE OE CLIENT. TAKE THAT UP WITH GOOGLE GROUPS SERVICE
A-HOLE-STAR...

Obviously you do not understand "Consumer Tests" and the value of
them. We could take your stupidity along the lines of anyone
volunteering for "beta testing" and reporting bugs - or in the very
least what a user knows appears a very wrong occurrence with some
software - obviously. Does this make even an unskilled Intermediate
User or Novice a worthless opinion with absolutely no merit ??? What
is your problem ??? If you took a moment to fish around a bit at where
I live on the internet you might learn something. I used to speak like
you - out of turn. I learned fast to stop it on the world web - and
because I was, and am no more, a complete novie newbie. In security
this dicipline achieves the desired effect - a safe community - by
stopping the electronic pen from halting forward movement. This is not
an intellectually challenged nation of people or world. Over 4 billion
of us have figured out how to survive.

Why and what am I responding to ? You picked my post and called it
stupid. You did. There is no intellectual sweetness to hide that. You
called my post stupid because it included a public vote with the
others all in the Software Reviews section of my BlueCollarPC.Net
Forums I pay for out of my pocket to offer the Community a place to
share and learn pc security as volunteer Forums Host - and these
BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Polls are obviously in no way pretending to
conclude as fact anything - but quite the opposite as an obvious
intended broad public poll of public opinion that the general public
is well aware that any Internet Brat can purposely be a Vandal and
vote Deceptively intentionally - - - I mean we all know that just
looking at what you did obviously and is why we are all looking at you
right now trying to get out of this by telling lies in some manner
about you did not imply that and how can you derive that from that and
on and on and on. I felt it quite necessary to NOT let you go
unchecked calling my Community Efforts as stupid and / or with some
hidden intent. But very, very obviously these are broader GENERAL
PUBLIC OPINION POLLS to publically compare notes with Official Reviews
by Professionals and Experts conducted in the Securrity Software
Industry as to a BALLPARK FIGURE of what is TRUE and what IS NOT....
Do You Get It Now ???? Maybe you are just stupid and like to be a
diarhea mouth and are constantly caught across the Net when you do
this - the age-old "leap without looking".


FULL MESSAGE YOU WON'T ERASE:

Vanguard View profile

"Gerald309" wrote in message

news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...

This article gives you the exact information : The Top Three
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228

<snip> --- REPLY SEPARATOR --- Only required because Gerald posts in
Usenet using quoted-printable format (not recommended). Voting lists
are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an anti-malware
product. Each user that votes has limited experience due to the
limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've never
been hit with malware because you use a particular product says
absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.

More options Jul 8, 3:48 pm

Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware

From: "Vanguard" <n...@mail.invalid>

Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:48:00 -0500


Subject: Re: Which anti-spyware softwear?

Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"Gerald309" wrote in message

news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...

This article gives you the exact information :

The Top Three

http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228

<snip>

--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---

Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable

format (not recommended).

Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an

anti-malware product. Each user that votes has limited experience due

to the limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've

never been hit with malware because you use a particular product says

absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.

------------------------------------------
Group-Web Owner : BlueCollarPC.Net
Web: http://www.bluecollarpc.net/
Discussion and Help Group:
http://www.bluecollarpc.net/joingroup.html
Join By Email To: bcpcgroup-subscribe@bluecollarpc.net
PDA Mobile Cafe Homepages:
http://www.pdamobilecafe.bluecollarpc.net/index.html
-------------------------------------------
_________________
*****Forum Moderator *****
BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Spyware Removal and Computing Safety
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/index.php

[Gerald309]

Now let's see if I can just enter my pre-emptive strike here to just
plainly shut this fool up before they reply over in the news room.

Now I have said or hinted that I believe this person is a complete
fraud posing as some white collar person of position in the computer
security filed - and is actually replying to public internet boards
established for this as one avenue of public help in the community.


Let's review his 3 basic statements:

1) Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an anti-
malware product

2) Each user that votes has limited experience due to the limited
number of attacks he/she receives

3) Saying that you've never been hit with malware because you use a
particular product says absolutely nothing about the coverage of that
product.


Okay let's say from the general feel of things - we walk into this
news room and here is this person saying this to this (actually my
post about security software).....

Okay, the substance of this person's comments actually feel
substantial and of great magnitude or as one having much gravity in
the field or implications as from a source of insider knowledge - - -
a person "talking down" to what was posted.... "talking down to" ....
"talking down to".... see it ?

Okay seeing that - you see this person in "talking down to" what was
posted that the person is establishing themselves as "above" whom they
are talking to. See it ?

Okay - simply what was said as far as computer securioty shows this
person is a complete buffoon - a circus clown - and I think everyone
does get that. But, let's take this directly to this person's
words....

You could call public user polls as completely weak in any real world
promotion of a security product - but are obviously not ruled out by
ANY security product available.... What do we always see when visiting
a security product website sale point - - - "Just listen to what Our
Customers say about our Product ! ? ... don't we... hmmm.... No I
would have to say they are very, very valued by ALL security products
and actually used as advertising the effectiveness of the product.

Okay, so this person moves on to "indict" the average user as of "low
intelligence and intellect" and embarrassingly says they have "no
experience" with spyware infection. Geez whizz... I hate to go through
with this repulsive troll but I will....

Okay, number one any quality antispyware program directly advertises
the "number of hits" blocked - actually informs the user right on the
front panel as to how many "attempts to infect" were blocked.... You
getting the same idea as me ? This fool has never even seen one
because it is a transient "living off the land for free". Sure... Mr.
Talk Down 'person of position' we should all listen into instead of
some fool with "worthless !!!" public polls at "BlueCollarPC.Net
Forums" !!!!

And the statement made was a blanket statement meaning "generally all
users at large" have limited experience - "due to the limited number
of attacks he/she receives" ..... Again, and anyone can see this right
now as true at Google, ALL SOURCES claim that up to or just over 90
Percent of ALL world computers are infected right now with malware
that includes spywares. So that the REALITY is the EXACT opposite of
what this "Mr. Talk Down BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Votes" says -
isn't it ? Is not the TRUTH that it is actually then that up to or
more then 9 Users out of 10 are encountering infections as we
speak ??? Or are ALL the experts liars ??? Well ??? Isn't the truth
then that almost everyone is encountering infection 24/7 ??? I mean
come on.... the person tried to slide across that the average life of
a computer user is "far and few between" encounters with infections,
malwares. That IS absurd - don't you think ?

This person makes me sick that they would pull a stunt like this and I
do indeed hope that some complete mass aggravation is being somewhat
quenched in this "smoked troll" (google it) outing.....

The point I would move onto is - okay let's say in the field you
weren't in security - you were in sales.... oh please !
_________________
*****Forum Moderator *****
BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Spyware Removal and Computing Safety
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/index.php
Gerald309 wrote:
> Usenet Trolls and the BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Polls .....
>
> [Don't you just hate it when you get to be older on Internet and
> realize that creeps like this posed as some white collar important
> people of posistion and suddenly realize they are the scum of the
> world web still posing as white collar people of posistion to hurt
> everyone's feelings with all there "engineered" put-downs and sarcasm
> coming in like a "Jersey South Paw" that they think nobody can "pull
> their covers" and expose them for what they really are and what they
> really just said and to who ??? Don't you ??? Me tooooooooo ] ): Read
> on ... Enjoy !
>
>
>
> Vanguard the idiot writes about Gerald309 Posts...
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...e_thread/threa
> d/1354ddb642b4f006?hl=en
>
> MY REPLIES - IN FULL BELOW TOO....
>
> 1) ""Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an
>
> anti-malware product. "" WRONG
>
> 1) Number one how can consumers be wrong ? If something does not work
> and we know and say so - who cares what excuses people like you give
> when the product has stopped selling. What was your point ?
>
> 2) ""Each user that votes has limited experience due
>
> 2) Number two - EVEN YOU will admit this is the most prejudicial
> statement the world has ever heard since Adolph Hitler introduced the
> "Final Solution" - the absolution and genocide of the Hebrew Race at
> will. You are that disgusting by calling everyone this - STUPID. Just
> who the hell are you anyway ? You my friend need an attitude
> adjustment I wish I could provide in person.
>
> to the limited number of attacks he/she receives."" WRONG OBVIOUSLY
>
> 3) ""Saying that you've never been hit with malware because you use a
> particular product says
>
> absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product. "" WRONG -
> IDIOT...
>
> 3) Statistics have chronically for over 48 months declared that 90
> percent or more of world computers are infected with malware - meaning
> also adware and spyware. This year the reports and warnings concerning
> all legitimate websites have hit the wires lkike a Christmas Tree....
> and by the way we did have a contest to "Name the Rock Vanguard
> Crawled Out From Under". THESE FACTS MY FRIEND ARE FROM THE SECURITY
> EXPERTS WORLDWIDE AND WORLD GOVERNMENT. This means - idiot - that AT
> LEAST NINE OUT OF TEN PEOPLE are infected at any given time and the
> OTHER PROTECTED PEOPLE SAYING THEY ARE NOT GETTING INFECTED BECAUSE OF
> A PARTICULAR PRODUCT (LIKE THE "TOP THREE" I MENTIONED THAT PASS VB100
> TOP TEST IN THE WORLD BY PROFESSIONALS AND EXPERTS) ARE EXACTLY AND
> ENTIRELY CORRECT OBVIOUSLY AS THE TEN PERCENT THAT ALL EXPERTS AND
> GOVERNEMENTS ARE SAYING ARE PROTECTED AND ARE QUITE CORRECT ACCORDING
> TO ALL EXPERTS AND GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD..... NOW YOU JUST GOOSE-
> STEP YOUR LITTLE TROLL SKINNY ASSES ON THE BIG-F- OUT OF HERE
> TROLL !!!!!
>
> THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF THIS --- TROLL !!!! THANK YOU HITLER FOR YOUR
> WONDERFUL OPINIONS OF THE COMMUNITY OF COMPUTER USERS WORLD WIDE - - -
> - YOUR OPINIONS ? NO NO THANKS, KEEP THEM FOR YOURSELF BECAUSE LIES
> STAY WITH LIES - NOT THE TRUTH !!!! DON'T COME BACK !!!!
>
> OH YEAH - - - ABOUT THIS::::>
>
> ""--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---
>
> Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable
>
> format (not recommended). "": WRONG - I AM IN GOOGLE GROUPS NOT USENET
> NEWS ROOMS LIKE THE OE CLIENT. TAKE THAT UP WITH GOOGLE GROUPS SERVICE
> A-HOLE-STAR...
>
> Obviously you do not understand "Consumer Tests" and the value of
> them. We could take your stupidity along the lines of anyone
> volunteering for "beta testing" and reporting bugs - or in the very
> least what a user knows appears a very wrong occurrence with some
> software - obviously. Does this make even an unskilled Intermediate
> User or Novice a worthless opinion with absolutely no merit ??? What
> is your problem ??? If you took a moment to fish around a bit at where
> I live on the internet you might learn something. I used to speak like
> you - out of turn. I learned fast to stop it on the world web - and
> because I was, and am no more, a complete novie newbie. In security
> this dicipline achieves the desired effect - a safe community - by
> stopping the electronic pen from halting forward movement. This is not
> an intellectually challenged nation of people or world. Over 4 billion
> of us have figured out how to survive.
>
> Why and what am I responding to ? You picked my post and called it
> stupid. You did. There is no intellectual sweetness to hide that. You
> called my post stupid because it included a public vote with the
> others all in the Software Reviews section of my BlueCollarPC.Net
> Forums I pay for out of my pocket to offer the Community a place to
> share and learn pc security as volunteer Forums Host - and these
> BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Polls are obviously in no way pretending to
> conclude as fact anything - but quite the opposite as an obvious
> intended broad public poll of public opinion that the general public
> is well aware that any Internet Brat can purposely be a Vandal and
> vote Deceptively intentionally - - - I mean we all know that just
> looking at what you did obviously and is why we are all looking at you
> right now trying to get out of this by telling lies in some manner
> about you did not imply that and how can you derive that from that and
> on and on and on. I felt it quite necessary to NOT let you go
> unchecked calling my Community Efforts as stupid and / or with some
> hidden intent. But very, very obviously these are broader GENERAL
> PUBLIC OPINION POLLS to publically compare notes with Official Reviews
> by Professionals and Experts conducted in the Securrity Software
> Industry as to a BALLPARK FIGURE of what is TRUE and what IS NOT....
> Do You Get It Now ???? Maybe you are just stupid and like to be a
> diarhea mouth and are constantly caught across the Net when you do
> this - the age-old "leap without looking".
>
>
> FULL MESSAGE YOU WON'T ERASE:
>
> Vanguard View profile
>
> "Gerald309" wrote in message
>
> news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
>
> This article gives you the exact information : The Top Three
> http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228
>
> <snip> --- REPLY SEPARATOR --- Only required because Gerald posts in
> Usenet using quoted-printable format (not recommended). Voting lists
> are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an anti-malware
> product. Each user that votes has limited experience due to the
> limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've never
> been hit with malware because you use a particular product says
> absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.
>
> More options Jul 8, 3:48 pm
>
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware
>
> From: "Vanguard" <n...@mail.invalid>
>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:48:00 -0500
>
>
> Subject: Re: Which anti-spyware softwear?
>
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
> original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>
> "Gerald309" wrote in message
>
> news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
>
> This article gives you the exact information :
>
> The Top Three
>
> http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228
>
> <snip>
>
> --- REPLY SEPARATOR ---
>
> Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable
>
> format (not recommended).
>
> Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an
>
> anti-malware product. Each user that votes has limited experience due
>
> to the limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've
>
> never been hit with malware because you use a particular product says
>
> absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Group-Web Owner : BlueCollarPC.Net
> Web: http://www.bluecollarpc.net/
> Discussion and Help Group:
> http://www.bluecollarpc.net/joingroup.html
> Join By Email To: bcpcgroup-subscribe@bluecollarpc.net
> PDA Mobile Cafe Homepages:
> http://www.pdamobilecafe.bluecollarpc.net/index.html
> -------------------------------------------
> _________________
> *****Forum Moderator *****
> BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Spyware Removal and Computing Safety
> http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/index.php

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Gerald309" <gerald309@gmail.com>

| Usenet Trolls and the BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Polls .....
|
| [Don't you just hate it when you get to be older on Internet and
| realize that creeps like this posed as some white collar important
| people of posistion and suddenly realize they are the scum of the
| world web still posing as white collar people of posistion to hurt
| everyone's feelings with all there "engineered" put-downs and sarcasm
| coming in like a "Jersey South Paw" that they think nobody can "pull
| their covers" and expose them for what they really are and what they
| really just said and to who ??? Don't you ??? Me tooooooooo ] ): Read
| on ... Enjoy !
|

< snip >

Vanguard is NOT a Troll and if you use terms like "Jersey South Paw" this Jerseyite will
have the Leed's hellish son, the Jersey Devil, come after 'ya. :-)

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[Vanguard]

"Gerald309" wrote in message
news:1184021585.518676.187490@k79g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> Usenet Trolls and the BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Public Polls .....
>
> [Don't you just hate it when you get to be older on Internet and
> realize that creeps like this posed as some white collar important
> people of posistion and suddenly realize they are the scum of the
> world web still posing as white collar people of posistion to hurt
> everyone's feelings with all there "engineered" put-downs and sarcasm
> coming in like a "Jersey South Paw" that they think nobody can "pull
> their covers" and expose them for what they really are and what they
> really just said and to who ??? Don't you ??? Me tooooooooo ] ): Read
> on ... Enjoy !

<snip - more ranting>

Oh hurray, I think we've found another Alan Connor wannabe. Agree with
him and you're a saint. Disagree and you're worse than whatever
negatives he can cogitate at the moment.
(http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/fga.shtml)