Vanguard the idiot writes about Gerald309 Posts...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...42b4f006?hl=en

MY REPLIES - IN FULL BELOW TOO....

1) ""Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an
anti-malware product. "" WRONG
1) Number one how can consumers be wrong ? If something does not work
and we know and say so - who cares what excuses people like you give
when the product has stopped selling. What was your point ?
2) ""Each user that votes has limited experience due
2) Number two - EVEN YOU will admit this is the most prejudicial
statement the world has ever heard since Adolph Hitler introduced the
"Final Solution" - the absolution and genocide of the Hebrew Race at
will. You are that disgusting by calling everyone this - STUPID. Just
who the hell are you anyway ? You my friend need an attitude
adjustment I wish I could provide in person.
to the limited number of attacks he/she receives."" WRONG OBVIOUSLY
3) ""Saying that you've never been hit with malware because you use a
particular product says
absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product. "" WRONG -
IDIOT...
3) Statistics have chronically for over 48 months declared that 90
percent or more of world computers are infected with malware - meaning
also adware and spyware. This year the reports and warnings concerning
all legitimate websites have hit the wires lkike a Christmas Tree....
and by the way we did have a contest to "Name the Rock Vanguard
Crawled Out From Under". THESE FACTS MY FRIEND ARE FROM THE SECURITY
EXPERTS WORLDWIDE AND WORLD GOVERNMENT. This means - idiot - that AT
LEAST NINE OUT OF TEN PEOPLE are infected at any given time and the
OTHER PROTECTED PEOPLE SAYING THEY ARE NOT GETTING INFECTED BECAUSE OF
A PARTICULAR PRODUCT (LIKE THE "TOP THREE" I MENTIONED THAT PASS VB100
TOP TEST IN THE WORLD BY PROFESSIONALS AND EXPERTS) ARE EXACTLY AND
ENTIRELY CORRECT OBVIOUSLY AS THE TEN PERCENT THAT ALL EXPERTS AND
GOVERNEMENTS ARE SAYING ARE PROTECTED AND ARE QUITE CORRECT ACCORDING
TO ALL EXPERTS AND GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD..... NOW YOU JUST GOOSE-
STEP YOUR LITTLE TROLL SKINNY ASSES ON THE BIG-F- OUT OF HERE
TROLL !!!!!

THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF THIS --- TROLL !!!! THANK YOU HITLER FOR YOUR
WONDERFUL OPINIONS OF THE COMMUNITY OF COMPUTER USERS WORLD WIDE - - -
- YOUR OPINIONS ? NO NO THANKS, KEEP THEM FOR YOURSELF BECAUSE LIES
STAY WITH LIES - NOT THE TRUTH !!!! DON'T COME BACK !!!!

OH YEAH - - - ABOUT THIS::::>

""--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---
Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable
format (not recommended). "": WRONG - I AM IN GOOGLE GROUPS NOT USENET
NEWS ROOMS LIKE THE OE CLIENT. TAKE THAT UP WITH GOOGLE GROUPS SERVICE
A-HOLE-STAR...

Obviously you do not understand "Consumer Tests" and the value of
them. We could take your stupidity along the lines of anyone
volunteering for "beta testing" and reporting bugs - or in the very
least what a user knows appears a very wrong occurrence with some
software - obviously. Does this make even an unskilled Intermediate
User or Novice a worthless opinion with absolutely no merit ??? What
is your problem ??? If you took a moment to fish around a bit at where
I live on the internet you might learn something. I used to speak like
you - out of turn. I learned fast to stop it on the world web - and
because I was, and am no more, a complete novie newbie. In security
this dicipline achieves the desired effect - a safe community - by
stopping the electronic pen from halting forward movement. This is not
an intellectually challenged nation of people or world. Over 4 billion
of us have figured out how to survive.

Why and what am I responding to ? You picked my post and called it
stupid. You did. There is no intellectual sweetness to hide that. You
called my post stupid because it included a public vote with the
others all in the Software Reviews section of my BlueCollarPC.Net
Forums I pay for out of my pocket to offer the Community a place to
share and learn pc security as volunteer Forums Host - and these
BlueCollarPC.Net Forums Polls are obviously in no way pretending to
conclude as fact anything - but quite the opposite as an obvious
intended broad public poll of public opinion that the general public
is well aware that any Internet Brat can purposely be a Vandal and
vote Deceptively intentionally - - - I mean we all know that just
looking at what you did obviously and is why we are all looking at you
right now trying to get out of this by telling lies in some manner
about you did not imply that and how can you derive that from that and
on and on and on. I felt it quite necessary to NOT let you go
unchecked calling my Community Efforts as stupid and / or with some
hidden intent. But very, very obviously these are broader GENERAL
PUBLIC OPINION POLLS to publically compare notes with Official
Reviews by Professionals and Experts conducted in the Securrity
Software Industry as to a BALLPARK FIGURE of what is TRUE and what IS
NOT.... Do You Get It Now ???? Maybe you are just stupid and like to
be a diarhea mouth and are constantly caught across the Net when you
do this - the age-old "leap without looking".

FULL MESSAGE YOU WON'T ERASE:
Vanguard View profile
"Gerald309" wrote in message

news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...

This article gives you the exact information : The Top Three
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228

<snip> --- REPLY SEPARATOR --- Only required because Gerald posts in
Usenet using quoted-printable format (not recommended). Voting lists
are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an anti-malware
product. Each user that votes has limited experience due to the
limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've never
been hit with malware because you use a particular product says
absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.
More options Jul 8, 3:48 pm

Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware
From: "Vanguard" <n...@mail.invalid>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:48:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Which anti-spyware softwear?
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
"Gerald309" wrote in message

news:1183908635.273656.101780@n2g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
This article gives you the exact information :

The Top Three
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=228

<snip>

--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---
Only required because Gerald posts in Usenet using quoted-printable
format (not recommended).

Voting lists are worthless for guaging the effectiveness of an
anti-malware product. Each user that votes has limited experience
due
to the limited number of attacks he/she receives. Saying that you've
never been hit with malware because you use a particular product says
absolutely nothing about the coverage of that product.