"Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in
newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:

> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>>
> Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
> recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
> 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe

Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.

> likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
> liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
> job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
> rating from them.

It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working
on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
down malware.



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml