Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

  1. #1
    Dustin Cook Guest

    BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT

    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
    email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


  2. #2
    Bear Bottoms Guest

    Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:

    > http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    >

    OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!


    --
    Bear Bottoms
    Freeware website: http://bearbottoms1.com

  3. #3
    Bear Bottoms Guest

    Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:

    > http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    >

    Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
    recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say 1300
    sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe likes it a
    lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has liked dos based
    ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough job handling the
    sigs you list, then it surely should get a better rating from them.

    Bottoms line is I'm getting it and putting it in my recovery toolbox.


    --
    Bear Bottoms
    Freeware website: http://bearbottoms1.com

  4. #4
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in newsp.tugcy8snjo4m88
    @c57jw11:

    > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    > <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
    >
    >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    >>

    > OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!


    Great.

    I look forward to your findings.

    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
    email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


  5. #5
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in
    newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:

    > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    > <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
    >
    >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    >>

    > Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
    > recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
    > 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe


    Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
    prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
    reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.

    > likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
    > liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
    > job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
    > rating from them.


    It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working
    on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
    they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
    eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
    down malware.



    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
    email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


  6. #6
    4Q Guest

    !Bug**** shill alert! Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    Dustin Cook wrote:
    > "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in
    > newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:
    >
    > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    > > <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    > >>

    > > Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
    > > recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
    > > 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe

    >


    Doesn't Beararse sound a lot like
    AV shill Chuckie the mental radioham?


    > Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
    > prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
    > reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.
    >


    Yes, more ****az spamming for your
    Trojan crap tool, you don't mention it
    nearly enough in these groups!

    *MORE!*


    > > likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
    > > liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
    > > job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
    > > rating from them.

    >


    That's right Chuckie II shill that
    beauty!


    > It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working


    WHAT?! Never! That's GUI is a masterpiece

    > on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
    >


    *Hmmm* me thinks Raidy dickhead has taken
    my critque too heart :-(


    >they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
    > eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
    > down malware.
    >


    Eye candy *ROFL* I can't wait to see the
    next spastic cobbled together "GUI"
    front-end you are going to tag onto your
    bASIC batch script.


    4Q
    http://fourq.host.sk <-- Chuckie, here's
    the 5star review you were looking for.


  7. #7
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: !Bug**** shill alert! Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007

    4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1182816987.931523.163810
    @m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com:

    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    >> "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in
    >> newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:
    >>
    >> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
    >> > <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
    >> >>
    >> > Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in

    your
    >> > recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
    >> > 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct?

    Downloadpipe
    >>

    >
    > Doesn't Beararse sound a lot like
    > AV shill Chuckie the mental radioham?


    You seem to have a theory about everyone who doesn't post in dislike of
    the program. Perhaps, indeed, it's you who has the mental problems.

    >> Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
    >> prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
    >> reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.
    >>

    >
    > Yes, more ****az spamming for your
    > Trojan crap tool, you don't mention it
    > nearly enough in these groups!


    These groups deal with freeware and malware removal software. My program
    provides a use for many individuals. You *still* provide nothing of any
    value to anyone.

    > That's right Chuckie II shill that
    > beauty!
    >
    >
    >> It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been

    working
    >
    > WHAT?! Never! That's GUI is a masterpiece


    Well, I don't see why you didn't take advantage of a cheap shot I left
    for you. I said GUI when it's really a console interface, as you so
    kindly mentioned in your ehh, review shall we say? of the program.

    I'm surprised you didn't notice the layout was essentially BBS style in
    nature. *chuckle*. Oh wait, I suppose you did comparing it to an old
    terminal.

    >> on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
    >>

    >
    > *Hmmm* me thinks Raidy dickhead has taken
    > my critque too heart :-(


    No. The screen display isn't as good as it could be. Your right in that
    aspect. However, in my own defense, and BugHunter's as well, the
    interface was designed to get the job done. Utilities of BugHunter's
    nature shouldn't require a real GUI to be useful.

    > Eye candy *ROFL* I can't wait to see the
    > next spastic cobbled together "GUI"
    > front-end you are going to tag onto your
    > bASIC batch script.


    If you were nearly the detective you wanted to us to believe you as
    being, You would have already posted where the "GUI" to BugHunter
    originated. Hint: It was a legitimate program released a long long time
    ago that won 4 out of 5 stars on zdnet; which many of my programs did
    during that time. Does that help? *grin*


    > 4Q
    > http://fourq.host.sk <-- Chuckie, here's
    > the 5star review you were looking for.


    We've been over this. I tore your "review" to ribbons, you won't even
    debate the points I brought up. You still don't understand how BugHunter
    works. Is it a string scanner, or a checksummer? *grin*


    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
    email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •