4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1182816987.931523.163810
@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote in
>> newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:
>>
>> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
>> > <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>> >>
>> > Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in
your
>> > recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
>> > 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct?
Downloadpipe
>>
>
> Doesn't Beararse sound a lot like
> AV shill Chuckie the mental radioham?

You seem to have a theory about everyone who doesn't post in dislike of
the program. Perhaps, indeed, it's you who has the mental problems.

>> Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
>> prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
>> reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.
>>
>
> Yes, more ****az spamming for your
> Trojan crap tool, you don't mention it
> nearly enough in these groups!

These groups deal with freeware and malware removal software. My program
provides a use for many individuals. You *still* provide nothing of any
value to anyone.

> That's right Chuckie II shill that
> beauty!
>
>
>> It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been
working
>
> WHAT?! Never! That's GUI is a masterpiece

Well, I don't see why you didn't take advantage of a cheap shot I left
for you. I said GUI when it's really a console interface, as you so
kindly mentioned in your ehh, review shall we say? of the program.

I'm surprised you didn't notice the layout was essentially BBS style in
nature. *chuckle*. Oh wait, I suppose you did comparing it to an old
terminal.

>> on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
>>
>
> *Hmmm* me thinks Raidy dickhead has taken
> my critque too heart :-(

No. The screen display isn't as good as it could be. Your right in that
aspect. However, in my own defense, and BugHunter's as well, the
interface was designed to get the job done. Utilities of BugHunter's
nature shouldn't require a real GUI to be useful.

> Eye candy *ROFL* I can't wait to see the
> next spastic cobbled together "GUI"
> front-end you are going to tag onto your
> bASIC batch script.

If you were nearly the detective you wanted to us to believe you as
being, You would have already posted where the "GUI" to BugHunter
originated. Hint: It was a legitimate program released a long long time
ago that won 4 out of 5 stars on zdnet; which many of my programs did
during that time. Does that help? *grin*


> 4Q
> http://fourq.host.sk <-- Chuckie, here's
> the 5star review you were looking for.

We've been over this. I tore your "review" to ribbons, you won't even
debate the points I brought up. You still don't understand how BugHunter
works. Is it a string scanner, or a checksummer? *grin*


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml