"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99413DAD7BD0HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121...
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f3lg3n$237$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> When you remove the reg entry and the dll but not the plug-in because
>> the word delet is not a command. The log file that Remove-it generates
>
> The plugin is an executable file. If you didn't depend only on filenames
> and locations, but used some other form of identification instead, you
> wouldn't need a "del" statement for every single file. Hint: that script
> you stole and hacked up wouldn't be 2 freaking megs!
>
>> picked it up. You know the file that you said does not exist.
>
> Your idea of a logfile and mine are clearly different. You can't even
> point
> out all the lines which create the damn thing. Further, it's already been
> shown time and time again that you STOLE the script, hacked the hell out
> of
> it, and have since claimed it as your own. As soon as a valid dmca was
> sent
> to you about spyerase, you re-hacked the hell out of it's identification
> strings and now pass it off (the same damn thing mind you) as "Remove-it".
>
> Really, who are you trying to fool? Nobody is really that stupid. Nobody
> could possibly be and have access to usenet. Seriously.

I don't really have much of a quarrel with what you say here Dustin, except
about nobody being that stupid. Of course there are people that are that
stupid, plenty of them. After all, Google has given any idiot the ability to
find Usenet articles and even to post them.

cmsix


>
>
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>