fourq.host.sk is down!

[4Q]

4Q wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On May 31, 1:52 am, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
> > >
> > > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
> > > like a ****er when I pulled your string
> > > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
> >
> > Sure you did. As for pulling my strings, heres the reply I got back
> > concerning your hosting of my picture:
> >
> > Try as you might, ***** boy, you fool no one.
> > Pavol Cvengros <pavol.cvengros@primeinteractive.net> hide details
> > May 28 (3 days ago)
> > to Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
> > date May 28, 2007 10:01 AM
> > subject Re: DMCA violation fourq.host.sk
> > mailed-by primeinteractive.net
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > as first I have to notify you that DMCA is valid only in USA, and it's
> > definitely not applicable in other countries. But we do respect IP
> > rights and
> > privacy. Mentioned picture bellow was deleted and user notified.
> >
> > If this will occur one more time the user account will be deleted.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pavol Cvengros
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
> I hadn't seen this message from Pavol
> until you posted it publically for
> Usenet Google archives. Don't worry thou
> I've updated Pavol of your tactics and
> pointed out that he should contact me via
> the host.sk provided email in future.
>
> Btw thanks for your explicit permission
> to host your picture along with the emailed attachment of your picture
> you
> sent me to my hushmail account,
> reaffirming this permission. It adds
> weight to the protected freespeech and
> safe harbour laws on copyrighted images for Satirist and humorists
> alike.
>
> *hehe* Remember when MI2G tried to sue
> Rob Rosenberger for hosting the M.D.'s
> photograph? Then they had to back down
> due to his double protection of parody
> under safe harbour law AND they fact they
> had actually sent his the picture in the
> first place. *GOd!" we got a ****ing
> good laugh out of that, and Rob got an
> extra column to bash them with. Can ya
> say "CHEEEEEEZ..."
>
>
> > > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
> > > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
> >
> > *yawn*.
> >
>
> Tired? From all that dancing. Chop-chop
> I want sparks from them little tap
> dancing moves of yours sonny. *grin*
>
> > > > That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've had 4q's
> > > > inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls, removed!
> > >
> > > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
> > > much for me to resist twanging your
> > > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
> >
> > It's up now. Your entire site, including urls generated a 404 error
> > code, and your main site redirected to the host.sk provider. The
> > fact it wasn't up for two days is highly unlikely to be able to pass
> > off as you taking it down voluntarily.
> >
>
> *Ho ho ho* Dustbin, you are tap dancing
> around in circles now. Are you really
> expecting people to believe that Pavol
> removed all them html files for a bit of
> a joke, then put them up a few days after
> you nearly tap danced yourself to death
> with kookie glee.
>
> Don't forget you put this little
> message up first
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...f13b73264cd60c
>
> Where you lamented about being a great
> guy for not getting the site canned.
> Like as if you had some kind of special
> superhero powers over my fate. *LOL*
>
> <quote>
> "He can continue as he pleases on his
> site, as long as...
>
> </quote>
>
> Then I worked my site vanished troll magic
> because I knew without fail you wouldn't
> be able to contain yourself from jumping
> up and down like a retarded kook...
> shouting "Look everyone I brought 4Q
> down, me Dustin, I did it, me, me...
> dance... dance.... dance... dance...
>
>
> And in the background the distant sounds
> of 4Q laughter and that all too familiar
> sound of your strings being Twanged!
> by the master *big ****in grin*
>
> C'mon Dustbin, do an encore! I want to
> see a blur where your feet should be.
>
> You fell for it hook line & sinker
>
> *HAHAHAHA*
>
>
> 4Q
> http://fourq.host.sk <-- I might do
> another 404 troll if you ask me nicely.


Dustbin decided not to humiliate himself
more in this thread, instead he lamed on
about revoking permissions blah, blah,
blah in another thread as not to show too
much red arse.

Stick your revoke crap up where your limited understanding of critique
and
satire goes.


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk <-- 404 troll master classes tutorial at 22:00
prompt
don't be late.

[Dustin Cook]

purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:

> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
>
>> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest> wrote:
>>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
>>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
>>>
>>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
>>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
>>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
>>>
>>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
>>>
>>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
>>>
>>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
>>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
>>>
>>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've had
>>> >> 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls, removed!
>>>
>>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
>>> > much for me to resist twanging your
>>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
>>>
>>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is no
>>> >> hope for you.
>>>
>>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
>>>
>>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh; MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>> >> *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH* BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
>>>
>>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
>>>
>>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
>>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
>>>
>>> > 4Q
>>> >http://fourq.host.sk
>>>
>>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
>>
>> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
>> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
>>
>>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
>>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
>>> back as soon as
>>
>> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
>> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a renamed
>> html file. But gone.
>>
>>
>>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
>>> good for
>>
>> *yawn*
>
> You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
> friggin moron.

You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.

> Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free to
> keep it up for a while.

Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.

On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on another
page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner. Truth be told, he still
has no freaking idea what it is. If you find ignorance like that
hilarious, than well, it obviously doesn't take much to amuse a simpleton
like yourself...


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
>
> > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
> > news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
> >
> >> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest> wrote:
> >>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
> >>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
> >>>
> >>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
> >>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
> >>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
> >>>
> >>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
> >>>
> >>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
> >>>
> >>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
> >>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
> >>>
> >>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've had
> >>> >> 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls, removed!
> >>>
> >>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
> >>> > much for me to resist twanging your
> >>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
> >>>
> >>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is no
> >>> >> hope for you.
> >>>
> >>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
> >>>
> >>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh; MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
> >>> >> *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH* BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
> >>>
> >>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
> >>>
> >>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
> >>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
> >>>
> >>> > 4Q
> >>> >http://fourq.host.sk
> >>>
> >>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
> >>
> >> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
> >> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
> >>
> >>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
> >>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
> >>> back as soon as
> >>
> >> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
> >> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a renamed
> >> html file. But gone.
> >>
> >>
> >>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
> >>> good for
> >>
> >> *yawn*
> >
> > You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
> > friggin moron.
>
> You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.
>
> > Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free to
> > keep it up for a while.
>
> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
>
> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on another
> page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner.

*ho ho ho* It's a standing joke. Lord
Bug**** does not like his ****az,
BugHumper to be so classified as a scanner (like as if he had the
skill to
write a scanner). No, instead the lame
coder ****-artist (Dustin "cock sucker Cook) writes simpleton
checksum crap. (oh, did I mention he
checks the filesize and name of malware?)
into his simpleton equation? That means
he has not ****ing chance if the malware
morphs in the absolute basic sense. (i.e. technology from 20 year ago)


>Truth be told, he still
> has no freaking idea what it is.

*translation*

Lord Bug**** wrote a pile of embarassing
crap in 16bit bASIC and he won't show
anyone the src code, instead he hides
his nugget of crap behind a compressor/packer so you cannot see his
code shame.

Okay the NET savvy will known that there
are tools such as Procdump that will
reverse any packer ****e, but why waste
your efforts Procdumping then going thru
the **** line by tedeous line with a
dubugger (SoftIcee) and an interactive
diassembler (like IDA pro free v4.1)
just to prove Dustbin wrote **** like
he always has (see links to his virus
source code on my pages)

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/


Okay for anyone still awake that needs
SoftICe or IDA pro to prove point, may
contact me via

fourq@vmyths.com care of Rob Rosenberger

or email

Laura Fredricks @ her hotmail 'remove clothes' account )



4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/ <-- email direct addy clue






====================

If you find ignorance like that
> hilarious, than well, it obviously doesn't take much to amuse a simpleton
> like yourself...
>

Keep thinking everyone aside from yourself
is a simpleton, dimbulb and you'll soon
find out who the real simpleton is )

[Dustin Cook]

purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
news199419377F@A26175.A01CE02F105DA2:

> Dustin Cook <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
> news:Xns99419BDA4E902HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121:
>
>> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
>> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest> wrote:
>>>>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
>>>>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
>>>>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
>>>>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
>>>>>
>>>>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
>>>>>
>>>>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
>>>>>
>>>>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
>>>>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
>>>>>
>>>>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've
>>>>> >> had 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls,
>>>>> >> removed!
>>>>>
>>>>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
>>>>> > much for me to resist twanging your
>>>>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
>>>>>
>>>>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is
>>>>> >> no hope for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh;
>>>>> >> MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH*
>>>>> >> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
>>>>>
>>>>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
>>>>>
>>>>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
>>>>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
>>>>>
>>>>> > 4Q
>>>>> >http://fourq.host.sk
>>>>>
>>>>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
>>>>
>>>> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
>>>> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
>>>>
>>>>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
>>>>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
>>>>> back as soon as
>>>>
>>>> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
>>>> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a renamed
>>>> html file. But gone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
>>>>> good for
>>>>
>>>> *yawn*
>>>
>>> You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
>>> friggin moron.
>>
>> You obviously never checked the site.
>
> Unlike you, I don't fall for "404" trolls.

Oh, I wouldn't be so sure, your already his *****.

>>> Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free to
>>> keep it up for a while.
>>
>> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
>>
>> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on
>> another page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner. Truth be
>> told, he still has no freaking idea what it is.
>
> Who cares what it is. The funny thing about his site is that it's
> making you sing and dance on Usenet.

Uh huh. Sure...



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:1180644657.669339.210170@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
>> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
>>
>> > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
>> > news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
>> >
>> >> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
>> >>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> >>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
>> >>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
>> >>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
>> >>>
>> >>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
>> >>>
>> >>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
>> >>>
>> >>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
>> >>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've
>> >>> >> had 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls,
>> >>> >> removed!
>> >>>
>> >>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
>> >>> > much for me to resist twanging your
>> >>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is
>> >>> >> no hope for you.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh;
>> >>> >> MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH*
>> >>> >> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
>> >>>
>> >>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
>> >>>
>> >>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
>> >>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
>> >>>
>> >>> > 4Q
>> >>> >http://fourq.host.sk
>> >>>
>> >>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
>> >>
>> >> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
>> >> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
>> >>
>> >>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
>> >>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
>> >>> back as soon as
>> >>
>> >> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
>> >> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a
>> >> renamed html file. But gone.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
>> >>> good for
>> >>
>> >> *yawn*
>> >
>> > You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
>> > friggin moron.
>>
>> You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.
>>
>> > Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free
>> > to keep it up for a while.
>>
>> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
>>
>> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on
>> another page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner.
>
> *ho ho ho* It's a standing joke. Lord
> Bug**** does not like his ****az,
> BugHumper to be so classified as a scanner (like as if he had the
> skill to
> write a scanner). No, instead the lame

But, alas it is a scanner.


> coder ****-artist (Dustin "cock sucker Cook) writes simpleton
> checksum crap. (oh, did I mention he
> checks the filesize and name of malware?)

BugHunter doesn't make use of any file's name. And it's not using a
simpleton checksum algorithm either, idiot. The reason I'm using a
filelength as an indicator is so that, unlike your half ass attempt at
writing a bughunter clone, I don't need to scan every single file on the
hard drive. You weren't even aware of that fact until I had to point it
out to you, in a comparison of why my algorithm is better than yours; as
yours waste time and resources checking files it shouldn't on a cold day
in hell have a md5 match for.

You cannot answer any questions regarding the program that have been
asked of you since it was released. You couldn't even write a halfway
decent clone of the program. You tried to pass off your sorry example as
a clone, but they aren't anything alike. Time and time again, you show us
all what you really don't know about malware and scanners alike.

Your friend pcbutts relies on filenames, nobody elses scanners do as far
as I know. Filenames, like md5summing every single file on your hard disk
is the mark of a wannabe coder, who doesn't grasp what it is he's trying
to do.

> into his simpleton equation? That means
> he has not ****ing chance if the malware
> morphs in the absolute basic sense. (i.e. technology from 20 year ago)

Your twisting what I said about your primitive work. As you rely on a
different md5 for each and every possible malware file you could run
across, your program is the one that will and does miss any variation.
Mine on the other hand could miss some variances, but will not miss them
all. It's smart enough to know it doesn't have to scan each and every
single file on your hard disk. For someone who claims to be interested in
Artificial Intelligence as you do, one would think you'd write a program
that atleast could make a determination of whether or not the file needed
to be scanned. You don't.

>
>>Truth be told, he still
>> has no freaking idea what it is.
>
> *translation*
>
> Lord Bug**** wrote a pile of embarassing
> crap in 16bit bASIC and he won't show
> anyone the src code, instead he hides
> his nugget of crap behind a compressor/packer so you cannot see his
> code shame.

I'm not embarrased about the program, quiet the opposite in fact. It's
continuing to win awards as more sites begin mirroring it.

it does it's job quiet well, various respected individuals in the
antimalware scene and data recovery scene, including a former nemesis are
thankful for the work I've done. Robert Greene even uses it. *grin*

> Okay the NET savvy will known that there
> are tools such as Procdump that will

Actually, any serious programmer knows you don't need the source code to
figure out how something works. Your whining about the fact I won't turn
over my hard work doesn't change that fact. You shouldn't need source
code if your half as good as you'd like us to think you are.

You actually sound like one of those paranoid people who refuse to use
utorrent because it's author won't provide the source code for it.

You shouldn't need to decompress it or even use procdump. You should be
able to determine what it is exactly and how it works with softice or ida
pro alone. I don't do any oddball interrupts. everything is well
documented.

We all know you don't actually possess any of the required skill to do
this, as you would know how BugHunter works by now if you did. You've
made yet another error in your diagnosis; BugHunter doesn't give a ****
what a files name is. Your friend, pcbutts script on the other hand,
does.

To prove you don't know what the hell your talking about (as usual), I'd
like for you to show me the code where BugHunter depends on filenames. As
well as the entries in the database files, if you please.

Since you claim it relies on filenames, you should know the filenames it
relies on as well, I'd like for you to post those too, please.

To ensure you can't cheat, BugHunter's algorithm is known and has been
known to some since it was originally released. So, answer my questions
then

Don't make too much of an ass of yourself on alt.hackers.malicious. You
started cross-posting this flame war to them in an effort to recruit
some. Do you think any of them will work for someone as dumb as you?

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
> news:1180644657.669339.210170@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com:
>
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
> >> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
> >>
> >> > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> > news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
> >> >
> >> >> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
> >> >>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >> >>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
> >> >>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
> >> >>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
> >> >>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've
> >> >>> >> had 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls,
> >> >>> >> removed!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
> >> >>> > much for me to resist twanging your
> >> >>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is
> >> >>> >> no hope for you.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh;
> >> >>> >> MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH*
> >> >>> >> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
> >> >>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > 4Q
> >> >>> >http://fourq.host.sk
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
> >> >>
> >> >> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
> >> >> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
> >> >>
> >> >>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
> >> >>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
> >> >>> back as soon as
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
> >> >> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a
> >> >> renamed html file. But gone.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
> >> >>> good for
> >> >>
> >> >> *yawn*
> >> >
> >> > You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
> >> > friggin moron.
> >>
> >> You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.
> >>
> >> > Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free
> >> > to keep it up for a while.
> >>
> >> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
> >>
> >> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on
> >> another page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner.
> >
> > *ho ho ho* It's a standing joke. Lord
> > Bug**** does not like his ****az,
> > BugHumper to be so classified as a scanner (like as if he had the
> > skill to
> > write a scanner). No, instead the lame
>
> But, alas it is a scanner.
>
>
> > coder ****-artist (Dustin "cock sucker Cook) writes simpleton
> > checksum crap. (oh, did I mention he
> > checks the filesize and name of malware?)
>
> BugHunter doesn't make use of any file's name. And it's not using a
> simpleton checksum algorithm either, idiot. The reason I'm using a
> filelength as an indicator is so that, unlike your half ass attempt at
> writing a bughunter clone, I don't need to scan every single file on the
> hard drive. You weren't even aware of that fact until I had to point it
> out to you, in a comparison of why my algorithm is better than yours; as
> yours waste time and resources checking files it shouldn't on a cold day
> in hell have a md5 match for.
>

Your right, and I was wrong about
Bug****! No, it's great! It's the
best piece of software ever in the
history of software... I'm sorry I
ever mocked you and your crap and the
mear fact you wrote it with a 16bit
DOS compiler and use your own secret
checking algorithm (which is obviously
better than something knocked up
by Ron Rivest [MD5] and used as an
industry standard for file integrity
checking)... Yes security through
obscurity is definately the way to
go.

You are extremely correct to compare
my hacked up in minutes piece of ****
with your 3 years of hard laboured love
of coding excellence, (checkout his
previous source codes on 4Q site to
see true code mastery) and prove that
without doubt, anyone who dares to
compete like for like and beat you
within a short timeframe is on a hiding
to nothing!


> You cannot answer any questions regarding the program that have been
> asked of you since it was released. You

You didn't click your finger and
make it sound like an order! You
know I only do things when someone
demands it.


>couldn't even write a halfway
> decent clone of the program. You tried to pass off your sorry example as
> a clone, but they aren't anything alike.

Yeah, so true. I spend minutes and
hope to demonstrate something as
advanced as Bug**** (3yrs of mastery).
Luckily for me I never released it
as a binary for people to start
laboratory type comparisons... You
know rename them both something like
ExampleA and ExampleB and let them
go head to head to see which one was
the knocked together crap.


> Time and time again, you show us
> all what you really don't know about malware and scanners alike.
>

Yes my adventure into the grown up
world of malware scanners has been
a complete disaster. If only I would
have spent a few more minutes on
things like a menu and **** then I
wouldn't be so damned as I have been.


> Your friend pcbutts relies on filenames, nobody elses scanners do as far
> as I know. Filenames, like md5summing every single file on your hard disk
> is the mark of a wannabe coder, who doesn't grasp what it is he's trying
> to do.

Maybe I could use your wonderful
Bug**** as an inspirational example
and give my friend a helping hand
with his coding. He wouldn't even
have to borrow it, I could just give
him the open source.


>
> > into his simpleton equation? That means
> > he has not ****ing chance if the malware
> > morphs in the absolute basic sense. (i.e. technology from 20 year ago)
>
> Your twisting what I said about your primitive work. As you rely on a
> different md5 for each and every possible malware file you could run
> across, your program is the one that will and does miss any variation.
> Mine on the other hand could miss some variances, but will not miss them
> all. It's smart enough to know it doesn't have to scan each and every
> single file on your hard disk. For

Hmmm. You mean check against a not
to scan list... Wow that's going to
involve at least another 20 minutes
of effort!

>someone who claims to be interested in
> Artificial Intelligence as you do, one would think you'd write a program
> that atleast could make a determination of whether or not the file needed
> to be scanned. You don't.
>

Damn me! If only I would have decided to
write it to incorporate artificial
intelligence! So, what you seem to be
hinting at is that underneath that
****ty 1960's technology interface
of Bug**** lies a massive positronic
artificial intelligence super brain?

You want to be careful man, IBM needs
a successor to the BigBlue chessmaster,
they might come-a-headhunting for
an AI super engine code disguised as a
****ing piece of crap 16bit filechecker!
Kasparov had better not stick his nose
into these Usenet groups looking for
a challenge!


> >
> >>Truth be told, he still
> >> has no freaking idea what it is.
> >
> > *translation*
> >
> > Lord Bug**** wrote a pile of embarassing
> > crap in 16bit bASIC and he won't show
> > anyone the src code, instead he hides
> > his nugget of crap behind a compressor/packer so you cannot see his
> > code shame.
>
> I'm not embarrased about the program, quiet the opposite in fact. It's
> continuing to win awards as more sites begin mirroring it.
>

No! Never be ashamed. I bet when you
take a dump you invite the neighbors
around to marvel at your wonderful
anal ejections masterpieces too!

> it does it's job quiet well, various respected individuals in the
> antimalware scene and data recovery scene, including a former nemesis are
> thankful for the work I've done. Robert Greene even uses it. *grin*
>

Oh wow, he was the guitarist out of
Fleetwood Mac! That is one hell of
an endorsement!!! You might get
Jimmy Page and Robert Plant of
Led Zeppelin to stand along side
Bughunter 3.0!, **** they might even
dig Jimi Hendrix coffin up and drag
his corpse along for 3.1 AI Turing
Test BugHunter Winner!


> > Okay the NET savvy will known that there
> > are tools such as Procdump that will
>
> Actually, any serious programmer knows you don't need the source code to
> figure out how something works. Your whining about the fact I won't turn
> over my hard work doesn't change that fact. You shouldn't need source
> code if your half as good as you'd like us to think you are.
>

No, that Positronic neural network
AI engined Bug**** has me beat!


<snipped rest of your long winded
boast without reading, I'm sure
it was key your meglamaniac rant
but I'm too busy helping PCButts
at the moment>


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk <-- still up!?