fourq.host.sk is down!

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
>
> > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
> > news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
> >
> >> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest> wrote:
> >>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
> >>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
> >>>
> >>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
> >>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
> >>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
> >>>
> >>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
> >>>
> >>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
> >>>
> >>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
> >>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
> >>>
> >>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've had
> >>> >> 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls, removed!
> >>>
> >>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
> >>> > much for me to resist twanging your
> >>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
> >>>
> >>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is no
> >>> >> hope for you.
> >>>
> >>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
> >>>
> >>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh; MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
> >>> >> *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH* BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
> >>>
> >>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
> >>>
> >>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
> >>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
> >>>
> >>> > 4Q
> >>> >http://fourq.host.sk
> >>>
> >>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
> >>
> >> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
> >> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
> >>
> >>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
> >>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
> >>> back as soon as
> >>
> >> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
> >> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a renamed
> >> html file. But gone.
> >>
> >>
> >>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
> >>> good for
> >>
> >> *yawn*
> >
> > You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
> > friggin moron.
>
> You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.
>
> > Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free to
> > keep it up for a while.
>
> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
>
> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on another
> page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner.

*ho ho ho* It's a standing joke. Lord
Bug**** does not like his ****az,
BugHumper to be so classified as a scanner (like as if he had the
skill to
write a scanner). No, instead the lame
coder ****-artist (Dustin "cock sucker Cook) writes simpleton
checksum crap. (oh, did I mention he
checks the filesize and name of malware?)
into his simpleton equation? That means
he has not ****ing chance if the malware
morphs in the absolute basic sense. (i.e. technology from 20 year ago)


>Truth be told, he still
> has no freaking idea what it is.

*translation*

Lord Bug**** wrote a pile of embarassing
crap in 16bit bASIC and he won't show
anyone the src code, instead he hides
his nugget of crap behind a compressor/packer so you cannot see his
code shame.

Okay the NET savvy will known that there
are tools such as Procdump that will
reverse any packer ****e, but why waste
your efforts Procdumping then going thru
the **** line by tedeous line with a
dubugger (SoftIcee) and an interactive
diassembler (like IDA pro free v4.1)
just to prove Dustbin wrote **** like
he always has (see links to his virus
source code on my pages)

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/


Okay for anyone still awake that needs
SoftICe or IDA pro to prove point, may
contact me via

fourq@vmyths.com care of Rob Rosenberger

or email

Laura Fredricks @ her hotmail 'remove clothes' account )



4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/ <-- email direct addy clue






====================

If you find ignorance like that
> hilarious, than well, it obviously doesn't take much to amuse a simpleton
> like yourself...
>

Keep thinking everyone aside from yourself
is a simpleton, dimbulb and you'll soon
find out who the real simpleton is )

[Dustin Cook]

4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:1180644657.669339.210170@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> purpurroterwald <purple@negative.forest> wrote in
>> news1994175F20@A2CA88.A01CE02F105DA2:
>>
>> > Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in
>> > news:1180609812.075373.198010@p47g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com:
>> >
>> >> On May 31, 2:36 am, purpurroterwald <pur...@negative.forest>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote
>> >>> innews:1180590766.047942.172940@q69g2000hsb.google groups.com:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> >>> >> I know, I shouldn't encourage it.. but I simply can't resist.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Yep,,, you couldn't resist to dance
>> >>> > like a ****er when I pulled your string
>> >>> > again *HAHAHAHHAHAHHA* you stupid ****er!
>> >>>
>> >>> >> fourq.host.sk is no longer online! Go me!
>> >>>
>> >>> > "Go me!" == Dance you ;]]
>> >>>
>> >>> > C'mon I wanna see flames coming off them
>> >>> > little pink ballet shoes of yours *LOL*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> That's two for two. I made good on both "kook threats", I've
>> >>> >> had 4q's inflammatory site removed, and pcbutt's bad urls,
>> >>> >> removed!
>> >>>
>> >>> > Really? *ROFL* 4Q is up, it was too
>> >>> > much for me to resist twanging your
>> >>> > strings with a site gone troll *HAHHHAHA*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> If any of you still doubt me or my intentions, there really is
>> >>> >> no hope for you.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Take your meds man! *lol*
>> >>>
>> >>> >> Btw, 4Q and pcbutts, I got the last laugh;
>> >>> >> MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *COUGH* MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA *COUGH*
>> >>> >> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
>> >>>
>> >>> > (INSERTS)_ last laugh *HAHAHAHHA*
>> >>>
>> >>> > I'll always be twanging your strings
>> >>> > Dustbin, you are too easy ;]]
>> >>>
>> >>> > 4Q
>> >>> >http://fourq.host.sk
>> >>>
>> >>> Not only is that site up, it's a ****in laugh-riot.
>> >>
>> >> It's up now, it was offline for more than 48 hours. It's highly
>> >> doubtful he voluntarily disabled it.
>> >>
>> >>> What'd you do, replace index.html with something that said "404"
>> >>> just to see if he'd buy it, and then put the original index.html
>> >>> back as soon as
>> >>
>> >> Are you really that dumb? His site had no index.html, it was being
>> >> redirected to the host; his site was deleted. Not simply, a
>> >> renamed html file. But gone.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> he started boasting? LOL! That's an old trick, but it's always
>> >>> good for
>> >>
>> >> *yawn*
>> >
>> > You got trolled with simple "404" page, and now you look like a
>> > friggin moron.
>>
>> You obviously never checked the site. It's ok, other people did.
>>
>> > Dancing around is only going to add to the hilarity, so feel free
>> > to keep it up for a while.
>>
>> Okay. Let me help you out a little bit.
>>
>> On 4q's main site, he claims bughunter is a checksummer, and on
>> another page, he claims it's a 16bit signature scanner.
>
> *ho ho ho* It's a standing joke. Lord
> Bug**** does not like his ****az,
> BugHumper to be so classified as a scanner (like as if he had the
> skill to
> write a scanner). No, instead the lame

But, alas it is a scanner.


> coder ****-artist (Dustin "cock sucker Cook) writes simpleton
> checksum crap. (oh, did I mention he
> checks the filesize and name of malware?)

BugHunter doesn't make use of any file's name. And it's not using a
simpleton checksum algorithm either, idiot. The reason I'm using a
filelength as an indicator is so that, unlike your half ass attempt at
writing a bughunter clone, I don't need to scan every single file on the
hard drive. You weren't even aware of that fact until I had to point it
out to you, in a comparison of why my algorithm is better than yours; as
yours waste time and resources checking files it shouldn't on a cold day
in hell have a md5 match for.

You cannot answer any questions regarding the program that have been
asked of you since it was released. You couldn't even write a halfway
decent clone of the program. You tried to pass off your sorry example as
a clone, but they aren't anything alike. Time and time again, you show us
all what you really don't know about malware and scanners alike.

Your friend pcbutts relies on filenames, nobody elses scanners do as far
as I know. Filenames, like md5summing every single file on your hard disk
is the mark of a wannabe coder, who doesn't grasp what it is he's trying
to do.

> into his simpleton equation? That means
> he has not ****ing chance if the malware
> morphs in the absolute basic sense. (i.e. technology from 20 year ago)

Your twisting what I said about your primitive work. As you rely on a
different md5 for each and every possible malware file you could run
across, your program is the one that will and does miss any variation.
Mine on the other hand could miss some variances, but will not miss them
all. It's smart enough to know it doesn't have to scan each and every
single file on your hard disk. For someone who claims to be interested in
Artificial Intelligence as you do, one would think you'd write a program
that atleast could make a determination of whether or not the file needed
to be scanned. You don't.

>
>>Truth be told, he still
>> has no freaking idea what it is.
>
> *translation*
>
> Lord Bug**** wrote a pile of embarassing
> crap in 16bit bASIC and he won't show
> anyone the src code, instead he hides
> his nugget of crap behind a compressor/packer so you cannot see his
> code shame.

I'm not embarrased about the program, quiet the opposite in fact. It's
continuing to win awards as more sites begin mirroring it.

it does it's job quiet well, various respected individuals in the
antimalware scene and data recovery scene, including a former nemesis are
thankful for the work I've done. Robert Greene even uses it. *grin*

> Okay the NET savvy will known that there
> are tools such as Procdump that will

Actually, any serious programmer knows you don't need the source code to
figure out how something works. Your whining about the fact I won't turn
over my hard work doesn't change that fact. You shouldn't need source
code if your half as good as you'd like us to think you are.

You actually sound like one of those paranoid people who refuse to use
utorrent because it's author won't provide the source code for it.

You shouldn't need to decompress it or even use procdump. You should be
able to determine what it is exactly and how it works with softice or ida
pro alone. I don't do any oddball interrupts. everything is well
documented.

We all know you don't actually possess any of the required skill to do
this, as you would know how BugHunter works by now if you did. You've
made yet another error in your diagnosis; BugHunter doesn't give a ****
what a files name is. Your friend, pcbutts script on the other hand,
does.

To prove you don't know what the hell your talking about (as usual), I'd
like for you to show me the code where BugHunter depends on filenames. As
well as the entries in the database files, if you please.

Since you claim it relies on filenames, you should know the filenames it
relies on as well, I'd like for you to post those too, please.

To ensure you can't cheat, BugHunter's algorithm is known and has been
known to some since it was originally released. So, answer my questions
then

Don't make too much of an ass of yourself on alt.hackers.malicious. You
started cross-posting this flame war to them in an effort to recruit
some. Do you think any of them will work for someone as dumb as you?

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml