On May 24, 12:24 pm, "Heather" <nos...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote in messagenews:qOe5i.11993$xV.112@trnddc05...
>
>
>
> > From: "Gerald309" <gerald...@gmail.com>
>
> > < snip >
>
> > | Apparently you are IMPERSONATING official Microsoft Personel
> > | PRETENDING to be some Microsoft News Owner. Are you personal friends
> > with Bill Gates you mean ? Room that you ""and I deliberately
> > top-posted because I CAN.....grin."" <<<<
> > Take it easy ! Figgs didn't flame you.
>
> > Figgs commented on several non-snipped replies. She is NOT on the MS
> > News Server and she impersonanting nobody.
> > She was also being sarcastic. Blame Google on the repetative posts
> > and please... lighten up.
>
> Thanks Dave.....obviously this humour-challenged person doesn't know
> Laura Fredericks and that she often does things and says "because I
> CAN". It was just a joke......one he didn't get. Sigh.....
>
> My sarcasm was not necessarily (or just) directed at the repetition, but
> at the fact he didn't trim 5 of them and one had to wade thru 6 kb of
> nothingness to get to his reply. In this case, top posting would have
> been preferable.
>
> Still giggling over him thinking I was *impersonating Microsoft
> personnel*........poor man doesn't know me well, that is for sure.
>
> Gerald.....I have NO interest in being an MS MVP nor have I ever
> impersonated one. Bill and I get along just fine the way it is. (VBG)
>
> Heather......a free agent.
>
>
>
> > --
> > Dave
> >http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> >http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

================================/

Well let me finish this then between the two of these persons. Number
one I will make very clear that when I read this ....

""QUOTE""

and I deliberately top-posted because (as Laura would say) I
> CAN.....grin.

""UNQUOTE""

.... I presumed that to mean that the person was saying to this string
and group that they had the ability to physically place there reply
comment at the top of the string - bumping all the others, mine
particularly, bumping all the others down so that the comments made by
them were as being corrective as coming from a List Onwer. Now you
know what I was talking about when I said Impersonating a List Owner.

As far as the little symantecs game over the words "top-posted" - well
you went there and not me. Who cares... it is not a term used in
familiartity anywhere but right here by you.

So my point of this reply is to say that here are two persons JUMPING
on my post again and going on about CORRECT ways I am to conduct my
communications in this string and presumably then everywhere else -
since they are in your opinions "golden rules" of conduct that I must
have obviously broken .... and so the point is who the hell are you
kidding ?

Everyone knows the both of your comments are completely off topic and
against any List rules to do such.

Again - you are both acting like List Moderators in telling me how to
conduct my communications and the both of you are admidtedly not,
correct. So I guess the proper response is to tell you both to shut
the f*ck up ! Ok?

I am not going to listen to you telling me what to do because you are
not List Owners and above that - you do not practice what you preach.
You have three posts here that have nothing to do with this string -
and that is called "continual off-topic posting" and that is cause for
being banned from any Group or List ...

AGAIN: YOU POSTED THIS OFF-TOPIC AND ARE TELLING ME HOW I SHOULD
CONDUCT COMMUNICATIONS WHEN YOU ARE BREAKING LIST RULES ? ? ?

""QUOTE""

Heather
View profile
More options May 23, 3:58 pm
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware
From: "Heather" <nos...@nospam.invalid>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:58:57 -0400
Local: Wed, May 23 2007 3:58 pm
Subject: Re: Does this sound like spyware?
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
DAMN, GERALD.......you send SIX posts (5 of them not trimmed) to make
this point?? Fix whatever it is you are using for an ng reader.....

Oh......and I deliberately top-posted because (as Laura would say) I
CAN.....grin.

Now...back to business.

Heather

"Gerald309" <gerald...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1179944606.736116.27430@q69g2000hsb.googlegro ups.com...

""UNQUOTE""

AND YOU DUDE - YOU CAN SHUT THE F*CK UP TO .... MR. CORRECTION TRIP...
HERE'S YOURS 9MORE OFF TOPIC POSTING AND ASSUMING LIST MODERATOR
DUTRIES WHEN YOU ARE NOT ONE -

""QUOTE""
Take it easy ! Figgs didn't flame you.
""UNQUOTE""

What and who are you to say this.. I don't even know you and you
certainly are not the List Owner or Moderator....

AND YES I WAS FLAMED LiAR...

""QUOTE""
> DAMN, GERALD.......you send SIX posts (5 of them not trimmed) to make
> this point?? Fix whatever it is you are using for an ng reader.....
""UNQUOTE""

So look at "DAMN GERALD"... you don't call that a lead in on a
flaming ? B*llsh*t !!!

The flaming further is the whole context of the message as the whole
'rush to judgement' scenario whereby the words "you send SIX posts" is
a complete presumption of fact (and notice the shouting "SIX") and
furthered here, "Fix whatever... is you are using" .... And as I said
what is this and who are you to waltz up to this string and post such
crap as and is a PERSONAL ATTACK in shouting and assigning blame to me
automatically without thought that it was on the server side and not
client side - the whole preponderence of evidence your small brain put
together to hatch your personal attack on me CLEARLY by all the direct
accusations you charged me with ?!

I am not inviting response from either one of you, but rather clearing
the crap from the board by washing the poop off with truth.

You are not that drunk or niave or stupid enough to argue your sides
of this further are you? Because I am not going to. I said what I said
- and the two of you have had your fun with two personal attacks
actually and you know where to stick your gag orders.... Good day.

Last chance for yous to get honest.... If niether of you replies, we
(the public world web) will accept that as your acknowledgement of the
truth and that you admit to it.

You post any further and the world web opinion is that you are now
compounding your violations with "troll-trash-talking" and "trashing a
forum board or group with multiple off-topic postings" .

Now both of you just think before you decide to get drunk here
again... don't react - think about what was said and what you did.
Look at the mechanics of general List Rules, understand them, and know
what was said. You want to act after that, fine. I ask you THINK
first ! before acting.

Good day.... and have a Nice group, forum, news room, board Day !

you troll you roll