BugHunter Sig update 05.15.2007

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get
> real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
> photoshopped.

You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server. Further,
you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit beastiliality;
which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic content, violating on
my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3 for 3.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[James Morrow]

In article <Xns9936A69B751E4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com says...
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> > So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get
> > real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
> > photoshopped.
>
> You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server. Further,
> you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit beastiliality;
> which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic content, violating on
> my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3 for 3.
>

For openers here we have copyright infringement, libel and defamation
of character. Wow. We are moving up in the world. One good tort
deserves another. Would an allegation of bestiality be likelyy to
expose one to public ridicule and censure? It would appear so. Thus it
is actionable as a tort. This could be really interesting.

--
James E. Morrow
Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

[Dustin Cook]

James Morrow <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in
news:MPG.20baad071dc03fb7989697@extreme.x-privat.org:

> In article <Xns9936A69B751E4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
> spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com says...
>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
>> news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>> > So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals?
>> > Get real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
>> > photoshopped.
>>
>> You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server.
>> Further, you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit
>> beastiliality; which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic
>> content, violating on my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3
>> for 3.
>>
>
> For openers here we have copyright infringement, libel and defamation
> of character. Wow. We are moving up in the world. One good tort
> deserves another. Would an allegation of bestiality be likelyy to
> expose one to public ridicule and censure? It would appear so. Thus it
> is actionable as a tort. This could be really interesting.

Yes. I've taken a drive to my lawyers office this morning and turned in
the information I have on Christopher as well as a copy of the site url.
A printed copy. I've also contacted his hosting providers legal
deptartment, and I will be contacting his local sheriffs office if I'm
not satisified with the results of sending a dmca to his hosting
provider. I'll keep you posted.





--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Lamey]

On Mon, 21 May 2007 20:46:29 GMT, Dustin Cook
<spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:

>James Morrow <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in
>news:MPG.20baad071dc03fb7989697@extreme.x-privat.org:
>
>> In article <Xns9936A69B751E4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
>> spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com says...
>>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
>>> news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>> > So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals?
>>> > Get real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
>>> > photoshopped.
>>>
>>> You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server.
>>> Further, you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit
>>> beastiliality; which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic
>>> content, violating on my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3
>>> for 3.
>>>
>>
>> For openers here we have copyright infringement, libel and defamation
>> of character. Wow. We are moving up in the world. One good tort
>> deserves another. Would an allegation of bestiality be likelyy to
>> expose one to public ridicule and censure? It would appear so. Thus it
>> is actionable as a tort. This could be really interesting.
>
>Yes. I've taken a drive to my lawyers office this morning and turned in
>the information I have on Christopher as well as a copy of the site url.
>A printed copy. I've also contacted his hosting providers legal
>deptartment, and I will be contacting his local sheriffs office if I'm
>not satisified with the results of sending a dmca to his hosting
>provider. I'll keep you posted.
>
>
KOOK!

--
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
http://blu05.port5.com
AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07
#20 Usenet *******
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
< we all know how well that works...LOL >
Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Oh fer ****sakes. Welcome to my killfile you annoying little gnat.

<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>

[Andy Walker]

Lamey wrote:

>>Yes. I've taken a drive to my lawyers office this morning and turned in
>>the information I have on Christopher as well as a copy of the site url.
>>A printed copy. I've also contacted his hosting providers legal
>>deptartment, and I will be contacting his local sheriffs office if I'm
>>not satisified with the results of sending a dmca to his hosting
>>provider. I'll keep you posted.
>>
>>
>KOOK!

Kinda' like the AUKtards calling you "an abuser of teh net", innit?

[Lamey]

On Mon, 21 May 2007 20:17:14 -0400, Andy Walker
<awalker@nspank.invalid> wrote:

>Lamey wrote:
>
>>>Yes. I've taken a drive to my lawyers office this morning and turned in
>>>the information I have on Christopher as well as a copy of the site url.
>>>A printed copy. I've also contacted his hosting providers legal
>>>deptartment, and I will be contacting his local sheriffs office if I'm
>>>not satisified with the results of sending a dmca to his hosting
>>>provider. I'll keep you posted.
>>>
>>>
>>KOOK!
>
>Kinda' like the AUKtards calling you "an abuser of teh net", innit?

Kinda

--
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
http://blu05.port5.com
AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07
#20 Usenet *******
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
< we all know how well that works...LOL >
Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Oh fer ****sakes. Welcome to my killfile you annoying little gnat.

<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>

[Dustin Cook]

teandson@hotmail.com (Lamey) wrote in news:465a3523.5676765@news.alt.net:

> On Mon, 21 May 2007 20:46:29 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>James Morrow <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in
>>news:MPG.20baad071dc03fb7989697@extreme.x-privat.org:
>>
>>> In article <Xns9936A69B751E4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
>>> spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com says...
>>>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
>>>> news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>> > So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals?
>>>> > Get real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
>>>> > photoshopped.
>>>>
>>>> You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server.
>>>> Further, you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit
>>>> beastiliality; which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic
>>>> content, violating on my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3
>>>> for 3.
>>>>
>>>
>>> For openers here we have copyright infringement, libel and defamation
>>> of character. Wow. We are moving up in the world. One good tort
>>> deserves another. Would an allegation of bestiality be likelyy to
>>> expose one to public ridicule and censure? It would appear so. Thus
it
>>> is actionable as a tort. This could be really interesting.
>>
>>Yes. I've taken a drive to my lawyers office this morning and turned in
>>the information I have on Christopher as well as a copy of the site
url.
>>A printed copy. I've also contacted his hosting providers legal
>>deptartment, and I will be contacting his local sheriffs office if I'm
>>not satisified with the results of sending a dmca to his hosting
>>provider. I'll keep you posted.
>>
>>
> KOOK!
>

Ahh, Lamey; congratulations, your getting a response from me. The only
one I'll be providing you. It's two words. Could you guess what they
might be without me having to spell it out for you? *grin*


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml