In article <Xns9936A69B751E4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com says...
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> > So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get
> > real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
> > photoshopped.
>
> You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server. Further,
> you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit beastiliality;
> which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic content, violating on
> my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3 for 3.
>

For openers here we have copyright infringement, libel and defamation
of character. Wow. We are moving up in the world. One good tort
deserves another. Would an allegation of bestiality be likelyy to
expose one to public ridicule and censure? It would appear so. Thus it
is actionable as a tort. This could be really interesting.

--
James E. Morrow
Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com