BugHunter Sig update 05.15.2007

[joe black]

"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179553369.323115.263570@n59g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>
> Well known bull**** merchant and award
> winning net.lo0n kook, Dustbin Cook makes
> more legal threats and takedown demands.
>
Whatever. Butts is wrong about the law. Beastiality is illegal in many
states, probably all of them if you dig hard enough through arcane laws. I
doubt, however, photoshopping someone's face on a horse's cock would be
considered beastiality. It would be considered just another day at the
Butts' homestead.

[H. L. Harmon, Esq.]

joe black wrote:
> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1179553369.323115.263570@n59g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>> Well known bull**** merchant and award
>> winning net.lo0n kook, Dustbin Cook makes
>> more legal threats and takedown demands.
>>
> Whatever. Butts is wrong about the law. Beastiality is illegal in many
> states, probably all of them if you dig hard enough through arcane laws. I
> doubt, however, photoshopping someone's face on a horse's cock would be
> considered beastiality. It would be considered just another day at the
> Butts' homestead.
>
>

Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
18 concerning the minor using the internet.

_By means of the World Wide Web_
"The term “by means of the World Wide Web” means by placement of
material in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly
accessible, over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any
successor protocol. "

_Intentional violations_
"In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
$50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
violation shall constitute a separate violation."

_Material that is harmful to minors_
"The term “material that is harmful to minors” means any communication,
picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or
other matter of any kind that is obscene or that—

(A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient interest;

(B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive
with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual
contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a
lewd exhibition of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and

(C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
scientific value for minors. "

Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one
section of USC Title 18

[pcbutts1]

So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get real!
There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not photoshopped.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"H. L. Harmon, Esq." <not.relesesd@privacy.org> wrote in message
news:f2n9ah$sd8$1@aioe.org...
> joe black wrote:
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1179553369.323115.263570@n59g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>>> Well known bull**** merchant and award
>>> winning net.lo0n kook, Dustbin Cook makes
>>> more legal threats and takedown demands.
>>>
>> Whatever. Butts is wrong about the law. Beastiality is illegal in many
>> states, probably all of them if you dig hard enough through arcane laws.
>> I doubt, however, photoshopping someone's face on a horse's cock would be
>> considered beastiality. It would be considered just another day at the
>> Butts' homestead.
>
> Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
> requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
> 18 concerning the minor using the internet.
>
> _By means of the World Wide Web_
> "The term “by means of the World Wide Web” means by placement of material
> in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly accessible,
> over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any successor
> protocol. "
>
> _Intentional violations_
> "In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
> violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
> $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
> violation shall constitute a separate violation."
>
> _Material that is harmful to minors_
> "The term “material that is harmful to minors” means any communication,
> picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or other
> matter of any kind that is obscene or that—
>
> (A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
> find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
> designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient interest;
>
> (B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive with
> respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual contact, an
> actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition
> of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and
>
> (C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
> scientific value for minors. "
>
> Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one section
> of USC Title 18

[jovstar58@yahoo.com]

On May 19, 6:35 pm, "pcbutts1" <pcbut...@leythosthestalker.com> wrote:
> So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get real!
> There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not photoshopped.
>
> --
>
> Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine herehttp://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
> The list grows. Leythos the stalkerhttp://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
> H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
> Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell
>
> "H. L. Harmon, Esq." <not.reles...@privacy.org> wrote in messagenews:f2n9ah$sd8$1@aioe.org...
>
>
>
> > joe black wrote:
> >> "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1179553369.323115.263570@n59g2000hsh.google groups.com...
> >>> Well known bull**** merchant and award
> >>> winning net.lo0n kook, Dustbin Cook makes
> >>> more legal threats and takedown demands.
>
> >> Whatever. Butts is wrong about the law. Beastiality is illegal in many
> >> states, probably all of them if you dig hard enough through arcane laws.
> >> I doubt, however, photoshopping someone's face on a horse's cock would be
> >> considered beastiality. It would be considered just another day at the
> >> Butts' homestead.
>
> > Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
> > requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
> > 18 concerning the minor using the internet.
>
> > _By means of the World Wide Web_
> > "The term "by means of the World Wide Web" means by placement of material
> > in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly accessible,
> > over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any successor
> > protocol. "
>
> > _Intentional violations_
> > "In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
> > violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
> > $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
> > violation shall constitute a separate violation."
>
> > _Material that is harmful to minors_
> > "The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any communication,
> > picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or other
> > matter of any kind that is obscene or that-
>
> > (A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
> > find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
> > designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient interest;
>
> > (B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive with
> > respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual contact, an
> > actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition
> > of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and
>
> > (C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
> > scientific value for minors. "
>
> > Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one section
> > of USC Title 18- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

its true you may not be a real man but u r a *****

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:f2o8kr$jlm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> So you are saying that we should start putting clothes on animals? Get
> real! There are no laws broken in that picture and it was not
> photoshopped.

You are illegally hosting my copyrighted picture on your server. Further,
you are using the picture below it to imply that I commit beastiliality;
which I do not. Your illegally hosting pornographic content, violating on
my copyright, AND slandering my name. That's 3 for 3.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:f2m0sr$1k3$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> Email recieved from bug****ter below. I recieved no such phone call. I
> tried to tell you that information you think you have on me is wrong.
> beastiality is not illegal, Showing a horse getting a blow job is not
> illegal. So you admit that that picture is really you? You sure are
> making an effort to get it removed.

Hi Christopher,

I've left another message for you at your JBL, Incorporated listed number
which your domain is registered to. I've also located the information I
need to contact your local sheriff's office if I get no response from
your service provider. I suspect however that I will, as I've emailed
them a copy of the laws they are helping you to violate.

Just in case you were not aware of the laws your violating,

Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
18 concerning the minor using the internet.

_By means of the World Wide Web_
"The term "by means of the World Wide Web" means by placement of
material in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly
accessible, over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any
successor protocol. "

_Intentional violations_
"In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
$50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
violation shall constitute a separate violation."

_Material that is harmful to minors_
"The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any communication,
picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or
other matter of any kind that is obscene or that-

(A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient
interest;

(B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive
with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual
contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a
lewd exhibition of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and

(C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
scientific value for minors. "

Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one
section of USC Title 18



I intend to pursue this matter, as it seems you are intentionally
breaking the law, and the fine is very expensive.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[H. L. Harmon, Esq.]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f2m0sr$1k3$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Email recieved from bug****ter below. I recieved no such phone call. I
>> tried to tell you that information you think you have on me is wrong.
>> beastiality is not illegal, Showing a horse getting a blow job is not
>> illegal. So you admit that that picture is really you? You sure are
>> making an effort to get it removed.
>
> Hi Christopher,
>

< cut >


>
> I intend to pursue this matter, as it seems you are intentionally
> breaking the law, and the fine is very expensive.
>


Well Mr. Cook since you are interested in those quoted sections of USC
Title 18, I will provide you with the text of another section Mr. Butts
is in violation of.


(a) Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or
other matter which—

(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990
of actual sexually explicit conduct; and

(2) is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been
mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or
transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate
or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable
records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.


(b) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to
every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually
explicit conduct—

(1) ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing
such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require
the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as
may be prescribed by regulations;

(2) ascertain any name, other than the performer’s present and correct
name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname,
stage, or professional name; and

(3) record in the records required by subsection (a) the information
required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other
identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation.


(i) Whoever violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more than
5 years, and fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or
both. Whoever violates this section after having been convicted of a
violation punishable under this section shall be imprisoned for any
period of years not more than 10 years but not less than 2 years, and
fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or both.

+++

Mr. Butts makes no hosting/posting notification that he holds the
records required under this section of USC Title 18.

As I previously stated the hosting of pornography is not in itself
illegal but in failing to comply with sections of Title 18, improper
internet hosting of such material is illegal.

In short to host pornography, the host must ascertain the name and age
of the participants in the depictions of any lewd or sexual acts and
must maintain records and must publicly make note of that those records
are being maintained according to the law. The host must ascertain the
age of the viewer of said depictions and must make every effort to block
access to the material from minors viewing it. Those who fail to
perform these, and other requirements, set forth in USC Title 18 are in
violation of the 1998 COPA act. Such violations are actionable both
criminally and civilly.

[pcbutts1]

Is your name Dustin Cook or Dustin Kook? Are you a NG troll? That is why you
are wasting your time.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9936AC13E799CHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f2m0sr$1k3$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Email recieved from bug****ter below. I recieved no such phone call. I
>> tried to tell you that information you think you have on me is wrong.
>> beastiality is not illegal, Showing a horse getting a blow job is not
>> illegal. So you admit that that picture is really you? You sure are
>> making an effort to get it removed.
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I've left another message for you at your JBL, Incorporated listed number
> which your domain is registered to. I've also located the information I
> need to contact your local sheriff's office if I get no response from
> your service provider. I suspect however that I will, as I've emailed
> them a copy of the laws they are helping you to violate.
>
> Just in case you were not aware of the laws your violating,
>
> Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
> requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
> 18 concerning the minor using the internet.
>
> _By means of the World Wide Web_
> "The term "by means of the World Wide Web" means by placement of
> material in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly
> accessible, over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any
> successor protocol. "
>
> _Intentional violations_
> "In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
> violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
> $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
> violation shall constitute a separate violation."
>
> _Material that is harmful to minors_
> "The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any communication,
> picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or
> other matter of any kind that is obscene or that-
>
> (A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
> find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
> designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient
> interest;
>
> (B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive
> with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual
> contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a
> lewd exhibition of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and
>
> (C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
> scientific value for minors. "
>
> Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one
> section of USC Title 18
>
>
>
> I intend to pursue this matter, as it seems you are intentionally
> breaking the law, and the fine is very expensive.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>

[pcbutts1]

I've been here all day, no phone call from you. You have the wrong number
fool.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9936AC13E799CHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:f2m0sr$1k3$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Email recieved from bug****ter below. I recieved no such phone call. I
>> tried to tell you that information you think you have on me is wrong.
>> beastiality is not illegal, Showing a horse getting a blow job is not
>> illegal. So you admit that that picture is really you? You sure are
>> making an effort to get it removed.
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I've left another message for you at your JBL, Incorporated listed number
> which your domain is registered to. I've also located the information I
> need to contact your local sheriff's office if I get no response from
> your service provider. I suspect however that I will, as I've emailed
> them a copy of the laws they are helping you to violate.
>
> Just in case you were not aware of the laws your violating,
>
> Pornography in itself is not illegal. However there are legal
> requirements of an internet host that must be complied with in USC Title
> 18 concerning the minor using the internet.
>
> _By means of the World Wide Web_
> "The term "by means of the World Wide Web" means by placement of
> material in a computer server-based file archive so that it is publicly
> accessible, over the Internet, using hypertext transfer protocol or any
> successor protocol. "
>
> _Intentional violations_
> "In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally
> violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than
> $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of
> violation shall constitute a separate violation."
>
> _Material that is harmful to minors_
> "The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any communication,
> picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or
> other matter of any kind that is obscene or that-
>
> (A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would
> find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is
> designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient
> interest;
>
> (B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive
> with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual
> contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a
> lewd exhibition of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and
>
> (C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
> scientific value for minors. "
>
> Butts' hosting violates the above and the above is is part of one
> section of USC Title 18
>
>
>
> I intend to pursue this matter, as it seems you are intentionally
> breaking the law, and the fine is very expensive.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>

[pcbutts1]

You don't know the law very well or my website.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"H. L. Harmon, Esq." <not.relesesd@privacy.org> wrote in message
news:f2qf3i$gng$1@aioe.org...
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
>> news:f2m0sr$1k3$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>> Email recieved from bug****ter below. I recieved no such phone call. I
>>> tried to tell you that information you think you have on me is wrong.
>>> beastiality is not illegal, Showing a horse getting a blow job is not
>>> illegal. So you admit that that picture is really you? You sure are
>>> making an effort to get it removed.
>>
>> Hi Christopher,
>>
>
> < cut >
>
>
>>
>> I intend to pursue this matter, as it seems you are intentionally
>> breaking the law, and the fine is very expensive.
>>
>
>
> Well Mr. Cook since you are interested in those quoted sections of USC
> Title 18, I will provide you with the text of another section Mr. Butts is
> in violation of.
>
>
> (a) Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or
> other matter which—
>
> (1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of
> actual sexually explicit conduct; and
>
> (2) is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed
> or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported
> or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign
> commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records
> pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
>
>
> (b) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to every
> performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit
> conduct—
>
> (1) ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing
> such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require the
> performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be
> prescribed by regulations;
>
> (2) ascertain any name, other than the performer’s present and correct
> name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname,
> stage, or professional name; and
>
> (3) record in the records required by subsection (a) the information
> required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other
> identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation.
>
>
> (i) Whoever violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more than 5
> years, and fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or both.
> Whoever violates this section after having been convicted of a violation
> punishable under this section shall be imprisoned for any period of years
> not more than 10 years but not less than 2 years, and fined in accordance
> with the provisions of this title, or both.
>
> +++
>
> Mr. Butts makes no hosting/posting notification that he holds the records
> required under this section of USC Title 18.
>
> As I previously stated the hosting of pornography is not in itself illegal
> but in failing to comply with sections of Title 18, improper internet
> hosting of such material is illegal.
>
> In short to host pornography, the host must ascertain the name and age of
> the participants in the depictions of any lewd or sexual acts and must
> maintain records and must publicly make note of that those records are
> being maintained according to the law. The host must ascertain the age of
> the viewer of said depictions and must make every effort to block access
> to the material from minors viewing it. Those who fail to perform these,
> and other requirements, set forth in USC Title 18 are in violation of the
> 1998 COPA act. Such violations are actionable both criminally and
> civilly.
>
>