BugHunter Signature Update 05.08.2007

[kurt wismer]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:f2epne$3sv$1@registered.motzarella.org:
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> This is NOT malware. It is classified as a "Potentially Unwanted
>>> Program"
>> also known as greyware... probably something dustin should consider
>> moving away from using in bughunter in future...
>>
>
> I wouldn't classify that program specifically as greyware. See here:

you may not classify it that way, but someone else already has...

potentially unwanted program == greyware...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"

[4Q]

Lord Bug**** wrote:
> 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
>

<snip>


> > Maybe you need to learn to read before
> > you step on your dick again, Lord Bug****
> >
> > "Bug****" is #1 on www.msn.com
> > "Bug****" is #1 on search.yahoo.com
> > "Bug****" is #1 on altavista.com
>
> "Bug****" isn't "BugHunter", 4Q. Who's dancing?
>

When people refer to a generic vacuum
cleaner they say "A Hoover". You don't
have to thank me for naming your generic
Hooveroid "Bug****" ;]]


<snip crap of Dustbin crying about not
being able to escape his maliciousness>




MD5
===

> >
> > "(not his own)" you ****in idiot MD5
> > is(was) the industry standard for
> > checksumming files and producing a oneway
> > hash developed by world renowned
> > crypto-scientist Ron Rivest (Hash clash
> > discovered by Chinese crypto-researcher
> > in 2004)
>
> And why don't you tell everyone about a collision hash with md5?
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/23/0618252
>
> Nevermind, they can click the link.
>

Slowhead what have I told you about
letting your head catch up with your
typing fingers, ey?


Read what I wrote with a bit more
care this time.

"is(was)" <-- see that '(was)' bit tagged
onto the 'is' then skip forward a few
words where some more words are enclosed
inside brackets ().
"(Hash clash discovered by Chinese
crypto-researcher in 2004)"

*waits a few hours for Dustbin to
let a couple of sentences sink in* Okay
now that you've had chance to re-read
at your normal thinking speed you will
see that I've answered your question
regarding the MD5 being broken
*hint*
by the Chinese crypto-researcher in 2004.




> > You need
> > to re-read what Kadaitcha Man had to
> > say about your scriddle skrit code
> > http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
>
>
> Kadaitchman got his ass handed to him trying to correct my code.
> Remember? I posted working code, his corrections resulted in non
> functional code. He backpeddled ever since. He did so poorly, his code
> wouldn't compile if you tried; And I didn't have to try to know this,
> despite his backpeddling claim saying otherwise.
>
> Your going to need more reliable witnesses on your side, He's a chump.
>

*whoosh* Right over your head. KM kicked
you around Usenet groups for fun! Who
gives a **** if a couple of ASIC ****e
lines didn't compile, the object of the
exercise was to kick you around like a
old floor cloth. I kept stumm about the
"Assembler" even though every ****ing
book on ASM I've got says "Assembler"
(even Borland and Microsoft call it
"Assembler" programming) because it was
funny as **** when KMan described your
crap as a "polished turd" a lovely
burnished bronze colored polished turd,
but a turd non the less! *HAHAHHAHAHA*

That my friend is what will stick in
peoples mind, the humor, not the accuracy
of some of 16bit DOS code semantics.

And just so people can have another laugh
I'll re-post the link and throw this
message out to a few of your fav. groups.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.o...e761e4f305991c


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk

[Dustin Cook]

kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:f2j2ln$nh1$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:f2epne$3sv$1@registered.motzarella.org:
>>
>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> This is NOT malware. It is classified as a "Potentially Unwanted
>>>> Program"
>>> also known as greyware... probably something dustin should consider
>>> moving away from using in bughunter in future...
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't classify that program specifically as greyware. See here:
>
> you may not classify it that way, but someone else already has...
>
> potentially unwanted program == greyware...
>

Well, sadly that is a decision they can make if they so choose. In
fairness, I'd expect them to detect the various utilities published by
sysinternals as well. While we're detecting greyware to further inflate
actual detection numbers, lets go ahead and add detection for format.com
and fdisk as well; as those are certainly capable of maliciousness.
Especially the system builder versions. heh.

Yes, Kurt, I was just being very sarcastic. I understand your point, and
I'm sure you understand mine.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml