Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

  1. #1
    yh7t78@yahoo.com Guest

    Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    I posted a message to 7 groups initially on April 10 detailing my
    experiences with privacy.li and how they scammed me. I'm not 100%
    confident that this message is strictly on-topic in all of these
    groups, but I'm trying my best. They were all suggested as privacy
    related groups by Google Groups. I'm not trying to spam anyone. I post
    relatively infrequently, so I don't think this should be a burden to
    anyone.

    There have been some developments since my last post. I was ready to
    drop this whole thing until the guys at privacy.li started showing
    their true colors.

    First of all, they posted my personal information (or at least what
    they thought was my information) on alt.privacy and alt.privacy.anon-
    server. They posted what they thought was my IP address (turned out to
    actually be a Tor exit node) and other information. The link to this
    is http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...73504778872530
    using Google Groups.

    The point of all this is that this is an anonymity/privacy service
    that has no reservations about releasing personal info about their
    customers. To those who don't understand how a proxy service works, in
    essence, the proxy service becomes your surrogate ISP. The sites you
    visit don't know who you are but a proxy service like privacy.li knows
    exactly who you are and what websites you visit, etc.

    They've proven they have no hesitation whatsoever in releasing this
    private data. The point is, I was cautious in dealing with them, and
    it paid off. If you sign up with them, you may just be putting your
    livelihood (or even your life) in their hands. Don't take this
    lightly. They've proven how untrustworthy and dishonest (and even
    stupid) they are.

    The post from the privacy.li admin serves a dual purpose. It not only
    shows the character of these people but it shows that I'm not just
    making this stuff up. They've, in essence, verified all the details
    I've posted as accurate.

    This is just the first part of the story. The second part also has to
    do with the character of the people at privacy.li. I've posted all of
    the details on the TrueCrypt forums ( http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?t=5893
    ) and on the Wilders Security forums ( http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=994124
    ). The details are in my 2 posts dated today (April 30, 2007). I just
    don't want to repost all the details here. It has to do with how the
    guys at privacy.li submitted my e-mail address to numerous scam/spam
    sites and about the e-mails I've received due to their actions. I'm
    sure they had no way of knowing this, but I can show fairly
    conclusively that it was them and only them who could have submitted
    my e-mail address to those sites. And the dates of those scam e-mails
    correspond very well with the date I first posted on usenet (April 10,
    2007). Read the forums for the details.

    I will also update my website ( http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/
    ) to reflect this new information right after I finish this post. Keep
    in mind that this is free web hosting, so I cannot control any
    problems that may occur after visiting the site. I don't think there's
    anything wrong with the site or any malware. I'm fairly technically
    savvy, and I haven't experienced any problems. If you have any
    reservations about it, just read the TrueCrypt and Wilders Security
    forums. It's the same information (although I would like to boost
    traffic to my site to help spread the word).

    Thanks for reading. I hope it's clear that I'm being honest in my
    posts, and I have nothing to gain by this except for spreading the
    word, and helping people avoid the problems I've experienced.

    Beware


  2. #2
    yh7t78@yahoo.com Guest

    Re: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    Addendum: My website http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/ has been
    removed for whatever reason. I won't bother to rebuild it, but I will
    still provide updates as new developments occur.

    Thanks for reading.

    yh7t78@yahoo.com wrote:
    > I posted a message to 7 groups initially on April 10 detailing my
    > experiences with privacy.li and how they scammed me. I'm not 100%
    > confident that this message is strictly on-topic in all of these
    > groups, but I'm trying my best. They were all suggested as privacy
    > related groups by Google Groups. I'm not trying to spam anyone. I post
    > relatively infrequently, so I don't think this should be a burden to
    > anyone.
    >
    > There have been some developments since my last post. I was ready to
    > drop this whole thing until the guys at privacy.li started showing
    > their true colors.
    >
    > First of all, they posted my personal information (or at least what
    > they thought was my information) on alt.privacy and alt.privacy.anon-
    > server. They posted what they thought was my IP address (turned out to
    > actually be a Tor exit node) and other information. The link to this
    > is http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...73504778872530
    > using Google Groups.
    >
    > The point of all this is that this is an anonymity/privacy service
    > that has no reservations about releasing personal info about their
    > customers. To those who don't understand how a proxy service works, in
    > essence, the proxy service becomes your surrogate ISP. The sites you
    > visit don't know who you are but a proxy service like privacy.li knows
    > exactly who you are and what websites you visit, etc.
    >
    > They've proven they have no hesitation whatsoever in releasing this
    > private data. The point is, I was cautious in dealing with them, and
    > it paid off. If you sign up with them, you may just be putting your
    > livelihood (or even your life) in their hands. Don't take this
    > lightly. They've proven how untrustworthy and dishonest (and even
    > stupid) they are.
    >
    > The post from the privacy.li admin serves a dual purpose. It not only
    > shows the character of these people but it shows that I'm not just
    > making this stuff up. They've, in essence, verified all the details
    > I've posted as accurate.
    >
    > This is just the first part of the story. The second part also has to
    > do with the character of the people at privacy.li. I've posted all of
    > the details on the TrueCrypt forums ( http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?t=5893
    > ) and on the Wilders Security forums ( http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=994124
    > ). The details are in my 2 posts dated today (April 30, 2007). I just
    > don't want to repost all the details here. It has to do with how the
    > guys at privacy.li submitted my e-mail address to numerous scam/spam
    > sites and about the e-mails I've received due to their actions. I'm
    > sure they had no way of knowing this, but I can show fairly
    > conclusively that it was them and only them who could have submitted
    > my e-mail address to those sites. And the dates of those scam e-mails
    > correspond very well with the date I first posted on usenet (April 10,
    > 2007). Read the forums for the details.
    >
    > I will also update my website ( http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/
    > ) to reflect this new information right after I finish this post. Keep
    > in mind that this is free web hosting, so I cannot control any
    > problems that may occur after visiting the site. I don't think there's
    > anything wrong with the site or any malware. I'm fairly technically
    > savvy, and I haven't experienced any problems. If you have any
    > reservations about it, just read the TrueCrypt and Wilders Security
    > forums. It's the same information (although I would like to boost
    > traffic to my site to help spread the word).
    >
    > Thanks for reading. I hope it's clear that I'm being honest in my
    > posts, and I have nothing to gain by this except for spreading the
    > word, and helping people avoid the problems I've experienced.
    >
    > Beware



  3. #3
    Leythos Guest

    Re: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:36:55 -0700, yh7t78 wrote:

    > Addendum: My website http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/ has been
    > removed for whatever reason. I won't bother to rebuild it, but I will
    > still provide updates as new developments occur.


    Don't use a FREE webhost and I don't think anyone is really reading your
    post about this.


    --
    Leythos
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
    spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

  4. #4
    macarro Guest

    Re: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    Leythos wrote:
    > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:36:55 -0700, yh7t78 wrote:
    >
    >> Addendum: My website http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/ has been
    >> removed for whatever reason. I won't bother to rebuild it, but I will
    >> still provide updates as new developments occur.

    >
    > Don't use a FREE webhost and I don't think anyone is really reading your
    > post about this.
    >
    >
    >


    I am, and you surely are reading it too since you reply.

    I see no problem about anyone using a free webhost for a non commercial
    purposes.


    --

    Customized News: http://news.spotback.com

  5. #5
    Leythos Guest

    Re: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:42:40 +0100, macarro wrote:

    > Leythos wrote:
    >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:36:55 -0700, yh7t78 wrote:
    >>
    >>> Addendum: My website http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/ has been
    >>> removed for whatever reason. I won't bother to rebuild it, but I will
    >>> still provide updates as new developments occur.

    >>
    >> Don't use a FREE webhost and I don't think anyone is really reading your
    >> post about this.
    >>

    >
    > I am, and you surely are reading it too since you reply.


    Nope, I stopped after the first rant started.

    > I see no problem about anyone using a free webhost for a non commercial
    > purposes.


    The reason is that they can take your pages down anytime THEY want - the
    comment was meant to get him on a site that HE controls so he could keep
    his message online.
    --
    Leythos
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
    spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

  6. #6
    Ari Guest

    Re: Scamster site, privacy.li (update)

    On 30 Apr 2007 05:10:34 -0700, yh7t78@yahoo.com wrote:

    > I posted a message to 7 groups initially on April 10 detailing my
    > experiences with privacy.li and how they scammed me. I'm not 100%
    > confident that this message is strictly on-topic in all of these
    > groups, but I'm trying my best. They were all suggested as privacy
    > related groups by Google Groups. I'm not trying to spam anyone. I post
    > relatively infrequently, so I don't think this should be a burden to
    > anyone.
    >
    > There have been some developments since my last post. I was ready to
    > drop this whole thing until the guys at privacy.li started showing
    > their true colors.
    >
    > First of all, they posted my personal information (or at least what
    > they thought was my information) on alt.privacy and alt.privacy.anon-
    > server. They posted what they thought was my IP address (turned out to
    > actually be a Tor exit node) and other information. The link to this
    > is http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...73504778872530
    > using Google Groups.
    >
    > The point of all this is that this is an anonymity/privacy service
    > that has no reservations about releasing personal info about their
    > customers. To those who don't understand how a proxy service works, in
    > essence, the proxy service becomes your surrogate ISP. The sites you
    > visit don't know who you are but a proxy service like privacy.li knows
    > exactly who you are and what websites you visit, etc.
    >
    > They've proven they have no hesitation whatsoever in releasing this
    > private data. The point is, I was cautious in dealing with them, and
    > it paid off. If you sign up with them, you may just be putting your
    > livelihood (or even your life) in their hands. Don't take this
    > lightly. They've proven how untrustworthy and dishonest (and even
    > stupid) they are.
    >
    > The post from the privacy.li admin serves a dual purpose. It not only
    > shows the character of these people but it shows that I'm not just
    > making this stuff up. They've, in essence, verified all the details
    > I've posted as accurate.
    >
    > This is just the first part of the story. The second part also has to
    > do with the character of the people at privacy.li. I've posted all of
    > the details on the TrueCrypt forums ( http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?t=5893
    > ) and on the Wilders Security forums ( http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=994124
    > ). The details are in my 2 posts dated today (April 30, 2007). I just
    > don't want to repost all the details here. It has to do with how the
    > guys at privacy.li submitted my e-mail address to numerous scam/spam
    > sites and about the e-mails I've received due to their actions. I'm
    > sure they had no way of knowing this, but I can show fairly
    > conclusively that it was them and only them who could have submitted
    > my e-mail address to those sites. And the dates of those scam e-mails
    > correspond very well with the date I first posted on usenet (April 10,
    > 2007). Read the forums for the details.
    >
    > I will also update my website ( http://screwprivacy.li.freewebspace.com/
    > ) to reflect this new information right after I finish this post. Keep
    > in mind that this is free web hosting, so I cannot control any
    > problems that may occur after visiting the site. I don't think there's
    > anything wrong with the site or any malware. I'm fairly technically
    > savvy, and I haven't experienced any problems. If you have any
    > reservations about it, just read the TrueCrypt and Wilders Security
    > forums. It's the same information (although I would like to boost
    > traffic to my site to help spread the word).
    >
    > Thanks for reading. I hope it's clear that I'm being honest in my
    > posts, and I have nothing to gain by this except for spreading the
    > word, and helping people avoid the problems I've experienced.
    >
    > Beware


    lol

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •