Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> Thou head louse. Thou pottle-deep,
beggarly common recreation. Ye puled:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s6t9o.ahm.17.1@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> Thou droning revolted tapster.
>> Thou puking beastly knave. Ye frothed:
>>
>>> "Lionel" <usenet@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f0a1kl$b6b$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:52:31 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou halfwit. Thou is open to
>>>>> incontinency. Ye irrupted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:15:04 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou piss stain. Why thou art a
>>>>>>> man of wax. Ye perorated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Way to go Rhodenta! - You sure did a great job of demonstrating
>>>>>>>> those lofty ethical standards of yours that you've spent so
>>>>>>>> much time lecturing us about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <twirls finger in air>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is difficult to offer agreement without being seen to be
>>>>>>> doing a victory dance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The way I see it, disqualifying myself from nominating her for
>>>>>> awards or voting for her is a big enough sop to satisfy my
>>>>>> oh-so-abysmal ethical standards, so I don't see any reason not to
>>>>>> slap "Pretty Vacant" onto the stereo, turn it up to 11, & start
>>>>>> pogoing on her empty head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nevertheless I agree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As do ~98% of the AUK posters who've expressed an opinion
>>>>>> regarding Queen Rhodenta's charming behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Charming to the point where "Respondant" even spoke out. It all
>>>>> adds up to anwful lot of alienation merely to prove charges of
>>>>> outright hypocrisy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I loved this bit:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Of course, that will require quite a bit of additional
>>>>> disclosure, but you're the one who's pushing, and obviously,
>>>>> you've been told an incomplete story."
>>>>> news:58nq8nF2ghh21U1@mid.individual.net
>>>>>
>>>>> The obvious implication is that I was feeding you information in
>>>>> private.
>>>>
>>>> Of course. Anyone who emails private dirt around as much as she
>>>> does will inevitably assume that everyone else uses the same
>>>> tactics.
>>>
>>> Actually, I don't do a whole lot of emailing or chatting. And the
>>> "private dirt" was mostly public dirt until I posted about the
>>> police at my door, i.e., the post Mike made early on was almost
>>> entirely about incidents that were previously posted, most
>>> especially the incident in the elevator and the public groping.
>>
>> Round and round you go... ever the victim.
>>
>> That that was already dispensed with is a matter of record.
>
> Dispensed with?
>
>>> Nonetheless, I can't think of a whole lot else I've disclosed
>>> privately to anyone that hasn't been posted here.
>>
>> How convenient.
>
> Well, at least you know what I've<*****SLAP>
oh hum
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top *******s on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een rectaal geneukte lelijke zweetanus.
Reply With Quote