On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Andy Walker <awalker@nspank.invalid> wrote:
>Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
>>But isn't Google the world's leading search engine? Why,
>>or how, would they allow malicious commercial spammers to take advantage
>>of them?
>
>They get paid lots of money... IMHO Google=Greed
>
>> I'm not the reviled eelbash, but I'm probably ignorant enough about the
>>subject matter on Internet spam, to qualify as a "troll" in the watchful eyes
>>of Internet experts.
>
>That much is certain.
>
>Well *that* and you're anonymous proxy makes you look really fat.
>
>> I am just sick of the spam. If there is nothing that
>>can be done about it, then I suppose that is that. Please say it isn't so.
>
>You can always killfile google, which pretty much echoes my sentiments
>towards webtv and aol.
>
>> I've never heard of botnets before, so I searched that term inclusive of
>>usenet AND spam AND google AND groups, which returns some interesting results.
>
>Hahaha, that's pretty lame of you. Statistics don't lie; 99.9999% of
>all spam is attributable to zombies, and the remainder is sold in a
>can.
>
>> I read that the "24hoursupport.helpdesk" and "alt.internet.search-engines"
>>groups might be of help on this, so I've added them to this reply.
>>
>>Paranoid
>
>I highly doubt your judgement in this matter.

Your spelling of judg-e-ment is so noted.

How about some answers?