BugHunter Signature Update 04.02.07-04.08.07

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
>>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>>
>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
>> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
>> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
>> either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
>> give a ****.
>
> You brought it up.
>
> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.

Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my mother or
something. I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually brought
the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you want to admit
it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.

Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.

> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?

Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said the
first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you look.

Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more enemies
than you have friends. And according to the post from kman, he's finally
begun to see you as I do.

You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't revolve
around usenet.

> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
> me.

Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the topic
of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread and the OP?
It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.


> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.

Cry me a river.

> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.

You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse added to
more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want people to listen
to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was rhetorical too.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2a
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
>>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
>>>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>>>
>>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
>>> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
>>> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
>>> either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
>>> give a ****.
>>
>> You brought it up.
>>
>> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
>
> Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my mother
> or something. I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
> brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
> want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.

So are a lot of people.

He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.

You did, you clueless ****stain.

> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.

4Q didn't mention me.

There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.

>> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
>
> Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said the
> first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you look.

You're a ****ing idiot.

> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
> he's finally begun to see you as I do.

You'd best not push this.

> You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't revolve
> around usenet.

Then prove it.

Don't be an *******.

>> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
>> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
>> me.
>
> Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
> topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
> and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.

I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.

>> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
>
> Cry me a river.

I'll flame you hairless, *******.

>> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
>
> You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
> added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
> people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
> rhetorical too.

You seem to have me confused with someone else.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer

[4Q]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
> > @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> >
> >> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
> >>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
> >>>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
> >>> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
> >>> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
> >>> either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
> >>> give a ****.
> >>
> >> You brought it up.
> >>
> >> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
> >
> > Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my mother
> > or something.

*lookout* The old boot will be popping
into Usenet again to defend her retarded
son.


> I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
> > brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
> > want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.
>
> So are a lot of people.
>
> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>
> You did, you clueless ****stain.
>

Yep

> > Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>
> 4Q didn't mention me.
>

Nope

> There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
> weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.
>
> >> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
> >

Yep


> > Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said the
> > first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you look.
>
> You're a ****ing idiot.
>

Yep++

> > Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
> > enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
> > he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>

Nope

> You'd best not push this.
>
> > You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't revolve
> > around usenet.
>
> Then prove it.
>

He can't see the wood for the trees

> Don't be an *******.
>

Not possible


> >> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
> >> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
> >> me.
> >
> > Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
> > topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
> > and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.
>
> I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.
>

AUK is *erm* AUK?


> >> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
> >
> > Cry me a river.
>
> I'll flame you hairless, *******.
>

*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!* pissed myself laughing



> >> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
> >
> > You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
> > added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
> > people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
> > rhetorical too.
>
> You seem to have me confused with someone else.
>

He does that kind of thing.

Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
like to be beaten or humiliated by a
woman (only his Mom).


4Q

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177001600.539018.249480@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
>> message news:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
>>>>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
>>>>>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
>>>>> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
>>>>> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't
>>>>> care either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I
>>>>> don't give a ****.
>>>>
>>>> You brought it up.
>>>>
>>>> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
>>>
>>> Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my
>>> mother or something.
>
> *lookout* The old boot will be popping
> into Usenet again to defend her retarded
> son.

Oh God. Not that again.

"It wasn't me. My mother did it."

>> I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
>>> brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
>>> want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.
>>
>> So are a lot of people.
>>
>> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>>
>> You did, you clueless ****stain.
>>
>
> Yep
>
>>> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>>
>> 4Q didn't mention me.
>>
>
> Nope

You're a keeper, 4Q.

>> There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
>> weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.
>>
>>>> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
>>>
>
> Yep

Apparently so.

>>> Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said
>>> the first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you
>>> look.
>>
>> You're a ****ing idiot.
>>
>
> Yep++

No doubt at all.

>>> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
>>> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
>>> he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>>
>
> Nope

Well, he's right about the post. Rick crossposted to acv, aps and, I
think, aca-v to cry to Dustin. It was just...stunning.

"Waaaaa! She's doing to me what she did to you, Dustin."

*boggle*

>> You'd best not push this.
>>
>>> You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't
>>> revolve around usenet.
>>
>> Then prove it.
>>
>
> He can't see the wood for the trees
>
>> Don't be an *******.
>>
>
> Not possible

Apparently so. Are we aware if, in addition to being stupid, he is also
a masochist?

>>>> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
>>>> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to
>>>> be me.
>>>
>>> Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
>>> topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
>>> and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.
>>
>> I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.
>>
>
> AUK is *erm* AUK?

The weird claims are flying this morning, believe you me.

I'll tell ya, if he tried just a little harder, he might be mistaken for
a kookologist.

>>>> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
>>>
>>> Cry me a river.
>>
>> I'll flame you hairless, *******.
>>
>
> *HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!* pissed myself laughing

You would think he'd've learned the first time or even the second.

>>>> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
>>>
>>> You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
>>> added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
>>> people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
>>> rhetorical too.
>>
>> You seem to have me confused with someone else.
>>
>
> He does that kind of thing.
>
> Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
> like to be beaten or humiliated by a
> woman (only his Mom).

This would explain the lack of girlfriend, because the lowliest of women
could beat him in 30 seconds flat.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer

[miguel]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:06:20 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
<rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:

>"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1177001600.539018.249480@e65g2000hsc.googleg roups.com
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>> message news:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
>>>>>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
>>>>>>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
>>>>>> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
>>>>>> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't
>>>>>> care either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I
>>>>>> don't give a ****.
>>>>>
>>>>> You brought it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my
>>>> mother or something.
>>
>> *lookout* The old boot will be popping
>> into Usenet again to defend her retarded
>> son.
>
>Oh God. Not that again.
>
>"It wasn't me. My mother did it."
>
>>> I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
>>>> brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
>>>> want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.
>>>
>>> So are a lot of people.
>>>
>>> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>>>
>>> You did, you clueless ****stain.
>>>
>>
>> Yep
>>
>>>> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>>>
>>> 4Q didn't mention me.
>>>
>>
>> Nope
>
>You're a keeper, 4Q.

Get a rOOM!!11!!!
>
>>> There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
>>> weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.
>>>
>>>>> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
>>>>
>>
>> Yep
>
>Apparently so.
>
>>>> Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said
>>>> the first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you
>>>> look.
>>>
>>> You're a ****ing idiot.
>>>
>>
>> Yep++
>
>No doubt at all.
>
>>>> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
>>>> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
>>>> he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>>>
>>
>> Nope
>
>Well, he's right about the post. Rick crossposted to acv, aps and, I
>think, aca-v to cry to Dustin. It was just...stunning.
>
>"Waaaaa! She's doing to me what she did to you, Dustin."
>
>*boggle*
>
>>> You'd best not push this.
>>>
>>>> You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't
>>>> revolve around usenet.
>>>
>>> Then prove it.
>>>
>>
>> He can't see the wood for the trees
>>
>>> Don't be an *******.
>>>
>>
>> Not possible
>
>Apparently so. Are we aware if, in addition to being stupid, he is also
>a masochist?
>
>>>>> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
>>>>> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to
>>>>> be me.
>>>>
>>>> Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
>>>> topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
>>>> and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.
>>>
>>> I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.
>>>
>>
>> AUK is *erm* AUK?
>
>The weird claims are flying this morning, believe you me.
>
>I'll tell ya, if he tried just a little harder, he might be mistaken for
>a kookologist.
>
>>>>> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
>>>>
>>>> Cry me a river.
>>>
>>> I'll flame you hairless, *******.
>>>
>>
>> *HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!* pissed myself laughing
>
>You would think he'd've learned the first time or even the second.
>
>>>>> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
>>>>
>>>> You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
>>>> added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
>>>> people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
>>>> rhetorical too.
>>>
>>> You seem to have me confused with someone else.
>>>
>>
>> He does that kind of thing.
>>
>> Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
>> like to be beaten or humiliated by a
>> woman (only his Mom).
>
>This would explain the lack of girlfriend, because the lowliest of women
>could beat him in 30 seconds flat.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"miguel" <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:sudf2350moojcssssqkh52no7lmtah4or1@4ax.com
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:06:20 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1177001600.539018.249480@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>>> message news:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all
>>>>>>>> the other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy
>>>>>>> isn't something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you,
>>>>>>> I have nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I
>>>>>>> really don't care either way whether you and he are friends
>>>>>>> enemies or what. I don't give a ****.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You brought it up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my
>>>>> mother or something.
>>>
>>> *lookout* The old boot will be popping
>>> into Usenet again to defend her retarded
>>> son.
>>
>> Oh God. Not that again.
>>
>> "It wasn't me. My mother did it."
>>
>>>> I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
>>>>> brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
>>>>> want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.
>>>>
>>>> So are a lot of people.
>>>>
>>>> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>>>>
>>>> You did, you clueless ****stain.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep
>>>
>>>>> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>>>>
>>>> 4Q didn't mention me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope
>>
>> You're a keeper, 4Q.
>
> Get a rOOM!!11!!!

<wags finger> Go to your room!

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer

[Kadaitcha Man]

Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> Thou cur. Thou bald, putrid
puppy-headed monster. Ye gabbled:

> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1177001600.539018.249480@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com

>>>> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
>>>> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
>>>> he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>>>
>>
>> Nope
>
> Well, he's right about the post. Rick crossposted to acv, aps and, I
> think, aca-v to cry to Dustin. It was just...stunning.
>
> "Waaaaa! She's doing to me what she did to you, Dustin."
>
> *boggle*

[^] Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:06:20 -0400

news:58pkv6F2hrmk3U1@mid.individual.net
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:38:25 -0400

> Rick made you do it.

Keep bringing him into it, and I will continue to feel the need to stand
up to it.

You utterly hypocritical ****head.

Of course, Dustin did it first, yeh. Or should that be, "Dustin made me do
it!"?

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top *******s on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

Ik vind jou een uit de gaskamer ontsnapte homopathische zeekreeft.

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f0768f$piu$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> So are a lot of people.

Doesn't matter, really. AUK was a general meaning, and you are one of
them. Why do you even care what I posted?

> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>
> You did, you clueless ****stain.

You've already lost the debate if you have to resort to petty/childish
name calling.

>> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>
> 4Q didn't mention me.
>
> There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
> weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.

You have a serious personality problem Rhonda. I didn't say either of you
were doing anything towards myself. If you took what I said to mean
anything different, You need to see a counselor; and fast.

>>> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
>>
>> Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said the
>> first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you look.
>
> You're a ****ing idiot.

Another petty name calling based insult. 2 for 2.

>> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
>> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
>> he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>
> You'd best not push this.

Another idle/harmless/worthless threat.

>> You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't revolve
>> around usenet.
>
> Then prove it.
>
> Don't be an *******.

Prove you can't hurt me? LoL, BugHunter already has.

>>> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
>>> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
>>> me.
>>
>> Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
>> topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
>> and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.
>
> I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.

Hmm, for the record, I tried explaining that very concept regarding
myself and HHI. You wouldn't accept it. You cannot use my logic to defend
you if you wouldn't accept it the first time around. You shouldn't play
people for idiots, not everyone is.

>>> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
>>
>> Cry me a river.
>
> I'll flame you hairless, *******.

*yawn*. I have been flamed by people far more interesting than yourself.
The only thing you can do, is call me names, whine and cry, and "flame"
me on usenet. Hardly anything that matters in real life. What it does
show is how immature you really are. They are getting to see the real
Rhonda. The one I suspected you were. *haha*

You've done your best to attack my character, but you have fallen way
short of your intended goal. Flame on, if you must, you mean nothing to
me. And you can't hurt me. I have done everything in the world to be
reasonable and have peace between us. Clearly it's not peace and mutual
co-existance you want. I told you from the getgo that your flamewar
against me would wind up biting you in the ass. I wasn't writing that to
threaten you. You shouldn't have taken it to mean as such. I was trying
to tell you in a smartass sort of way that I was already well known
before 4Q brought up his national enquirer style site.


>>> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
>>
>> You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
>> added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
>> people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
>> rhetorical too.
>
> You seem to have me confused with someone else.

Nah. I have the right person. Email can be interesting. *grin*


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

On Apr 19, 1:06 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh God. Not that again.
>
> "It wasn't me. My mother did it."

What an ignorant person you are. Didn't you try to blame me for the
alt.sex post due to the way the word your was used? Hmm. Well, if
you'll re-read the posts that my mom did in fact make, you'll find her
style of writing isn't the same as mine. I know, I know, you don't
care about the facts, but I thought i'd mention it anyway. I find your
ignorance amusing.
> You're a keeper, 4Q.

Your a dumb ****, Rhonda.

> >> There are a lot of people who post in auk, and the two you mentioned
> >> weren't doing a bloody ****ing thing to you.
>
> >>>> Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?
>
> > Yep
>
> Apparently so.

By all means, get yourself an AUK award. I'll sit back and watch you
explode.

> >>> Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said
> >>> the first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you
> >>> look.
>
> >> You're a ****ing idiot.
>
> > Yep++
>
> No doubt at all.

See above. Read slowly this time. You *are* a dumb ****, Rhonda.

> >>> Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more
> >>> enemies than you have friends. And according to the post from kman,
> >>> he's finally begun to see you as I do.
>
> > Nope
>
> Well, he's right about the post. Rick crossposted to acv, aps and, I
> think, aca-v to cry to Dustin. It was just...stunning.

Kman knows the type of person you are, as do many others. you continue
to show us more about your true character and personality with each
flame post you make. You willingly allign yourself with a known
jackass, participate in trolling me with kman, and now, heh, your on
the recieving end and somehow it's my fault he's finally figured your
the dumb **** I said you were? Who the **** do you think your fooling
at this point?

> "Waaaaa! She's doing to me what she did to you, Dustin."

Well, you were trying. I've been following along in the thread. He's
essentially handed your ass to you. Perhaps 4Q can save you.

> *boggle*
>
> >> You'd best not push this.
>
> >>> You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't
> >>> revolve around usenet.
>
> >> Then prove it.
>
> > He can't see the wood for the trees
>
> >> Don't be an *******.
>
> > Not possible
>
> Apparently so. Are we aware if, in addition to being stupid, he is also
> a masochist?

You have serious deep issues rhonda, I think usenet might be doing you
more harm than good. Nobodies out to get you, nobody wishes any
personal harm towards you. Several of us do however think you are in
poor mental health, and in need of a serious visit to a mental
facility.

> >>>> You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
> >>>> irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to
> >>>> be me.
>
> >>> Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the
> >>> topic of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread
> >>> and the OP? It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.
>
> >> I am not auk. Kadaitcha Man is not auk.
>
> > AUK is *erm* AUK?
>
> The weird claims are flying this morning, believe you me.
>
> I'll tell ya, if he tried just a little harder, he might be mistaken for
> a kookologist.

Weren't you at one point friends with them? You made it a point to
bring up my awards offered by them. I wonder if your going to qualify
for any awards this month. Wouldn't that be amusing? How quick you've
caused your own people to turn on you. 4Q is not an asset to you
Rhonda, i hope one day you get the **** out of your eyes and see that
for yourself, while people still talk to you. heh.

> >>>> As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.
>
> >>> Cry me a river.
>
> >> I'll flame you hairless, *******.
>
> > *HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!* pissed myself laughing
>
> You would think he'd've learned the first time or even the second.

Your obvious need to "win" on usenet hasn't gone unnoticed. What your
doing doesn't have any real effect on me. BugHunter is doing well, I'm
doing well, and I'm gaining more supporters on a daily basis; or
haven't you noticed the piss off attitude several people are now
giving you?

You can't play the pity card here anymore, You've shown us what your
deal is. You inserted foot and swallowed as much as you could, just
today infact.

I do thank you for coming clean with everybody tho. You are doing this
for personal reasons, and your goal is imaginary PR damage you think
you can inflict. The only PR damage I see happening is your own. Kman
of all people isn't loyal to you anymore. Just how did you screw up so
badly rhonda?

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

> >>>> I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
>
> >>> You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse
> >>> added to more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want
> >>> people to listen to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was
> >>> rhetorical too.
>
> >> You seem to have me confused with someone else.
>
> > He does that kind of thing.
>
> > Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
> > like to be beaten or humiliated by a
> > woman (only his Mom).
>
> This would explain the lack of girlfriend, because the lowliest of women
> could beat him in 30 seconds flat.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer

[Dustin Cook]

On Apr 19, 3:51 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "miguel" <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:sudf2350moojcssssqkh52no7lmtah4or1@4ax.com
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:06:20 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> > <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1177001600.539018.249480@e65g2000hsc.google groups.com
> >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> >>>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >>>> messagenews:Xns9917237AB5012HHI2948AJD832@69.28.18 6.121
> >>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
> >>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >>>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.goo glegroups.com
> >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all
> >>>>>>>> the other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.
>
> >>>>>>> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy
> >>>>>>> isn't something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you,
> >>>>>>> I have nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I
> >>>>>>> really don't care either way whether you and he are friends
> >>>>>>> enemies or what. I don't give a ****.
>
> >>>>>> You brought it up.
>
> >>>>>> Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.
>
> >>>>> Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my
> >>>>> mother or something.
>
> >>> *lookout* The old boot will be popping
> >>> into Usenet again to defend her retarded
> >>> son.
>
> >> Oh God. Not that again.
>
> >> "It wasn't me. My mother did it."
>
> >>>> I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually
> >>>>> brought the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you
> >>>>> want to admit it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.
>
> >>>> So are a lot of people.
>
> >>>> He didn't mention me, nor did he mention Kadaitcha Man.
>
> >>>> You did, you clueless ****stain.
>
> >>> Yep
>
> >>>>> Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.
>
> >>>> 4Q didn't mention me.
>
> >>> Nope
>
> >> You're a keeper, 4Q.
>
> > Get a rOOM!!11!!!
>
> <wags finger> Go to your room!

See what I mean? The only PR damage your doing is to yourself. Your
not hurting me in the least, dear.

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk