Dustin Cook wrote:

Please dance harder! *Twang!*

More foam in your next long post


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- no ripping, mkay ;]]


> On Apr 18, 11:25 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
> > link so I added it back for you )
> >
> > p.s. MyBugHunterprogram took
> > a couple of hours to knock up (including
> > coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
> > and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
> > everything your lame Bug**** does!
>
> Good for you. I'm sure it has the stability issues resolved. since I
> basically laid out the plans for you to follow.
>
> And it scans for almost 8,000 unique spyware/rootkits/trojans etc yes?
>
> > Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
> > coder and Bug**** took years to code!
> > YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
> > *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>
> Hmm. Anyone else wonder what drugs hes doing? 2 years development for
> cross os compatability, bug fixes, research, malware sample
> collection; live stuff, spreading stuff, not crap stored in some kids
> collection.
>
> Your a CS aren't you? Legitimate programs take time to develop,
> especially in the persons spare time.
>
> > p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests
>
> Well, I didn't really expect you to be able to answer any of them. As
> I said, I was testing you. And as I expected, you couldn't pass it on
> a snowy day in hell. You don't know what the hell your talking about
> concerning BugHunter, you can't even answer a few technical questions
> regarding it. Peer review scares you huh? *haha*
>
> > *HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*
>
> I don't know why your laughing so much, it's your face that's getting
> hit.
>
> Remember, you have two days to research the answers to those
> questions. If your program does everything BugHunter does, you should
> have no trouble telling us what the engine is actually doing. After
> all, it took you two hours to write one, right?
>
> You don't have to answer this question either. We both know you don't
> know the answers. I don't know why your trying so hard to defend
> yourself. I mean, seriously man, you look like a f*cking idiot at this
> point. Do you really want to ensure moron is a label that sticks to
> you?
>
> You used to be the great and powerful wizard of satire. I'd recommend
> you resume that, code isn't your forte. You simply, don't impress me.
> You need to brush up on your programming if you want to do the
> antimalware thing. As for your comments concerning the malware I
> authored, you should also mention you authored some too. In fact, you
> suggested others see for themselves, you wanted to shove my nose in
> it, remember? You are, by your own words just as guilty as me; Your a
> malicious malware/bs spreader. I'm a former malicious malware author.
> You seem to be missing the main point, sadly. You haven't grown up.
> You probably never will. You think your untouchable. Some day, your
> likely to screwup, and it only takes once, someone gets ahold of your
> real name, bam; your in a courtroom for the content on your website.
>
> Theirs a fine line between satire and libel. You wouldn't want anyone
> to actually get you in a courtroom; you'd be a complete laughing stock
> on usenet, irc, aim, yahoo, google groups, msn, myspace, various
> newsportals. You'd be more famous than the melissa virus, for getting
> your ass handed to you.
>
> I'm highly unlikely to pursue you, because I know you, Not personally
> by name, but I know you after years of dealing with your antics. Your
> doing nothing that you didn't do 7-8 years ago. Your website sucks as
> much now as it did then, Hell, it has less content now. You give us
> nothing but lies and empty promises.
>
> You have fallen far from your pedastal man. At one point, I had a
> little respect for you, You were even funny a few years ago. Now your
> so obsessed, your just totally losing the plot. Very disappointing.
> You could do alot better, if you put effort into being funny again.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
>
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
> >
> > > > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
> >
> > > > > > 1) The packer
> >
> > > > <snip> More deluded bull****
> >
> > > Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
> >
> > > Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
> >
> > > > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > > > piano? It's in tune!
> >
> > > > Please dance some more Dustbin.
> >
> > > Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> > > is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
> >
> > > > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > > > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
> >
> > > I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> > > list them:
> >
> > > 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> > > future when pressed to prove your claim)
> > > 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> > > 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> > > 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> > > defend that claim either.BugHunterrelies on
> > > proprietary technology.
> >
> > > > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > > > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > > > full of **** numpty!
> >
> > > A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> > > look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> > > well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
> >
> > > > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > > > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > > > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
> >
> > > Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh?BugHunteris very configurable this way.
> > > See locate.txt
> > > If you'd like to complain further,BugHunternow includes a batch file
> > > (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> > > written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> > > scanner, andBugHunterwill obey.
> >
> > > Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> > >BugHuntercould indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> > > bother?
> >
> > > > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > > > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
> >
> > > Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> > > In fact,
> >
> > > LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> > > The program is distributed withBugHunterin
> > > accordance
> > > to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> > > which
> > > accompanies the program.
> >
> > > LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> > > program
> > > written by Charles Dye.
> >
> > >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
> >
> > > Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> > > others programs, created for the community.
> >
> > > Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> > > While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> > > malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> > > that. And if your wondering whybughunterhas process.exe, is because
> > >BugHunteris a dos based application and cannot control windows
> > > threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> > > the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> > > operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> > > boot clean.
> >
> > > > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > > > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > > > on a stick.
> >
> > > Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> > > make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> > > don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
> >
> > > > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/<-- Utter ****e
> >
> > > Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> > > ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> > > as do various other sites. Tip: typebughunterin any search engine.
> > > *grin*
> >
> > > What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
> >
> > > I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
> >
> > > 1. What isBugHunteractually doing?
> > > 2. How does the engine work?
> > > 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> > > 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> > > 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> > > 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> > > utorrent)
> >
> > > Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
> >
> > > When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> > > answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> > > wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
> >
> > > Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> > > are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> > > answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> > > this.
> >
> > > --
> > > Dustin Cook
> > >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk