On Apr 18, 11:25 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
> link so I added it back for you)
>
> p.s. MyBugHunterprogram took
> a couple of hours to knock up (including
> coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
> and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
> everything your lame Bug**** does!
Good for you. I'm sure it has the stability issues resolved. since I
basically laid out the plans for you to follow.
And it scans for almost 8,000 unique spyware/rootkits/trojans etc yes?
> Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
> coder and Bug**** took years to code!
> YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
Hmm. Anyone else wonder what drugs hes doing? 2 years development for
cross os compatability, bug fixes, research, malware sample
collection; live stuff, spreading stuff, not crap stored in some kids
collection.
Your a CS aren't you? Legitimate programs take time to develop,
especially in the persons spare time.
> p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests
Well, I didn't really expect you to be able to answer any of them. As
I said, I was testing you. And as I expected, you couldn't pass it on
a snowy day in hell. You don't know what the hell your talking about
concerning BugHunter, you can't even answer a few technical questions
regarding it. Peer review scares you huh? *haha*
> *HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*
I don't know why your laughing so much, it's your face that's getting
hit.
Remember, you have two days to research the answers to those
questions. If your program does everything BugHunter does, you should
have no trouble telling us what the engine is actually doing. After
all, it took you two hours to write one, right?
You don't have to answer this question either. We both know you don't
know the answers. I don't know why your trying so hard to defend
yourself. I mean, seriously man, you look like a f*cking idiot at this
point. Do you really want to ensure moron is a label that sticks to
you?
You used to be the great and powerful wizard of satire. I'd recommend
you resume that, code isn't your forte. You simply, don't impress me.
You need to brush up on your programming if you want to do the
antimalware thing. As for your comments concerning the malware I
authored, you should also mention you authored some too. In fact, you
suggested others see for themselves, you wanted to shove my nose in
it, remember? You are, by your own words just as guilty as me; Your a
malicious malware/bs spreader. I'm a former malicious malware author.
You seem to be missing the main point, sadly. You haven't grown up.
You probably never will. You think your untouchable. Some day, your
likely to screwup, and it only takes once, someone gets ahold of your
real name, bam; your in a courtroom for the content on your website.
Theirs a fine line between satire and libel. You wouldn't want anyone
to actually get you in a courtroom; you'd be a complete laughing stock
on usenet, irc, aim, yahoo, google groups, msn, myspace, various
newsportals. You'd be more famous than the melissa virus, for getting
your ass handed to you.
I'm highly unlikely to pursue you, because I know you, Not personally
by name, but I know you after years of dealing with your antics. Your
doing nothing that you didn't do 7-8 years ago. Your website sucks as
much now as it did then, Hell, it has less content now. You give us
nothing but lies and empty promises.
You have fallen far from your pedastal man. At one point, I had a
little respect for you, You were even funny a few years ago. Now your
so obsessed, your just totally losing the plot. Very disappointing.
You could do alot better, if you put effort into being funny again.
--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
>
> > > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
>
> > > > > 1) The packer
>
> > > <snip> More deluded bull****
>
> > Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
>
> > Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
>
> > > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > > piano? It's in tune!
>
> > > Please dance some more Dustbin.
>
> > Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> > is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
>
> > > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
>
> > I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> > list them:
>
> > 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> > future when pressed to prove your claim)
> > 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> > 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> > 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> > defend that claim either.BugHunterrelies on
> > proprietary technology.
>
> > > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > > full of **** numpty!
>
> > A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> > look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> > well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
>
> > > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
>
> > Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh?BugHunteris very configurable this way.
> > See locate.txt
> > If you'd like to complain further,BugHunternow includes a batch file
> > (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> > written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> > scanner, andBugHunterwill obey.
>
> > Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> >BugHuntercould indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> > bother?
>
> > > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
>
> > Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> > In fact,
>
> > LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> > The program is distributed withBugHunterin
> > accordance
> > to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> > which
> > accompanies the program.
>
> > LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> > program
> > written by Charles Dye.
>
> >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
>
> > Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> > others programs, created for the community.
>
> > Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> > While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> > malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> > that. And if your wondering whybughunterhas process.exe, is because
> >BugHunteris a dos based application and cannot control windows
> > threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> > the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> > operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> > boot clean.
>
> > > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > > on a stick.
>
> > Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> > make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> > don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
>
> > > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/<-- Utter ****e
>
> > Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> > ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> > as do various other sites. Tip: typebughunterin any search engine.
> > *grin*
>
> > What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
>
> > I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
>
> > 1. What isBugHunteractually doing?
> > 2. How does the engine work?
> > 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> > 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> > 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> > 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> > utorrent)
>
> > Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
>
> > When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> > answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> > wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
>
> > Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> > are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> > answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> > this.
>
> > --
> > Dustin Cook
> >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Reply With Quote