You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
link so I added it back for you )

p.s. My BugHunter program took
a couple of hours to knock up (including
coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
everything your lame Bug**** does!
Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
coder and Bug**** took years to code!
YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
*HAHAHAHAHAHA*

p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests
you might have more luck if you click
your fingers at me and shout at the
top volume, Pencil-neck ;]]


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/

*HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*



Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
> >
> > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
> >
> > > > 1) The packer
> >
> > <snip> More deluded bull****
>
> Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
>
> Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
>
> > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > piano? It's in tune!
> >
> > Please dance some more Dustbin.
>
> Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
>
> > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
>
> I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> list them:
>
> 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> future when pressed to prove your claim)
> 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> defend that claim either. BugHunter relies on
> proprietary technology.
>
>
> > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > full of **** numpty!
>
> A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
>
> > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
>
> Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh? BugHunter is very configurable this way.
> See locate.txt
> If you'd like to complain further, BugHunter now includes a batch file
> (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> scanner, and BugHunter will obey.
>
> Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> BugHunter could indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> bother?
>
>
> > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
>
> Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> In fact,
>
> LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> The program is distributed with BugHunter in
> accordance
> to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> which
> accompanies the program.
>
> LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> program
> written by Charles Dye.
>
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
>
> Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> others programs, created for the community.
>
> Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> that. And if your wondering why bughunter has process.exe, is because
> BugHunter is a dos based application and cannot control windows
> threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> boot clean.
>
> > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > on a stick.
>
> Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
>
> > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- Utter ****e
>
> Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> as do various other sites. Tip: type bughunter in any search engine.
> *grin*
>
> What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
>
> I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
>
> 1. What is BugHunter actually doing?
> 2. How does the engine work?
> 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> utorrent)
>
> Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
>
> When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
>
> Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> this.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk