On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped

>
> > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.

>
> > > 1) The packer

>
> <snip> More deluded bull****


Yes, valid points don't help you do they.

Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...

> > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > piano? It's in tune!

>
> Please dance some more Dustbin.


Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.

> I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> down laughing when I saw what was inside!


I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
list them:

1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
future when pressed to prove your claim)
2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
defend that claim either. BugHunter relies on
proprietary technology.


> Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> script, you braggarting arsey holed
> full of **** numpty!


A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.

> *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> disk scan you had to use someone elses
> program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*


Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh? BugHunter is very configurable this way.
See locate.txt
If you'd like to complain further, BugHunter now includes a batch file
(yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
scanner, and BugHunter will obey.

Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
BugHunter could indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
bother?


> Mr. Application-Ripper!
> LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye


Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
In fact,

LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
The program is distributed with BugHunter in
accordance
to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
which
accompanies the program.

LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
program
written by Charles Dye.

http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt

Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
others programs, created for the community.

Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
that. And if your wondering why bughunter has process.exe, is because
BugHunter is a dos based application and cannot control windows
threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
boot clean.

> Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> on a stick.


Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.

> 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- Utter ****e


Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
as do various other sites. Tip: type bughunter in any search engine.
*grin*

What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.

I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.

1. What is BugHunter actually doing?
2. How does the engine work?
3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
4. What is the record length of each entry?
5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
utorrent)

Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.

When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.

Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
this.

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk