BugHunter Signature Update 04.02.07-04.08.07

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Apr 16, 3:12 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

<insert snipped link>

http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/

<snip> irrelevant nonsense from Dustbin


>
> > made for me, the lame CRC checksum.
>
> Stepping on the foot again I see. The

You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
on your peepee again. I made three points
(3) <-- count

Begin
point1 -->,<-- seperator
point2 -->,<-- seperator
point3
End

Not two points, or two and a bit


1) The packer
2) The message
3) The weak CRC16 checksum
function you are using.

>marker isn't a checksum,

*DUH* Let your slowhead catch up
with your fingers next time.

Are you sure that 180 IQ (bs)
wasn't a -180 IQ. How that ****
could *YOU* engineer a program
to produce a checksum of FU4Q!!! *Y-O-U!* el-thicko180
So don't expect anyone else to think
FU4Q was any kind of a checksum value.
And before you start to rack your
tiny mind for some face saving
bull**** (like your "Dark" black
webpage server ****up!). How you
going to engineer it to know it's
own checksum of "FU4Q" in advance of
compiling... chicken and egg?!?
*As in egg on your face* *ROFL*

Now c'mon do us all a nice koOkdance!

4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/

[4Q]

4Q wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 3:12 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>

*Oops* correction

> going to engineer it to know it's

it's = its <-- I thought I'd better
correct this typo, I know you struggle
with those funny little ', tick marks.

4Q

[Dustin Cook]

On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
> You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped

As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.

> 1) The packer

Packing executables isn't an issue. It's routinely done by many
authors/individuals. This is a pointless assault.

> 2) The message

The message is visible if you look inside the binary; As you were told
awhile ago, it was designed to see if your were bsing or not. You
were, you got caught. Complain about the marker all you want. Pretend
that you trolled me all you want, when reality hits you like a bus,
I'll be laughing.


> 3) The weak CRC16 checksum
> function you are using.

CRC16 function? *hahaha*

You really don't have a clue.

Alas, but what can I expect from someone who thought/still publishes
that BugHunter is a string scanner. Keep posting more bs, show us all
how much you actually don't know about code.


> *DUH* Let your slowhead catch up
> with your fingers next time.

Nice try. Do you like when the saints go marching in?

> webpage server ****up!). How you
> going to engineer it to know it's
> own checksum of "FU4Q" in advance of

See above. Wiggle, squirm if you must, but I've caught you, and beaten
you at your own little game. I Raidy have 0wned you, time and time
again. I must admit tho, it's not like you were difficult to con.

> Now c'mon do us all a nice koOkdance!

Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
piano? It's in tune!

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
>
> As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
>
> > 1) The packer

<snip> More deluded bull****

>
> > Now c'mon do us all a nice koOkdance!
>
> Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> piano? It's in tune!

Please dance some more Dustbin.

I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
down laughing when I saw what was inside!
Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!
BugHunter is little more than a batch
script, you braggarting arsey holed
full of **** numpty!

*ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
disk scan you had to use someone elses
program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
Mr. Application-Ripper!
LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye


Expect to see BugHunter review on
4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
on a stick.


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- Utter ****e

[Dustin Cook]

On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
>
> > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
>
> > > 1) The packer
>
> <snip> More deluded bull****

Yes, valid points don't help you do they.

Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...

> > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > piano? It's in tune!
>
> Please dance some more Dustbin.

Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.

> I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> down laughing when I saw what was inside!

I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
list them:

1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
future when pressed to prove your claim)
2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
defend that claim either. BugHunter relies on
proprietary technology.


> Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> script, you braggarting arsey holed
> full of **** numpty!

A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.

> *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> disk scan you had to use someone elses
> program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*

Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh? BugHunter is very configurable this way.
See locate.txt
If you'd like to complain further, BugHunter now includes a batch file
(yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
scanner, and BugHunter will obey.

Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
BugHunter could indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
bother?


> Mr. Application-Ripper!
> LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye

Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
In fact,

LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
The program is distributed with BugHunter in
accordance
to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
which
accompanies the program.

LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
program
written by Charles Dye.

http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt

Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
others programs, created for the community.

Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
that. And if your wondering why bughunter has process.exe, is because
BugHunter is a dos based application and cannot control windows
threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
boot clean.

> Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> on a stick.

Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.

> 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- Utter ****e

Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
as do various other sites. Tip: type bughunter in any search engine.
*grin*

What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.

I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.

1. What is BugHunter actually doing?
2. How does the engine work?
3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
4. What is the record length of each entry?
5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
utorrent)

Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.

When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.

Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
this.

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

[4Q]

You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
link so I added it back for you )

p.s. My BugHunter program took
a couple of hours to knock up (including
coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
everything your lame Bug**** does!
Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
coder and Bug**** took years to code!
YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
*HAHAHAHAHAHA*

p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests
you might have more luck if you click
your fingers at me and shout at the
top volume, Pencil-neck ;]]


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/

*HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*



Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
> >
> > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
> >
> > > > 1) The packer
> >
> > <snip> More deluded bull****
>
> Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
>
> Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
>
> > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > piano? It's in tune!
> >
> > Please dance some more Dustbin.
>
> Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
>
> > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
>
> I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> list them:
>
> 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> future when pressed to prove your claim)
> 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> defend that claim either. BugHunter relies on
> proprietary technology.
>
>
> > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > full of **** numpty!
>
> A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
>
> > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
>
> Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh? BugHunter is very configurable this way.
> See locate.txt
> If you'd like to complain further, BugHunter now includes a batch file
> (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> scanner, and BugHunter will obey.
>
> Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> BugHunter could indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> bother?
>
>
> > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
>
> Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> In fact,
>
> LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> The program is distributed with BugHunter in
> accordance
> to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> which
> accompanies the program.
>
> LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> program
> written by Charles Dye.
>
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
>
> Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> others programs, created for the community.
>
> Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> that. And if your wondering why bughunter has process.exe, is because
> BugHunter is a dos based application and cannot control windows
> threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> boot clean.
>
> > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > on a stick.
>
> Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
>
> > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- Utter ****e
>
> Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> as do various other sites. Tip: type bughunter in any search engine.
> *grin*
>
> What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
>
> I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
>
> 1. What is BugHunter actually doing?
> 2. How does the engine work?
> 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> utorrent)
>
> Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
>
> When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
>
> Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> this.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

[Dustin Cook]

On Apr 18, 11:25 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
> link so I added it back for you )
>
> p.s. MyBugHunterprogram took
> a couple of hours to knock up (including
> coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
> and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
> everything your lame Bug**** does!

Good for you. I'm sure it has the stability issues resolved. since I
basically laid out the plans for you to follow.

And it scans for almost 8,000 unique spyware/rootkits/trojans etc yes?

> Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
> coder and Bug**** took years to code!
> YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*

Hmm. Anyone else wonder what drugs hes doing? 2 years development for
cross os compatability, bug fixes, research, malware sample
collection; live stuff, spreading stuff, not crap stored in some kids
collection.

Your a CS aren't you? Legitimate programs take time to develop,
especially in the persons spare time.

> p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests

Well, I didn't really expect you to be able to answer any of them. As
I said, I was testing you. And as I expected, you couldn't pass it on
a snowy day in hell. You don't know what the hell your talking about
concerning BugHunter, you can't even answer a few technical questions
regarding it. Peer review scares you huh? *haha*

> *HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*

I don't know why your laughing so much, it's your face that's getting
hit.

Remember, you have two days to research the answers to those
questions. If your program does everything BugHunter does, you should
have no trouble telling us what the engine is actually doing. After
all, it took you two hours to write one, right?

You don't have to answer this question either. We both know you don't
know the answers. I don't know why your trying so hard to defend
yourself. I mean, seriously man, you look like a f*cking idiot at this
point. Do you really want to ensure moron is a label that sticks to
you?

You used to be the great and powerful wizard of satire. I'd recommend
you resume that, code isn't your forte. You simply, don't impress me.
You need to brush up on your programming if you want to do the
antimalware thing. As for your comments concerning the malware I
authored, you should also mention you authored some too. In fact, you
suggested others see for themselves, you wanted to shove my nose in
it, remember? You are, by your own words just as guilty as me; Your a
malicious malware/bs spreader. I'm a former malicious malware author.
You seem to be missing the main point, sadly. You haven't grown up.
You probably never will. You think your untouchable. Some day, your
likely to screwup, and it only takes once, someone gets ahold of your
real name, bam; your in a courtroom for the content on your website.

Theirs a fine line between satire and libel. You wouldn't want anyone
to actually get you in a courtroom; you'd be a complete laughing stock
on usenet, irc, aim, yahoo, google groups, msn, myspace, various
newsportals. You'd be more famous than the melissa virus, for getting
your ass handed to you.

I'm highly unlikely to pursue you, because I know you, Not personally
by name, but I know you after years of dealing with your antics. Your
doing nothing that you didn't do 7-8 years ago. Your website sucks as
much now as it did then, Hell, it has less content now. You give us
nothing but lies and empty promises.

You have fallen far from your pedastal man. At one point, I had a
little respect for you, You were even funny a few years ago. Now your
so obsessed, your just totally losing the plot. Very disappointing.
You could do alot better, if you put effort into being funny again.

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
>
> > > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
>
> > > > > 1) The packer
>
> > > <snip> More deluded bull****
>
> > Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
>
> > Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
>
> > > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > > piano? It's in tune!
>
> > > Please dance some more Dustbin.
>
> > Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> > is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
>
> > > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
>
> > I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> > list them:
>
> > 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> > future when pressed to prove your claim)
> > 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> > 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> > 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> > defend that claim either.BugHunterrelies on
> > proprietary technology.
>
> > > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > > full of **** numpty!
>
> > A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> > look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> > well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
>
> > > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
>
> > Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh?BugHunteris very configurable this way.
> > See locate.txt
> > If you'd like to complain further,BugHunternow includes a batch file
> > (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> > written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> > scanner, andBugHunterwill obey.
>
> > Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> >BugHuntercould indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> > bother?
>
> > > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
>
> > Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> > In fact,
>
> > LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> > The program is distributed withBugHunterin
> > accordance
> > to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> > which
> > accompanies the program.
>
> > LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> > program
> > written by Charles Dye.
>
> >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
>
> > Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> > others programs, created for the community.
>
> > Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> > While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> > malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> > that. And if your wondering whybughunterhas process.exe, is because
> >BugHunteris a dos based application and cannot control windows
> > threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> > the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> > operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> > boot clean.
>
> > > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > > on a stick.
>
> > Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> > make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> > don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
>
> > > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/<-- Utter ****e
>
> > Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> > ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> > as do various other sites. Tip: typebughunterin any search engine.
> > *grin*
>
> > What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
>
> > I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
>
> > 1. What isBugHunteractually doing?
> > 2. How does the engine work?
> > 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> > 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> > 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> > 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> > utorrent)
>
> > Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
>
> > When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> > answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> > wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
>
> > Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> > are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> > answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> > this.
>
> > --
> > Dustin Cook
> >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:

Please dance harder! *Twang!*

More foam in your next long post


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/ <-- no ripping, mkay ;]]


> On Apr 18, 11:25 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > You snecked the alt.usenet.kooks
> > link so I added it back for you )
> >
> > p.s. MyBugHunterprogram took
> > a couple of hours to knock up (including
> > coffeebreaks and timeout to watch some TV
> > and have my dinner!). And it nearly does
> > everything your lame Bug**** does!
>
> Good for you. I'm sure it has the stability issues resolved. since I
> basically laid out the plans for you to follow.
>
> And it scans for almost 8,000 unique spyware/rootkits/trojans etc yes?
>
> > Yet you claim you are a MASTER ASIC
> > coder and Bug**** took years to code!
> > YOU LAME UTTER ****ED **** ON A STICK!
> > *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>
> Hmm. Anyone else wonder what drugs hes doing? 2 years development for
> cross os compatability, bug fixes, research, malware sample
> collection; live stuff, spreading stuff, not crap stored in some kids
> collection.
>
> Your a CS aren't you? Legitimate programs take time to develop,
> especially in the persons spare time.
>
> > p.p.s. If you want me to do any requests
>
> Well, I didn't really expect you to be able to answer any of them. As
> I said, I was testing you. And as I expected, you couldn't pass it on
> a snowy day in hell. You don't know what the hell your talking about
> concerning BugHunter, you can't even answer a few technical questions
> regarding it. Peer review scares you huh? *haha*
>
> > *HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAAHA*
>
> I don't know why your laughing so much, it's your face that's getting
> hit.
>
> Remember, you have two days to research the answers to those
> questions. If your program does everything BugHunter does, you should
> have no trouble telling us what the engine is actually doing. After
> all, it took you two hours to write one, right?
>
> You don't have to answer this question either. We both know you don't
> know the answers. I don't know why your trying so hard to defend
> yourself. I mean, seriously man, you look like a f*cking idiot at this
> point. Do you really want to ensure moron is a label that sticks to
> you?
>
> You used to be the great and powerful wizard of satire. I'd recommend
> you resume that, code isn't your forte. You simply, don't impress me.
> You need to brush up on your programming if you want to do the
> antimalware thing. As for your comments concerning the malware I
> authored, you should also mention you authored some too. In fact, you
> suggested others see for themselves, you wanted to shove my nose in
> it, remember? You are, by your own words just as guilty as me; Your a
> malicious malware/bs spreader. I'm a former malicious malware author.
> You seem to be missing the main point, sadly. You haven't grown up.
> You probably never will. You think your untouchable. Some day, your
> likely to screwup, and it only takes once, someone gets ahold of your
> real name, bam; your in a courtroom for the content on your website.
>
> Theirs a fine line between satire and libel. You wouldn't want anyone
> to actually get you in a courtroom; you'd be a complete laughing stock
> on usenet, irc, aim, yahoo, google groups, msn, myspace, various
> newsportals. You'd be more famous than the melissa virus, for getting
> your ass handed to you.
>
> I'm highly unlikely to pursue you, because I know you, Not personally
> by name, but I know you after years of dealing with your antics. Your
> doing nothing that you didn't do 7-8 years ago. Your website sucks as
> much now as it did then, Hell, it has less content now. You give us
> nothing but lies and empty promises.
>
> You have fallen far from your pedastal man. At one point, I had a
> little respect for you, You were even funny a few years ago. Now your
> so obsessed, your just totally losing the plot. Very disappointing.
> You could do alot better, if you put effort into being funny again.
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
>
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > On Apr 18, 2:54 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > > > > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
> >
> > > > > As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
> > > > > back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.
> >
> > > > > > 1) The packer
> >
> > > > <snip> More deluded bull****
> >
> > > Yes, valid points don't help you do they.
> >
> > > Oh when the saints.. Oh when the saints go marching in...
> >
> > > > > Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
> > > > > piano? It's in tune!
> >
> > > > Please dance some more Dustbin.
> >
> > > Play me a song 4Q. You have been 0wned. You have no recourse. Nobody
> > > is buying your bull****. You are my little *****. Go fetch.
> >
> > > > I opened the "zip" and I ****ing fell
> > > > down laughing when I saw what was inside!
> >
> > > I've been laughing at everything you've written about it so far. Let's
> > > list them:
> >
> > > 1. It's a trojan (You later changed this to it'll be a trojan in the
> > > future when pressed to prove your claim)
> > > 2. It's a string scanner (haha, no it's not)
> > > 3. It's using a crc16 checksum (haha, no it's not)
> > > 4. It's not a compiled batch file, and i don't think you'll be able to
> > > defend that claim either.BugHunterrelies on
> > > proprietary technology.
> >
> > > > Y-O-U ****ing lame piece of ****!!!BugHunteris little more than a batch
> > > > script, you braggarting arsey holed
> > > > full of **** numpty!
> >
> > > A batch script? You mean batch files yes? You need to take a closer
> > > look kiddo, you might be quized and asked to backup those claims as
> > > well; When I can stop laughing at your stupid ass long enough.
> >
> > > > *ROFL* You couldn't even do a recursive
> > > > disk scan you had to use someone elses
> > > > program!!! *HAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA*
> >
> > > Hmm, Your a bit clueless eh?BugHunteris very configurable this way.
> > > See locate.txt
> > > If you'd like to complain further,BugHunternow includes a batch file
> > > (yes, a real one this time) and PROCESS.EXE
> > > written by Craig Peacock. Locate can be configured for very customized
> > > scanner, andBugHunterwill obey.
> >
> > > Please do not confuse why I did this or that in the future moron,
> > >BugHuntercould indeed do recursive scanning on it's own, but why
> > > bother?
> >
> > > > Mr. Application-Ripper!
> > > > LOCATE.COM by Charles Dye
> >
> > > Application Ripper? I think not. I do not take credit for the program.
> > > In fact,
> >
> > > LOCATE.COM = This file is required for full recursion support.
> > > The program is distributed withBugHunterin
> > > accordance
> > > to licensing information present in LOCATE.TXT
> > > which
> > > accompanies the program.
> >
> > > LOCATE.TXT = Documentation for the accompanying LOCATE.COM
> > > program
> > > written by Charles Dye.
> >
> > >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunt.txt
> >
> > > Incidently, many scripts/tools in the antispyware field make use of
> > > others programs, created for the community.
> >
> > > Please, continue to make an ass of yourself in antimalware newsgroups.
> > > While your doing so, I'd suggest you see what tools are available for
> > > malware removal. You'll find many use external programs for this or
> > > that. And if your wondering whybughunterhas process.exe, is because
> > >BugHunteris a dos based application and cannot control windows
> > > threads on it's own. Process.exe is the most compatable way of putting
> > > the system in a safer state for scanning if using Windows NT based
> > > operating system. It's a mid step option the user has before having to
> > > boot clean.
> >
> > > > Expect to seeBugHunterreview on
> > > > 4Q site in a few hours you utter ****
> > > > on a stick.
> >
> > > Well, I hope you have figured it out by then. Or I'm going to have to
> > > make editoral changes to your review. Read: Fix your mistakes, so you
> > > don't appear to the world to be as stupid as we both know you are.
> >
> > > > 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/<-- Utter ****e
> >
> > > Various sites would disagree with you. The creators and community of
> > > ultimate boot disk, would disagree with you, cnet disagrees with you
> > > as do various other sites. Tip: typebughunterin any search engine.
> > > *grin*
> >
> > > What sites support your conclusions? Hehehe.
> >
> > > I pose the following questions as a test of your real skill.
> >
> > > 1. What isBugHunteractually doing?
> > > 2. How does the engine work?
> > > 3. What is the internal layout of the database files?
> > > 4. What is the record length of each entry?
> > > 5. What's the 12 byte index file do exactly?
> > > 6. Which packer am I using? (I gave you this one, it's the same as
> > > utorrent)
> >
> > > Answer them here, please. Where everybody can comment.
> >
> > > When your finished answering my questions, I'll provide the real
> > > answers and we'll see how many you got right vs how many you got
> > > wrong. You have two days. That should be plenty enough time for you.
> >
> > > Oh, and before you try bsing your way out of my amusing challenge, You
> > > are forewarned various antimalware specialists already know the
> > > answers to those questions I presented you. You will be tested on
> > > this.
> >
> > > --
> > > Dustin Cook
> > >http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk