Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 84

Thread: BugHunter Signature Update 04.02.07-04.08.07

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    On Apr 16, 3:12 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > You ****ing cowardly turd, you snipped
    > the most important Bug**** link. Here
    > let me add it for you.


    LOL! I didn't snip anything of value. I posted links describing
    bughunter and it's awards, and obviously the usefulness of the
    program. Your link doesn't provide any information of use. When I
    checked it yesterday, it was a sloppy placeholder.

    You really should work on one section of your site at a time, you
    obviously can't handle multiple projects at once.. CS major eh?
    Bulll****.

    > > the face. Hows your nose these days? *grin*

    >
    > *heh* Retardboi the more your Bug****
    > spreads the harder your fall will be.


    This fall, your latest prediction is based on?


    > I doubt many ppl downloading your crap
    > from the above links will know about
    > it's malicious author, yet. However


    Why yes, 7 years ago, the past actions I've done. Actually, your
    probably wrong in so far as who knows about my past. I'd say it's a
    safe bet, Dustin Cook/Raid is a household name; I'm infamous. I
    couldn't hide my past if I wanted too.

    I am a former virus writer. I released potentially destructive self
    replicating code. As did you, remember?

    The difference between us tho, is I quit doing malicious things over 7
    years ago, and you haven't stopped yet. Other than your site, you
    haven't done anything of any note in the last 7 years or so.

    > before long (let's say within the next
    > 6 months) Google will be carrying a
    > warning in the top ranked pages linked
    > to the crap. People will be able to make


    2 years and counting, nothing malicious reported so far. More awards
    and more sites hosting me, however.


    > an informed decision about installing
    > your malware and trusting their personal
    > information to a known urban cyber-terrorist.


    Just what personal information is it they are asked to trust me with?
    BugHunter doesn't require any sort of registration or activation, and
    it doesn't email me anything, doesn't make any connections to the
    outside world to transmit or receieve any information whatsoever. Care
    to enlighten not only myself but everyone else how any personal
    information could be leaked to me in this case?

    Can you prove the cyber terrorist claims 4Q? What I did 7 years ago is
    former bad activities on my part, which I have taken responsibility
    for.
    > > Your greeting has been present since v1.9.4; I know this comes as a
    > > complete and utter shock to you, but you were setup by the marker. I
    > > as well as several others knew about the marker, We waited to see if
    > > you were full of crap or not regarding the program.

    >
    > *haha* I trolled you for information,


    LOL. Trying to save again? I 0wn you, dude. I always have, and I
    always will; as long as you remain as ignorant as you are now. Your
    own ignorance about me is your undoing.

    But, like the riaa and dinosaurs, you just don't have the brain
    capacity to know you've been beaten at your own game. You were
    trolled, fed misinformation by the truck load, and you took it all as
    fact. Your an idiot, and it's been a pleasure showing you up for the
    moron you really are. I appreciate the site dedicated to me, it proves
    my points quiet nicely.

    > I twanged your strings and you danced
    > like a ****er!!! *ROFL* Without even


    Sure I did. then reality sets in.

    > made for me, the lame CRC checksum.


    Stepping on the foot again I see. The marker isn't a checksum, it's
    not even used in the program. It's a marker, nothing more, nothing
    less. I thought it was funny to put FU4Q as a marker.

    Alas, but what can I expect from someone who thought/still publishes
    that BugHunter is a string scanner. Keep posting more bs, show us all
    how much you actually don't know about code.

    > > It didn't take
    > > long for you to step on your foot and claim you hadn't even downloaded
    > > it until recently. IE: No disassembly, no scathing review, you were
    > > full of it, and we know it.

    >
    > A well executed troll. I must admit I


    Yes, It was good work on my part. I don't think your going to get far
    trying to play it off tho. I got you, hook line and sinker, and theres
    no way for you to wiggle out of it.

    > *twang!* C'mon do the one of them little
    > dances like a circus dog... *holds up loop*


    See above. and laugh as I do.

    > "cheap shot" = purile childish ****,
    > because someone trolled you *HAHAHAHA*


    trolled me? no, you misunderstood what I wrote. You host a bull****
    site, I responded with a bull**** greeting towards you, that you
    posted is a lame crc checksum; which it isn't. Tit for tat.

    > > Laugh laugh, neither of which are valid awards by any recognized group
    > > of individuals. Sorry lamer, AUK isn't considered anything special. A
    > > fly by night internet degree holds more value. *grin*

    >
    > Yes you would say that wouldn't you


    I would, because it's true. Would you like to provide evidence showing
    otherwise?

    > <snip> Braggarting ****e screed


    Of course, it's bragging when BugHunter is shown as a useful program,
    and not bragging when you make half-assed remarks towards it.. Laugh,
    your an idiot.

    > What award do you think they will
    > give you next Dustbin?


    I think Rhonda and Kman will have to stop fighting long enough to
    choose awards. Hell, Rhonda/kman himself might even get one this
    month. Or, are you not paying attention?

    Have you noticed how many people are killfiling you now? How many
    people other than myself find yoursite worthless? HEHEHE. Your not
    doing so good with public relations these days, chum.

    --
    Dustin Cook
    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk


  2. #2
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1176826013.552989.102250@y5g2000hsa.googlegro ups.com

    <snipped>

    >> What award do you think they will
    >> give you next Dustbin?

    >
    > I think Rhonda and Kman will have to stop fighting long enough to
    > choose awards. Hell, Rhonda/kman himself might even get one this
    > month. Or, are you not paying attention?


    Don't make me come over there, Dustin.

    Your only warning.

    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk

    You can discover what your enemy fears most by
    observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer



  3. #3
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    On Apr 17, 3:55 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >
    > news:1176826013.552989.102250@y5g2000hsa.googlegro ups.com
    >
    > <snipped>
    >
    > >> What award do you think they will
    > >> give you next Dustbin?

    >
    > > I think Rhonda and Kman will have to stop fighting long enough to
    > > choose awards. Hell, Rhonda/kman himself might even get one this
    > > month. Or, are you not paying attention?

    >
    > Don't make me come over there, Dustin.
    >
    > Your only warning.


    I've already established the points in my case Rhonda. Various
    individuals have essentially voiced there opinions, and unlike your
    world, reality doesn't agree with the idea that your a victim. Don't
    waste your time, or mine by threatening me. I've remained out of your
    feud with kman out of respect for you, but don't push it.

    I've apologized for everything I believe I did wrong to you. I owe you
    nothing further.

    --
    Dustin Cook
    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk



  4. #4
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1176915177.186388.124950@y5g2000hsa.googlegro ups.com
    > On Apr 17, 3:55 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>
    >> news:1176826013.552989.102250@y5g2000hsa.googlegro ups.com
    >>
    >> <snipped>
    >>
    >>>> What award do you think they will
    >>>> give you next Dustbin?

    >>
    >>> I think Rhonda and Kman will have to stop fighting long enough to
    >>> choose awards. Hell, Rhonda/kman himself might even get one this
    >>> month. Or, are you not paying attention?

    >>
    >> Don't make me come over there, Dustin.
    >>
    >> Your only warning.

    >
    > I've already established the points in my case Rhonda.


    This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the other
    text of the post in, instead of trimming it.

    > Various
    > individuals have essentially voiced there opinions, and unlike your
    > world, reality doesn't agree with the idea that your a victim. Don't
    > waste your time, or mine by threatening me.


    I'm perfectly willing to come back and offer 4Q my moral support. I
    stopped for one reason only. If you start it again, by making reference
    to something irrelevant to your "case," I'll be back.

    > I've remained out of your
    > feud with kman out of respect for you, but don't push it.


    Dustin, /you're/ the one who brought my "feud" into it.

    I trimmed down everything else in the post, and sent the message, "Don't
    start this again, or it will start again."

    Read it slowly, Dustin.

    > I've apologized for everything I believe I did wrong to you. I owe you
    > nothing further.


    This has nothing to do with that. It has everything to do with the cheap
    shot. As long as you stay out of it, I have no reason to do anything.

    It's up to you, Dustin. Think before you hit the send key.

    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk

    You can discover what your enemy fears most by
    observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer



  5. #5
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the other
    > text of the post in, instead of trimming it.


    Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
    something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
    nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
    either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
    give a ****.

    > I'm perfectly willing to come back and offer 4Q my moral support. I
    > stopped for one reason only. If you start it again, by making reference


    Another threat Rhonda? Perhaps you really don't get it. 4Q is an
    ignorant ****wad, and I've proven it already. You are fast making
    enemies, and making general regulars post/killfile you in response.
    They as well as I am tired of your constant whiny bull****.


    > to something irrelevant to your "case," I'll be back.


    Okay, let me put this to you in a manner you can understand...

    "**** Off"

    > Read it slowly, Dustin.


    See above, take head.



  6. #6
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
    > On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
    >> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.

    >
    > Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
    > something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
    > nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
    > either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
    > give a ****.


    You brought it up.

    Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.

    >> I'm perfectly willing to come back and offer 4Q my moral support. I
    >> stopped for one reason only. If you start it again, by making
    >> reference

    >
    > Another threat Rhonda? Perhaps you really don't get it. 4Q is an
    > ignorant ****wad, and I've proven it already. You are fast making
    > enemies, and making general regulars post/killfile you in response.
    > They as well as I am tired of your constant whiny bull****.


    Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?

    >> to something irrelevant to your "case," I'll be back.

    >
    > Okay, let me put this to you in a manner you can understand...
    >
    > "**** Off"


    No.

    >> Read it slowly, Dustin.

    >
    > See above, take head.


    You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
    irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
    me.

    As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.

    I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.
    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk

    You can discover what your enemy fears most by
    observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer



  7. #7
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:f06nd3$idj$1
    @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

    > "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:1176949933.598071.76150@b58g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com
    >> On Apr 18, 1:20 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> This has nothing to do with your "case," or I'd have left all the
    >>> other text of the post in, instead of trimming it.

    >>
    >> Hmm, allow me to put this another way then, since diplomacy isn't
    >> something you seem to understand. I am not bothering you, I have
    >> nothing to do with your and kman's problems, and I really don't care
    >> either way whether you and he are friends enemies or what. I don't
    >> give a ****.

    >
    > You brought it up.
    >
    > Don't bring it up. Or rather, don't keep bringing it up.


    Actually, first, don't try telling me what to do as if your my mother or
    something. I don't follow orders from you. Second, 4Q actually brought
    the entire thing up when he mentioned AUK. And whether you want to admit
    it or not, your an AUK regular and supporter.

    Next time you want to point the finger, check your own camp first.

    > Do you really want to start this again, Dustin?


    Rhonda, if you start trolling again you'll only prove what I said the
    first time. The more you respond in this fashion, the worse you look.

    Your efforts to smash me have failed miserably, you've made more enemies
    than you have friends. And according to the post from kman, he's finally
    begun to see you as I do.

    You need to let go, you can't do me any harm. My life doesn't revolve
    around usenet.

    > You should just stop now. You brought in something that was totally
    > irrelevant to your argument with 4Q and that something happened to be
    > me.


    Pay attention this time, read it again if you must. 4Q brought the topic
    of AUK up in the first place. Notice the title of the thread and the OP?
    It's a rhetorical question, you probably didn't.


    > As far as I'm concerned, that's a first strike.


    Cry me a river.

    > I've told you not to do it. You seem to want the fight.


    You pose no threat to me, dear. You'll just get your stupid arse added to
    more killfiles. A completely opposite goal if you want people to listen
    to you. Don't ya think? Not to worry, that was rhetorical too.


    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2a
    email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


  8. #8
    4Q Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    Dustin Cook wrote:
    > On Apr 16, 3:12 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:


    <insert snipped link>

    http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/BugHunter/

    <snip> irrelevant nonsense from Dustbin


    >
    > > made for me, the lame CRC checksum.

    >
    > Stepping on the foot again I see. The


    You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped
    on your peepee again. I made three points
    (3) <-- count

    Begin
    point1 -->,<-- seperator
    point2 -->,<-- seperator
    point3
    End

    Not two points, or two and a bit


    1) The packer
    2) The message
    3) The weak CRC16 checksum
    function you are using.

    >marker isn't a checksum,


    *DUH* Let your slowhead catch up
    with your fingers next time.

    Are you sure that 180 IQ (bs)
    wasn't a -180 IQ. How that ****
    could *YOU* engineer a program
    to produce a checksum of FU4Q!!! *Y-O-U!* el-thicko180
    So don't expect anyone else to think
    FU4Q was any kind of a checksum value.
    And before you start to rack your
    tiny mind for some face saving
    bull**** (like your "Dark" black
    webpage server ****up!). How you
    going to engineer it to know it's
    own checksum of "FU4Q" in advance of
    compiling... chicken and egg?!?
    *As in egg on your face* *ROFL*

    Now c'mon do us all a nice koOkdance!

    4Q
    http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/


  9. #9
    4Q Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    4Q wrote:
    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > > On Apr 16, 3:12 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

    >


    *Oops* correction

    > going to engineer it to know it's


    it's = its <-- I thought I'd better
    correct this typo, I know you struggle
    with those funny little ', tick marks.

    4Q


  10. #10
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Dustbin Cook author of Bug**** doesn't recognize AUK awards!

    On Apr 17, 6:39 pm, 4Q <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > You snipped too early dimbulb and stepped


    As I said previously, whatever drugs it is your doing, you need to cut
    back. Your confusing your world with reality, again.

    > 1) The packer


    Packing executables isn't an issue. It's routinely done by many
    authors/individuals. This is a pointless assault.

    > 2) The message


    The message is visible if you look inside the binary; As you were told
    awhile ago, it was designed to see if your were bsing or not. You
    were, you got caught. Complain about the marker all you want. Pretend
    that you trolled me all you want, when reality hits you like a bus,
    I'll be laughing.


    > 3) The weak CRC16 checksum
    > function you are using.


    CRC16 function? *hahaha*

    You really don't have a clue.

    Alas, but what can I expect from someone who thought/still publishes
    that BugHunter is a string scanner. Keep posting more bs, show us all
    how much you actually don't know about code.


    > *DUH* Let your slowhead catch up
    > with your fingers next time.


    Nice try. Do you like when the saints go marching in?

    > webpage server ****up!). How you
    > going to engineer it to know it's
    > own checksum of "FU4Q" in advance of


    See above. Wiggle, squirm if you must, but I've caught you, and beaten
    you at your own little game. I Raidy have 0wned you, time and time
    again. I must admit tho, it's not like you were difficult to con.

    > Now c'mon do us all a nice koOkdance!


    Wouldn't you rather I play when the saints go marching in on this nice
    piano? It's in tune!

    --
    Dustin Cook
    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •