On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:32:54 GMT, Dustin Cook
<spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:

>"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:ev8f32$3ff$1
>@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns990ADBBD7B989HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:ev1481$sc2$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> When have I ever mailbombed anyone? Dates and times please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You make a lot of demands, Dustin.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you talk ****, and I know your talking ****, I'm going to call
>>>>> you on it. You claimed I was mailbombing, again.. That implies that
>>>>> I had done this before, I want proof of this. otherwise, I can say
>>>>> your a liar and it would be the truth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> See below.
>>>
>>>>>>> <links snipped, they don't apply>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <links restored>
>>>>>
>>>>> For what reason? No mailbombing has taken place, stopspam.org and
>>>>> nana doesn't apply in this case.
>>>>
>>>> I think you fail to understand how most people with a clue will
>>>> interpret your original posts.
>>>
>>> And again, I reiterate, most people got the meaning behind the post as
>>> soon as a ripping group greet was mentioned. The ehm, fact your
>>> knowledge of the net and computers in general is laughingly, low,
>>> doesn't make what you said accurate. You need to stop making the
>>> assumption that various individuals on alt.comp.virus don't know me,
>>> They do, some know me more than you ever will. Some of them even have
>>> my trust, that alone is something you didn't ever have, Rhonda. You
>>> should also quit making the assumption that everyone reading these
>>> newsgroups and threads are as ignorant as you concerning computers,
>>> or the internet. C'mon, you didn't even know how a hit counter
>>> worked, how could anyone expect you to understand a ripping group
>>> greet... *shrug*
>>
>> Y'know, Dustin, what everyone can see is your dishonesty and the way you
>> backpedal.
>>
>> Feel free to continue.
>
>Hahaha. Your trying the same defense 4Q tried.. It didn't work to well for
>him, what makes you think it's going to work for you? You have been caught,
>plain and simple making a complete fool of yourself by assuming even for a
>second that anyone would actually mail bomb 4Q from HHI. You made an error
>in judgement, and instead of admitting it and moving on, your trying to
>claim it's dishonesty on my part. No mam, you misjudged me, and you can't
>back your way out of that, now.
>
>>>> And just to point it up, you are a part of Happy Hackers, Inc., so
>>>> talking about it as though you're somehow removed from what it does
>>>> doesn't cut the mustard.
>>>
>>> A part yes, but I don't have the final say. It wouldn't be a group,
>>> if I did... Stop trying to mislead people Rhonda.
>>
>> How am I trying to mislead anyone by pointing out that you are a part of
>> the group.
>
>The misleading aspect comes into play when you make the assumption that
>because I am part of the group, that I have control over the groups
>activities. Unless your completely ignorant of how organizations like this
>run, and I suspect you probably are, you would know I do *not* have
>complete authority or control over the group of individuals who consist of
>HHI.
>
>I have about as much control over what HHI does as you do over what AUK
>posts.
>
>> It seems to me that you've tried to divorce yourself from the actions of
>> the group.
>>
>> That's not honest.
>
>Actually, It's not honest making assumptions and based on those assumptions
>trying to convince people that so and so is this or that.
>
>Even when facts stating otherwise are pointed out to you, You want to
>fight.
>
>>> Nobody's really
>>> falling for it now anyway. Have you had time to review the thread
>>> that the thank you for BugHunter came from? It goes against the BS
>>> you've been trying to get people to swallow, hook line and sinker. I
>>> told you, yes, your being conned alright, but not by me. 4Q will use
>>> anyone to help him target who ever he has in mind at the time. You
>>> have seriouslly allied yourself with one untrustworthy, unreliable
>>> coward; which is a leech/plague to Av and Vx alike.
>>
>> Y'know, Dustin, you seem confused about what I'm doing.
>
>No, I don't think so. At this point, Your angry with me, and your going to
>continue playing games on usenet until you feel you've done enough
>imaginary PR damage to either myself or the program known as BugHunter.
>
>When you decide to stop is when your going to stop, nothing I say or do has
>any barring on your decision. You get off on usenet fights It would seem.
>
>>> I don't think your a troll, no. I think your still angry with me, and
>>> you don't want to resolve anything yet. So for the time being, your
>>> going to continue jerking me around and playing games on usenet.
>>
>> I'm not angry, Dustin.
>
>I respectfully would call you a liar, in that case.
>
>>> The reason I say this is because of your last thread, which you
>>> decided to inform everyone about 4Q's latest html handywork. I
>>> haven't had previous conversation with you in sometime until you did
>>> that. It tells me that you are still angry, as I said, and you want
>>> to fight. Your looking to pick them at this point.
>>
>> I think you just aren't reading the same words I'm typing.
>
>I don't know what it is you *think* your typing, but they are not friendly.
>
>>> You've made innuendo threats about my credibility concerning you and
>>> your auk friends; As if you could actually hurt anything. The field I
>>> work and specialize in is simply, out of your league.
>>
>> What is an innuendo threat?
>
>Threat Begin:
>I said:
>> The impression I make on people doesn't seem to bother me. Based on
>> the thank you emails for bughunter, I'd say I'm making a kickass
>> impression as a malware fighter. What you or your auk friends think of
>> me doesn't matter at the end of the day.
>and you responded with:
>
>We'll see how that turns out.
>
>Threat End:
>
>To quote yourself,
>
>"I think you fail to understand how most people with a clue will
>interpret your original posts."
>
>>> Don't rely on 4Q for the dirt on me Rhonda. If you want to know
>>> something, ask me.
>>
>> I know all I need to know about you, Dustin.
>
>Heh, you know what they say about assumptions right?
>
I don't think I like you very much.

--
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
http://blu05.port5.com
#20 Usenet *******
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Oh fer ****sakes. Welcome to my killfile you annoying little gnat.

<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>