On Apr 4, 5:05 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175720042.204805.44050@w1g2000hsg.googlegrou ps.com
>
>
>
> > On Apr 4, 3:19 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175626759.582779.305300@n76g2000hsh.google groups.com
>
> >>> On Apr 3, 8:24 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >>>> message
>
> >>>>news:Xns9907121FF18C4HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.1 21
>
> >>>>> "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>> news:1175576588.213622.219000 @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>>>>> Customers of retail giant T.K.Max reeling
> >>>>>> in horror as they realize backdoor Trojan
> >>>>>> BugHunteris responsible for the theft of
>
> >>>>> Don't forget 4Q, each download is a punch in your face.
>
> >>>>> Say, somebody in HHI wanted me to ask how your email was doing
> >>>>> these days? Getting alot of fan mail? HAHAHAH
>
> >>>> Mailbombing again, Dustin?
>
> >>> No wonder this post didn't show in my news client, You've
> >>> crossposted it to auk...
>
> >>> Nobody has mailbombed anyone, Rhonda. I was told that 4Q was greeted
> >>> in an .nfo release, that's why I asked about his fanmail. With
> >>> thousands of downloads and counting, I'd be surprised if someone
> >>> didn't email him. Remember Dear, he openly attacked HHI here on
> >>> usenet. I have no control over what might occur as a result.
>
> >> And again, Dustin, this is exactly why no one should trust you.
>
> > Ehh? Excuse me... In case you missed it, 4Q has a beef with HHI that
> > doesn't directly involve me. He wanted to bring attention to the
> > group, so he's got there attention. Now, whatever happens to him or
> > his site as a result is heh, his problem, not mine. You can't hold me
> > responsible if someone else decides to shut his mouth for him.
>
> You're part of HHI.
>
> And this is like saying I can't hold you responsible for the posting of
> my address.
>
> I do.
>
> > Despite your attempts at character assissanation, it's not going to
> > happen. Face facts, people do trust me, more people trust me with each
> > passing day. Nobody really cares about your tit for tat attacks on me.
>
> Do they?
>
> > Any particular reason your crossposting to alt.usenet.kooks? You've
> > tried to pass yourself off as something other than a troll, but I
> > don't think your conning too many people at this point. Everyone can
> > see I'm extending a peace offering, and your spitting in my face.
>
> I thought you recognized that I'm not a troll.
>
> Shall I retrieve the post?

I think you misunderstood me. I don't actually think you are a troll
per say, but you are trying your best to act like one presently.

> >>>> Will you ever learn to color within the lines?
>
> >>> When will you learn to talk about things you do know about? Instead
> >>> of making an ass of yourself like you did with this post of yours.
> >>> Mailbombing... PFFt.
>
> >> <shakes head> You really don't understand the impression you make on
> >> people, do you.
>
> > The impression I make on people doesn't seem to bother me. Based on
> > the thank you emails for bughunter, I'd say I'm making a kickass
> > impression as a malware fighter. What you or your auk friends think of
> > me doesn't matter at the end of the day.
>
> We'll see how that turns out.

LoL! Rhonda, I don't mind idle threats; I personally find them
hillarious. My abilities ehh, speak for themselves.

> >>> When have I ever mailbombed anyone? Dates and times please.
>
> >> You make a lot of demands, Dustin.
>
> > When you talk ****, and I know your talking ****, I'm going to call
> > you on it. You claimed I was mailbombing, again.. That implies that I
> > had done this before, I want proof of this. otherwise, I can say your
> > a liar and it would be the truth.
>
>

I don't see why your smiling...You had no clue what I was talking
about, because your a technological idiot, but don't assume everyone
else here is...

> >>> <links snipped, they don't apply>
>
> >> <links restored>
>
> > For what reason? No mailbombing has taken place, stopspam.org and nana
> > doesn't apply in this case.
>
> I think you fail to understand how most people with a clue will
> interpret your original posts.

Nah, I don't think so Rhonda. Anyone who isn't a technological idiot
knows what .nfo files are, and what it is to be greeted inside one.
The fact that you don't have a clue about it, doesn't matter.

> And just to point it up, you are a part of Happy Hackers, Inc., so
> talking about it as though you're somehow removed from what it does
> doesn't cut the mustard.

What point is it your trying to make? I'm part of HHI yes, does that
mean I have the final say in what's done? No, it's a group; the group
makes the decisions not individuals. 4Q doesn't even know the persons
involved in the group besides myself, None of them have any clue why
he wants to involve HHI into anything here. HHI has never done
anything untowards him or anyone else who isn't affiliated with the
record labels. If his dirt on me is so weak he has to involve others
into it, he might as well give it up and accept the fact he's a
coward. He's more deserving of auk awards then I ever would be.

> >>> Rhonda, I've apologized for everything I felt I did wrong towards
> >>> you, At this point, I don't feel I owe you anything more.
>
> >> rofl!
>
> > Rhonda, You do realize with each wiseass remark you make towards my
> > offers of truce, you are looking more and more like the troll I
> > originally said you were. So keep it up.
>
> Can't make up your mind, can you.

heh.. Rhonda, why do you want to play games? The primary question is
simple.

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk