BugHunter responsible for 45million stolen credit cards from T.K.Max

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns990CE2BEA3F2BHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:evbb0p$ou8$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> You flat out asked him if he was enjoying all the mail he was
>> getting. You tried to arrange for him to be mailbombed.
>
> *sigh*
>
> http://www.google.com/search?
> hl=en&q=hinder+hhi+torrent&btnG=Google+Search
>
> No mailbombing attempt was taking place, and nobody in HHI tried to
> have such a silly thing done.
>
>> Did it work?
>
> Again, he wasn't mailbombed. Probably greeted by some who don't share
> his view regarding HHI, but mailbombed I highly doubt.

Maybe someday you'll learn to tone down your hyperbole.

>> Posting my name, address and phone number takes it out of the realm
>> of usenet and brings it into the real world.
>
> Correction, emailing your name, address and phone number to persons
> you do not know online brings it into the real world.

No. It doesn't.

> You seem to
> have a very hard time accepting the fact that you originally provided
> the information which eventually was posted to usenet.

I gave the information to you. It was not intended for posting.

I think you ought to go back and read what you wrote about it at the
time--in email. Then figure out how you're going to reconcile it.

> You're
> Your beating a dead horse tho, I've already apologized to you for my
> part in that happening.

Very recently. Yet you keep waffling. It wasn't your fault, because I
gave you the information.

This is the heart of the problem, Dustin.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:evc8l4$a6p$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns990CE2BEA3F2BHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:evbb0p$ou8$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> You flat out asked him if he was enjoying all the mail he was
>>> getting. You tried to arrange for him to be mailbombed.
>>
>> *sigh*
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?
>> hl=en&q=hinder+hhi+torrent&btnG=Google+Search
>>
>> No mailbombing attempt was taking place, and nobody in HHI tried to
>> have such a silly thing done.
>>
>>> Did it work?
>>
>> Again, he wasn't mailbombed. Probably greeted by some who don't share
>> his view regarding HHI, but mailbombed I highly doubt.
>
> Maybe someday you'll learn to tone down your hyperbole.

Ah yes, a detailed explanation for exactly what did take place would be
hyperbole if it doesn't help your cause wouldn't it... My bad.

>>> Posting my name, address and phone number takes it out of the realm
>>> of usenet and brings it into the real world.
>>
>> Correction, emailing your name, address and phone number to persons
>> you do not know online brings it into the real world.
>
> No. It doesn't.

Ehh, why do you think it doesn't?

>> You seem to
>> have a very hard time accepting the fact that you originally provided
>> the information which eventually was posted to usenet.
>
> I gave the information to you. It was not intended for posting.

The information traveled via open email servers. I have already
apologized for the information leak that I caused. Again, I am sorry.
I don't understand why you think I'm trying to evade responsibility for
the leak in the first place. You can't really be this ignorant.
You have to be playing myself and others who read this thread.

> I think you ought to go back and read what you wrote about it at the
> time--in email. Then figure out how you're going to reconcile it.

Not possible. Correspondence with you has since been deleted. I'm not in
the habit of keeping emails for any real length of time. Especially if I
no longer email said person.

>> You're
>> Your beating a dead horse tho, I've already apologized to you for my
>> part in that happening.
>
> Very recently. Yet you keep waffling. It wasn't your fault, because I
> gave you the information.

Again, I am sorry the information was leaked, It was my fault the leaking
occured. And indirectly my fault for the post occuring; as I did provide
the information and resources necessary for the post to occur.

> This is the heart of the problem, Dustin.

Tsk. Your lieing again. The heart of the problem is that you are still
very angry with me, and your going to pursue this until someone will
listen to you concerning your issues with me.

You already twist things around to suit you. I haven't said it wasn't my
fault at any point, I said you had some to share in it, but that I was
not in some way not responsible for it. Now, if your half as intelligent
as your trying to pass yourself off to be, I don't see how you could have
missed any of this.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2a
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Lamey]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:32:54 GMT, Dustin Cook
<spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote:

>"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:ev8f32$3ff$1
>@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns990ADBBD7B989HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:ev1481$sc2$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> When have I ever mailbombed anyone? Dates and times please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You make a lot of demands, Dustin.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you talk ****, and I know your talking ****, I'm going to call
>>>>> you on it. You claimed I was mailbombing, again.. That implies that
>>>>> I had done this before, I want proof of this. otherwise, I can say
>>>>> your a liar and it would be the truth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> See below.
>>>
>>>>>>> <links snipped, they don't apply>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <links restored>
>>>>>
>>>>> For what reason? No mailbombing has taken place, stopspam.org and
>>>>> nana doesn't apply in this case.
>>>>
>>>> I think you fail to understand how most people with a clue will
>>>> interpret your original posts.
>>>
>>> And again, I reiterate, most people got the meaning behind the post as
>>> soon as a ripping group greet was mentioned. The ehm, fact your
>>> knowledge of the net and computers in general is laughingly, low,
>>> doesn't make what you said accurate. You need to stop making the
>>> assumption that various individuals on alt.comp.virus don't know me,
>>> They do, some know me more than you ever will. Some of them even have
>>> my trust, that alone is something you didn't ever have, Rhonda. You
>>> should also quit making the assumption that everyone reading these
>>> newsgroups and threads are as ignorant as you concerning computers,
>>> or the internet. C'mon, you didn't even know how a hit counter
>>> worked, how could anyone expect you to understand a ripping group
>>> greet... *shrug*
>>
>> Y'know, Dustin, what everyone can see is your dishonesty and the way you
>> backpedal.
>>
>> Feel free to continue.
>
>Hahaha. Your trying the same defense 4Q tried.. It didn't work to well for
>him, what makes you think it's going to work for you? You have been caught,
>plain and simple making a complete fool of yourself by assuming even for a
>second that anyone would actually mail bomb 4Q from HHI. You made an error
>in judgement, and instead of admitting it and moving on, your trying to
>claim it's dishonesty on my part. No mam, you misjudged me, and you can't
>back your way out of that, now.
>
>>>> And just to point it up, you are a part of Happy Hackers, Inc., so
>>>> talking about it as though you're somehow removed from what it does
>>>> doesn't cut the mustard.
>>>
>>> A part yes, but I don't have the final say. It wouldn't be a group,
>>> if I did... Stop trying to mislead people Rhonda.
>>
>> How am I trying to mislead anyone by pointing out that you are a part of
>> the group.
>
>The misleading aspect comes into play when you make the assumption that
>because I am part of the group, that I have control over the groups
>activities. Unless your completely ignorant of how organizations like this
>run, and I suspect you probably are, you would know I do *not* have
>complete authority or control over the group of individuals who consist of
>HHI.
>
>I have about as much control over what HHI does as you do over what AUK
>posts.
>
>> It seems to me that you've tried to divorce yourself from the actions of
>> the group.
>>
>> That's not honest.
>
>Actually, It's not honest making assumptions and based on those assumptions
>trying to convince people that so and so is this or that.
>
>Even when facts stating otherwise are pointed out to you, You want to
>fight.
>
>>> Nobody's really
>>> falling for it now anyway. Have you had time to review the thread
>>> that the thank you for BugHunter came from? It goes against the BS
>>> you've been trying to get people to swallow, hook line and sinker. I
>>> told you, yes, your being conned alright, but not by me. 4Q will use
>>> anyone to help him target who ever he has in mind at the time. You
>>> have seriouslly allied yourself with one untrustworthy, unreliable
>>> coward; which is a leech/plague to Av and Vx alike.
>>
>> Y'know, Dustin, you seem confused about what I'm doing.
>
>No, I don't think so. At this point, Your angry with me, and your going to
>continue playing games on usenet until you feel you've done enough
>imaginary PR damage to either myself or the program known as BugHunter.
>
>When you decide to stop is when your going to stop, nothing I say or do has
>any barring on your decision. You get off on usenet fights It would seem.
>
>>> I don't think your a troll, no. I think your still angry with me, and
>>> you don't want to resolve anything yet. So for the time being, your
>>> going to continue jerking me around and playing games on usenet.
>>
>> I'm not angry, Dustin.
>
>I respectfully would call you a liar, in that case.
>
>>> The reason I say this is because of your last thread, which you
>>> decided to inform everyone about 4Q's latest html handywork. I
>>> haven't had previous conversation with you in sometime until you did
>>> that. It tells me that you are still angry, as I said, and you want
>>> to fight. Your looking to pick them at this point.
>>
>> I think you just aren't reading the same words I'm typing.
>
>I don't know what it is you *think* your typing, but they are not friendly.
>
>>> You've made innuendo threats about my credibility concerning you and
>>> your auk friends; As if you could actually hurt anything. The field I
>>> work and specialize in is simply, out of your league.
>>
>> What is an innuendo threat?
>
>Threat Begin:
>I said:
>> The impression I make on people doesn't seem to bother me. Based on
>> the thank you emails for bughunter, I'd say I'm making a kickass
>> impression as a malware fighter. What you or your auk friends think of
>> me doesn't matter at the end of the day.
>and you responded with:
>
>We'll see how that turns out.
>
>Threat End:
>
>To quote yourself,
>
>"I think you fail to understand how most people with a clue will
>interpret your original posts."
>
>>> Don't rely on 4Q for the dirt on me Rhonda. If you want to know
>>> something, ask me.
>>
>> I know all I need to know about you, Dustin.
>
>Heh, you know what they say about assumptions right?
>
I don't think I like you very much.

--
Usenet lits score:

GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
http://blu05.port5.com
#20 Usenet *******
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Oh fer ****sakes. Welcome to my killfile you annoying little gnat.

<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>