On Apr 3, 6:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns990710F21ED9EHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>
>
>
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:eur0hf$22$1
> > @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186 .121
> >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
> >>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
> >>>> different discussion.
>
> >>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting
> >>>> history.
>
> >>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>
> >> Email you again?
>
> >> Huh?
>
> >>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
> >>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
> >>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
> >>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
> >>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences.
> >>>>> BugHunter is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>
> >>>> You're missing the point.
>
> >>>> Again.
>
> >>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
> >>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
> >>> working.
>
> >> How can you tell?
>
> >>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
> >>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
> >>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>
> >>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>
> >>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>
> >> As I said.
>
> >>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can
> >>>> do to change that.
>
> >>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
> >>> this?
>
> >> No.
>
> >> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>
> > I don't see what an IQ has to do with my question.
>
> For someone with a high IQ, you have serious reading comprehension
> problems.

Perhaps, or perhaps I really don't like assinine tit for tat riddles.
You said I was trying to change something or other, I asked for
clarification, you don't wish to answer, fine.

> > Hmm. Does it really matter? Your basing your opinions on me based on
> > old usenet posts primarily.
>
> No. I'm not, actually. I'm basing my opinion of you on the way I've seen
> you behave, in the present time, with me and with others.

Do you really expect anyone to believe this bull**** of yours? I have
apologized for everything that I did, I don't know what the hell else
you expect from me. You've seen usenet posts, you haven't seen private
correspondence, online chats, nor have you observed me in real life on
my time or company time. Your opinion isn't based on factual evidence,
only what you percieve to be. And you already have a slanted view.

> You went over the line with /me/, remember?

After you began discussing in usenet with kman about why I might have
decided to no longer speak to you.

> So I know what kind of person you are.

No, you don't. You have no clue about me.

> >>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
> >>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>
> >>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to
> >>> people on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on
> >>> serious drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>
> >> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>
> > Are you trying to emulate a liza program? Or have you been to see a
> > therapist recently?
>
> Why are you responding, Dustin?

At this point, I really don't know why I bother... It's obvious you
don't want a resolution, you just want to troll. So troll away, I'm
done.
> >>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
> >>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you
> >>> can continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It
> >>> doesn't make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>
> >> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>
> > Indeed, from my own keyboard. Yes, when I was doing quasi legal
> > things. Does it change the point I made in the slightest? No.
>
> You were lying then or you're lying now. Either way, you lie.

Do you know of any humans that do not lie? It's a pointless strawman
Rhonda.


> No one had your emails, I didn't start poking at you until you started
> calling me names and wishing me dead. I even protested the treatment you
> were receiving up until them.

Not entirely true. Are you intentionally misleading persons? I believe
you started hypothesising with kman over why I decided I no longer
wished to speak with you. You've had a tone with me ever since. I
didn't respond in a professional manner, but lets not forget who
exactly initiated this.

> Tell me again about your ability to reason.

I don't know what else I can do for you, I've apologized for
everything I did. I've taken more than my fair share of the blame for
it even having gotten as far as it has. You could try meeting me
halfway here. Of course, that would be a bad assumption on my part, as
I do not wish to continue a troll fight; and you do.

> Right. That's why I wasn't worried about your having my address. More
> like, I have far too little paranoia.

Rhonda, another misleading? Your address and name YOU willingly
inserted into some program that thought it wise to include it with
each outgoing email. Stop trying to pretend your address was a well
kept secret. I wasn't going to say anything about that, but it's
getting old. Play a new song.

> I don't think Einstein ever took an IQ test. I haven't researched it
> thoroughly, but I believe his IQ was estimated, based on what he did.
> That should tell you something about your claims.

My claims? Whatever. This is pointless. If some people here can digup
my criminal record, they can likely dig up my medical records too.
Debating over a few IQ points is a complete waste of my time. You may
think whatever suits you, I really don't care. I am not going to fight
with you, do you understand this yet?

--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk