PcButts caught in another lie on his blog

[Dustin Cook]

Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in news:1175136047_8027
@sp6iad.superfeed.net:

> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:33:49 +0000, Dustin Cook wrote:
>>
>> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in
>> news:1175135435_8021@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>>>
>>> There you go, complaint file by ME, showing your entire headers, your
>>> site violating the LAW again, and that it's back up. Now, keep the
>>> filth online and see what happens.
>>>
>>
>> Hey, at this point, doesn't the ISP become liable? as they have not
>> disabled access to the offending material...
>
> His host has two options - pull his account, not just the site, or have
> legal complaint file with the LEO in the company location for failure
to
> have the material removed. The violation of US law is real and most
ISP's
> would rather cancel an account than deal with that.
>
> He won't put the other pages back online, he knows what will happen if
> they see that he's flaunting it and abusing their TOS/AUP.
>

This link is still good:

http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm

And it's porno. I've screen captured it in case he tries to change
anything. Inform file the complaint with the LEO, since the ISP seems to
be slow to take action.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in news:1175136047_8027
@sp6iad.superfeed.net:

> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:33:49 +0000, Dustin Cook wrote:
>>
>> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in
>> news:1175135435_8021@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>>>
>>> There you go, complaint file by ME, showing your entire headers, your
>>> site violating the LAW again, and that it's back up. Now, keep the
>>> filth online and see what happens.
>>>
>>
>> Hey, at this point, doesn't the ISP become liable? as they have not
>> disabled access to the offending material...
>
> His host has two options - pull his account, not just the site, or have
> legal complaint file with the LEO in the company location for failure
to
> have the material removed. The violation of US law is real and most
ISP's
> would rather cancel an account than deal with that.
>
> He won't put the other pages back online, he knows what will happen if
> they see that he's flaunting it and abusing their TOS/AUP.
>

Looks like his license page is a template, stolen from another site
entirely. LOL!

He cut/pasted somebody elses html code, and modified the description to
include the paragraph and the lame pictures... What a looo hooo seerrr!


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[C J.]

This thread is living proof that its always better to tell the truth from
the start. One lie leads to 10 more... and as the number of lies go up...
your chances of slipping up /getting ow3ned become greater.

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9901EFD4F37AFHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in news:1175136047_8027
> @sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:33:49 +0000, Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in
>>> news:1175135435_8021@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>>>>
>>>> There you go, complaint file by ME, showing your entire headers, your
>>>> site violating the LAW again, and that it's back up. Now, keep the
>>>> filth online and see what happens.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hey, at this point, doesn't the ISP become liable? as they have not
>>> disabled access to the offending material...
>>
>> His host has two options - pull his account, not just the site, or have
>> legal complaint file with the LEO in the company location for failure
> to
>> have the material removed. The violation of US law is real and most
> ISP's
>> would rather cancel an account than deal with that.
>>
>> He won't put the other pages back online, he knows what will happen if
>> they see that he's flaunting it and abusing their TOS/AUP.
>>
>
> Looks like his license page is a template, stolen from another site
> entirely. LOL!
>
> He cut/pasted somebody elses html code, and modified the description to
> include the paragraph and the lame pictures... What a looo hooo seerrr!
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
> bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>

[Dustin Cook]

"C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in
news:YNHOh.3042$YL5.1596@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t:

> This thread is living proof that its always better to tell the truth
> from the start. One lie leads to 10 more... and as the number of lies
> go up... your chances of slipping up /getting ow3ned become greater.

This is why I was upfront and honest about my past when I decided to
release BugHunter.

It's why 4Q is having such a hard time running me thru the mud. I didn't
lie about who I am. heh.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99027A1E617FHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in
> news:YNHOh.3042$YL5.1596@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t:
>
>> This thread is living proof that its always better to tell the truth
>> from the start. One lie leads to 10 more... and as the number of lies
>> go up... your chances of slipping up /getting ow3ned become greater.
>
> This is why I was upfront and honest about my past when I decided to
> release BugHunter.
>
> It's why 4Q is having such a hard time running me thru the mud. I
> didn't lie about who I am. heh.

Here's what everyone knows about you, Dustin:

When you work yourself into a frenzy, you're capable of anything.

Anyone who reads the posts leading up to your disclosure of my home
address and cell phone number (which you posted to alt.sex, encouraging
people to stop by) can easily see that you have no loyalty and no honor.

What that means is that you cannot be trusted, even now.

We engaged in a correspondence. I never disclosed any of it to anyone,
but you chose to endanger my family because you were losing a flame war.

If you'll do that, you'll do anything.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Leythos]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:

> This link ******* http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm remember,
> hey dumb **** this link I posted 2 days ago
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm here it is again
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm

http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm 404 - Page not found

LOL - complaint worked fine.

--
Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
*** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[pcbutts1]

You dumb ass I told you last week that I was going to leave that link up for
1 week, it's been one week. Complaint failed! Didn't you just say at least 4
times that that link was not part of your complaint. You're an *******,
You're a ****ing troll, You are mad because you can't use that link in your
sig file anymore.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:1175188304_8457@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>
>> This link ******* http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>> remember,
>> hey dumb **** this link I posted 2 days ago
>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm here it is again
>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm 404 - Page not found
>
> LOL - complaint worked fine.
>
> --
> Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
> *** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
> abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
> website ***
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[no.pencil.necks]

On Mar 29, 12:11 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns99027A1E617FHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>
> > "C J." <no.re...@example.invalid> wrote in
> >news:YNHOh.3042$YL5.1596@newssvr29.news.prodigy.n et:
>
> >> This thread is living proof that its always better to tell the truth
> >> from the start. One lie leads to 10 more... and as the number of lies
> >> go up... your chances of slipping up /getting ow3ned become greater.
>
> > This is why I was upfront and honest about my past when I decided to
> > release BugHunter.
>
> > It's why 4Q is having such a hard time running me thru the mud. I
> > didn't lie about who I am. heh.
>
> Here's what everyone knows about you, Dustin:
>
> When you work yourself into a frenzy, you're capable of anything.
>
> Anyone who reads the posts leading up to your disclosure of my home
> address and cell phone number (which you posted to alt.sex, encouraging
> people to stop by) can easily see that you have no loyalty and no honor.
>
> What that means is that you cannot be trusted, even now.
>
> We engaged in a correspondence. I never disclosed any of it to anyone,
> but you chose to endanger my family because you were losing a flame war.
>
> If you'll do that, you'll do anything.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
> willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

Er, well, Dustbin (I hope you do not mind referring to you with that
nick since we have not met nor exchanged any "private" emails which
seems a wise choice as you have no compunction to use any and all
means to attack others)...

1. You should Google for a definition of HONEST and report which one
you have adopted. The audience would be curious, nay, entertained.

2. Do you not mean when you "seeded" the BugPumper program to the
hapless users? Staging those folks for an upcoming major "UPDATE"?

3. While you and butts get endlessly flamed, did it occur to anyone
that while the debated origins of WGET tool are not fully resolved
[here], that the USE OF WGET BY OUR WINGED SUPERHERO (the esteemed
David H. Lipman {I did genuflect when I typed his name by the way}) is
probably not proper since the AV companies he gets the definitions
[from] are not posting those for his targeted use. (Please prove
otherwise).

4. Moreover, BatMan gets lots of kudos for his multi-av when it is
nothing more than a wrapper around the work of countless others? Yet
he is so very important that he seldom if ever mentions this fact?
Proper credit, that is.

5. Lastly, our hovering superzero denies any responsibility when
multi-av breaks something. This is simply a foolish response on his
part as we all know very well that the myriad PC configurations that
do exist render COMPLETE testing impossible and there will be a
stochastic process that involves the occasional PC that WILL SUFFER
HARM from his "wrapper".


n.p.n

[Leythos]

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:21:32 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>
> You dumb ass I told you last week that I was going to leave that link up for
> 1 week, it's been one week. Complaint failed! Didn't you just say at least 4
> times that that link was not part of your complaint. You're an *******,
> You're a ****ing troll, You are mad because you can't use that link in your
> sig file anymore.
>

I'm not mad and it seems strange that the complaint was file, that the
page is no longer that, and that your claims are appearing to be full of
nothing but hot air.

I filed the complaint last night and it worked.

Oh, and I can leave anything I want in my sig, in fact, I know several
people that will host the content you had on those pages you can no longer
put on your website and could direct people to them, but I'm not into
filth like you appear to be.

So, as I said before, prove me a liar, put all of the filth back online at
the SAME location and SAME names and leave it up, prove me wrong.

I would actually be happy to think that you had gained some ethics, some
morals, and could find non-pornographic means to express yourself in a way
that doesn't expose innocent kids to your filth.

--
Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
*** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[C J.]

"no.pencil.necks" <no.pencil.necks@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175189044.071702.203520@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com...
On Mar 29, 12:11 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns99027A1E617FHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>
> > "C J." <no.re...@example.invalid> wrote in
> >news:YNHOh.3042$YL5.1596@newssvr29.news.prodigy.n et:
>
> >> This thread is living proof that its always better to tell the truth
> >> from the start. One lie leads to 10 more... and as the number of lies
> >> go up... your chances of slipping up /getting ow3ned become greater.
>
> > This is why I was upfront and honest about my past when I decided to
> > release BugHunter.
>
> > It's why 4Q is having such a hard time running me thru the mud. I
> > didn't lie about who I am. heh.
>
> Here's what everyone knows about you, Dustin:
>
> When you work yourself into a frenzy, you're capable of anything.
>
> Anyone who reads the posts leading up to your disclosure of my home
> address and cell phone number (which you posted to alt.sex, encouraging
> people to stop by) can easily see that you have no loyalty and no honor.
>
> What that means is that you cannot be trusted, even now.
>
> We engaged in a correspondence. I never disclosed any of it to anyone,
> but you chose to endanger my family because you were losing a flame war.
>
> If you'll do that, you'll do anything.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
> willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

Er, well, Dustbin (I hope you do not mind referring to you with that
nick since we have not met nor exchanged any "private" emails which
seems a wise choice as you have no compunction to use any and all
means to attack others)...

1. You should Google for a definition of HONEST and report which one
you have adopted. The audience would be curious, nay, entertained.

2. Do you not mean when you "seeded" the BugPumper program to the
hapless users? Staging those folks for an upcoming major "UPDATE"?

3. While you and butts get endlessly flamed, did it occur to anyone
that while the debated origins of WGET tool are not fully resolved
[here], that the USE OF WGET BY OUR WINGED SUPERHERO (the esteemed
David H. Lipman {I did genuflect when I typed his name by the way}) is
probably not proper since the AV companies he gets the definitions
[from] are not posting those for his targeted use. (Please prove
otherwise).

4. Moreover, BatMan gets lots of kudos for his multi-av when it is
nothing more than a wrapper around the work of countless others? Yet
he is so very important that he seldom if ever mentions this fact?
Proper credit, that is.

5. Lastly, our hovering superzero denies any responsibility when
multi-av breaks something. This is simply a foolish response on his
part as we all know very well that the myriad PC configurations that
do exist render COMPLETE testing impossible and there will be a
stochastic process that involves the occasional PC that WILL SUFFER
HARM from his "wrapper".


n.p.n

Multi_Av is a useful utility. I've used it on a couple of PCs I've repaired
for others - as well as tested it on my own PC. Its primary purpose - in
use - is to scan for and remove viruses and IMO it does it very well. I
suppose you could say Multi AV becomes a tool of last resort when your own
installed AV and/or Firewall programs have failed, or have been disabled by
malware, or other more serious infectors.

In the case of massive infection, its pretty much a given by that point,
that any machines OS will most likey be fried, even after all the infectors
found - are eradicated.

As an example - I used Daves tool, along with Ewido, Spybot Search and
Destroy, and Adaware SE on a Dell Dimension 4600C that was infected with
over 522 viruses /trojans on a neighbors PC in July 2006.

After running the 4 utilities twice (once in safe mode, once in normal mode)
all but 10 items had been successfully removed. The Windows Core on her pc
was severrily crippled - and left in an unusable state.

I contacted Mikiemoes over at Bleepingcomputer.com and had him/her working
with me towards final cleanup for a repair install over the course of a
couple of days via posting of Hijackthis logs. After we got nowhere with
taking that approach, and because the core was to far gone - in the end I
made the decision to wipe my neighbors drive and re-install Windows onto a
new larger harddrive *.

Do I believe Mr Lipman's Multi_AV tool was responsible for the damage done
to my neighbors Windows installation.

No. And to come away with that opinion - would be completely idiotic. This
tool was not designed with the intention of replacing a PC users existing
installed Antivirus solution.

What I know was responsible for the damage done, was the neighbors own
surfing habits, combined with letting another member of her family use her
computer.

The machine was just taken out of the box and set up and used. It hadn't
been patched, it wasn't behind a firewall, their virus defs hadn't been
updated in nearly 18 months, and Viral scanning had been turned off by one
or more of the infectors.

( * It was later determined thru addition testing, that her harddrive had
massive cluster/sector, and service cylinder damage.)