Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in news:1175136047_8027
@sp6iad.superfeed.net:

> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:33:49 +0000, Dustin Cook wrote:
>>
>> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in
>> news:1175135435_8021@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:15:13 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/license.htm
>>>
>>> There you go, complaint file by ME, showing your entire headers, your
>>> site violating the LAW again, and that it's back up. Now, keep the
>>> filth online and see what happens.
>>>
>>
>> Hey, at this point, doesn't the ISP become liable? as they have not
>> disabled access to the offending material...
>
> His host has two options - pull his account, not just the site, or have
> legal complaint file with the LEO in the company location for failure
to
> have the material removed. The violation of US law is real and most
ISP's
> would rather cancel an account than deal with that.

Well then, you know what needs to be done.
Why stop at the links when the site itself placed the ISP in a legal
mess. Pursue the issue.

> He won't put the other pages back online, he knows what will happen if
> they see that he's flaunting it and abusing their TOS/AUP.
>


It's already down... The last link.. LOL


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml