"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in news:eus4di$3im$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> I'm busy putting up more pages
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/bughunter.htm would you like one?
Haha. More complaints filed against you... LoL. Your a ****ing moron
PcButts.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175564898.268965.223900
@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
> Dustbin wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or
have
>> you forgotten what it is I do for a living?
>
> Albert Dustbinstein (aka Raid) works in
> a hardware store. In between his main
> duties, cleaning the floors, counting
> delivered goods, running errands,
> stacking shelves, he gets his grubby mits
> on other peoples PC's. His problem
*hahahaha* A hardware store? LOL! Keep guessing moron. Here's a little
clue for your stupid ass, NET, PCSOS... Thats two.. If you can figure out
what those stand for, You'd see why I'm laughing so much at you right
now.
For the rest of you techies in the states, you know exactly what they
are. heheh.
> solving skills include opening the PC
> case and extracting dust from the circuit
> boards, then reassembling the case being
> careful not to have too many spare screws
> left over.
Wow. I didn't know xerox certification tests were that easy! Perhaps you
should do them.
> He sometimes draws upon the full extent
> of his 180 IQ training and uses his
> Degree in Soldering Wires Together from the
> University of PC circuit board cleaning.
Tsk Tsk, you really stepped on your own dick claiming IQ only goes to
170. *hahaha*.
You have gotten so desperate 4Q, I've never seen you this low on
something juicy to come at someone with. You might find i'm more than you
can handle, like AUK was. For shame for shame, your just not the billy
bad-ass editor at large you used to be.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euscel$o1s$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1175564898.268965.223900@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com
>> Dustbin wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>>> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or
>>> have you forgotten what it is I do for a living?
>>
>> Albert Dustbinstein (aka Raid) works in
>> a hardware store. In between his main
>> duties, cleaning the floors, counting
>> delivered goods, running errands,
>> stacking shelves, he gets his grubby mits
>> on other peoples PC's. His problem
>> solving skills include opening the PC
>> case and extracting dust from the circuit
>> boards, then reassembling the case being
>> careful not to have too many spare screws
>> left over.
>>
>> He sometimes draws upon the full extent
>> of his 180 IQ training and uses his
>> Degree in Soldering Wires Together from the
>> University of PC circuit board cleaning.
>
> You missed your calling, 4Q. <still laughing>
>
Have either of you verified my BEAM award claims yet? I'd love to be a
fly on the wall when either of you see my scores. I'd also like to ask at
that point, How does crow taste... heheheheh.
Ah well. I've said all I can say to you, I suppose. I don't wish to
fight, you do. So, unless you have questions of me or something, I won't
be responding further.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:1175464821.923405.79130@p15g2000hsd.googlegro ups.com:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175439630.899327.269950
>> @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> >> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:1175411394.262869.77750 @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>> >>
>> >> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> >> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:euk7vv$68f$1 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago
>> >> >> when
>> I
>> >> was
>> >> >> posting all that horse-****,
>> >> >
>> >> > Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>> >> >
>> >> > I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
>> >> > equestrian till I saw the photo of you
>> >> > looking after your pet on Butts site.
>> >>
>> >> *yawn*..
>> >>
>> >> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last
>> >> laugh.
>> Oh,
>> >> btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary, I'm
>> going
>> >> to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open it with
>> >> a
>> hex
>> >> editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4 bytes. It's
>> not,
>> >> heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Not even unzipped it. ;]]
>>
>> *haha*. I didn't think you did man.
>
> Why make a big effort to unzip when I
> can make you dance like a ****er so
> easily? *wink*
Ah yes, Of course, I'm dancing as your roasting in the firepit...
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns990711FAD95BFHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euscel$o1s$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1175564898.268965.223900@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com
>>> Dustbin wrote:
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or
>>>> have you forgotten what it is I do for a living?
>>>
>>> Albert Dustbinstein (aka Raid) works in
>>> a hardware store. In between his main
>>> duties, cleaning the floors, counting
>>> delivered goods, running errands,
>>> stacking shelves, he gets his grubby mits
>>> on other peoples PC's. His problem
>>> solving skills include opening the PC
>>> case and extracting dust from the circuit
>>> boards, then reassembling the case being
>>> careful not to have too many spare screws
>>> left over.
>>>
>>> He sometimes draws upon the full extent
>>> of his 180 IQ training and uses his
>>> Degree in Soldering Wires Together from the
>>> University of PC circuit board cleaning.
>>
>> You missed your calling, 4Q. <still laughing>
>>
>
> Have either of you verified my BEAM award claims yet? I'd love to be a
> fly on the wall when either of you see my scores. I'd also like to
> ask at that point, How does crow taste... heheheheh.
It doesn't appear to be an especially pretigious award, because i can't
even find it.
http://www.google.com/search?num=50&...22&btnG=Search
As for verifying it <shrug>...if you want to prove how smart you are,
prove it.
You can't, because you're not.
> Ah well. I've said all I can say to you, I suppose. I don't wish to
> fight, you do. So, unless you have questions of me or something, I
> won't be responding further.
Righto.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9907111723DB2HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euru44$gvc$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:aBeQh.5230$Kd3.3618@newssvr27.news.prodigy.ne t
>>> Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the
>>> Energizer Bunny have in common??
>>>
>>> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh
>>
>> Something to do on a lazy afternoon.
>>> (meanwhile PCButts has
>>> " fled the thread..." )
>>
>> He is, at his heart, a coward.
>
> What exactly do you see yourself as Rhonda?
How is that any of your business, Dustin?
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns990710F21ED9EHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eur0hf$22$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
>> message news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>>>> different discussion.
>>>>
>>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting
>>>> history.
>>>
>>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>>
>> Email you again?
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences.
>>>>> BugHunter is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>>>
>>>> You're missing the point.
>>>>
>>>> Again.
>>>
>>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
>>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
>>> working.
>>
>> How can you tell?
>>
>>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>>>
>>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>>>
>>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>>
>> As I said.
>>
>>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can
>>>> do to change that.
>>>
>>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
>>> this?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>
> I don't see what an IQ has to do with my question.
For someone with a high IQ, you have serious reading comprehension
problems.
>>>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen
>>>>>>> the program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was
>>>>>>> 0wned on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate
>>>>>>> to protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It
>>>>>>> hasn't been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it
>>>>> does not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>>>
>>>> And again.
>>>>
>>>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>>>> past.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my
>>>>> past isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals
>>>>> have no reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited
>>>>> knowledge they do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym
>>>>> Raid. Some people even think I'm out to get them, or that I will
>>>>> at some point, I'm just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from
>>>>> my nym Raid mind you, people have formed conclusions about what I
>>>>> must be like and even look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath
>>>>> based on nothing more, than usenet posts.
>>>>
>>>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>>>
>>> Not really.
>>
>> Really. You snipped.
>
> Hmm. Does it really matter? Your basing your opinions on me based on
> old usenet posts primarily.
No. I'm not, actually. I'm basing my opinion of you on the way I've seen
you behave, in the present time, with me and with others.
And snipping out the parts of the argument you don't want to deal
with--much like a cat trying to cover a pile of **** on the living room
carpet--isn't going to work to give me a better opinion of you.
>>> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
>>> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
>>> just say so. Why beat around the bush?
>>
>> Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?
>
> Wtf...
Why snip my words and replace them with words of your own. I don't care
how you perceived what I wrote...mostly because you perceive it
incorrectly.
>>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago
>>>>> when I was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would
>>>>> actually believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>>>
>>>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>>>
>>> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
>>> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The
>>> fact it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that
>>> fact.
>>
>> Just keep digging that hole.
>
> No hole to dig hun. Look up the history for yourself. You were conned
> into believing the bull****.
No, Dustin.
You went over the line with /me/, remember?
So I know what kind of person you are.
>>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>>>
>>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to
>>> people on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on
>>> serious drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>>
>> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>
> Are you trying to emulate a liza program? Or have you been to see a
> therapist recently?
Why are you responding, Dustin?
>>> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
>>> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
>>> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
>>> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
>>> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
>>> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.
>>
>> Baaaaaaaaaa.
>
> Is it the time of day when you responded? Your clearly not making any
> sense here...
You called me a sheep. What's not to understand?
>>>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>>>> gullible.It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that
>>>>> part about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>>>> believe you.
>>>
>>> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
>>> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
>>> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
>>> anything about me.
>>
>> On usenet, you are your words.
>
> Obviously that's not true. As you and several others are selectively
> choosing my words to form your opinions concerning myself.
No. I look at your behavior.
When pushed, you flip out. And then you do really ****ed up ****.
That's the test of everything.
>>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
>>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you
>>> can continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It
>>> doesn't make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>>
>> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>
> Indeed, from my own keyboard. Yes, when I was doing quasi legal
> things. Does it change the point I made in the slightest? No.
You were lying then or you're lying now. Either way, you lie.
>>>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a
>>>>> problem, I wish to resolve it.
>>>>
>>>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>>>
>>> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.
>>
>> <projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information
>> because of what you thought I was going to do. That I never even
>> considered doing. That I never did.
>
> You keep saying because i thought this or that. Truth is Rhonda, I
> thought (rightfully so) that you were trolling me. Nothing more,
> nothing less.
But all the evidence indicated that wasn't so.
No one had your emails, I didn't start poking at you until you started
calling me names and wishing me dead. I even protested the treatment you
were receiving up until them.
Tell me again about your ability to reason.
>> Tell me about paranoid.
>
> I'm sure you have years experience on me.
Right. That's why I wasn't worried about your having my address. More
like, I have far too little paranoia.
>>>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I
>>>>>> have
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>>>
>>>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>>>
>>> I see. Those degrees please?
>>
>> My education isn't germane to the discussion.
>
> Your questioning my intelligence because you don't personally think IQ
> scales go beyond 170.
I didn't say that.
And here, again, is the link I posted:
http://hem.bredband.net/b153434/Index.htm
Now if you even skim it, you should understand what 4Q was saying about
"170."
> Since I know for a fact they do, and that the IQ
> tests provided to Einstein are NOT the same tests as provided today,
> Your damn right your education plays into the discussion.
I don't think Einstein ever took an IQ test. I haven't researched it
thoroughly, but I believe his IQ was estimated, based on what he did.
That should tell you something about your claims.
> What you do know, or in this case, don't specifically.
Eh?
>>>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>>>
>>> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
>>> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
>>> I'd like to know your qualifications.
>>
>> Did you read the links I posted?
>
> The links do not list your qualifications. Those links are no
> better/worse than mine.
So much for critical thinking.
>>>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>>>
>>>> No problem.
>>>
>>> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
>>> please?
>>
>> Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.
>
>
>> If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
>> astronomical IQ, I can't help you.
>
> An astronomical IQ? What are you smoking? Do you really believe this
> or are you just playing a part at this point?
Read my link.
You went overboard, and you look like an idiot.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
On Mar 30, 11:10 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Albert Dustbinstein wrote:
> >> > > system... NOW THAT IS entertainment!
>
> > > *haha* Another one!
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Co...is_Dick_Again/
>
>
>
> > Yep, I switched C.J with npn, my bad. The original comments/attacks were
> > directed at the proper poster. It was a long day, sorry.
>
> "long day" my arse! What about today?
> The day has barely even started an you've
> stepped on it again! *reminder* You
> aren't suppost to be able to read these
> words, K/F remember ;]]
>
> > >> > Dustin, I know you think you're a blooming genius, but you have
> > >> > never evidenced much more than an average IQ. You're not special,
> > >> > so don't kid yourself.
>
> > >> Rhonda, I already provided things for 4Q to checkout, the beam awards
> > >> and such. While I do not consider myself to be a genius, I do,
> > >> despite what you think, have a high IQ... It's in the 160-180 range
> > >> last time I was tested, hon.
>
> > > *haha* Liar. Genius is 150 and above
> > > and the scale only goes upto 170.
>
> > Which scale are you relying on?
>
> The one measured in Miles Per Hour!
> yours are in KPH where 160 = 100 on the
> one everyone else uses. i.e. 100 =
> average (or 50% of the population)
>
> <snip>
>
> > > *You* the genius writing code in
> > > BASIC!!! *LOL* It's called BASIC because
> > > it's for beginners... and it's
> > > simplified so a genius like you can
> > > hamfisted whack together some ****e
> > > like this
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c.../msg/600600e47
> > > 1413116
>
> > Two points, The person I said couldn't hold a candle to me has already
> > stated as much. 2nd, I can program fluently in several languages and
> > several dialects of basic, including visual basic.
>
> Liar.
>
> >You may attack me for
> > code I wrote 10 years ago that was a complete waste of time and poor use
> > of skills if you wish, but it doesn't deter the fact it was 10 years ago.
>
> Let's see something recent then. My bet
> is looks almost the same as the ****az
> you showed Kadaiatcha Man, before he
> ripped you a new arsehole.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...66dc14da7ffec7
>
> Don't bother with another one of your high
> IQ genius replies, Albert... post some
> code to prove you have improved in the
> last 10 years. *silence*
>
> 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
So in Dustin's courses at the University of Printed Circuit Board
Repair, he teaches:
Where we know KE as Kinetic Energy, Dustin teaches it as KoOky Energy
PE, Potential Energy is Pony Energy (ack)
-or-
PE, Poletential Energy
n.p.n
On Apr 3, 6:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns990710F21ED9EHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>
>
>
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:eur0hf$22$1
> > @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186 .121
> >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
> >>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
> >>>> different discussion.
>
> >>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting
> >>>> history.
>
> >>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>
> >> Email you again?
>
> >> Huh?
>
> >>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
> >>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
> >>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
> >>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
> >>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences.
> >>>>> BugHunter is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>
> >>>> You're missing the point.
>
> >>>> Again.
>
> >>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
> >>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
> >>> working.
>
> >> How can you tell?
>
> >>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
> >>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
> >>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>
> >>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>
> >>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>
> >> As I said.
>
> >>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can
> >>>> do to change that.
>
> >>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
> >>> this?
>
> >> No.
>
> >> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>
> > I don't see what an IQ has to do with my question.
>
> For someone with a high IQ, you have serious reading comprehension
> problems.
Perhaps, or perhaps I really don't like assinine tit for tat riddles.
You said I was trying to change something or other, I asked for
clarification, you don't wish to answer, fine.
> > Hmm. Does it really matter? Your basing your opinions on me based on
> > old usenet posts primarily.
>
> No. I'm not, actually. I'm basing my opinion of you on the way I've seen
> you behave, in the present time, with me and with others.
Do you really expect anyone to believe this bull**** of yours? I have
apologized for everything that I did, I don't know what the hell else
you expect from me. You've seen usenet posts, you haven't seen private
correspondence, online chats, nor have you observed me in real life on
my time or company time. Your opinion isn't based on factual evidence,
only what you percieve to be. And you already have a slanted view.
> You went over the line with /me/, remember?
After you began discussing in usenet with kman about why I might have
decided to no longer speak to you.
> So I know what kind of person you are.
No, you don't. You have no clue about me.
> >>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
> >>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>
> >>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to
> >>> people on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on
> >>> serious drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>
> >> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>
> > Are you trying to emulate a liza program? Or have you been to see a
> > therapist recently?
>
> Why are you responding, Dustin?
At this point, I really don't know why I bother... It's obvious you
don't want a resolution, you just want to troll. So troll away, I'm
done.
> >>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
> >>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you
> >>> can continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It
> >>> doesn't make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>
> >> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>
> > Indeed, from my own keyboard. Yes, when I was doing quasi legal
> > things. Does it change the point I made in the slightest? No.
>
> You were lying then or you're lying now. Either way, you lie.
Do you know of any humans that do not lie? It's a pointless strawman
Rhonda.
> No one had your emails, I didn't start poking at you until you started
> calling me names and wishing me dead. I even protested the treatment you
> were receiving up until them.
Not entirely true. Are you intentionally misleading persons? I believe
you started hypothesising with kman over why I decided I no longer
wished to speak with you. You've had a tone with me ever since. I
didn't respond in a professional manner, but lets not forget who
exactly initiated this.
> Tell me again about your ability to reason.
I don't know what else I can do for you, I've apologized for
everything I did. I've taken more than my fair share of the blame for
it even having gotten as far as it has. You could try meeting me
halfway here. Of course, that would be a bad assumption on my part, as
I do not wish to continue a troll fight; and you do.
> Right. That's why I wasn't worried about your having my address. More
> like, I have far too little paranoia.
Rhonda, another misleading? Your address and name YOU willingly
inserted into some program that thought it wise to include it with
each outgoing email. Stop trying to pretend your address was a well
kept secret. I wasn't going to say anything about that, but it's
getting old. Play a new song.
> I don't think Einstein ever took an IQ test. I haven't researched it
> thoroughly, but I believe his IQ was estimated, based on what he did.
> That should tell you something about your claims.
My claims? Whatever. This is pointless. If some people here can digup
my criminal record, they can likely dig up my medical records too.
Debating over a few IQ points is a complete waste of my time. You may
think whatever suits you, I really don't care. I am not going to fight
with you, do you understand this yet?
--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
On Apr 1, 10:00 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
> > @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>
> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
> > >> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> > > <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>
> > >> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
> > was
> > >> posting all that horse-****,
>
> > > Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>
> > > I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
> > > equestrian till I saw the photo of you
> > > looking after your pet on Butts site.
>
> > *yawn*..
>
> > Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh. Oh,
> > btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary, I'm going
> > to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open it with a hex
> > editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4 bytes. It's not,
> > heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
>
> Not even unzipped it. ;]]
That might explain why you haven't provided a report nor a
disassembly, like you said you would months ago. Rhonda wants to take
a cheap shot at me for my past, well, your currently lieing to us all,
yet she says nothing to you about it. Double standard? That marker has
been in the executable for months. I've been waiting months for your
report, and it never materialized. BugHunter never was a string
scanner, but you sure thought it was, until I told you it's a
checksummer. Then you tried to rewrite what I said, tried to imply I
said you didn't know the difference. Well, when it came to BugHunter,
you sure didn't know.
Your having trouble finding anything good to trash me with. Each
download, is another punch in your face. AUK has served it's purpose
well, Thanks to those idiots, BugHunter has maintained 1st place on
various search engines for a long time now, and even more sites are
getting permission to host copies! Go me!
Nothing you say about the program will change anything, people are
checking it out, and many seem to like it.I can't thank you stupid
ass enough for the publicity. And just think, 4Q, Everyone who uses
it, is saying "FU4Q" hahaha.
--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote