PcButts caught in another lie on his blog

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:aBeQh.5230$Kd3.3618@newssvr27.news.prodigy.ne t
> Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the
> Energizer Bunny have in common??
>
> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh

Something to do on a lazy afternoon.

> (meanwhile PCButts has
> " fled the thread..." )

He is, at his heart, a coward.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Leythos]

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:29:42 +0000, C J. wrote:
>
> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh (meanwhile PCButts has " fled
> the thread..."

But just think - look at how many references there will be to "PCBUTTS
caught in ANOTHER LIE" scattered around the world - there is some good
that comes from the never ending thread

--
Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
*** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[pcbutts1]

I'm busy putting up more pages
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/bughunter.htm would you like one?


--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:aBeQh.5230$Kd3.3618@newssvr27.news.prodigy.ne t...
> Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the
> Energizer Bunny have in common??
>
> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh (meanwhile PCButts has "
> fled the thread..." )
>
>
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eur0hf$22$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>>>> different discussion.
>>>>
>>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.
>>>
>>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>>
>> Email you again?
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter
>>>>> is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>>>
>>>> You're missing the point.
>>>>
>>>> Again.
>>>
>>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
>>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
>>> working.
>>
>> How can you tell?
>>
>>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>>>
>>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>>>
>>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>>
>> As I said.
>>
>>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do
>>>> to change that.
>>>
>>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
>>> this?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>>
>>>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does
>>>>> not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>>>
>>>> And again.
>>>>
>>>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>>>> past.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>>>>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>>>>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they
>>>>> do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people
>>>>> even think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm
>>>>> just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you,
>>>>> people have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even
>>>>> look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more,
>>>>> than usenet posts.
>>>>
>>>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>>>
>>> Not really.
>>
>> Really. You snipped.
>>
>>> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
>>> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
>>> just say so. Why beat around the bush?
>>
>> Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?
>>
>>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>>>>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually
>>>>> believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>>>
>>>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>>>
>>> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
>>> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact
>>> it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.
>>
>> Just keep digging that hole.
>>
>>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>>>
>>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people
>>> on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious
>>> drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>>
>> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>>
>>> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
>>> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
>>> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
>>> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
>>> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
>>> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.
>>
>> Baaaaaaaaaa.
>>
>>>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>>>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>>>>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>>>> believe you.
>>>
>>> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
>>> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
>>> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
>>> anything about me.
>>
>> On usenet, you are your words.
>>
>>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
>>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
>>> continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
>>> make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>>
>> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>>
>>>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem,
>>>>> I wish to resolve it.
>>>>
>>>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>>>
>>> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.
>>
>> <projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information because of
>> what you thought I was going to do. That I never even considered doing.
>> That I never did.
>>
>> Tell me about paranoid.
>>
>>>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>>>
>>>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>>>
>>> I see. Those degrees please?
>>
>> My education isn't germane to the discussion.
>>
>>>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>>>
>>> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
>>> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
>>> I'd like to know your qualifications.
>>
>> Did you read the links I posted?
>>
>>>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>>>
>>>> No problem.
>>>
>>> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
>>> please?
>>
>> Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.
>>
>> If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
>> astronomical IQ, I can't help you.
>>
>> --
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>>
>> If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
>> just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
>> where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
>>
>
>

[C J.]

This is true ... I've happened to find the contents of this thread posted
on several other sites. I was freaked at first. lol

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:1175551003_24549@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:29:42 +0000, C J. wrote:
>>
>> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh (meanwhile PCButts has "
>> fled
>> the thread..."
>
> But just think - look at how many references there will be to "PCBUTTS
> caught in ANOTHER LIE" scattered around the world - there is some good
> that comes from the never ending thread
>
> --
> Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
> *** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
> abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
> website ***
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[C J.]

After seeing some of your ... ahem ... work... I think not. But thank you
for the offer
"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
news:eus4di$3im$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> I'm busy putting up more pages
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/bughunter.htm would you like one?
>
>
> --
>
> Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
> The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com,
> David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
> Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell
>
>
>
> "C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:aBeQh.5230$Kd3.3618@newssvr27.news.prodigy.ne t...
>> Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the
>> Energizer Bunny have in common??
>>
>> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh (meanwhile PCButts has "
>> fled the thread..." )
>>
>>
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eur0hf$22$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>>>>> different discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.
>>>>
>>>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>>>
>>> Email you again?
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter
>>>>>> is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're missing the point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
>>>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
>>>> working.
>>>
>>> How can you tell?
>>>
>>>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>>>>
>>>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>>>
>>> As I said.
>>>
>>>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do
>>>>> to change that.
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
>>>> this?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>>>
>>>>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>>>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>>>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>>>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>>>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>>>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does
>>>>>> not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>>>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>>>>
>>>>> And again.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>>>>> past.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>>>>>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>>>>>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they
>>>>>> do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people
>>>>>> even think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm
>>>>>> just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you,
>>>>>> people have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even
>>>>>> look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more,
>>>>>> than usenet posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>>>>
>>>> Not really.
>>>
>>> Really. You snipped.
>>>
>>>> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
>>>> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
>>>> just say so. Why beat around the bush?
>>>
>>> Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?
>>>
>>>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>>>>>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually
>>>>>> believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
>>>> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact
>>>> it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.
>>>
>>> Just keep digging that hole.
>>>
>>>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>>>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>>>>
>>>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people
>>>> on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious
>>>> drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>>>
>>> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>>>
>>>> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
>>>> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
>>>> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
>>>> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
>>>> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
>>>> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.
>>>
>>> Baaaaaaaaaa.
>>>
>>>>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>>>>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>>>>>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>>>>> believe you.
>>>>
>>>> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
>>>> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
>>>> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
>>>> anything about me.
>>>
>>> On usenet, you are your words.
>>>
>>>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
>>>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
>>>> continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
>>>> make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>>>
>>> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>>>
>>>>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>>>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>>>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>>>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem,
>>>>>> I wish to resolve it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>>>>
>>>> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.
>>>
>>> <projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information because
>>> of what you thought I was going to do. That I never even considered
>>> doing. That I never did.
>>>
>>> Tell me about paranoid.
>>>
>>>>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>>>>
>>>> I see. Those degrees please?
>>>
>>> My education isn't germane to the discussion.
>>>
>>>>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>>>>
>>>> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
>>>> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
>>>> I'd like to know your qualifications.
>>>
>>> Did you read the links I posted?
>>>
>>>>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>>>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> No problem.
>>>>
>>>> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
>>>> please?
>>>
>>> Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.
>>>
>>> If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
>>> astronomical IQ, I can't help you.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>>>
>>> If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
>>> just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
>>> where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Leythos]

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:42:36 -0700, pcbutts1 wrote:
>
> I'm busy putting up more pages
> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/bughunter.htm would you like one?

Complaint and violation of the law filed.


--
Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
*** WARNING - this links contains foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/leythos.htm

[4Q]

Dustbin wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>

<snip>


> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or have
> you forgotten what it is I do for a living?

Albert Dustbinstein (aka Raid) works in
a hardware store. In between his main
duties, cleaning the floors, counting
delivered goods, running errands,
stacking shelves, he gets his grubby mits
on other peoples PC's. His problem
solving skills include opening the PC
case and extracting dust from the circuit
boards, then reassembling the case being
careful not to have too many spare screws
left over.

He sometimes draws upon the full extent
of his 180 IQ training and uses his
Degree in Soldering Wires Together from the
University of PC circuit board cleaning.


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175564898.268965.223900@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com
> Dustbin wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or
>> have you forgotten what it is I do for a living?
>
> Albert Dustbinstein (aka Raid) works in
> a hardware store. In between his main
> duties, cleaning the floors, counting
> delivered goods, running errands,
> stacking shelves, he gets his grubby mits
> on other peoples PC's. His problem
> solving skills include opening the PC
> case and extracting dust from the circuit
> boards, then reassembling the case being
> careful not to have too many spare screws
> left over.
>
> He sometimes draws upon the full extent
> of his 180 IQ training and uses his
> Degree in Soldering Wires Together from the
> University of PC circuit board cleaning.

You missed your calling, 4Q. <still laughing>

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eur0hf$22$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>>> different discussion.
>>>
>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.
>>
>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>
> Email you again?
>
> Huh?
>
>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter
>>>> is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>>
>>> You're missing the point.
>>>
>>> Again.
>>
>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
>> working.
>
> How can you tell?
>
>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>>
>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>>
>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>
> As I said.
>
>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do
>>> to change that.
>>
>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
>> this?
>
> No.
>
> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.

I don't see what an IQ has to do with my question.

>>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>>
>>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>>
>>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does
>>>> not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>>
>>> And again.
>>>
>>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>>> past.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>>
>>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>>>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>>>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they
>>>> do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people
>>>> even think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm
>>>> just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you,
>>>> people have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even
>>>> look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more,
>>>> than usenet posts.
>>>
>>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>>
>> Not really.
>
> Really. You snipped.

Hmm. Does it really matter? Your basing your opinions on me based on old
usenet posts primarily.

>> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
>> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
>> just say so. Why beat around the bush?
>
> Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?

Wtf...

>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>>>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually
>>>> believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>>
>>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>>
>> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
>> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact
>> it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.
>
> Just keep digging that hole.

No hole to dig hun. Look up the history for yourself. You were conned
into believing the bull****.

>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>>
>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people
>> on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious
>> drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>
> Then why are you responding, Dustin?

Are you trying to emulate a liza program? Or have you been to see a
therapist recently?

>> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
>> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
>> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
>> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
>> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
>> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.
>
> Baaaaaaaaaa.

Is it the time of day when you responded? Your clearly not making any
sense here...

>>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>>>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>>
>>> Right.
>>>
>>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>>> believe you.
>>
>> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
>> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
>> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
>> anything about me.
>
> On usenet, you are your words.

Obviously that's not true. As you and several others are selectively
choosing my words to form your opinions concerning myself.

>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
>> continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
>> make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>
> Bad information from your own keyboard.

Indeed, from my own keyboard. Yes, when I was doing quasi legal things.
Does it change the point I made in the slightest? No.

>>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem,
>>>> I wish to resolve it.
>>>
>>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>>
>> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.
>
> <projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information because
> of what you thought I was going to do. That I never even considered
> doing. That I never did.

You keep saying because i thought this or that. Truth is Rhonda, I
thought (rightfully so) that you were trolling me. Nothing more, nothing
less.

> Tell me about paranoid.

I'm sure you have years experience on me.

>>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>>
>>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>>
>> I see. Those degrees please?
>
> My education isn't germane to the discussion.

Your questioning my intelligence because you don't personally think IQ
scales go beyond 170. Since I know for a fact they do, and that the IQ
tests provided to Einstein are NOT the same tests as provided today, Your
damn right your education plays into the discussion.

What you do know, or in this case, don't specifically.

>>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>>
>> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
>> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
>> I'd like to know your qualifications.
>
> Did you read the links I posted?

The links do not list your qualifications. Those links are no
better/worse than mine.

>>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>>
>>> No problem.
>>
>> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
>> please?
>
> Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.


> If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
> astronomical IQ, I can't help you.

An astronomical IQ? What are you smoking? Do you really believe this or
are you just playing a part at this point?





--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euru44$gvc$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> "C J." <no.reply@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:aBeQh.5230$Kd3.3618@newssvr27.news.prodigy.ne t
>> Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the
>> Energizer Bunny have in common??
>>
>> It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh
>
> Something to do on a lazy afternoon.
>> (meanwhile PCButts has
>> " fled the thread..." )
>
> He is, at his heart, a coward.

What exactly do you see yourself as Rhonda?




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml