PcButts caught in another lie on his blog

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99057471F1252HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
> @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>
>> <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>>
>>
>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when
>>> I was posting all that horse-****,
>>
>> Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>>
>> I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
>> equestrian till I saw the photo of you
>> looking after your pet on Butts site.
>
> *yawn*..
>
> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh.

I'm afraid not.

> Oh, btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary,
> I'm going to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open
> it with a hex editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4
> bytes. It's not, heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.

You'll never understand that it's the attitude underlying this kind of
**** that makes it unsafe to trust you.

Now, see if you can misunderstand what I just wrote.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Dustin Cook]

"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175439630.899327.269950
@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
>> @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>> >> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>> >>
>> >
>> > <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>> >
>> >
>> >> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when
I
>> was
>> >> posting all that horse-****,
>> >
>> > Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>> >
>> > I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
>> > equestrian till I saw the photo of you
>> > looking after your pet on Butts site.
>>
>> *yawn*..
>>
>> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh.
Oh,
>> btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary, I'm
going
>> to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open it with a
hex
>> editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4 bytes. It's
not,
>> heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
>>
>
>
> Not even unzipped it. ;]]

*haha*. I didn't think you did man.
I screwed up tho, wrong executable build. The marker is the same but the
location isn't at offset 28. *shrug*. Anyways, It was just a cheap jab at
you. "FU4Q" heh.


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euoo35$l27$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns99057471F1252HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
>> @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>>>
>>>
>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when
>>>> I was posting all that horse-****,
>>>
>>> Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>>>
>>> I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
>>> equestrian till I saw the photo of you
>>> looking after your pet on Butts site.
>>
>> *yawn*..
>>
>> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh.
>
> I'm afraid not.

You are entitled to your opinion.

>> Oh, btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary,
>> I'm going to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open
>> it with a hex editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4
>> bytes. It's not, heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
>
> You'll never understand that it's the attitude underlying this kind of
> **** that makes it unsafe to trust you.
>
> Now, see if you can misunderstand what I just wrote.

Rhonda, it's an ascii tag. Not executable code, programmers do this all
the time. Not that you'd actually know the difference...

Anyways, if it's a fight you still want, it's just going to be yourself
continuing it. I really don't want to fight.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99059C8D41E82HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euoo35$l27$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in
>> message news:Xns99057471F1252HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>>> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
>>> @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when
>>>>> I was posting all that horse-****,
>>>>
>>>> Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
>>>>
>>>> I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
>>>> equestrian till I saw the photo of you
>>>> looking after your pet on Butts site.
>>>
>>> *yawn*..
>>>
>>> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh.
>>
>> I'm afraid not.
>
> You are entitled to your opinion.
>
>>> Oh, btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary,
>>> I'm going to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open
>>> it with a hex editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4
>>> bytes. It's not, heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
>>
>> You'll never understand that it's the attitude underlying this kind
>> of **** that makes it unsafe to trust you.
>>
>> Now, see if you can misunderstand what I just wrote.
>
> Rhonda, it's an ascii tag. Not executable code, programmers do this
> all the time. Not that you'd actually know the difference...

Bingo. Just as predicted.

How can someone with such a high IQ be so dense? Oh...wait...

> Anyways, if it's a fight you still want, it's just going to be
> yourself continuing it. I really don't want to fight.

But you're always fighting with someone, anyway.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175439630.899327.269950
> @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >> "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:1175411394.262869.77750
> >> @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> >>
> >> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> >> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
> >> >> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > <snip> ****e, saved for the Scratchpad ;]]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when
> I
> >> was
> >> >> posting all that horse-****,
> >> >
> >> > Freudian slip there Mr. Ed ;]]
> >> >
> >> > I never knew you was such a KEEN *uNf*
> >> > equestrian till I saw the photo of you
> >> > looking after your pet on Butts site.
> >>
> >> *yawn*..
> >>
> >> Good luck in your future endeavers 4Q, I still have the last laugh.
> Oh,
> >> btw since you never actually looked at the bughunt.exe binary, I'm
> going
> >> to point out a little greeting I left in it for you. Open it with a
> hex
> >> editor, seek to decimal offset 28, and read the next 4 bytes. It's
> not,
> >> heh, hidden code, 4Q, but an amusing marker.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Not even unzipped it. ;]]
>
> *haha*. I didn't think you did man.

Why make a big effort to unzip when I
can make you dance like a ****er so
easily? *wink*


> I screwed up tho, wrong executable build.

*surprised!* That's not like you to
****up and step on it so easily. *wink*

>The marker is the same but the
> location isn't at offset 28. *shrug*. Anyways, It was just a cheap jab at
> you. "FU4Q" heh.

*Wow* Did you expend all of that 180
IQ thinking this up (twice). I can see
now how Einstein's E=MC^2 work of genius
pales in comparison to your masterpiece.
You should win that AUK "Busted Urinal"
award easily!


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175464821.923405.79130@p15g2000hsd.googlegro ups.com

> *Wow* Did you expend all of that 180
> IQ thinking this up (twice). I can see
> now how Einstein's E=MC^2 work of genius
> pales in comparison to your masterpiece.
> You should win that AUK "Busted Urinal"
> award easily!

That's my cue:

news:Xns9905E2BDB827wranglercaballista@204.153.245 .131

or

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...80ab01080e87bf


The vote must appear in alt.usenet.kooks to be counted.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns990511E2BA8BDHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:euk7vv$68f$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Even if I were to grant your grandiose claims, I would point out to
>> you that your overall performance does not reflect your purported
>> abilities.
>
> LoL. Rhonda, your making assumptions based on what you know about me
> from usenet posts, many of which we have already established to
> contain bogus information. It's all well and good tho, I really do
> not wish to fight with you.

I'm talking about your own posts.

> A couple of other random thoughts... Einstein was you'll agree a
> genius yes? Well, he couldn't tie his own shoes, and he managed to
> bomb out of math classes. What do you think Thomas Edison's IQ was?
> He had ehh, ungenius moments himself, tho.

Einstein was eccentric. We're not talking about eccentricity here.

Having an "ungenius" moment is not the same as evidencing the consistent
behavior of a dullard.

> You can be at genius level in some things, and not so genius level at
> other things, Rhonda. Now, unless you've been bsing us all along with
> your alleged knowledge, you already know this... So I don't understand
> why you are joining 4Q in his latest jest?

To have your IQ measured at the level you claim, you have to meet
certain standards.

You don't meet those standards.

>> Perhaps you should spend your time making wiser use of your alleged
>> intellect.
>
> IQ isn't set in stone Rhonda. I'm sure your aware the results can
> differ depending on your mood as well. IE: Depression.
> I make good use of my intellect by solving problems for people. Or
> have you forgotten what it is I do for a living? Not that you are
> really in any sort of position to make any judgements about myself...

Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a different
discussion.

You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.

>>>>>>>> Hmm. You make no sense. How can someone with no character
>>>>>>>> willingly write release and support a completely free program?
>>>>
>>>>> Easy, it's a sleeper Trojan. It will be
>>>>> your biggest ****-YOU-ALL malware of all
>>>>> time, you will go down in VX infamy as
>>>>> the greatest social engineering ****-you
>>>>> of all time!
>>>>
>>>> I think you're not quite clear enough about the mechanism, 4Q.
>>>
>>> Details. Provide details, then. I've said it's not malicious from
>>> the beginning, he claimed it was, I asked him to prove it, fork some
>>> disassembly; He threatened to, with a scathing review to boot; I've
>>> yet to see either.
>>
>> He's not quite the frantic fellow you are.
>>
>> Patience is a virtue.
>
> I'm reminded of the Guns and Roses song for some reason...

Sing me a few bars.

>>>> At the present time, I'm quite sure he has no intention of doing
>>>> anything bad to anyone--just the idea that should the need arise,
>>>> he holds a trump card.
>>>
>>> holds a trump card? Lets think about this logically. BugHunter is a
>>> dos based application which has no internet capabilities on it's own
>>> of any kind, despite suggestions being made that it should contain
>>> an auto update ability. I've maintained that it should not, for this
>>> very reason. *grin*. If BugHunter ever did cause any mischief
>>> intentionally, the site hosting it would be down withen minutes; You
>>> forget, my host is a serious antimalware group, I've got good peer
>>> support. I said I was respected by many in the antimalware scene,
>>> and I am. Feel free to visit Temerc.com and look up my profile
>>> 'raid'. I'm a "Security Developer" rank.
>>
>> And your point is?
>
> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me from
> one or more users; not even including corporations for deliberatly
> altering/deleting files without authorization. Those are very real
> crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter is released
> under my real name, Rhonda.

You're missing the point.

Again.

> The persons who make up temerc.com are not easily fooled individuals,
> they've been fighting malware and the persons who create it for
> years, As have antivirus companies. They know me, by name. In fact,
> 4Q is on the record claiming that Martin Overton outed me. Well,
> that's not exactly true. Various AV individuals already knew me on a
> name basis due to my friend, Rod Fewster.

Still.

> I have been on good relations with various contacts in the antivirus
> industry before my VXer days. Some of them have always known who Raid
> really was, especially considering I had valid registration keys to my
> real name, given to me by various companies/individuals.

And still.

> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned, but,
> again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to do your
> own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.

Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.

But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do to
change that.

>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>
>> You continue to troll yourself.
>
> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does or
> will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does not
> do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become curious, and
> download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.

And again.

>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the past.
>>
>> Do you understand what I just said?
>
> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they do
> have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people even
> think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm just
> waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you, people
> have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even look like.
> Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more, than usenet
> posts.

You snipped what I wrote again.

> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually believe
> it. I expected a few, but not the majority.

Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.

You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so hard
to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.

> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.

Right.

Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
believe you.

>>> You've previously stated that I am easy to figure out, and that I'm
>>> very impulsive.
>>
>> Not quite in those terms, but your pattern of behavior is
>> predictable.
>
> Sadly, it's not as you might think it to be... See above.

"Because I say so."

>>> I wouldn't be able to wait 2 years and counting if
>>> such was actually true.
>>
>> That's not true.
>
> I know it's not true, because I'm not really a sociopath, I just
> played one on usenet. You've been right about one thing, partially in
> the last few exchanges, I am not interested in doing harm to anyone;
> That is very true.

Holy ****.

>> It was clear to me when I read your response that you didn't
>> understand even half of what I'm trying to tell you.
>
> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to know
> what it would take for us to resolve our differences peacefully? I
> suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but this does not
> solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem, I wish to
> resolve it.

You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.

>> You need to stop the argument by snippage. It makes you look really,
>> really dishonest.
>
> That was really a mistake on my part! I trimmed too much by accident.

Like you did up above?

>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>
> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?

This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.

And again, you trimmed what I wrote.

> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could be
> taken as such, ok?

No problem.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a different
> discussion.
>
> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.

*yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me from
>> one or more users; not even including corporations for deliberatly
>> altering/deleting files without authorization. Those are very real
>> crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter is released
>> under my real name, Rhonda.
>
> You're missing the point.
>
> Again.

I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was all
along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not working.

>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned, but,
>> again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to do your
>> own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>
> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.

I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.

> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do to
> change that.

I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
this?

>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>
>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>
>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does or
>> will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does not
>> do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become curious, and
>> download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>
> And again.
>
>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the past.
>>>
>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>
>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they do
>> have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people even
>> think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm just
>> waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you, people
>> have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even look like.
>> Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more, than usenet
>> posts.
>
> You snipped what I wrote again.

Not really. You said my past is why some people have issue with me. Now,
if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint, just say so.
Why beat around the bush?

>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually believe
>> it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>
> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.

I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many posts
under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact it duped
you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.

> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so hard
> to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.

Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people on
usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious drugs
and/or have a serious drinking problem.

The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily bull****
is just something your going to have to deal with. As a newbie to this,
it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And it's not very nice of
4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry prick knows much of the
raid posts is bull****, but he's going to continue to let you think
otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.

>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>
> Right.
>
> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
> believe you.

I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been accused
of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe what I've
written; because as I said all along, you don't know anything about me.

You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact you
jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
make any difference to me at the end of the day.

>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to know
>> what it would take for us to resolve our differences peacefully? I
>> suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but this does not
>> solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem, I wish to
>> resolve it.
>
> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.

Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.

>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>
>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>
> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.

I see. Those degrees please?

> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.

You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's claim
of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information, I'd like to
know your qualifications.

>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could be
>> taken as such, ok?
>
> No problem.

Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
please?




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>> different discussion.
>>
>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.
>
> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?

Email you again?

Huh?

>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter
>>> is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>
>> You're missing the point.
>>
>> Again.
>
> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
> working.

How can you tell?

>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>
>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>
> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.

As I said.

>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do
>> to change that.
>
> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
> this?

No.

You have a high IQ. Figure it out.

>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>
>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>
>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does
>>> not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>
>> And again.
>>
>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>> past.
>>>>
>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>
>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they
>>> do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people
>>> even think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm
>>> just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you,
>>> people have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even
>>> look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more,
>>> than usenet posts.
>>
>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>
> Not really.

Really. You snipped.

> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
> just say so. Why beat around the bush?

Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?

>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually
>>> believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>
>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>
> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact
> it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.

Just keep digging that hole.

>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>
> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people
> on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious
> drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.

Then why are you responding, Dustin?

> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.

Baaaaaaaaaa.

>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>
>> Right.
>>
>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>> believe you.
>
> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
> anything about me.

On usenet, you are your words.

> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
> continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
> make any difference to me at the end of the day.

Bad information from your own keyboard.

>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem,
>>> I wish to resolve it.
>>
>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>
> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.

<projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information because
of what you thought I was going to do. That I never even considered
doing. That I never did.

Tell me about paranoid.

>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>
>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>
> I see. Those degrees please?

My education isn't germane to the discussion.

>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>
> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
> I'd like to know your qualifications.

Did you read the links I posted?

>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>
>> No problem.
>
> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
> please?

Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.

If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
astronomical IQ, I can't help you.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

[C J.]

Time for a little Joke: ... Okay? What does this thread and the Energizer
Bunny have in common??

It keeps going, and going and going ..... heh (meanwhile PCButts has " fled
the thread..." )


"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eur0hf$22$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> "Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns990673855344HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:eupni3$d7l$1
>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> Dustin, if you had claimed a particular talent, it would be a
>>> different discussion.
>>>
>>> You claimed a measured IQ that is belied by your own posting history.
>>
>> *yawn*. Round and round you go. Why did you ever email me again?
>
> Email you again?
>
> Huh?
>
>>>> The program would quickly be taken offline, a notice would be
>>>> released, I would be in a courtroom for damage claims against me
>>>> from one or more users; not even including corporations for
>>>> deliberatly altering/deleting files without authorization. Those
>>>> are very real crimes, and they do carry prison sentences. BugHunter
>>>> is released under my real name, Rhonda.
>>>
>>> You're missing the point.
>>>
>>> Again.
>>
>> I'm not missing anything Rhonda. The program is as I've said it was
>> all along. Your trying to defend a very weak theory. And it's not
>> working.
>
> How can you tell?
>
>>>> As I said Rhonda, You have every right to feel your being conned,
>>>> but, again, I'm not the one bsing you. I strongly encourage you to
>>>> do your own research on 4Q before you really list him as a friend.
>>>
>>> Somehow I don't feel as if you're being protective of me, Dustin.
>>
>> I have no interest in trying to protect you from anything, Rhonda.
>
> As I said.
>
>>> But 4Q knows what to expect from me, and there is nothing you can do
>>> to change that.
>>
>> I wasn't aware I was trying to change anything. Care to elaborate on
>> this?
>
> No.
>
> You have a high IQ. Figure it out.
>
>>>>>> BugHunter has on average 200 or so downloads per day, and it's
>>>>>> slowly but surely growing!. Lots and lots of people have seen the
>>>>>> program now, and everybody knows it's not malicious. 4Q was 0wned
>>>>>> on his claim of it being malicious, he's really desperate to
>>>>>> protect his claim with well, it's a sleeper trojan now. It hasn't
>>>>>> been a trojan of any kind in 2 years time.
>>>>>
>>>>> You continue to troll yourself.
>>>>
>>>> By no means. Various individuals have claimed BugHunter is or does
>>>> or will do things I have maintained from the beginning that it does
>>>> not do. You know what does tend to happen tho? People become
>>>> curious, and download it. That's more downloads Rhonda.
>>>
>>> And again.
>>>
>>>>> you to the concerns of those who have seen you in action in the
>>>>> past.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you understand what I just said?
>>>>
>>>> I understand where some individuals are coming from Rhonda, my past
>>>> isn't exactly something to be proud of. Some individuals have no
>>>> reason to trust me or my code, based on the limited knowledge they
>>>> do have on me, which is primarily, under the nym Raid. Some people
>>>> even think I'm out to get them, or that I will at some point, I'm
>>>> just waiting...Based on posts on usenet from my nym Raid mind you,
>>>> people have formed conclusions about what I must be like and even
>>>> look like. Some even think I'm a sociopath based on nothing more,
>>>> than usenet posts.
>>>
>>> You snipped what I wrote again.
>>
>> Not really.
>
> Really. You snipped.
>
>> You said my past is why some people have issue with me.
>> Now, if you don't want to discuss this from a logical standpoint,
>> just say so. Why beat around the bush?
>
> Why put words in my mouth when I'm happy with the words I wrote?
>
>>>> In a strange way, it's funny. I didn't really think years ago when I
>>>> was posting all that horse-****, that everyone would actually
>>>> believe it. I expected a few, but not the majority.
>>>
>>> Dustin, this is a very big backpedal.
>>
>> I'm not backpeddling anything. The fact of the matter is that many
>> posts under the nym Raid are bull****. No two ways about it. The fact
>> it duped you and who knows how many others doesn't change that fact.
>
> Just keep digging that hole.
>
>>> You would be more believable, after all, if you weren't trying so
>>> hard to convince people that the old Dustin was full of ****.
>>
>> Rhonda, if you think I'm responding to you to be believable to people
>> on usenet, which mainly consists of trolls anymore, your on serious
>> drugs and/or have a serious drinking problem.
>
> Then why are you responding, Dustin?
>
>> The fact those old posts that you hold against me are primarily
>> bull**** is just something your going to have to deal with. As a
>> newbie to this, it's your own fault for buying into all of it. And
>> it's not very nice of 4Q to let you believe it all either. The sorry
>> prick knows much of the raid posts is bull****, but he's going to
>> continue to let you think otherwise. Your a sheep rhonda.
>
> Baaaaaaaaaa.
>
>>>> In another way, it's a bit depressing to think people are that
>>>> gullible. It does reflect my pessimistic viewpoint tho, that part
>>>> about me is true. I am indeed, a pessimist.
>>>
>>> Right.
>>>
>>> Actually, I think you're an optimist, because you expect people to
>>> believe you.
>>
>> I think even 4Q would have to disagree with you. I've never been
>> accused of being an optimist, and again, you don't have to believe
>> what I've written; because as I said all along, you don't know
>> anything about me.
>
> On usenet, you are your words.
>
>> You know what was written years ago. You can either accept the fact
>> you jumped to conclusions about me based on bad information or you can
>> continue to try and deflect and defend your weak arguement, It doesn't
>> make any difference to me at the end of the day.
>
> Bad information from your own keyboard.
>
>>>> Then, with all due respect, dumb it down for me. I would like to
>>>> know what it would take for us to resolve our differences
>>>> peacefully? I suppose I could go back to ignoring your posts, but
>>>> this does not solve the underlying issue. You and I have a problem,
>>>> I wish to resolve it.
>>>
>>> You don't look like you have an ulterior motive or anything.
>>
>> Heh. I think i've proven my point nicely. You are too paranoid.
>
> <projection> You're the guy who posted my personal information because of
> what you thought I was going to do. That I never even considered doing.
> That I never did.
>
> Tell me about paranoid.
>
>>>>> It's not good information. Besides the links I posted above, I have
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, would you mind listing your degrees again please?
>>>
>>> This is one of those logical fallacy things, Dustin.
>>
>> I see. Those degrees please?
>
> My education isn't germane to the discussion.
>
>>> And again, you trimmed what I wrote.
>>
>> You said the information I posted was crap, it disagrees with 4Q's
>> claim of the IQ chart. If your going to challenge the information,
>> I'd like to know your qualifications.
>
> Did you read the links I posted?
>
>>>> I do not mean to ask in a hostile way, although the question could
>>>> be taken as such, ok?
>>>
>>> No problem.
>>
>> Great, so you should have no trouble answering it then. Your degrees
>> please?
>
> Again, they aren't relevant, Dustin. Read the links.
>
> If you don't know that you look like a smacked ass for claiming an
> astronomical IQ, I can't help you.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
> just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
> where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
>