Dustin Cook wrote:
> kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:eu7kb3$5nm$5
[snip]
>> not vx? that would be like saying i'm not av... just because someone is
>> willing to tear his peers a new one doesn't mean he doesn't hold the
>> same ideals as they do... who is it, after all, that's trying to get
> the
>> band back together (in a manner of speaking)?
>>
>> plus, why would a non-vx'er have been given the rights to boot people
>> from #virus?
>
> 4Q isn't vx nor is he av, and I'm doubtful he'd claim otherwise. He's
> more of an outside commentator, peeking in and giving his 2 cents about
> what he sees.
sorry, i've seen too much of him over the years and seen him too
embedded in the clique at the center of the vx to accept the notion that
he's just peeking in...
perhaps we're using vx to mean different things - i'm not talking about
virus coders specifically, although the clique was composed mostly of
those, but rather those who are pro-virus-exchange... 4q has been pretty
unambiguous in the past about the connection he sees between computer
viruses and his main interest in artificial life...
> You do not have to be a vxer to get ops in #virus; You just have to be
> friends with someone who is already an op. Did you think #virus was
> really strict? Years ago, I remember it was, but that was a long time
> ago.
years ago is when i was talking about... and his words/actions were
towards the benefit of the vx community...
--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"


Reply With Quote
