Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 97

Thread: Has David Lipman been providing malware to known malware criminals?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    4Q Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    kurt wismer wrote:
    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > [snip]
    > > You have to understand something rather important about 4Q, He's not av
    > > and he's not VX. He's a somewhat neutral annoyance to both sides.

    >
    > not vx? that would be like saying i'm not av... just because someone is
    > willing to tear his peers a new one doesn't mean he doesn't hold the
    > same ideals as they do... who is it, after all, that's trying to get the
    > band back together (in a manner of speaking)?


    That's as clear as mud... but I'm sure
    you can mumble on some more.

    >
    > plus, why would a non-vx'er have been given the rights to boot people
    > from #virus?


    Raid has already lost his shirt when he
    said I was "non-coder" (then a VX
    article with code appeared -- I think
    you'll find the AVers called that virus
    "Linux.orig" *not my best admitted* but
    an example of how Raid is incorrect with
    his bull**** once again). And I'm still
    waiting for him to comment on the 16bit
    DOS ASM code with the CRC checksumming
    I posted to 4Q site recently, after he
    claimed I didn't know what checksumming
    was!

    Btw Kurt I assume when you did your
    degree in computer science, as when I
    did my degree in computer science. One
    of the requirements was to write code
    (to demonstrate the theory and first
    principles of the discipline was understood). Now given Dustin Cook
    left
    school with no qualifications I'm sure
    it's difficult for his limited comprehension
    to understand you can't fake doing a 3-4
    year course with structured programming
    and come out with a B.Sc Honours degree.

    Now when we take a look at his code
    as Kadaitcha Man did recently, anyone with
    an ounce of knowledge in programming
    would understand that Dustin Cook hasn't
    got a clue about Modular, Structured
    or Object Oriented methodologies... his
    code is cobbled together hacked ****os
    or "a polished turd" as K-Man refered to
    it.

    And this after he tried to laugh in
    KM's face with "I pity the fool who doesn
    't
    understand code" *gaff* !KM who's been a
    computer professional and coder since
    the 70's... Anyone reading these threads
    can clearly see Dustin Cook has sever
    psychological problems dealing with
    a challenge to his egomania.He's replaced
    his lack of skill in coding with more
    than his fair share in maliciousness.

    Anyone that values their privacy and
    computer security shouldn't trust Dustin
    Cook, *he* will **** them over at some
    point in the near future!


    4Q
    http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/


  2. #2
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:eu7kb3$5nm$5
    @registered.motzarella.org:

    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > [snip]
    >> You have to understand something rather important about 4Q, He's not

    av
    >> and he's not VX. He's a somewhat neutral annoyance to both sides.

    >
    > not vx? that would be like saying i'm not av... just because someone is
    > willing to tear his peers a new one doesn't mean he doesn't hold the
    > same ideals as they do... who is it, after all, that's trying to get

    the
    > band back together (in a manner of speaking)?
    >
    > plus, why would a non-vx'er have been given the rights to boot people
    > from #virus?


    4Q isn't vx nor is he av, and I'm doubtful he'd claim otherwise. He's
    more of an outside commentator, peeking in and giving his 2 cents about
    what he sees.

    You do not have to be a vxer to get ops in #virus; You just have to be
    friends with someone who is already an op. Did you think #virus was
    really strict? Years ago, I remember it was, but that was a long time
    ago.

    While I have no problem with being torn a new one, it wouldn't hurt to
    use factual information when doing so. I see no reason to mislead people,
    as 4Q has been doing and continues to do.

    Apparently, he's targetting David Lipman now... *shrug*


    --
    Dustin Cook
    Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
    web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
    bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
    Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml


  3. #3
    4Q Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    Dustin Cook wrote:
    > kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:eu7kb3$5nm$5
    > @registered.motzarella.org:
    >
    > > Dustin Cook wrote:
    > > [snip]
    > >> You have to understand something rather important about 4Q, He's not

    > av
    > >> and he's not VX. He's a somewhat neutral annoyance to both sides.

    > >
    > > not vx? that would be like saying i'm not av... just because someone is
    > > willing to tear his peers a new one doesn't mean he doesn't hold the
    > > same ideals as they do... who is it, after all, that's trying to get

    > the
    > > band back together (in a manner of speaking)?
    > >
    > > plus, why would a non-vx'er have been given the rights to boot people
    > > from #virus?

    >
    > 4Q isn't vx nor is he av, and I'm doubtful he'd claim otherwise.


    I don't believe in VX as represented by
    someone like yourself. For me VX is part
    of my interest in AL (Artifical Life),
    I believe in self-replicating entities
    as a legitimate study. However the VX
    I love is not represented by a **** that
    codes ****e in bASIC (overwriters, prependers)
    then makes a lot of noise about those
    nuggets of crap... you are the male
    version of attention seeking 'Gigabyte'
    only worse.


    >He's
    > more of an outside commentator, peeking in and giving his 2 cents about
    > what he sees.


    Yes I am commenting. You have set
    yourself up with your years of posting
    malicious crap talk. You are an excellent
    example of a piss poor coder with a nasty
    mouth and malicious tendancies, something
    other VXers should avoid.

    >
    > You do not have to be a vxer to get ops in #virus; You just have to be
    > friends with someone who is already an op.


    I think you'll find Evul gave me 200
    level access on day one. That was the
    same level you had. I was given 201 level
    in #vxers by Perikles so dickheads with
    200 like yourself couldn't play silly
    k/b games because I wouldn't put up with
    the "look-at-me! I coded a prepender in
    bASIC" crapola. ;]]


    Did you think #virus was
    > really strict? Years ago, I remember it was, but that was a long time
    > ago.
    >
    > While I have no problem with being torn a new one, it wouldn't hurt to
    > use factual information when doing so. I see no reason to mislead people,
    > as 4Q has been doing and continues to do.


    You mean quoting what you wrote and
    adding some analysis? Are you seriously
    suggesting I've misquoted you? There
    your words, you live with the consequences, idiot.


    >
    > Apparently, he's targetting David Lipman now... *shrug*
    >


    I'm asking Lipman if he provided malware
    to you Dustin Cook, a known malware
    sociopath with a long history of abuse.


    4Q
    http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/


  4. #4
    kurt wismer Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    Dustin Cook wrote:
    > kurt wismer <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:eu7kb3$5nm$5

    [snip]
    >> not vx? that would be like saying i'm not av... just because someone is
    >> willing to tear his peers a new one doesn't mean he doesn't hold the
    >> same ideals as they do... who is it, after all, that's trying to get

    > the
    >> band back together (in a manner of speaking)?
    >>
    >> plus, why would a non-vx'er have been given the rights to boot people
    >> from #virus?

    >
    > 4Q isn't vx nor is he av, and I'm doubtful he'd claim otherwise. He's
    > more of an outside commentator, peeking in and giving his 2 cents about
    > what he sees.


    sorry, i've seen too much of him over the years and seen him too
    embedded in the clique at the center of the vx to accept the notion that
    he's just peeking in...

    perhaps we're using vx to mean different things - i'm not talking about
    virus coders specifically, although the clique was composed mostly of
    those, but rather those who are pro-virus-exchange... 4q has been pretty
    unambiguous in the past about the connection he sees between computer
    viruses and his main interest in artificial life...

    > You do not have to be a vxer to get ops in #virus; You just have to be
    > friends with someone who is already an op. Did you think #virus was
    > really strict? Years ago, I remember it was, but that was a long time
    > ago.


    years ago is when i was talking about... and his words/actions were
    towards the benefit of the vx community...

    --
    "it's not the right time to be sober
    now the idiots have taken over
    spreading like a social cancer,
    is there an answer?"

  5. #5
    kurt wismer Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    Leythos wrote:
    [snip]
    > Having worked with LE for years, many, concerning internet/network related
    > crimes, I'm very aware of the types of people that can't be cured of their
    > mind-set, but, I've also seen many "hackers" change and remain good
    > people. I'm fully aware of Dustin's past, but I have not seen anything to
    > indicate that he's currently a problem. For 4Q to bring Davids name into
    > it is completely uncalled for and a sign that 4Q is not being honest and
    > is paraniod or out for blood rather than the truth.


    well, duh... you don't really think someone who is proud to call
    themselves a troll would really be interested in the truth, do you?

    --
    "it's not the right time to be sober
    now the idiots have taken over
    spreading like a social cancer,
    is there an answer?"

  6. #6
    4Q Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    kurt wismer wrote:
    > Leythos wrote:
    > [snip]
    > > Having worked with LE for years, many, concerning internet/network related
    > > crimes, I'm very aware of the types of people that can't be cured of their
    > > mind-set, but, I've also seen many "hackers" change and remain good
    > > people. I'm fully aware of Dustin's past, but I have not seen anything to
    > > indicate that he's currently a problem. For 4Q to bring Davids name into
    > > it is completely uncalled for and a sign that 4Q is not being honest and
    > > is paraniod or out for blood rather than the truth.

    >
    > well, duh... you don't really think someone who is proud to call
    > themselves a troll


    *twat!* I'm an uber troll ;]]

    >would really be interested in the truth, >do you?


    The truth about Lipman spreading malware
    to sociopathic criminal virus/malware
    spreaders with a long history of abuse?
    Yeah actually I'd be quite interested to
    hear Lipman's side of the story, I'm sure
    other people that rely on the integrity
    of these purported saviours of computer
    privacy would be interested too.
    Perhaps David could make a guest
    appearance and quell the rumors.


    4Q (super troll)
    http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/


  7. #7
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    On Mar 26, 4:19 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
    > kurt wismer wrote:
    > > Leythos wrote:
    > > [snip]
    > > > Having worked with LE for years, many, concerning internet/network related
    > > > crimes, I'm very aware of the types of people that can't be cured of their
    > > > mind-set, but, I've also seen many "hackers" change and remain good
    > > > people. I'm fully aware of Dustin's past, but I have not seen anything to
    > > > indicate that he's currently a problem. For 4Q to bring Davids name into
    > > > it is completely uncalled for and a sign that 4Q is not being honest and
    > > > is paraniod or out for blood rather than the truth.

    >
    > > well, duh... you don't really think someone who is proud to call
    > > themselves a troll

    >
    > *twat!* I'm an uber troll ;]]
    >
    > >would really be interested in the truth, >do you?

    >
    > spreaders with a long history of abuse?


    That's the whole point, 4Q. A history of abuse which stopped by all
    accounts in 2000. You don't have anything even remotely close to
    current to attack me with. You couldn't even locate more recent
    interviews. I didn't give many, even then. It never was fame I was
    in search of, dimwit. LoL.

    Whatever I did 7+ years ago is in the past, I can't take it back. The
    only thing I can do is not do it again, and return something to the
    community that I interfered with in the first place. What can you
    claim to have done in the last 7 years?

    This will be my final reply to you for awhile, Your already killfiled
    in my newsclient... *shrug*

    Have a nice day, 4Q.

    --
    Dustin Cook
    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk



  8. #8
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    On Mar 25, 11:37 pm, kurt wismer <k...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    > Leythos wrote:
    >
    > [snip]
    >
    > > Having worked with LE for years, many, concerning internet/network related
    > > crimes, I'm very aware of the types of people that can't be cured of their
    > > mind-set, but, I've also seen many "hackers" change and remain good
    > > people. I'm fully aware of Dustin's past, but I have not seen anything to
    > > indicate that he's currently a problem. For 4Q to bring Davids name into
    > > it is completely uncalled for and a sign that 4Q is not being honest and
    > > is paraniod or out for blood rather than the truth.

    >
    > well, duh... you don't really think someone who is proud to call
    > themselves a troll would really be interested in the truth, do you?


    In all fairness to the sorry weasel, He doesn't specialize in outright
    lies. He does intentionally mislead persons by quoting things out of
    context and obviously showing a sided viewpoint.

    --
    Dustin Cook
    http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk



  9. #9
    4Q Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    Dustin Cook wrote:
    > On Mar 25, 11:37 pm, kurt wismer <k...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    > > Leythos wrote:
    > >
    > > [snip]
    > >
    > > > Having worked with LE for years, many, concerning internet/network related
    > > > crimes, I'm very aware of the types of people that can't be cured of their
    > > > mind-set, but, I've also seen many "hackers" change and remain good
    > > > people. I'm fully aware of Dustin's past, but I have not seen anything to
    > > > indicate that he's currently a problem. For 4Q to bring Davids name into
    > > > it is completely uncalled for and a sign that 4Q is not being honest and
    > > > is paraniod or out for blood rather than the truth.

    > >
    > > well, duh... you don't really think someone who is proud to call
    > > themselves a troll would really be interested in the truth, do you?

    >
    > In all fairness to the sorry weasel,


    "weasel"? *shrug* It's a sorry day when
    you drop so low as to call me a weasel,
    I remember better days when you held me
    in higher regard, referring to me as
    "a slippery little ****er" *Oh, the loss*
    :[

    > He doesn't specialize in outright
    > lies. He does intentionally mislead persons by quoting things out of
    > context and obviously showing a sided viewpoint.
    >


    You mean out of context by printing your
    quoted text, adding a barb and including
    a reference to the original message?

    Please stop crying Dustbin, you're making
    my heart bleed for you! :]]


    4Q
    http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/ <-- teh troowth


  10. #10
    4Q Guest

    Re: Has 4Q proven anything by complaining about Dustin?

    optikl wrote:
    > "Leythos" <Void@nowhere.com> wrote in message
    > news:1174825656_2469@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
    > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:54:01 -0700, 4Q wrote:
    > >>
    > >> Meanwhile you
    > >> are dodging the real focus of this
    > >> thread which is to assertain if David
    > >> has spread malware to a R-E-A-L irresponsible
    > >> loon, Dustin Cook.

    > >
    > > Until you show me that Dustin is a crook I can't accept your ideas or your
    > > methods. As best I can tell, Dustin is a stand-up person, repented for
    > > anything he may have done, and has been absolved for his past issues.
    > >
    > > I think you need to learn that people can change, read that as Grow Up,
    > > and become responsible adults, it happens all the time.
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > Leythos
    > > spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

    >
    > That's funny. I'd suggest you do some googling of long ago posts in ACV,
    > like "RAiD+ I hate people+January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2001", for
    > starters. Also for the same period "Dustin Cook + Graham Cluely". Maybe you
    > believe in sociopaths and liars redeeming themselves, like changing clothes.


    Here's an interesting one regarding Irok
    virus. Here he describes how he wrote it
    because he hates people. (always has,
    always will - after all Dustin Cook is
    a true sociopath)

    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...de21bad4943e85

    There is lots of evidence like this of
    the real sociopath Dustin Cook (aka Raid)

    And let's not forget his maliciousness
    towards Rhonda Lea Kirk a few months back
    when he printed her name & address into
    alt.sex newsgroups and asked perverts to
    stalk her in real life. Sociopathic Outer
    filth that he is.


    > Evidence abounds from numerous studies on criminal and deviant behavior to
    > suggest otherwise. Take this as constructive criticism, not a slag or a
    > troll.


    He's always been a deviant and he still
    continues to be one. This BugHunter****
    bollocks is a front, maybe Leythos and
    the other sychophants have forgotten
    that Raidy runs a distribution network
    ( HHI ) for illegal download of films & music, amongst other things.
    And it's not
    because he is philanthropic, it's a
    selfish mechanism used as a form of
    currency to buy favour with other
    network traders (for whatever their
    stolen goods happen to be). Nice criminal
    friends you've got there Leythos ;]]


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •