George Orwell wrote:
> CNET
> http://************/dofg
>
> Spyware Doctor http://************/spyware_proctologist suffers from
> software glitches; failed to identify or remove a test Trojan horse;
> returned a high number of false positive or extremely low-risk results;
> doesn't include telephone support.
>
> The bottom line: Until this recent release, Spyware Doctor was one of
> the better antispyware choices. Nettlesome glitches and a low rate of
> spyware removal, however, keep us from recommending Spyware Doctor for
> now.
>

Must you continuously report the news? Is there nothing else you can do,
from a technical aspect?