James Egan wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2007 15:19:26 -0700, "4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wonder what my Anti-Virus friends
>> KWismer, DCook, DLipman, AKopp et al have
>> got to say.
>
> If they adopt your timescales any reply might come in about 10 years
> time, if you're lucky.

not sure what that's supposed to mean...

at any rate winning and losing are nonsense concepts in this context
(http://anti-virus-rants.blogspot.com...-have-we.html),
automation in malware analysis will only improve over time
(http://anti-virus-rants.blogspot.com...-numbers.html),
and more generally a multi-layered defense is better than a single point
of defense so users should complement their blacklists with whitelists
(http://anti-virus-rants.blogspot.com...aviour-or.html
and
http://anti-virus-rants.blogspot.com...ar-alarm.html)...

and since the disreputable representative from my killfile once promised
me a troll-shrine, i'm surprised he'd have to wonder about what i'd say
to such things...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"