miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> Thou giglet wench. Your peevish chastity is
not worth a breakfast in the cheapest country. Thou footboy. You, that
are polluted with your lusts, stained with the guiltless blood of
innocents, corrupt and tainted with a thousand vices. Ye sobbed and ye
wavered:
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> Text Medium No. 5 <mhm29x21@meeeeooooooowwww.flonk> Thou goat. Thou
>> dost over ween in all. Thou quailing very land-fish. Thou
>> lice-infested barnacle. Ye disputed and ye cooed:
>>
>>> Hail Eris! On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 05:15:04 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>> jabbered inanely:
>>>
>>>> The Demon Prince of Absurdity <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corny>
>>>> Thou bowlegged hereditary hangman. Thou musty lousy footboy. Thou
>>>> dim-witted fatal screech-owl. Thou folly-fallen proud disdainful
>>>> haggard. Ye strained out and ye banged out:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:21:43 -0500, Rhonda Lea Kirk did the
>>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>> "Lionel" wrote
>>>>>>> Please check out:
>>>>>>> <3z13i2cqydadv20wxez54zsvs575dxpn1u@4nk.pbz> (Requires the
>>>>>>> obvious transformation.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're welcome to email me if the situation is less than obvious
>>>>>>> to you.
>>>>>> There's a reply in the thread that I would take as authoritative:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rffpb0$h7s$1@arjf.argvaf.arg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires same transformation as above message-id.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I feel compelled to point out that this post defines (for me) the
>>>>>> reason why an "******* exception" to Formosa's Rule is a really
>>>>>> bad idea.
>>>>> The AE is vital -- *******s are inclined to take advantage of
>>>>> Formosa for their own purposes. They deserve no mercy, and
>>>>> anything that happens to them, happens because they're *******s,
>>>>> not because life's unfair.
>>>> I'm 100% with Rhonda on this. Despite the damning text in the
>>>> message ID Rhonda provided up there, your entire focus is still on
>>>> the ******* exception alone. You don't seem to have even the
>>>> slightest conern for either her daughter or herself, viz:
>>>>
>>>> "Although I do have suicidal impulses I put them in check for the
>>>> sake of the sperm donor's offspring."
>>>>
>>>> news:1172275831.150222.121230@8g2000cwh.googlegrou ps.com
>>>>
>>>> You should take good note of the severe and persistent dissociation
>>>> of "sperm donor's offspring" from the notion of "my daughter".
>>>>
>>>>> Life _is_ unfair, but anything untoward happening to an *******
>>>>> isn't even remotely proof of it
>>>> Even if anything untoward happens because of some people's
>>>> insistence that the ******* exception should take precedence over
>>>> the safety of her "sperm donor's offspring"?
>>>>
>>>> Find another k0ok, Snarky. This one should be left alone.
>>> Well, actually, I've given this a lot of thought over the past few
>>> months, since first discussing it with NightMist back in December,
>>> or thereabouts (before I began archiving my chats), and I told NM
>>> she'd get Formosa'd, but I also told her she'd lose that
>>> protection. She's all talk and no action -- if there is a daughter,
>>> no harm will come to her that wouldn't come anyway because Mummy's
>>> crazy (and hopefully, "the offspring" will be taken away and placed
>>> in foster care before much longer, optimistically assuming her
>>> existence), and she'll not likely do anything to herself (not that
>>> I care what happens to the little manipulatrix) that she wouldn't
>>> do without being poked. She wants attention, not death.
>>
>> You missed the whole point I'm driving at, again, Snarky. You said it
>> yourself and still you missed it...
>>
>> "if there is a daughter, no harm will come to her that wouldn't come
>> anyway because Mummy's crazy..."
>>
>> Normally I admire confidence, but in this instance I can only take a
>> cold shower in the hope that my hackles will go down.
>>
>> Who are you and what do you know that allows you the authority to
>> make such a confident assertion, Snarky?
>>
>> The whole thrust of my opposition to the lifting of the Formosa is
>> comprised of these points:
>>
>> 1. The woman appears to be genuinely and seriously mentally ill.
>>
>> 2. Who here is equiped to answer the question, "Are her arsehole-like
>> tendencies innate or are they part of a highly complex manifestation
>> of long-term mental illness?
>>
>> 3. It is reasonable to believe that there is a high likelihood that
>> the child will suffer the consequences, either physically or
>> emotionally, of any prodding and poking done to AOK.
>>
>> 4. Not that my agreement means anything, but in order to get it,
>> someone will have to cross the real life boundary to prove that the
>> woman has no child and/or is not mentally ill. And I'll have a lot
>> to say about that if it's done by a kookologist.
>>
>> To those four points, I unashamedly add the point that Rhonda drew
>> out in her inimitable style...
>>
>> 5. "The whole point of not poking the Formosa'd person is to avoid
>> exacerbating
>> the potential danger."
>>
>> Point 1 should speak for itself.
>>
>> Point 2 should stop you dead in your tracks.
>>
>> Point 3 plus point 5 ahould be enough to knock the idea on the head
>> without the other points supporting them.
>>
>> Point 4 is a no-no, AFAIAC.
>>
>> Point 5 can't be ignored.
>>
>> I grant that, on the surface of, the woman is an arsehole who is
>> worthy of an arsehole exception, but given what else I see I cannot
>> in all conscience condone an exception.
>>
>> Look, I'll appeal to authority here... myself. I am not known for
>> letting arseholes off the hook but, IMO, AOK is one arsehole who
>> should be let off, if not for any reason other than doubt.
>>
> I'm proud of you for this, he-*****.
Too bad for you, cranston, you sickeningly fawning lickspittle. I've already
let my quota of one arsehole off the hook for this decade.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Vescere puter subgalia meis.
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Reply With Quote