On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:51:18 -0800, Dustin Cook did most oddly state:
> On Mar 2, 5:20 pm, "4Q" wrote:
>
>> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
>> address, telephone number... Then you posted it into alt.sex in order
>> for her to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
>
> I wish I could take credit for doing it, after all the annoyance it's
> caused her, but alas, I can't because I didn't.
>> It's true I have been begging for shell accounts, resources, hosting,
>> anonymizers I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this kind of teasing). It
>> gets the people
>> stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".
>
> Of course it does.
>
>> I've always liked teasing twats like
>> yourself... I got you to beg like a dog
>
> Of course you do.
>> > btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
>>
>> This was a psychological mind job, it's even obvious to Blind Society of
>> America AUK have been pushing your buttons since day one.
>
> Yes, of course it was. Anytime someone questions you, You meant to do
> that.
>> A fine example of a well executed SE, (don't you feel cheated now
>> *hehe*)
>> Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]
>
> I don't feel cheated at all, thanks.
>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
>> > (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
>> > return. Pick your allies more carefully next time, twits.
>>
>> *HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK gang. They are a virtual hammer to
>> bash you over the head with. If you ever do
>
> Oh, of course they are.
>
>> > And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI? He is pissed off at the group
>> > because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
>> > emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
>> > space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
>>
>> Shame, I was looking forward to testing your network... FROM THE INSIDE!
>> *g*
>
> Hahahaha. Sure you were.
>
>> Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
>> who did it? Don't you need a way of
>
> Did I say anything other than 0wned your ass? How many times did you get
> ****listed on X for christs sake? C'mon, your audience wants to know.
>
>> determining my IP address before a DoS can targetted someone? Or did you
>> just
>
> Well, it's no secret that you hide behind other peoples equipment. You
> don't have the guts to do anything yourself, because alas, you are a
> coward. You've done the same exact thing for 10 years or more, nothing has
> changed. You BS people left and right, all the while hiding like the *****
> you really are.
>
>> but with regard myself, nothing. A big zero relating to knowing the
>> first thing
>
> I know your life consists of trash talking others on the net. You don't
> have a life outside of that. It's not what I'd call a life, but to each
> his own.
>
>
>> about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally identifiable IP addresses.
>>
>> > C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
>> > begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.
>
> [snip bull**** answer to my question]
>
> Tell them how many admins told you to go **** yourself. Was it easier to
> understand this time?
>
>> Poor dust****. I'm only printing what you have written over the years...
>> and adding a bit of context.
>
> misleading people is what you meant to say.
>
>> Fear the ******* Philosophy and Savage Satire. When you can't laugh DoS!
>> *lol*
>
> I fear nothing, little one, I've already seen your service providers
> bandwidth limitations from a test. Does it hurt much to know that site
> only lives because I allow it to do so?
>
> How does that make you feel, ****wit, knowing anytime we want, we can down
> your provider, and keep him offline for as long as we want.. and theres
> nothing you can do about it. hahah.
>
>> "My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]
>
> Of course, until you annoy them as well.
>> It's what everyone has come to expect of you everytime you drop your
>> rattle out of the pram.
>
> Nah, nice try at evasion, but it didn't work. You involved HHI into your
> petty argument because they wouldn't help you harrass individuals further.
> When I posted the facts behind your involvement with HHI, of course you'd
> try and spin it. But you've failed to do so. Now everybody knows what your
> real intentions are.
>
>> > > (before you ask BugScan is coming along nicely with MD5
>> > > checksumming)
>>
>> > Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
>>
>> Trojan? I'm going to release my source code and the application will
>> perform the described task(s). The Trojan is
>
>
> Your program scans for and removes my BugHunter yes? It claims BugHunter
> is a trojan, and this is how you justify it's removal, yes? Then, by very
> definition, your program (yes, your program) is a trojan; as it's
> misleading people.
>
>> more likely to come from the K0ok with a track record of releasing virus
>> and
>
> I see. when it's pointed out ever so painfully that you couldn't backup
> the initial claim of BugHunter being a trojan, your next hat trick will be
> simply to explain, well, uhh, it might have trojan code in the future, you
> just can't trust him. It's been 2 years 4Q, no trojan code yet... hah.
>
>> malware into the wild and hiding his
>> code away from public scrutiny (did
>
> What public scrutiny? I post a sample, your idol kman couldn't even get
> the syntax right...
>
>> That would be you Dustbin Cook (aka
>> Raid/Casio/Gremlin the virus spreader)
>
> The same Gremlin who's known in the BBS history archives.. yes.. I've been
> around a very long time, ****wit.

Busted Urinal Award

The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.

The above is so nominated.

Seconds?

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>

Still waiting for you to put up or shut up, Dustfart.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark