Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: How much damage can malicious spyware Bughunter do?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Aratzio Guest

    Re: How much damage can malicious spyware Bughunter do?

    On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:01:15 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
    <popesnarky.verwarring@verwirren.confused.k00ks.ca ballista.org> got
    double secret probation because:

    >On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:05 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
    >issue further by squeaking:
    >
    >> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo I'm sure many people
    >> will be very interested in reading this Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an
    >> analysis point of view, and start to realize the AUK attacks method can be
    >> beaten.
    >>
    >> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
    >>
    >> Paul

    >
    >Yeah, facts do us(tinu) in like nobody's business.


    Our (tino) Organization (tino) of Bullies (tanb) is in big trouble.

    VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

  2. #2
    The God of Odd Statements Guest

    Re: How much damage can malicious spyware Bughunter do?

    On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:06:42 -0800, Aratzio did most oddly state:
    > On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:01:15 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion got double
    > secret probation because:
    >>On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:05 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
    >>issue further by squeaking:
    >>
    >>> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo I'm sure many
    >>> people will be very interested in reading this Dustin Cook vs AUK saga
    >>> from an analysis point of view, and start to realize the AUK attacks
    >>> method can be beaten.
    >>>
    >>> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
    >>>
    >>> Paul

    >>
    >>Yeah, facts do us(tinu) in like nobody's business.

    >
    > Our (tino) Organization (tino) of Bullies (tanb) is in big trouble.


    Waitaminnit, I thought we(tinw) were ****heads?

    > VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

    VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

    --
    __________________________________________________ ______________________
    Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28
    Demon Lord of Confusion
    COOSN-029-06-71069
    The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
    to speak with me in private.
    Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
    Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!

    VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
    Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>

    "Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

    "You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
    a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
    Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

    "He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
    because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
    tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
    for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
    tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
    TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
    others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

    "Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
    and well-read?
    A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

    "It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
    have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
    of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
    group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
    bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
    'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
    reached new heights, in Message-ID:
    <Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>
    "Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
    L. Mencken

    "Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
    supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
    beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
    impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
    this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
    hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
    part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

    "If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
    deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
    United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
    Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
    you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
    members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
    investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
    designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
    up." -- William Rivers Pitt

    "It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
    people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
    president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
    and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
    the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
    worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
    declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
    http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •