On Mar 2, 5:20 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:

> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
> address, telephone number... Then you
> posted it into alt.sex in order for her
> to be harrassed by sexual predetors.

I wish I could take credit for doing it, after all the annoyance it's
caused her, but alas, I can't because I didn't.
> It's true I have been begging for shell
> accounts, resources, hosting, anonymizers
> I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this
> kind of teasing). It gets the people
> stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".

Of course it does.

> I've always liked teasing twats like
> yourself... I got you to beg like a dog

Of course you do.
> > btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
>
> This was a psychological mind job, it's
> even obvious to Blind Society of America
> AUK have been pushing your buttons since
> day one.

Yes, of course it was. Anytime someone questions you, You meant to do
that.
> A fine example of a well executed SE,
> (don't you feel cheated now *hehe*)
> Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]

I don't feel cheated at all, thanks.

> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
> > (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
> > return. Pick your allies more carefully next time, twits.
>
> *HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK
> gang. They are a virtual hammer to bash
> you over the head with. If you ever do

Oh, of course they are.

> > And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI? He is pissed off at the group
> > because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
> > emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
> > space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
>
> Shame, I was looking forward to testing
> your network... FROM THE INSIDE! *g*

Hahahaha. Sure you were.

> Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
> who did it? Don't you need a way of

Did I say anything other than 0wned your ass? How many times did you
get ****listed on X for christs sake? C'mon, your audience wants to
know.

> determining my IP address before a DoS
> can targetted someone? Or did you just

Well, it's no secret that you hide behind other peoples equipment. You
don't have the guts to do anything yourself, because alas, you are a
coward. You've done the same exact thing for 10 years or more, nothing
has changed. You BS people left and right, all the while hiding like
the ***** you really are.

> but with regard myself, nothing. A big
> zero relating to knowing the first thing

I know your life consists of trash talking others on the net. You
don't have a life outside of that. It's not what I'd call a life, but
to each his own.


> about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally
> identifiable IP addresses.
>
> > C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
> > begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.

[snip bull**** answer to my question]

Tell them how many admins told you to go **** yourself. Was it easier
to understand this time?

> Poor dust****. I'm only printing what
> you have written over the years... and
> adding a bit of context.

misleading people is what you meant to say.

> Fear the ******* Philosophy and Savage
> Satire. When you can't laugh DoS! *lol*

I fear nothing, little one, I've already seen your service providers
bandwidth limitations from a test. Does it hurt much to know that site
only lives because I allow it to do so?

How does that make you feel, ****wit, knowing anytime we want, we can
down your provider, and keep him offline for as long as we want.. and
theres nothing you can do about it. hahah.

> "My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]

Of course, until you annoy them as well.
> It's what everyone has come to expect
> of you everytime you drop your rattle
> out of the pram.

Nah, nice try at evasion, but it didn't work. You involved HHI into
your petty argument because they wouldn't help you harrass individuals
further. When I posted the facts behind your involvement with HHI, of
course you'd try and spin it. But you've failed to do so. Now
everybody knows what your real intentions are.

> > > (before you ask BugScan is coming along
> > > nicely with MD5 checksumming)
>
> > Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
>
> Trojan? I'm going to release my source
> code and the application will perform
> the described task(s). The Trojan is


Your program scans for and removes my BugHunter yes? It claims
BugHunter is a trojan, and this is how you justify it's removal, yes?
Then, by very definition, your program (yes, your program) is a
trojan; as it's misleading people.

> more likely to come from the K0ok with
> a track record of releasing virus and

I see. when it's pointed out ever so painfully that you couldn't
backup the initial claim of BugHunter being a trojan, your next hat
trick will be simply to explain, well, uhh, it might have trojan code
in the future, you just can't trust him. It's been 2 years 4Q, no
trojan code yet... hah.

> malware into the wild and hiding his
> code away from public scrutiny (did

What public scrutiny? I post a sample, your idol kman couldn't even
get the syntax right...

> That would be you Dustbin Cook (aka
> Raid/Casio/Gremlin the virus spreader)

The same Gremlin who's known in the BBS history archives.. yes.. I've
been around a very long time, ****wit.