How much damage can malicious spyware Bughunter do?

[Demon Lord of Confusion]

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:51:18 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
> On Mar 2, 5:20 pm, "4Q" wrote:
>
>> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
>> address, telephone number... Then you posted it into alt.sex in order
>> for her to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
>
> I wish I could take credit for doing it, after all the annoyance it's
> caused her, but alas, I can't because I didn't.

So why are you so shy about outing her outer, Outer Filth?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4aps7a68k0s9stn2e4i@4ax.com>

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exebuyola@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.338.19.1@news.alt.net>

"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.998087.289050@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups. com>

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://************/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an ******* you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat *******."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups. com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.c om

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://************/ehu3v

[The God of Odd Statements]

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:51:18 -0800, Dustin Cook did most oddly state:
> On Mar 2, 5:20 pm, "4Q" wrote:
>
>> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
>> address, telephone number... Then you posted it into alt.sex in order
>> for her to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
>
> I wish I could take credit for doing it, after all the annoyance it's
> caused her, but alas, I can't because I didn't.
>> It's true I have been begging for shell accounts, resources, hosting,
>> anonymizers I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this kind of teasing). It
>> gets the people
>> stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".
>
> Of course it does.
>
>> I've always liked teasing twats like
>> yourself... I got you to beg like a dog
>
> Of course you do.
>> > btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
>>
>> This was a psychological mind job, it's even obvious to Blind Society of
>> America AUK have been pushing your buttons since day one.
>
> Yes, of course it was. Anytime someone questions you, You meant to do
> that.
>> A fine example of a well executed SE, (don't you feel cheated now
>> *hehe*)
>> Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]
>
> I don't feel cheated at all, thanks.
>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
>> > (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
>> > return. Pick your allies more carefully next time, twits.
>>
>> *HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK gang. They are a virtual hammer to
>> bash you over the head with. If you ever do
>
> Oh, of course they are.
>
>> > And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI? He is pissed off at the group
>> > because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
>> > emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
>> > space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
>>
>> Shame, I was looking forward to testing your network... FROM THE INSIDE!
>> *g*
>
> Hahahaha. Sure you were.
>
>> Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
>> who did it? Don't you need a way of
>
> Did I say anything other than 0wned your ass? How many times did you get
> ****listed on X for christs sake? C'mon, your audience wants to know.
>
>> determining my IP address before a DoS can targetted someone? Or did you
>> just
>
> Well, it's no secret that you hide behind other peoples equipment. You
> don't have the guts to do anything yourself, because alas, you are a
> coward. You've done the same exact thing for 10 years or more, nothing has
> changed. You BS people left and right, all the while hiding like the *****
> you really are.
>
>> but with regard myself, nothing. A big zero relating to knowing the
>> first thing
>
> I know your life consists of trash talking others on the net. You don't
> have a life outside of that. It's not what I'd call a life, but to each
> his own.
>
>
>> about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally identifiable IP addresses.
>>
>> > C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
>> > begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.
>
> [snip bull**** answer to my question]
>
> Tell them how many admins told you to go **** yourself. Was it easier to
> understand this time?
>
>> Poor dust****. I'm only printing what you have written over the years...
>> and adding a bit of context.
>
> misleading people is what you meant to say.
>
>> Fear the ******* Philosophy and Savage Satire. When you can't laugh DoS!
>> *lol*
>
> I fear nothing, little one, I've already seen your service providers
> bandwidth limitations from a test. Does it hurt much to know that site
> only lives because I allow it to do so?
>
> How does that make you feel, ****wit, knowing anytime we want, we can down
> your provider, and keep him offline for as long as we want.. and theres
> nothing you can do about it. hahah.
>
>> "My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]
>
> Of course, until you annoy them as well.
>> It's what everyone has come to expect of you everytime you drop your
>> rattle out of the pram.
>
> Nah, nice try at evasion, but it didn't work. You involved HHI into your
> petty argument because they wouldn't help you harrass individuals further.
> When I posted the facts behind your involvement with HHI, of course you'd
> try and spin it. But you've failed to do so. Now everybody knows what your
> real intentions are.
>
>> > > (before you ask BugScan is coming along nicely with MD5
>> > > checksumming)
>>
>> > Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
>>
>> Trojan? I'm going to release my source code and the application will
>> perform the described task(s). The Trojan is
>
>
> Your program scans for and removes my BugHunter yes? It claims BugHunter
> is a trojan, and this is how you justify it's removal, yes? Then, by very
> definition, your program (yes, your program) is a trojan; as it's
> misleading people.
>
>> more likely to come from the K0ok with a track record of releasing virus
>> and
>
> I see. when it's pointed out ever so painfully that you couldn't backup
> the initial claim of BugHunter being a trojan, your next hat trick will be
> simply to explain, well, uhh, it might have trojan code in the future, you
> just can't trust him. It's been 2 years 4Q, no trojan code yet... hah.
>
>> malware into the wild and hiding his
>> code away from public scrutiny (did
>
> What public scrutiny? I post a sample, your idol kman couldn't even get
> the syntax right...
>
>> That would be you Dustbin Cook (aka
>> Raid/Casio/Gremlin the virus spreader)
>
> The same Gremlin who's known in the BBS history archives.. yes.. I've been
> around a very long time, ****wit.

Busted Urinal Award

The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.

The above is so nominated.

Seconds?

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>

Still waiting for you to put up or shut up, Dustfart.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

[The God of Odd Statements]

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:06:42 -0800, Aratzio did most oddly state:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:01:15 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion got double
> secret probation because:
>>On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:05 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
>>issue further by squeaking:
>>
>>> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo I'm sure many
>>> people will be very interested in reading this Dustin Cook vs AUK saga
>>> from an analysis point of view, and start to realize the AUK attacks
>>> method can be beaten.
>>>
>>> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>>Yeah, facts do us(tinu) in like nobody's business.
>
> Our (tino) Organization (tino) of Bullies (tanb) is in big trouble.

Waitaminnit, I thought we(tinw) were ****heads?

> VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

[Nomen Nescio]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 10:45 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >>> He does not, as such things have not taken place. HHI exists, but
> >>> BugHunterwasn't developed with their assistance. HHI is an
> >>> audio/video archiving/ripping group. It has nothing to do with any
> >>> credit card/identity theft, ad nausem.
> >>
> >> I have got no idea if HHI is an organised
> >> criminal gang dealing in credit card/
> >> identity theft.
> >
> > Time to show the world why your really doing this. I hope you don't
> > mind me posting your emails, but it's necessary.
>
> <snipped email>
>
> I can't believe you posted his email, Dustin.

Doesn't surprise me in the least. Cook has no morals, no integrity, and
no problem with doing the very same things he wets his pants over if he
only thinks other people will do them.

He just never grew up, and probably never will. Bad parenting or
something..... who knows.

>
> This was why you went after me--merely because you /thought/ I was
> going to post yours. Which I never did, btw.
>
> You're a bottomfeeder.
>