Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> > Or the last dick he sucked off for that hit.
>
> It's your lack of self-control that saps your credibility, Dustin,
> not what other people write about you.
Yes indeed. Cook would have a hard enough time convincing people he's
anything but a terminally juvenile delinquent without this sort of
stupidity. With it he's little better than a sad joke.
On Mar 1, 10:45 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > He does not, as such things have not taken place. HHI exists, but
> >BugHunterwasn't developed with their assistance. HHI is an audio/video
> > archiving/ripping group. It has nothing to do with any credit
> > card/identity theft, ad nausem.
>
> I have got no idea if HHI is an organised
> criminal gang dealing in credit card/
> identity theft.
Time to show the world why your really doing this. I hope you don't
mind me posting your emails, but it's necessary.
]What news of the HHI shell account?
Paul
Still waiting on the vote list.
I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
- Show quoted text -
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:54:42 +0100 Dustin Cook
<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>Still waiting on the vote list.
>
>I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
I see, sounds very organised. Do you have any idea
when a decision will be made?
btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
I'm sure many people will be very interested in reading this
Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an analysis point of view, and
start to realize the AUK attacks method can be beaten.
A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
Paul
- Show quoted text -
Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
(HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
return.Pick your allies more carefully next time, twits.
And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI?
because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
> high bandwidth to DoS/DDoS, he's even
> admitted on Usenet to being involved in
> firing off his packet gun.
Well, yes, It's no secret that many of in in the Vx channels on irc
0wned your ass on a daily basis. Thank you for admitting we did this
to you.
you, so often.
C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door. AUK
thinks your cool, poor ****wits had no idea that if we had helped you,
it would be them in your crosshairs, not us. lol!
> distributes it illegally. Obviously
> something his supporters Nick Skrepetos
I told you stupid, I had several supporters. Your attempts to lie and
mislead people are a waste of time. Anyone with an IQ, say that
above.. a monkey? should know better than to take anything you say at
face value. The IQ requirement obviously explains why AUK trolls
including Rhonda support you.
> him and giving him support. I've known
> the **** for years and he's always been
You've known what I've allowed you to know, you mean.
> Sorry I can't take all the credit for
> exposing your past/present and future.
Well, I suppose you could claim some credit for exposing my past, But
I already did that before you had the chance.. Oops
> However if anonymous posters do read
> my website and decide to use some of the
> material I'd at least like a "thanks to
But of course, the same anonymous posters who want autopsy pics and
discussions on farting.
(Do a posting history on Non what's his name.. lol)
> p.s. How is the TOS,DMCA notice, and
> DDoS K0okTHREAT on my host coming along?
Can't read? Post didn't make it to your server? No DMCA notice is
forthcoming. No DDoS is either. Instead, we are waiting to see what
you do.
I really hope you didn't mind those emails becoming public knowledge,
but I think it's only fair that people know why your involving HHI in
this.
> (before you ask BugScan is coming along
> nicely with MD5 checksumming)
Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Mar 1, 10:45 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>> He does not, as such things have not taken place. HHI exists, but
>>> BugHunterwasn't developed with their assistance. HHI is an
>>> audio/video archiving/ripping group. It has nothing to do with any
>>> credit card/identity theft, ad nausem.
>>
>> I have got no idea if HHI is an organised
>> criminal gang dealing in credit card/
>> identity theft.
>
> Time to show the world why your really doing this. I hope you don't
> mind me posting your emails, but it's necessary.
<snipped email>
I can't believe you posted his email, Dustin.
This was why you went after me--merely because you /thought/ I was going
to post yours. Which I never did, btw.
You're a bottomfeeder.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Mar 1, 10:45 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > He does not, as such things have not taken place. HHI exists, but
> > >BugHunterwasn't developed with their assistance. HHI is an audio/video
> > > archiving/ripping group. It has nothing to do with any credit
> > > card/identity theft, ad nausem.
> >
> > I have got no idea if HHI is an organised
> > criminal gang dealing in credit card/
> > identity theft.
>
> Time to show the world why your really doing this. I hope you don't
> mind me posting your emails, but it's necessary.
>
Like when you posted Rhonda's home
address, telephone number... Then you
posted it into alt.sex in order for her
to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
> ]What news of the HHI shell account?
>
> Paul
>
> Still waiting on the vote list.
>
> I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
> - Show quoted text -
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:54:42 +0100 Dustin Cook
> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Still waiting on the vote list.
> >
> >I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
>
> I see, sounds very organised. Do you have any idea
> when a decision will be made?
It's true I have been begging for shell
accounts, resources, hosting, anonymizers
I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this
kind of teasing). It gets the people
stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".
I've always liked teasing twats like
yourself... I got you to beg like a dog
to a 15yr old girl (Gigabyte) on my
behalf for an account on her server,
even though a snowflake in hell would
have more chance than me (Gigasuck luvs
me muchly!!!) After all I did setup a
childrens section on my ******* site for
her... But a thick **** like yourself
didn't realize I was taking the piss.
I had a fully operation site HOST.SK
(so why the **** would I need a pile of
crap from some clueless 15yr old that
can't secure a basic webpage server?)
Ans: More "attrition" mischief *lol* ;]]
>
> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
This was a psychological mind job, it's
even obvious to Blind Society of America
AUK have been pushing your buttons since
day one.
> I'm sure many people will be very interested in reading this
> Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an analysis point of view, and
> start to realize the AUK attacks method can be beaten.
More SE, that you seemed to have fallen
for. I couldn't really give a damn who
wins, just so long as I can sit on my
perch looking down and observing, then
writing the funny bits up... (e.g.
Kadaitcha Man drags Dustin Cook through
a code hedge backwards and spikes the
**** out in the middle of a field as a
techno-numpty raggarty arse scarecrow)
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Co...d2f3323b4a0f8/
That's the kind of write up I'm talking
about.
>
> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
>
> Paul
A fine example of a well executed SE,
(don't you feel cheated now *hehe*)
Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]
> - Show quoted text -
>
> Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
> (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
> return.
*HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK
gang. They are a virtual hammer to bash
you over the head with. If you ever do
manage to better Kadaitcha I'm sure
it won't just appear on my site... people
will be able to read it on CNN, The New
York Times, BBC World Service etc...
(read that as less likely than a 300
mile wide asteroid hitting you full
square on the noggin, event)
>
> And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI?
> because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
> emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
> space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
>
Shame, I was looking forward to testing
your network... FROM THE INSIDE! *g*
> > high bandwidth to DoS/DDoS, he's even
> > admitted on Usenet to being involved in
> > firing off his packet gun.
>
> Well, yes, It's no secret that many of in in the Vx channels on irc
> 0wned your ass on a daily basis.
Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
who did it? Don't you need a way of
determining my IP address before a DoS
can targetted someone? Or did you just
run your braggarty mouth again, with
more of your trademark (Tm) K0okTHREATS
>Thank you for admitting we did this
> to you.
> you, so often.
>
I heard you boasting alot about DoS'ing
people or threatening to kill someone
(read your RAP.TXT log for a clue) or
http://www.packetstormsecurity.nl/mag/b0g/b0g-3.txt <-- Lines 924 to
1166
but with regard myself, nothing. A big
zero relating to knowing the first thing
about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally
identifiable IP addresses.
> C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
> begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.
Erm, Coderz.net (I've got one counted
up on my fingers, thumbs and toes so far)...
Yep I managed to bring Coderz.net to its
knees with my ******* satire page, the
admin could face being laughed at anymore
so he kicked about 80 sites off his server,
and closed his doors... A Good Inside
assassination job I'd say...
Didn't he threaten a massive DDoS, TOS on
another server for hosting me...
*that's my second big toe counted* but
the admin of No.2 host closed his doors
because he supported my right to free
speech *taking the piss out of losers
like you* but couldn't handle the pressure
of being threatened with TOS & D0S. A
bully tactic employed by ****s like you.
*counting on thumbs now* A string of
throw away accounts closed because they
only have to hear the word TOS/D0S/DMCA
and they crap their pants into submission
(i.e. sites not suitable for anything a
big risky like *Piss Taking Humor*)
Then there was the site on Rob's server.
fbi-nipc.info (or somethin)
This had a nice 'Raid the Lamer' page
(aka Dustin Cook the criminal) and you
*****ed and cried like a little baby twat
for him to take it down... Luckily for
you he had to go to Iraq on a tour of
duty, so the site went into hibernation.
Then and lastly HOST.SK (very fast,
very stable, and put K0okTHREATS into
the bin @ /dev/null)...
I'd never put my eggs in one basket
of some pencil-necked loser like you, I
wouldn't trust you further than I could
throw you... I have said this many times
here in public Usenet for all to see.
No-one can trust you, you are a deviant
who will **** anyone over at the drop of
a hat, history proves this point
(Google archives ;]]).
Luckily for me, I can drop my website
pages straight into Google archives
using debug ASCII scripts, outlasted your BASE64 virus binaries.
e.g.
One of 4Q's piss-taking-webpage
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...5?dmode=source
vs
Dustin Cook (the criminal) virus binary
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...0e0c140372dcd4
> AUK
> thinks your cool, poor ****wits had no idea that if we had helped you,
> it would be them in your crosshairs, not us. lol!
???
AUK <> 4Q or put it anotherway 4Q <> AUK
>
> > distributes it illegally. Obviously
> > something his supporters Nick Skrepetos
>
> I told you stupid, I had several supporters. Your attempts to lie and
> mislead people are a waste of time.
Poor dust****. I'm only printing what
you have written over the years... and
adding a bit of context.
>Anyone with an IQ, say that
> above.. a monkey? should know better than to take anything you say at
> face value.
Fear the ******* Philosophy and Savage
Satire. When you can't laugh DoS! *lol*
>The IQ requirement obviously explains why AUK trolls
> including Rhonda support you.
>
"My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]
> > him and giving him support. I've known
> > the **** for years and he's always been
>
> You've known what I've allowed you to know, you mean.
>
> > Sorry I can't take all the credit for
> > exposing your past/present and future.
>
> Well, I suppose you could claim some credit for exposing my past, But
> I already did that before you had the chance.. Oops
>
> > However if anonymous posters do read
> > my website and decide to use some of the
> > material I'd at least like a "thanks to
>
> But of course, the same anonymous posters who want autopsy pics and
> discussions on farting.
> (Do a posting history on Non what's his name.. lol)
>
> > p.s. How is the TOS,DMCA notice, and
> > DDoS K0okTHREAT on my host coming along?
>
> Can't read? Post didn't make it to your server? No DMCA notice is
> forthcoming. No DDoS is either. Instead, we are waiting to see what
> you do.
>
> I really hope you didn't mind those emails becoming public knowledge,
It's what everyone has come to expect
of you everytime you drop your rattle
out of the pram.
> but I think it's only fair that people know why your involving HHI in
> this.
>
> > (before you ask BugScan is coming along
> > nicely with MD5 checksumming)
>
> Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
Trojan? I'm going to release my source
code and the application will perform
the described task(s). The Trojan is
more likely to come from the K0ok with
a track record of releasing virus and
malware into the wild and hiding his
code away from public scrutiny (did
I mention illegal pirate films/music?)
That would be you Dustbin Cook (aka
Raid/Casio/Gremlin the virus spreader)
4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
4Q wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 10:45 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > > He does not, as such things have not taken place. HHI exists, but
> > > >BugHunterwasn't developed with their assistance. HHI is an audio/video
> > > > archiving/ripping group. It has nothing to do with any credit
> > > > card/identity theft, ad nausem.
> > >
> > > I have got no idea if HHI is an organised
> > > criminal gang dealing in credit card/
> > > identity theft.
> >
> > Time to show the world why your really doing this. I hope you don't
> > mind me posting your emails, but it's necessary.
> >
>
> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
> address, telephone number... Then you
> posted it into alt.sex in order for her
> to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
>
>
> > ]What news of the HHI shell account?
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > Still waiting on the vote list.
> >
> > I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:54:42 +0100 Dustin Cook
> > <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Still waiting on the vote list.
> > >
> > >I know it went up for a senior vote on Monday
> >
> > I see, sounds very organised. Do you have any idea
> > when a decision will be made?
>
> It's true I have been begging for shell
> accounts, resources, hosting, anonymizers
> I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this
> kind of teasing). It gets the people
> stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".
>
> I've always liked teasing twats like
> yourself... I got you to beg like a dog
> to a 15yr old girl (Gigabyte) on my
> behalf for an account on her server,
> even though a snowflake in hell would
> have more chance than me (Gigasuck luvs
> me muchly!!!) After all I did setup a
> childrens section on my ******* site for
> her... But a thick **** like yourself
> didn't realize I was taking the piss.
> I had a fully operation site HOST.SK
> (so why the **** would I need a pile of
> crap from some clueless 15yr old that
> can't secure a basic webpage server?)
> Ans: More "attrition" mischief *lol* ;]]
>
> >
> > btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
>
> This was a psychological mind job, it's
> even obvious to Blind Society of America
> AUK have been pushing your buttons since
> day one.
>
>
> > I'm sure many people will be very interested in reading this
> > Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an analysis point of view, and
> > start to realize the AUK attacks method can be beaten.
>
> More SE, that you seemed to have fallen
> for. I couldn't really give a damn who
> wins, just so long as I can sit on my
> perch looking down and observing, then
> writing the funny bits up... (e.g.
> Kadaitcha Man drags Dustin Cook through
> a code hedge backwards and spikes the
> **** out in the middle of a field as a
> techno-numpty raggarty arse scarecrow)
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Co...d2f3323b4a0f8/
> That's the kind of write up I'm talking
> about.
>
> >
> > A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
> >
> > Paul
>
> A fine example of a well executed SE,
> (don't you feel cheated now *hehe*)
> Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]
>
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
> > (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
> > return.
>
> *HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK
> gang. They are a virtual hammer to bash
> you over the head with. If you ever do
> manage to better Kadaitcha I'm sure
> it won't just appear on my site... people
> will be able to read it on CNN, The New
> York Times, BBC World Service etc...
> (read that as less likely than a 300
> mile wide asteroid hitting you full
> square on the noggin, event)
>
> >
> > And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI?
> > because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
> > emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
> > space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
> >
>
> Shame, I was looking forward to testing
> your network... FROM THE INSIDE! *g*
>
>
> > > high bandwidth to DoS/DDoS, he's even
> > > admitted on Usenet to being involved in
> > > firing off his packet gun.
> >
> > Well, yes, It's no secret that many of in in the Vx channels on irc
> > 0wned your ass on a daily basis.
>
> Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
> who did it? Don't you need a way of
> determining my IP address before a DoS
> can targetted someone? Or did you just
> run your braggarty mouth again, with
> more of your trademark (Tm) K0okTHREATS
>
> >Thank you for admitting we did this
> > to you.
> > you, so often.
> >
>
> I heard you boasting alot about DoS'ing
> people or threatening to kill someone
> (read your RAP.TXT log for a clue) or
> http://www.packetstormsecurity.nl/mag/b0g/b0g-3.txt <-- Lines 924 to
> 1166
> but with regard myself, nothing. A big
> zero relating to knowing the first thing
> about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally
> identifiable IP addresses.
>
> > C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
> > begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.
>
> Erm, Coderz.net (I've got one counted
> up on my fingers, thumbs and toes so far)...
> Yep I managed to bring Coderz.net to its
> knees with my ******* satire page, the
> admin could face being laughed at
*couldn't
On Mar 2, 5:20 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Like when you posted Rhonda's home
> address, telephone number... Then you
> posted it into alt.sex in order for her
> to be harrassed by sexual predetors.
I wish I could take credit for doing it, after all the annoyance it's
caused her, but alas, I can't because I didn't.
> It's true I have been begging for shell
> accounts, resources, hosting, anonymizers
> I even asked Kadaitcha Man (I like this
> kind of teasing). It gets the people
> stirred up to say "F*#%*&! OFF!".
Of course it does.
> I've always liked teasing twats like
> yourself... I got you to beg like a dog
Of course you do.
> > btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo
>
> This was a psychological mind job, it's
> even obvious to Blind Society of America
> AUK have been pushing your buttons since
> day one.
Yes, of course it was. Anytime someone questions you, You meant to do
that.
> A fine example of a well executed SE,
> (don't you feel cheated now *hehe*)
> Feel the power of ******* satire ;]]
I don't feel cheated at all, thanks.
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Yes, AUK trolls, 4Q was gunning for you, but he needed our help. We
> > (HHI) chose not to provide him shells, and this is what we got in
> > return.
>
> *HAHAHA* 4Q is not an inductee to AUK
> gang. They are a virtual hammer to bash
> you over the head with. If you ever do
Oh, of course they are.
> > And why is 4Q even mentioning HHI?
> > because we wouldn't provide him shell accounts. After some lengthy
> > emails back and forth, it was decided he isn't worth our storage
> > space, nor our bandwidth. He's a leech, simple as that.
>
> Shame, I was looking forward to testing
> your network... FROM THE INSIDE! *g*
Hahahaha. Sure you were.
> Name one? When was I ever DoS'd and
> who did it? Don't you need a way of
Did I say anything other than 0wned your ass? How many times did you
get ****listed on X for christs sake? C'mon, your audience wants to
know.
> determining my IP address before a DoS
> can targetted someone? Or did you just
Well, it's no secret that you hide behind other peoples equipment. You
don't have the guts to do anything yourself, because alas, you are a
coward. You've done the same exact thing for 10 years or more, nothing
has changed. You BS people left and right, all the while hiding like
the ***** you really are.
> but with regard myself, nothing. A big
> zero relating to knowing the first thing
I know your life consists of trash talking others on the net. You
don't have a life outside of that. It's not what I'd call a life, but
to each his own.
> about me, i.e. HUSHMAIL don't do personally
> identifiable IP addresses.
>
> > C'mon, tell them what an annoying little twit, access begger, hosting
> > begger you are. Tell them how many admins showed you the door.
[snip bull**** answer to my question]
Tell them how many admins told you to go **** yourself. Was it easier
to understand this time?
> Poor dust****. I'm only printing what
> you have written over the years... and
> adding a bit of context.
misleading people is what you meant to say.
> Fear the ******* Philosophy and Savage
> Satire. When you can't laugh DoS! *lol*
I fear nothing, little one, I've already seen your service providers
bandwidth limitations from a test. Does it hurt much to know that site
only lives because I allow it to do so?
How does that make you feel, ****wit, knowing anytime we want, we can
down your provider, and keep him offline for as long as we want.. and
theres nothing you can do about it. hahah.
> "My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]
Of course, until you annoy them as well.
> It's what everyone has come to expect
> of you everytime you drop your rattle
> out of the pram.
Nah, nice try at evasion, but it didn't work. You involved HHI into
your petty argument because they wouldn't help you harrass individuals
further. When I posted the facts behind your involvement with HHI, of
course you'd try and spin it. But you've failed to do so. Now
everybody knows what your real intentions are.
> > > (before you ask BugScan is coming along
> > > nicely with MD5 checksumming)
>
> > Lots of work for a trojan, but okay.
>
> Trojan? I'm going to release my source
> code and the application will perform
> the described task(s). The Trojan is
Your program scans for and removes my BugHunter yes? It claims
BugHunter is a trojan, and this is how you justify it's removal, yes?
Then, by very definition, your program (yes, your program) is a
trojan; as it's misleading people.
> more likely to come from the K0ok with
> a track record of releasing virus and
I see. when it's pointed out ever so painfully that you couldn't
backup the initial claim of BugHunter being a trojan, your next hat
trick will be simply to explain, well, uhh, it might have trojan code
in the future, you just can't trust him. It's been 2 years 4Q, no
trojan code yet... hah.
> malware into the wild and hiding his
> code away from public scrutiny (did
What public scrutiny? I post a sample, your idol kman couldn't even
get the syntax right...
> That would be you Dustbin Cook (aka
> Raid/Casio/Gremlin the virus spreader)
The same Gremlin who's known in the BBS history archives.. yes.. I've
been around a very long time, ****wit.
4Q wrote:
<snipped>
> I'd never put my eggs in one basket
> of some pencil-necked loser like you, I
> wouldn't trust you further than I could
> throw you... I have said this many times
> here in public Usenet for all to see.
> No-one can trust you, you are a deviant
> who will **** anyone over at the drop of
> a hat, history proves this point
> (Google archives ;]]).
Dustin has it in his head that people should continue to show loyalty to
him even after he ****s them over. He expected it from me, so there's no
doubt he would expect it from you.
It's a common enough trait in borderlines and narcissists.
<snip>
> Poor dust****. I'm only printing what
> you have written over the years... and
> adding a bit of context.
He will never understand that it is his own words and actions that
indict him, not the words and actions of third parties.
<snip>
>> The IQ requirement obviously explains why AUK trolls
>> including Rhonda support you.
>>
>
> "My enemy's enemy is my friend" ;]]
Well, I can't speak for anyone but me, and for me, it's not the reason
why...
....but it's as good a reason as any.
>> You've known what I've allowed you to know, you mean.
You'd be surprised at how much you give away about yourself, Dustin.
>> I really hope you didn't mind those emails becoming public knowledge,
>
> It's what everyone has come to expect
> of you everytime you drop your rattle
> out of the pram.
But heaven forfend that anyone else might do it.
I'm just boggled.
<snip>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> 4Q wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> > I'd never put my eggs in one basket
> > of some pencil-necked loser like you, I
> > wouldn't trust you further than I could
> > throw you... I have said this many times
> > here in public Usenet for all to see.
> > No-one can trust you, you are a deviant
> > who will **** anyone over at the drop of
> > a hat, history proves this point
> > (Google archives ;]]).
>
> Dustin has it in his head that people should continue to show loyalty to
> him even after he ****s them over. He expected it from me, so there's no
> doubt he would expect it from you.
>
> It's a common enough trait in borderlines and narcissists.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Poor dust****. I'm only printing what
> > you have written over the years... and
> > adding a bit of context.
>
> He will never understand that it is his own words and actions that
> indict him, not the words and actions of third parties.
>
> <snip>
I've been bouncing the Dust**** ball
up and down for years. He's a great
resource for my website, because he'll
never shut-the-****-up and continue to
step on his own dick with very little
prompting... It makes for great *******
satire! I couldn't believe it when he
forked the photo over... photoshop
is going to be one busy ****er morphing
his dork face. Not to mention his
beaver tail shaped dick from all that
clumsy stepping *ROFL*
4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:05 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo I'm sure many people
> will be very interested in reading this Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an
> analysis point of view, and start to realize the AUK attacks method can be
> beaten.
>
> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
>
> Paul
Yeah, facts do us(tinu) in like nobody's business.
--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html
VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98E5DECE6B54Dwranglercaballista@204.153.245.13 1>
"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4aps7a68k0s9stn2e4i@4ax.com>
"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exebuyola@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.338.19.1@news.alt.net>
"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.998087.289050@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups. com>
If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml
"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
Thread where outing begins: http://************/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an ******* you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat *******."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups. com>
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.c om
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://************/ehu3v
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:01:15 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
<popesnarky.verwarring@verwirren.confused.k00ks.ca ballista.org> got
double secret probation because:
>On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:05 -0800, Dustin Cook attempted to confuse the
>issue further by squeaking:
>
>> btw. It really looks like AUK are running low on ammo I'm sure many people
>> will be very interested in reading this Dustin Cook vs AUK saga from an
>> analysis point of view, and start to realize the AUK attacks method can be
>> beaten.
>>
>> A most useful case study in beating the bullies.
>>
>> Paul
>
>Yeah, facts do us(tinu) in like nobody's business.
Our (tino) Organization (tino) of Bullies (tanb) is in big trouble.
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote