Re: Is the BugHunter backdoor Trojan safe to run on my PC?

[Dustin Cook]

On Feb 26, 3:21 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You don't take losing very well, do you.

Good try, dear. But try as you might, your ignorance concerning how
the internet works, and how lans work is already proven. Nothing you
say at this point is going to change any of that. You sunk your own
ass. Nobody has lost anything here, aside from yourself and your
trolling buddies.

> Here's the entire thread, btw:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...se_frm/thread/...
>
> Pretty funny that all the people on the list were reliable until you
> realized Meat Plow and I are on the list.

That isn't what I said, stupid. The reliable persons are the
commentators whom pcbutts has stolen material from, and the mvp's. You
are certainly not technology educated, and your reliability concerning
what is what is not stolen code certainly has no barring on the
discussion; Not that you actually needed that pointed out to you.

Since you and k-man seem to get off splitting hairs, I'll try to be as
specific as possible when I reply to you in the future, so it doesn't
go over your head. Is this an auk tactic when one is beaten?

> You to 4Q: "But alas, your credibility is shot... And theres a very
> important difference between our links. Mine is based on factual
> information gathered by reliable individuals who are taken seriously.
> You sir, are considered as a joke... at best. "
>
> Me to you: "Reliable individuals?"
>
> You to me: "Are you implying that something in that link isn't factual
> Rhonda? Or that the individuals in the file are not considered Reliable?
> I think you will find your ass handed to you on a silver platter if
> you actually try to defend either of those positions, but i'd love to
> see you try."
>
> "...the individuals in that file..."
>
> One of whom is me. PMSL at you.

Read above, again, this time, slowly.

You were going to come up with a wiseass reply until you realized the
link was discussing pcbutts. You knew as well as I did that you
wouldn't have a chance in hell of defending him, so your trying your
best to change the spotlight from yourself, back to me. It hasn't
worked tho. You demonstrated by your own posts that you haven't got a
clue how hit counters work, and you don't know **** about lans, and
likely the internet in general. you leech information provided by
others in a vain effort to troll someone else, in this case, me.

> On the topic of the "lan party," you wrote:
>
> "...you still think I posted your name and address to alt.sex, what you
> don't seem to understand however is the fact I have a small LAN at home,
> every single computer on it as far as the internet is concerned comes
> from the same IP address. We did have a lan gaming party the day the
> post
> happened, and you are already aware of the circumstances. I did not
> make the post, dumb *****. Another user on my lan did, dumb *****."
>
> The day the post "happened"?

Are you on some heavy drugs today or what? Did you not understand what
I wrote? You quoted and responded to it...

> Tell me something, Dustin. Why did you give my address to one of your
> friends on the day the post "happened"?

Actually, Rhonda, thanks for the opportunity to show you up for the
ignorant assmuncher you so obviously are. Everybody at my house that
day has seen your hillarious emails and usenet trolling posts. You
didn't think I'd keep such amusing comedy all to myself did you?

Get a grip girl, just accept the fact you are, once again, wrong.

I'm starting to realize why you've been married several times in your
life. I'm sure it was there fault it didn't work out, right?

> When you're done confabulating that, please explain to me why--seven
> days after the original message got no attention (zip, zilch, nit, nil
> and bobkes)--you posted another message pointing it out to Chuck
> Lysaght.

Newsflash, stupid. I wasn't made aware of the post until the person
responsible for it told me, I went to see it, thought it was funny as
all hell, and posted that chuck should take himself a look. it's no
different than what you've tried doing to me, really.

> If you have managed to get this far, I'd be interested to hear why you
> told Kadaitcha--the following day, in an entirely different thread--that
> you had not seen the alt.sex post.

See above, read very slowly.

> I can't understand is how such a pathetically small guy manages to trip
> over his dick as often as you do.

Rhonda, small guy? I'm probably thicker than yourself, assuming the
pic I have of you is really you.
As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.

> Hugs and kisses,
> rl

Right back at you.

[Kadaitcha Man]

Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> Thou gross watery pumpion. Thou
carrion monster. Thou bat. Thou wanton boy that swims on bladders. Ye
dirged and ye expressed:

> Good try, dear. But try as you might, your ignorance concerning how
> the internet works, and how lans work is already proven. Nothing you
> say at this point is going to change any of that. You sunk your own
> ass. Nobody has lost anything here, aside from yourself and your
> trolling buddies.

Tacit admission to you having no credibility to lose.

> That isn't what I said

Really? How about using your "superior intelligence" to post the proof?

> Newsflash, stupid. I wasn't made aware of the post until the person
> responsible for it told me, I went to see it, thought it was funny as
> all hell, and posted that chuck should take himself a look. it's no
> different than what you've tried doing to me, really.

Eh? Rhonda posted your personal information into a sex group?

> Rhonda, small guy? I'm probably thicker than yourself, assuming the
> pic I have of you is really you.

thick (n) - thicker (adj)
10. mentally slow; stupid; dull.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

> As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
> ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
> it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
> right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.

Quick critique <> correction.

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

Vescere immunda subgalia meis.

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Feb 26, 3:21 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You don't take losing very well, do you.
>
> Good try, dear. But try as you might, your ignorance concerning how
> the internet works, and how lans work is already proven. Nothing you
> say at this point is going to change any of that. You sunk your own
> ass. Nobody has lost anything here, aside from yourself and your
> trolling buddies.
>
>> Here's the entire thread, btw:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...se_frm/thread/...
>>
>> Pretty funny that all the people on the list were reliable until you
>> realized Meat Plow and I are on the list.
>
> That isn't what I said, stupid.

Yes. That's exactly what you said. And no matter how many times you
scream impotently that it's not what you said, it will still be what you
wrote.

> The reliable persons are the
> commentators whom pcbutts has stolen material from, and the mvp's. You
> are certainly not technology educated, and your reliability concerning
> what is what is not stolen code certainly has no barring on the
> discussion; Not that you actually needed that pointed out to you.

That's not what you wrote.

> Since you and k-man seem to get off splitting hairs, I'll try to be as
> specific as possible when I reply to you in the future, so it doesn't
> go over your head. Is this an auk tactic when one is beaten?

Says you, as you marinate in a welter of your own gore.

>> You to 4Q: "But alas, your credibility is shot... And theres a
>> very important difference between our links. Mine is based on factual
>> information gathered by reliable individuals who are taken seriously.
>> You sir, are considered as a joke... at best. "
>>
>> Me to you: "Reliable individuals?"
>>
>> You to me: "Are you implying that something in that link isn't
>> factual Rhonda? Or that the individuals in the file are not
>> considered Reliable? I think you will find your ass handed to you on
>> a silver platter if
>> you actually try to defend either of those positions, but i'd love to
>> see you try."
>>
>> "...the individuals in that file..."
>>
>> One of whom is me. PMSL at you.
>
> Read above, again, this time, slowly.

I've almost got it memorized at this point, Dustin.

Poor baby. Trolled yourself again.

> You were going to come up with a wiseass reply until you realized the
> link was discussing pcbutts. You knew as well as I did that you
> wouldn't have a chance in hell of defending him, so your trying your
> best to change the spotlight from yourself, back to me. It hasn't
> worked tho. You demonstrated by your own posts that you haven't got a
> clue how hit counters work, and you don't know **** about lans, and
> likely the internet in general. you leech information provided by
> others in a vain effort to troll someone else, in this case, me.

Do you really believe this, Dustin?

That's a serious question.

>> On the topic of the "lan party," you wrote:
>>
>> "...you still think I posted your name and address to alt.sex, what
>> you don't seem to understand however is the fact I have a small LAN
>> at home, every single computer on it as far as the internet is
>> concerned comes from the same IP address. We did have a lan gaming
>> party the day the post
>> happened, and you are already aware of the circumstances. I did not
>> make the post, dumb *****. Another user on my lan did, dumb *****."
>>
>> The day the post "happened"?
>
> Are you on some heavy drugs today or what? Did you not understand what
> I wrote? You quoted and responded to it...

I was commenting on the use of the word "happened." That's all.

I should've realized your language skills aren't up to understanding
what I wrote.

>> Tell me something, Dustin. Why did you give my address to one of your
>> friends on the day the post "happened"?
>
> Actually, Rhonda, thanks for the opportunity to show you up for the
> ignorant assmuncher you so obviously are. Everybody at my house that
> day has seen your hillarious emails and usenet trolling posts. You
> didn't think I'd keep such amusing comedy all to myself did you?

Ah. Now we get down to it.

You were afraid I would share your emails because you were sharing mine.

Eventually, the truth does come out.

> Get a grip girl, just accept the fact you are, once again, wrong.
>
> I'm starting to realize why you've been married several times in your
> life. I'm sure it was there fault it didn't work out, right?

How do you know they didn't die?

>> When you're done confabulating that, please explain to me why--seven
>> days after the original message got no attention (zip, zilch, nit,
>> nil and bobkes)--you posted another message pointing it out to Chuck
>> Lysaght.
>
> Newsflash, stupid. I wasn't made aware of the post until the person
> responsible for it told me, I went to see it, thought it was funny as
> all hell, and posted that chuck should take himself a look. it's no
> different than what you've tried doing to me, really.
>
>> If you have managed to get this far, I'd be interested to hear why
>> you told Kadaitcha--the following day, in an entirely different
>> thread--that you had not seen the alt.sex post.
>
> See above, read very slowly.

Dustin, you denied knowing about it a day after you posted a pointer to
it. Do you want me to post the message IDs?

>> I can't understand is how such a pathetically small guy manages to
>> trip over his dick as often as you do.
>
> Rhonda, small guy? I'm probably thicker than yourself,

That's just weird, Dustin.

> assuming the
> pic I have of you is really you.

Assuming.

> As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
> ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
> it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
> right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.

At one time, I liked you well enough.

Everyone makes mistakes.

>> Hugs and kisses,
>> rl
>
> Right back at you.

Gak!

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Dustin Cook]

On Feb 26, 10:10 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've almost got it memorized at this point, Dustin.

And you still don't understand it... Amazing.

> > You were going to come up with a wiseass reply until you realized the
> > link was discussing pcbutts. You knew as well as I did that you
> > wouldn't have a chance in hell of defending him, so your trying your
> > best to change the spotlight from yourself, back to me. It hasn't
> > worked tho. You demonstrated by your own posts that you haven't got a
> > clue how hit counters work, and you don't know **** about lans, and
> > likely the internet in general. you leech information provided by
> > others in a vain effort to troll someone else, in this case, me.
>
> Do you really believe this, Dustin?

Yep, I do. Your a troll, I pegged you for one awhile ago, that's why
you and I no longer get along. You emailed me out of the blue, I
corresponded for a bit and determined it wasn't a good idea to
continue conversing with you. Your pissed off because I came to that
conclusion before whoever put you upto emailing me could get anything
of value. Your easy enough to figure out.

> That's a serious question.

And above is a serious answer.

> I was commenting on the use of the word "happened." That's all.

And I was explaining to your ignorant ass what did actually happen,
stupid ****.


> Ah. Now we get down to it.

So you admit finally, that *i* didn't make the post you accused me
off? After all this time.... Hmm, I don't care for your apology at
this point, stupid ****.

> > I'm starting to realize why you've been married several times in your
> > life. I'm sure it was there fault it didn't work out, right?
>
> How do you know they didn't die?

All 4? Black widow?

> Dustin, you denied knowing about it a day after you posted a pointer to
> it. Do you want me to post the message IDs?

You really, truely are a stupid ****. Honestly, you really are. I'm
not going to keep going round and round. Get a clue, stupid ****. you
****ing admitted above that I didn't write the message, and I suspect
you've known that this entire time. You just like adding to a fight
already in progress, as if somebody really gives a **** about you
either way.

> That's just weird, Dustin.

No rhonda, you are just weird. Emailing me out of the blue, getting
rejected and getting pissed off.

> > assuming the
> > pic I have of you is really you.
>
> Assuming.

Well, we know you don't always tell the truth. You ****ing damn well
knew I didn't write the post when you originally made a stank about
it. Now everyone else does too. Stupid, ****.

> > As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
> > ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
> > it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
> > right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.
>
> At one time, I liked you well enough.

You liked BugHunter too, even corrected one of your friends regarding
what it is and isn't. You attack BugHunter simply out of spite for me,
nothing more, nothing less. If anybody wasn't sure, they probably are
now. Your not nearly as sneaky as you seem to think.

You forget, you posted support of it, and it's in the archives, dear.
Your support for the program stopped when I stopped wanting to talk to
you. Coincidence? I don't think so.

> Everyone makes mistakes.

Another admission. Have you found religion or something Rhonda?

> >> Hugs and kisses,
> >> rl
>
> > Right back at you.
>
> Gak!

Ya know, when I read your post yesterday, I was thinking the same
thing. I'm glad we're finally on the same foot, stupid ****.

--
Dustin Cook

> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
> willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:10 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've almost got it memorized at this point, Dustin.
>
> And you still don't understand it... Amazing.
>
>>> You were going to come up with a wiseass reply until you realized
>>> the link was discussing pcbutts. You knew as well as I did that you
>>> wouldn't have a chance in hell of defending him, so your trying your
>>> best to change the spotlight from yourself, back to me. It hasn't
>>> worked tho. You demonstrated by your own posts that you haven't got
>>> a clue how hit counters work, and you don't know **** about lans,
>>> and likely the internet in general. you leech information provided
>>> by others in a vain effort to troll someone else, in this case, me.
>>
>> Do you really believe this, Dustin?
>
> Yep, I do. Your a troll, I pegged you for one awhile ago, that's why
> you and I no longer get along. You emailed me out of the blue, I
> corresponded for a bit and determined it wasn't a good idea to
> continue conversing with you. Your pissed off because I came to that
> conclusion before whoever put you upto emailing me could get anything
> of value. Your easy enough to figure out.

Un****ingbelievable.

>> That's a serious question.
>
> And above is a serious answer.

As I said, it's un****ingbelievable.

You trolled yourself. Period. You won kook awards because you are a
paranoid kook, not because you were trolled into it by me.

>> I was commenting on the use of the word "happened." That's all.
>
> And I was explaining to your ignorant ass what did actually happen,
> stupid ****.
>
>
>> Ah. Now we get down to it.
>
> So you admit finally, that *i* didn't make the post you accused me
> off? After all this time.... Hmm, I don't care for your apology at
> this point, stupid ****.

Good thing, because you're not getting one.

I have no doubt that you made the post.

>>> I'm starting to realize why you've been married several times in
>>> your life. I'm sure it was there fault it didn't work out, right?
>>
>> How do you know they didn't die?
>
> All 4? Black widow?

Unlike you--who has killed two people--I have never killed anyone.

It must've just been bad luck.

>> Dustin, you denied knowing about it a day after you posted a pointer
>> to it. Do you want me to post the message IDs?
>
> You really, truely are a stupid ****. Honestly, you really are. I'm
> not going to keep going round and round. Get a clue, stupid ****. you
> ****ing admitted above that I didn't write the message,

No, I didn't "admit" that at all.

> and I suspect
> you've known that this entire time. You just like adding to a fight
> already in progress, as if somebody really gives a **** about you
> either way.

I have no doubt you made that post. But if I run with it for the sake of
argument, I still don't know what you were thinking giving my address
and phone number to one of your friends.

>> That's just weird, Dustin.
>
> No rhonda, you are just weird. Emailing me out of the blue, getting
> rejected and getting pissed off.

I email lots of people, Dustin. Sometimes we continue to correspond,
sometimes not.

That's part of what makes this so ironic. Credibility is measured in
actions, not in words, Dustin, and your actions are not credible.

>>> assuming the
>>> pic I have of you is really you.
>>
>> Assuming.
>
> Well, we know you don't always tell the truth. You ****ing damn well
> knew I didn't write the post when you originally made a stank about
> it. Now everyone else does too. Stupid, ****.

No. It's not my fault that your reading comprehension is poor.

You maintain that someone else made the post. If that's true (which is
is not), I'm asking you to explain why you gave my address and phone
number to someone who is a stranger to me.

That's not an admission of anything, because I still believe you made
the post. I'm just pointing out to you the flaw in your defense.

>>> As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
>>> ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
>>> it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
>>> right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.
>>
>> At one time, I liked you well enough.
>
> You liked BugHunter too, even corrected one of your friends regarding
> what it is and isn't. You attack BugHunter simply out of spite for me,
> nothing more, nothing less. If anybody wasn't sure, they probably are
> now. Your not nearly as sneaky as you seem to think.

I strongly suggest you take a course in critical thinking, Dustin.

> You forget, you posted support of it,

I posted in support of you too.

Then you called me a slut, wished me dead, accused me of sharing your
email.

The experience gave me a whole new take on your character.

> and it's in the archives, dear.

It sure is.

> Your support for the program stopped when I stopped wanting to talk to
> you. Coincidence? I don't think so.

See above.

>> Everyone makes mistakes.
>
> Another admission. Have you found religion or something Rhonda?

I admit you were a mistake, Dustin. I suspect your mother feels the same
way at this point.

>>>> Hugs and kisses,
>>>> rl
>>
>>> Right back at you.
>>
>> Gak!
>
> Ya know, when I read your post yesterday, I was thinking the same
> thing. I'm glad we're finally on the same foot, stupid ****.

You're pretty obsessed with ****, Dustin. What's up with that?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Kadaitcha Man]

Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> Thou *****-wolf's son. Thou
jaded groom. Thou gormless fools on both sides. Thou despicable
bawd-born. Ye spluttered and ye orated:

>> Ah. Now we get down to it.

>> You were afraid I would share your emails because you were
>> sharing mine.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You snipped that, Dustfart.

>> Ah. Now we get down to it.
>
> So you admit finally, that *i* didn't make the post you accused me
> off?

> You really, truely are a stupid ****. Honestly, you really are. I'm
> not going to keep going round and round. Get a clue, stupid ****. you
> ****ing admitted above that I didn't write the message, and I suspect
> you've known that this entire time.

You snipped the context, Dustfart, so I've put it back. As you can see,
there is no logical path from "You were afraid I would share your emails
because you were sharing mine" to "So you admit finally, that *i* didn't
make the post..."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You ****ing perpetual loser, Dustfart.

> Well, we know you don't always tell the truth.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! PKB after PKN after PKB after PK...

> You ****ing damn well
> knew I didn't write the post when you originally made a stank about
> it. Now everyone else does too. Stupid, ****.

Name every single one of those you deign to speak for, Dustfart.

> Your not nearly as sneaky as you seem to think.

Yet it's ok for you think you have more brain power than a common garden
weed, yes?

> You attack BugHunter

> You forget, you posted support of it

> it's in the archives, dear.

The only one raving on about BogHumper is you, Dustfart, and google shows it
was you who fired the shots by called Rhonda a slut; Rhonda did not call you
a slut. Or do those ever so minor details escape you?

>> Everyone makes mistakes.
>
> Another admission. Have you found religion or something Rhonda?

The last person who never made a mistake and never told a lie was crucified
around 2,000 years ago. Should the reasonable reader now take a leaf out of
your book and madly infer that you are Jesus Christ?


--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

Vescere puter subgalia meis.

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

[The Secretary of HomIntern]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:06:45 -0800, Dustin Cook k'lamed:
> On Feb 26, 10:10 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote:
>> I've almost got it memorized at this point, Dustin.
>
> And you still don't understand it... Amazing.

There's someone in this thread with a lack of understanding, Dustfart, but
it isn't Rhonda, 4Q, K-Man, or myself.

>> > You were going to come up with a wiseass reply until you realized the
>> > link was discussing pcbutts. You knew as well as I did that you
>> > wouldn't have a chance in hell of defending him, so your trying your
>> > best to change the spotlight from yourself, back to me. It hasn't
>> > worked tho. You demonstrated by your own posts that you haven't got a
>> > clue how hit counters work, and you don't know **** about lans, and
>> > likely the internet in general. you leech information provided by
>> > others in a vain effort to troll someone else, in this case, me.
>>
>> Do you really believe this, Dustin?
>
> Yep, I do. Your a troll, I pegged you for one awhile ago, that's why you
> and I no longer get along. You emailed me out of the blue, I corresponded
> for a bit and determined it wasn't a good idea to continue conversing with
> you. Your pissed off because I came to that conclusion before whoever put
> you upto emailing me could get anything of value. Your easy enough to
> figure out.

Results 1 - 10 of about 20,300 for "I am not a troll":

http://groups.google.ca/groups/searc...not+a+troll%22

I think an insistence on the belief that one is "not a troll" may well
be a k00ksign, and if it isn't in The Way Of The K0ok, it ought to be,
right along with accusing others in the discussion of being trolls.

>> That's a serious question.
>
> And above is a serious answer.

And then you became Outer Filth, because you assumed she was going to do
to you what you did to her. Real classy, that.

>> I was commenting on the use of the word "happened." That's all.
>
> And I was explaining to your ignorant ass what did actually happen, stupid
> ****.

You couldn't explain poker to Kenny Rogers without diagrams, two decks
of cards, and ten years to kill, Dustfart.

>> Ah. Now we get down to it.
>
> So you admit finally, that *i* didn't make the post you accused me off?
> After all this time.... Hmm, I don't care for your apology at this point,
> stupid ****.

I think you're hallucinating her apology, Dustfart.

>> > I'm starting to realize why you've been married several times in your
>> > life. I'm sure it was there fault it didn't work out, right?
>>
>> How do you know they didn't die?
>
> All 4? Black widow?

Or maybe just two or three of them?

>> Dustin, you denied knowing about it a day after you posted a pointer to
>> it. Do you want me to post the message IDs?
>
> You really, truely are a stupid ****. Honestly, you really are. I'm not
> going to keep going round and round. Get a clue, stupid ****. you ****ing
> admitted above that I didn't write the message, and I suspect you've known
> that this entire time. You just like adding to a fight already in
> progress, as if somebody really gives a **** about you either way.

Still hallucinating, I see. You posted a pointer to the Outer Filth on
alt.sex a day before you denied knowing anything about it -- way to
shred your credibility, Dustfart. How'd you manage to forget knowing it
was there, hmmm? Short-term memory going already?

>> That's just weird, Dustin.
>
> No rhonda, you are just weird. Emailing me out of the blue, getting
> rejected and getting pissed off.

Pissing Rhonda off isn't _that_ easy, Dustfart. You have feelings of
persecution, is all.

"email is not a private form of communication." -- Dustin Cook, in
Message-ID: <1157484607.556401.25070@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups. com>

>> > assuming the
>> > pic I have of you is really you.
>>
>> Assuming.
>
> Well, we know you don't always tell the truth. You ****ing damn well knew
> I didn't write the post when you originally made a stank about it. Now
> everyone else does too. Stupid, ****.

I know it's more than likely that you're a ****ing lying **** who's all
talk and no action when it comes to threats, except for threats about
weaselly things like Outer Filth, Dustfart.

>> > As far as tripping over his own dick, either you can't read, or your
>> > ashamed to admit it, but k-man if he had a penis, would have smashed
>> > it correcting my asic code, considering he can't even get the syntax
>> > right. You look up to some odd people, I must admit.
>>
>> At one time, I liked you well enough.
>
> You liked BugHunter too, even corrected one of your friends regarding what
> it is and isn't. You attack BugHunter simply out of spite for me, nothing
> more, nothing less. If anybody wasn't sure, they probably are now. Your
> not nearly as sneaky as you seem to think.

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>

Yeah, guess you're the sneaky one.

> You forget, you posted support of it, and it's in the archives, dear. Your
> support for the program stopped when I stopped wanting to talk to you.
> Coincidence? I don't think so.

She wised up. Is that a crime?

>> Everyone makes mistakes.
>
> Another admission. Have you found religion or something Rhonda?

I guess you *never* make mistakes, huh?

>> >> Hugs and kisses,
>> >> rl
>>
>> > Right back at you.
>>
>> Gak!
>
> Ya know, when I read your post yesterday, I was thinking the same thing.
> I'm glad we're finally on the same foot, stupid ****.

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579.179851.33970@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.c om>

So which are you doing, Dustfart?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant Cock-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069
Rotate email munge 13 times to get real addy
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm
TEH WAY OF THE K00K
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make false
accusations. Include the children of your target in your allegations,
even if they don't have any.
(06-Jun-05) When nobody else will listen, post to your own fan group.
(06-Jun-05) Obviously, since you have your own fan group, this must mean
that you have fans. Post prolifically to your fan group - you wouldn't
want to disappoint them!
(10-May-2005)Everyone reads usenet. Approval here means approval
everywhere.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call kookologists "k00ks."
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
When all else fails, accuse various and sundry kookologists of e-mailing
viruses to you. This is a sure-fire method of garnering sympathy and
ensuring that the General Public will always see things your way. An
especially effective sub-strategy here is to accuse them of infecting
you with the 'Sasser' worm via e-mail.
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
(9-Jul-05) Anytime your computer is infected with a virus, bogged down
by spyware, attacked over your internet connection, or otherwise suffers
from preventable problems, government agencies are responsible and are
trying to silence you and are monitoring your computer files.
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines.
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs, false
police reports, and harassing letters to the FBI and other gubbermint
agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to support you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets and
use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you write.
(17-Mar-05) When dealing with law enforcement, remember that it is they
who have the problem, not you. Be sure to inform them of this at every
available opportunity, as they will surely appreciate your constructive
criticism. Be sure to make them aware that YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS! ("The
cops like that, when people know their rights. That way they don't have
to read them to you on the way to the station." - George Carlin)
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
When confronted with a reality that you don't like: Announce loudly
that you are departing, never to return as long as there's an Internet.
Come back in three or four days and claim you were drunk, hacked,
abducted by alience, or forged. Alternately you can just not even
mention your prior departure, and if anyone asks you about it, either
ignore them or respond with something along the lines of "YOUR NOT THE
BOSS OF ME! *PLONK*!" People really know you mean business then.
Always remain clueproof.
(20-Mar-05) Anyone who does not believe that you are the reincarnation
of [$DEITY_OR_PROPHET] is obviously an infidel lacking in faith whose
soul in in peril of everlasting damnation.
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy.
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When spnaked, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your k00ky
glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
(20-Mar-05) If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Anybody who fails to understand this is engaged in a deliberate campaign
of misinformation and character assassination.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
The k00k considers itself the most intelligent person in any
conversation, possibly on the planet. Other people are benighted and
ignorant, and have been waiting their whole lives for the k00k to rescue
them from intellectual darkness.
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you, he's
obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just dying
to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you "****nozzle".
Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
The k00k will, without any trace of irony, lie, manipulate, impersonate,
censor, and declare themselves powerful in ways ranging from the ability
to have an account shut down to being God Herself, in order to convince
people that they are not liars, manipulators, censors, or insane.
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind that
you're one ugly mother****er and that there were 30,000 femininas that
thought you were a scumbag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond. They
like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
(06-Oct-05) When spanked, always retreat to the safety of the Ad
Hominem.
(04-Aug-2005) When spanked mercilessly for days on end, proving with
each poast just what an illiterate and ignorant fool you are, ALWAYS
claim ownership of [person(s),froup(s)]. This works on so many levels.
It inspires dread in your opponents that they will no longer be able to
poast in their home froup and that they will eventually have to pay
rent, to name just two.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who are
trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always unable
to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose of harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals. They
are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away and
keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for net.abuse
as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts, this merely
proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a black-belt in
manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
stores, and absolutely not to be ****ed with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available opportunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time.
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the k00k can see.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"

....with thanks to Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry, of AUK. Meow. Original thread
at http://************/3fsho - some posts may not appear due to
x-no-archive headers. The spelling mistakes are intentional, dolt.