Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou compact of jars. The very
> butcher of silk button. Thou bloodshot fat rogue. Thou dense amazonian
> trull. Ye hectored and ye articulated:
>
>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou lewd inhuman traitor. Thou
>>> hasty-witted monkey. Thou famished beggar. An admirable evasion of
>>> ***** master man, to lay thy goatish disposition to the charge of a
>>> star. Ye chimed in and ye ummed and arred:
>>>
>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou *****son beetle-headed.
>>>>> Thou braggart vile. Thou gross watery pumpion. Thou lumpish,
>>>>> mad-bred filthy traitor. Ye mewled and ye growled:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou hasty-witted subtle.
>>>>>>> Thou weedy busy meddling fiend. Thou ticklebrain. Thou unthrifty
>>>>>>> son. Ye scoffed and ye maundered:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>> bughunter.dustin@gmail.com Thou recreant. Thy will is most
>>>>>>>>> malignant. Thou inane dish of skim milk. Thou unsightly most
>>>>>>>>> villainous knave. Ye
>>>>>>>>> jargoned and ye swore:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 25, 5:35 am, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I bet when your code is peer-reviewed your stock response to
>>>>>>>>>>> the peels of laughter is "that was sloppy on my part". You
>>>>>>>>>>> have had code peer-reviewed, yes?
>>>>>>>>>> Your very amusing at times.
>>>>>>>>> The question stands. Please attend to it...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have had code peer-reviewed, yes?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just lazy, huh? More like you downright don't ****ing know
>>>>>>>>>>> what you're doing. Of course, the rest of this post is aimed
>>>>>>>>>>> at proving exactly that claim.
>>>>>>>>>> We shall see.
>>>>>>>>> You can only fool yourself all of the time, Dustfart.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Firstly, your delusions of adequacy and your NORAD-like
>>>>>>>>> psychological defence mechansisms (to pinch a phrase I coined
>>>>>>>>> earlier in another thread
>>>>>>>>> where other ko0ks like yourself were being discussed) never
>>>>>>>>> fail kick in to
>>>>>>>>> protect you from the reality of the depth of your utter
>>>>>>>>> worthlessness. It
>>>>>>>>> goes without saying that you could stand before God Almighty,
>>>>>>>>> Him accusing
>>>>>>>>> you of sheer ****wittery, and still have the bare-faced cheek
>>>>>>>>> to deny you're
>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Dustfart, and you've been told this time and time
>>>>>>>>> again, and still
>>>>>>>>> it hasn't sunken in to that massive slab of steel-reinforced
>>>>>>>>> concrete you
>>>>>>>>> like to call a head; It is neither your decision nor mine to
>>>>>>>>> determine the
>>>>>>>>> accuracy or otherwise of the accusations of consummate
>>>>>>>>> ****wittery made
>>>>>>>>> against you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your readers will decide. Not you. Not me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 20-20 hindsight, btw.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b=rnd(0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b=b mod 23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death=b
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Three lines of code are used to do what can be done in one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> line... death = rnd(0) mod 23
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahh, but your wrong sir. This is Asic, it cannot be done in
>>>>>>>>>>>> one line.
>>>>>>>>>>> Admission to using **** to write **** noted.
>>>>>>>>>> Admission that you<BICTHSLAP>
>>>>>>>>> Monkey see, monkey do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> messed up, noted.
>>>>>>>>>> Admission that you couldn't even get such simple code
>>>>>>>>>> commented properly, also noted.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I won't bother responding to your assinine attempts
>>>>>>>>> Dustfart, if the same principle were applied to you and all
>>>>>>>>> your usenet
>>>>>>>>> posts, you'd be the world's loneliest poster. Hell, even
>>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers
>>>>>>>>> would get more acknowledgement of their existence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> to figure asic
>>>>>>>>>> out, as you aren't correct on any of it
>>>>>>>>> Is that so? How do you explain this then...?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a$=string$(24,"+-")
>>>>>>>>>> Here, eat some crow, you piteous halfwit...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that will do the same as the code above and below.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a$="+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"
>>>>>>>>>> Pig's ****ing arse it will, you utterly inept wretch.
>>>>>>>>> Go on. Explain that in context of my allegedly not being
>>>>>>>>> "correct on any of it".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> even after providing you the
>>>>>>>>>> damn manual which comes with it. The code generated by asic,
>>>>>>>>>> as in the exe fie, isn't interpreted or p-code as you seem to
>>>>>>>>>> be thinking it is.
>>>>>>>>> You incompetent ****head. Code is what you write; or in your
>>>>>>>>> case, scribble.
>>>>>>>>> Instructions are what compilers produce.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CODE <> INSTRUCTIONS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you understand that, Mister-High-and-Mighty-Programmer who
>>>>>>>>> also does not
>>>>>>>>> know the difference between input and output?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Results 1 - 100 of about 1,090,000 English pages for computer
>>>>>>>>> programming
>>>>>>>>> basics code instructions. (0.76 seconds)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Picking a link at random from only the first eight displayed of
>>>>>>>>> the more than one million pages...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Programming BasicsSince a computer program consists of a series
>>>>>>>>> of instructions for the computer ... the process of writing the
>>>>>>>>> actual program
>>>>>>>>> code in some computer language. ...
>>>>>>>>> http://www.play-hookey.com/computers...ng_basics.html - 8k -
>>>>>>>>> Cached - Similar pages
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your assembler<*****SLAP>
>>>>>>>>> Assembly, Dustfart. Assembly. I, being highly skilled in
>>>>>>>>> programming, write
>>>>>>>>> Assembly. You, being the dribbling ****wit that you are are the
>>>>>>>>> one who
>>>>>>>>> dabbles about with "assembler".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the target of your coding, if I may ask?
>>>>>>> Nowadays I generally just keep up to date in Visual Studio 2005
>>>>>>> and .NET, with a bit of Tcl and perl thrown in for good measure,
>>>>>>> but recently an occasion arose to write a large in-house
>>>>>>> application in .NET for getting at project schedule data stored
>>>>>>> in SQL Server so I'm working on that at the moment. In the past
>>>>>>> I've earned a living writing everything from Assembly, through
>>>>>>> Pascal, FORTRAN, COBOL and goodness knows what else on PCs,
>>>>>>> DEC/VAX running VMS, and IBM mainframes running CICS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I once wrote a very interesting bit of MC68XXX code for AmigaOS,
>>>>>>>> it was was a serial interrupt handler for streaming MIDI that
>>>>>>>> didn't obstruct the multitasking (at 7.5Mh) and captured every
>>>>>>>> byte (at 33250 baud) and which was (after every use) then pulled
>>>>>>>> and the handler pointer reset to the system's.
>>>>>>>>
>> Would you like to see this source?
>
> To be perfectly honest, not particularly, no. Thanks anyway.
>

lol

--
When you do something right,
No one will know you did anything at all.

....attributed to 'God'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-nXT8lSnPQ