Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou lewd inhuman traitor. Thou
> hasty-witted monkey. Thou famished beggar. An admirable evasion of *****
> master man, to lay thy goatish disposition to the charge of a star. Ye
> chimed in and ye ummed and arred:
>
>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou *****son beetle-headed.
>>> Thou braggart vile. Thou gross watery pumpion. Thou lumpish,
>>> mad-bred filthy traitor. Ye mewled and ye growled:
>>>
>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>> Mowe Z. Slowley <slowley@TreeEnt.org> Thou hasty-witted subtle.
>>>>> Thou weedy busy meddling fiend. Thou ticklebrain. Thou unthrifty
>>>>> son. Ye scoffed and ye maundered:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>> bughunter.dustin@gmail.com Thou recreant. Thy will is most
>>>>>>> malignant. Thou inane dish of skim milk. Thou unsightly most
>>>>>>> villainous knave. Ye
>>>>>>> jargoned and ye swore:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Feb 25, 5:35 am, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I bet when your code is peer-reviewed your stock response to
>>>>>>>>> the peels of laughter is "that was sloppy on my part". You
>>>>>>>>> have had code peer-reviewed, yes?
>>>>>>>> Your very amusing at times.
>>>>>>> The question stands. Please attend to it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have had code peer-reviewed, yes?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just lazy, huh? More like you downright don't ****ing know what
>>>>>>>>> you're doing. Of course, the rest of this post is aimed at
>>>>>>>>> proving exactly that claim.
>>>>>>>> We shall see.
>>>>>>> You can only fool yourself all of the time, Dustfart.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Firstly, your delusions of adequacy and your NORAD-like
>>>>>>> psychological defence mechansisms (to pinch a phrase I coined
>>>>>>> earlier in another thread
>>>>>>> where other ko0ks like yourself were being discussed) never fail
>>>>>>> kick in to
>>>>>>> protect you from the reality of the depth of your utter
>>>>>>> worthlessness. It
>>>>>>> goes without saying that you could stand before God Almighty, Him
>>>>>>> accusing
>>>>>>> you of sheer ****wittery, and still have the bare-faced cheek to
>>>>>>> deny you're
>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Secondly, Dustfart, and you've been told this time and time
>>>>>>> again, and still
>>>>>>> it hasn't sunken in to that massive slab of steel-reinforced
>>>>>>> concrete you
>>>>>>> like to call a head; It is neither your decision nor mine to
>>>>>>> determine the
>>>>>>> accuracy or otherwise of the accusations of consummate
>>>>>>> ****wittery made
>>>>>>> against you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your readers will decide. Not you. Not me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 20-20 hindsight, btw.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b=rnd(0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> b=b mod 23
>>>>>>>>>>>> death=b
>>>>>>>>>>> Three lines of code are used to do what can be done in one
>>>>>>>>>>> line... death = rnd(0) mod 23
>>>>>>>>>> Ahh, but your wrong sir. This is Asic, it cannot be done in
>>>>>>>>>> one line.
>>>>>>>>> Admission to using **** to write **** noted.
>>>>>>>> Admission that you<BICTHSLAP>
>>>>>>> Monkey see, monkey do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> messed up, noted.
>>>>>>>> Admission that you couldn't even get such simple code commented
>>>>>>>> properly, also noted.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I won't bother responding to your assinine attempts
>>>>>>> Dustfart, if the same principle were applied to you and all your
>>>>>>> usenet
>>>>>>> posts, you'd be the world's loneliest poster. Hell, even drive-by
>>>>>>> spammers
>>>>>>> would get more acknowledgement of their existence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to figure asic
>>>>>>>> out, as you aren't correct on any of it
>>>>>>> Is that so? How do you explain this then...?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a$=string$(24,"+-")
>>>>>>>> Here, eat some crow, you piteous halfwit...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that will do the same as the code above and below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a$="+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"
>>>>>>>> Pig's ****ing arse it will, you utterly inept wretch.
>>>>>>> Go on. Explain that in context of my allegedly not being "correct
>>>>>>> on any of it".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> even after providing you the
>>>>>>>> damn manual which comes with it. The code generated by asic, as
>>>>>>>> in the exe fie, isn't interpreted or p-code as you seem to be
>>>>>>>> thinking it is.
>>>>>>> You incompetent ****head. Code is what you write; or in your
>>>>>>> case, scribble.
>>>>>>> Instructions are what compilers produce.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CODE <> INSTRUCTIONS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you understand that, Mister-High-and-Mighty-Programmer who
>>>>>>> also does not
>>>>>>> know the difference between input and output?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Results 1 - 100 of about 1,090,000 English pages for computer
>>>>>>> programming
>>>>>>> basics code instructions. (0.76 seconds)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Picking a link at random from only the first eight displayed of
>>>>>>> the more than one million pages...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Programming BasicsSince a computer program consists of a series
>>>>>>> of instructions for the computer ... the process of writing the
>>>>>>> actual program
>>>>>>> code in some computer language. ...
>>>>>>> http://www.play-hookey.com/computers...ng_basics.html - 8k -
>>>>>>> Cached - Similar pages
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your assembler<*****SLAP>
>>>>>>> Assembly, Dustfart. Assembly. I, being highly skilled in
>>>>>>> programming, write
>>>>>>> Assembly. You, being the dribbling ****wit that you are are the
>>>>>>> one who
>>>>>>> dabbles about with "assembler".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the target of your coding, if I may ask?
>>>>> Nowadays I generally just keep up to date in Visual Studio 2005 and
>>>>> .NET, with a bit of Tcl and perl thrown in for good measure, but
>>>>> recently an occasion arose to write a large in-house application in
>>>>> .NET for getting at project schedule data stored in SQL Server so
>>>>> I'm working on that at the moment. In the past I've earned a living
>>>>> writing everything from Assembly, through Pascal, FORTRAN, COBOL
>>>>> and goodness knows what else on PCs, DEC/VAX running VMS, and IBM
>>>>> mainframes running CICS.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I once wrote a very interesting bit of MC68XXX code for AmigaOS,
>>>>>> it was was a serial interrupt handler for streaming MIDI that
>>>>>> didn't obstruct the multitasking (at 7.5Mh) and captured every
>>>>>> byte (at 33250 baud) and which was (after every use) then pulled
>>>>>> and the handler pointer reset to the system's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the fellow you were trolling me to contact?
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>> Males named 'Dusty' raise bad connotations in my mind.
>>>> My own little baby sized PTSD.
>>> Do go on.
>>>
>> Dipwad borrowed $200 from me and used it to file a section 40 on my
>> ass.
>
> pmsl
>
>> http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/Mining/Title...escription.htm
>
gets even better.
trust != gold + fever
he did the parts of my claim line specified in the complaint.
In the end he was royally fricasseed.
I have a lot of credibility at the Ministry.
It's a character thing.
My claims are secure 'till 2010.
--
When you do something right,
No one will know you did anything at all.
....attributed to 'God'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-nXT8lSnPQ
Reply With Quote