On Feb 25, 7:05 am, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> Thou such toasts-and-butter.
> Out of my sight, thou dost infect mine eyes. Thou idle gaud. Thou
> hell-bound. Ye blurted and ye blubbed:
>
> > a$=string$(24,"+-")
>
> Here, eat some crow, you piteous halfwit...
>
> > that will do the same as the code above and below.
>
> > a$="+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"
>
> Pig's ****ing arse it will, you utterly inept wretch.
>
> STRING$ only recognises the first character, so, unlike in your delusional
> world where any ****ing old bull**** rules, in the real world, the result of
> this:
>
> a$=string$(24,"+-")
>
> Is this...
>
> "++++++++++++++++++++++++"
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! LMFARO@you, Dustfart.

Yep, so you read the asic.txt link eh? It's been a very long time
since I've used the function.
language syntax helps, doesn't it?

> So, you still reckon you're a programmer, eh, Dustfart? **** me dead. You

Yep, I am. I know to atleast know the language syntax before I comment
on someone elses code, especially if I'm trying to make them look
stupid in doing so, wouldn't want it to backfire as it has here on
you.

> waffle on and on about assembler [sic] code and you can't even ****ing well
> write working code in your precious ****BASIC. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ****ing
> pathetic.

Well k-man, I made a simple mistake which would have still generated
an executable. Your one line code improvement over my code that you
dedicated a paragraph bashing on me was not proper syntax, and would
not compile.

My programming mistake resulting in a less functional program, yours
resulted in no functional program at all. <g>


> --
> alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
> September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
>
> "Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
> alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
> AOK innews:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org