Hello,
I'm looking for background information on
the Usenet creep known as Dustin Cook
(aka Raid [SLAM]). I would appreciate it
if you could help or point us in the
general direction of personal information
as well as binary samples of his
malicious Trojan and Virus work (and
source codes).
I'm putting his biography online for
future reference and it needs to be as
comprehensive as it could possibly be.
Thanks in advance.
4Q (In for the long haul)
http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/
> I'm putting his biography online
Plonk
Bud wrote:
> > I'm putting his biography online
>
> Plonk
*PLONK!*
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:13:01 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
<rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bud wrote:
>> > I'm putting his biography online
>>
>> Plonk
>
>*PLONK!*
>
>--
>Rhonda Lea Kirk
Rhonda, 'tis only a matter of time 'til your sojourn as 4's bodyguard
becomes another plaything for his website. Maybe it's all a conspiracy
by raid and 4 to enchant you?
(He wouldn't do that!)
Oh yes he would!
(pantomime continues)
Jim.
James Egan wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:13:01 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bud wrote:
>>> > I'm putting his biography online
>>>
>>> Plonk
>>
>> *PLONK!*
>>
>> --
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Rhonda, 'tis only a matter of time 'til your sojourn as 4's bodyguard
Bodyguard?
> becomes another plaything for his website.
That's okay. He'll have years of posts to work with. If it had ever been
a big deal, I'd have gone back and google-nuked all the "evidence," but
it's not, so I didn't.
He can start on rec.skydiving around about 1995, but I'd be mighty
grateful if he could find the older posts in alt.callahans and the psych
groups, the latter of which go back to late '89.
> Maybe it's all a conspiracy
> by raid and 4 to enchant you?
Anything's possible, but I'm pretty sure I'm not that important.
> (He wouldn't do that!)
I think that if he took it into his head to lampoon me, he would do it
thoroughly and factually, but not particularly viciously.
I'm sure you haven't the necessary braincells to fathom why that might
be.
> Oh yes he would!
>
> (pantomime continues)
Your EQ is not high, but I thought your IQ might be a bit higher.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
On Feb 21, 5:12 pm, James Egan <j...@jegan.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:13:01 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>
> <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Bud wrote:
> >> > I'm putting his biography online
>
> >> Plonk
>
> >*PLONK!*
>
> >--
> >Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Rhonda, 'tis only a matter of time 'til your sojourn as 4's bodyguard
> becomes another plaything for his website. Maybe it's all a conspiracy
> by raid and 4 to enchant you?
If such a thing is taking place, let it be known, I have nothing to do
with it. 4Q doesn't tell me what he's upto all the time.
On Feb 21, 5:32 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anything's possible, but I'm pretty sure I'm not that important.
Hey, for once, your right..
> I think that if he took it into his head to lampoon me, he would do it
> thoroughly and factually, but not particularly viciously.
*hahahahahaahahahaha*. Factually, 4Q? that's almost a complete and
utter oxymoron.
I know, your not a programmer, so you haven't a clue what we've been
going back and forth over the last few days, but 4Q hasn't been
thorough nor factual regarding myself, so what makes you think he
would do you any favors?
It's not in 4Q's interest to be factual with his bashings, they
wouldn't be nearly as fun. Case in point, the picture I sent him has
nothing written on the shirt. He isn't even able to keep one thing
original. Ie: not edited. I sent the same picture to Laura yesterday
and I placed it on my website. I've caught 4Q with his pants down over
the code he was so quick to assume I stole, (I didn't, and he knows
this now... hehehe) In fact, he's lied in a few posts. Bughunter isn't
a string scanner. When this was brought to his attention he's tried in
vain to derail the comment.
Anybody who can't even keep a picture as it was sent to him, surely
can't be trusted to host anything else as it was originally either.
Indeed, You align yourself with strange allies.
> I'm sure you haven't the necessary braincells to fathom why that might
> be.
Rhonda, You've demonstrated to us all the sort of person you really
are. Any insults from you regarding anothers intelligence level is
simply, laughable.
> Your EQ is not high, but I thought your IQ might be a bit higher.
See above.
Dustin Cook wrote:
> On Feb 21, 5:32 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anything's possible, but I'm pretty sure I'm not that important.
>
> Hey, for once, your right..
>
>> I think that if he took it into his head to lampoon me, he would do
>> it thoroughly and factually, but not particularly viciously.
>
> *hahahahahaahahahaha*. Factually, 4Q? that's almost a complete and
> utter oxymoron.
>
> I know, your not a programmer, so you haven't a clue what we've been
> going back and forth over the last few days, but 4Q hasn't been
> thorough nor factual regarding myself, so what makes you think he
> would do you any favors?
>
> It's not in 4Q's interest to be factual with his bashings, they
> wouldn't be nearly as fun. Case in point, the picture I sent him has
> nothing written on the shirt. He isn't even able to keep one thing
> original. Ie: not edited. I sent the same picture to Laura yesterday
> and I placed it on my website. I've caught 4Q with his pants down over
> the code he was so quick to assume I stole, (I didn't, and he knows
> this now... hehehe) In fact, he's lied in a few posts. Bughunter isn't
> a string scanner. When this was brought to his attention he's tried in
> vain to derail the comment.
>
> Anybody who can't even keep a picture as it was sent to him, surely
> can't be trusted to host anything else as it was originally either.
>
> Indeed, You align yourself with strange allies.
>
>
>> I'm sure you haven't the necessary braincells to fathom why that
>> might be.
>
> Rhonda, You've demonstrated to us all the sort of person you really
> are. Any insults from you regarding anothers intelligence level is
> simply, laughable.
>
>> Your EQ is not high, but I thought your IQ might be a bit higher.
>
> See above.
Go fetch, boy.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
On Feb 21, 7:09 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Feb 21, 5:32 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Anything's possible, but I'm pretty sure I'm not that important.
>
> > Hey, for once, your right..
>
> >> I think that if he took it into his head to lampoon me, he would do
> >> it thoroughly and factually, but not particularly viciously.
>
> > *hahahahahaahahahaha*. Factually, 4Q? that's almost a complete and
> > utter oxymoron.
>
> > I know, your not a programmer, so you haven't a clue what we've been
> > going back and forth over the last few days, but 4Q hasn't been
> > thorough nor factual regarding myself, so what makes you think he
> > would do you any favors?
>
> > It's not in 4Q's interest to be factual with his bashings, they
> > wouldn't be nearly as fun. Case in point, the picture I sent him has
> > nothing written on the shirt. He isn't even able to keep one thing
> > original. Ie: not edited. I sent the same picture to Laura yesterday
> > and I placed it on my website. I've caught 4Q with his pants down over
> > the code he was so quick to assume I stole, (I didn't, and he knows
> > this now... hehehe) In fact, he's lied in a few posts. Bughunter isn't
> > a string scanner. When this was brought to his attention he's tried in
> > vain to derail the comment.
>
> > Anybody who can't even keep a picture as it was sent to him, surely
> > can't be trusted to host anything else as it was originally either.
>
> > Indeed, You align yourself with strange allies.
>
> >> I'm sure you haven't the necessary braincells to fathom why that
> >> might be.
>
> > Rhonda, You've demonstrated to us all the sort of person you really
> > are. Any insults from you regarding anothers intelligence level is
> > simply, laughable.
>
> >> Your EQ is not high, but I thought your IQ might be a bit higher.
>
> > See above.
>
> Go fetch, boy.
>
Your admittance of inability to challenge any of my statements has
been duly noted, thanks for playing, hun.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote