On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:47:01 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
>
> Total now stands at 5,381 signatures for malware.
Hey, I once tried to download your tool but I got a security warning that
it was trying to change the permissions on the folder I was downloading
your tool to. I was running under a limited user account at the time so it
could do sweet **** all. I went back the next day and it downloaded fine
but I never did try it out. What is up with that?
Pipboy <no@email.invalid> wrote in
news:1brph9zsvqjb1$.143sk5qvhr5pq.dlg@40tude.net:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:47:01 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Total now stands at 5,381 signatures for malware.
>
> Hey, I once tried to download your tool but I got a security warning
> that it was trying to change the permissions on the folder I was
> downloading your tool to. I was running under a limited user account
> at the time so it could do sweet **** all. I went back the next day
> and it downloaded fine but I never did try it out. What is up with
> that?
Do you have some sort of download manager or something? As my site doesn't
try to make any changes of anything. It's simple html...
What gave you a security warning? My site has a standard link for the
download, so it doesn't try to do anything out of the ordinary.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.1
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:26:28 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
> Do you have some sort of download manager or something? As my site doesn't
> try to make any changes of anything. It's simple html...
>
> What gave you a security warning? My site has a standard link for the
> download, so it doesn't try to do anything out of the ordinary.
Only download manager is the one that comes with Firefox. It was XP that
gave me the security warning. Must have been a glitch due to being in a
limited user account or something as I downloaded the file the next day and
got no such warning. It just made me concerned at first because I wasn't
sure if your file/site was legit or not.
Pipboy <no@email.invalid> wrote in
news:vgtkwin6eqwn$.1oph5t5df25zb$.dlg@40tude.net:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:26:28 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
>
>
>> Do you have some sort of download manager or something? As my site
>> doesn't try to make any changes of anything. It's simple html...
>>
>> What gave you a security warning? My site has a standard link for the
>> download, so it doesn't try to do anything out of the ordinary.
>
> Only download manager is the one that comes with Firefox. It was XP
> that gave me the security warning. Must have been a glitch due to
> being in a limited user account or something as I downloaded the file
> the next day and got no such warning. It just made me concerned at
> first because I wasn't sure if your file/site was legit or not.
Understood. I really don't know why it would complain if you were using a
limited user account tho... I don't usually have trouble downloading with
them... Ah well.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.1
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:26:38 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
> Understood. I really don't know why it would complain if you were using a
> limited user account tho... I don't usually have trouble downloading with
> them... Ah well.
It would complain because it was trying to change the folder permnissions
and it couldn't. I see someone up above some some weird stuff about you.
On Feb 20, 11:30 pm, Pipboy <n...@email.invalid> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:26:38 GMT, Dustin Cook wrote:
> > Understood. I really don't know why it would complain if you were using a
> > limited user account tho... I don't usually have trouble downloading with
> > them... Ah well.
>
> It would complain because it was trying to change the folder permnissions
> and it couldn't. I see someone up above some some weird stuff about you.
I understood why it complained, but what I don't understand is what my
site had to do with the problem you experienced. I don't use scripts.
and in the thousands of visitors I've had, your the only individual
who has reported this.
On 21 Feb 2007 01:23:51 -0800, Dustin Cook wrote:
> I understood why it complained, but what I don't understand is what my
> site had to do with the problem you experienced. I don't use scripts.
> and in the thousands of visitors I've had, your the only individual
> who has reported this.
Well, that's what happened. Why, I cannot say.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote