On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:18:00 +0000, Tx2 wrote:

> In article <1170177263_6101@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> Leythos <void@nowhere.lan>
> thought we'd be interested in the following...
>
> [...]
>
>
>> We handle the IT needs of several sororities and find that McAfee shows
>> the following problems on users machines:
>>
>> 1) They purchase and install, but they never register it
>> 2) Being unregistered they never get updates
>> 3) Since the pretty bars show some sign of protection, even with very old
>> definition, they think they are protected
>> 4) Users are compromised because the product does not auto-update unless
>> the users registered for updates.
>
> None of the above will be an issue for me. I have already registered the
> software, updated, check the config to make sure it auto-updates (with
> notifications on) and have thus far checked and double checked on
> numerous occasions!
>
> So, IYO, you are saying the 'suite' is perfectly adequate?

If you ensure that you are keeping the definitions fully updated then I
would say that your "Antivirus" solution is "adequate", but I don't use
their "suites" so I can't say for the rest.

--
Want to know what PCBUTTS1 is really about?
*** WARNING - these links contain foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***
http://www.pcbutts1.com/rlk/rlk.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/license.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/max.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/mpv.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/wtcpcb.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/cracks.htm ,
http://www.pcbutts1.com/Louthe*******.htm
All while spamming his company website at: http://www.seedsv.com